<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>All Discussions - Mutual Fund Observer Discussions</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions/feed.rss</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 13 08:48:48 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>All Discussions - Mutual Fund Observer Discussions</description>
   <language>en-CA</language>
   <atom:link href="/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
   <item>
      <title>Investment advice</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6590/investment-advice</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:43:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Puddnhead</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6590@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[All, I had found this site a long time ago and have been deriving good advice from it ever since. Am requesting advisement on investment opportunities for my 401k. Currently, I have many large cap funds and would like to pare them down some. My choices were driven either by investment firm managers I was following, or by lucrative dividends and income potential, or by my affinity for new funds. Some funds I have had for years; others, not very long. Some I maintain a toe hold in; others carry a more significant balance. In short, I need advice on how to consolidate across the board so that my portfolio becomes more focused. (My 401k is a Fidelity Brokerage Account.) All comments, please. Thank you in advance for your help. My current holdings are: AVEDX, BUFDX, CHDEX, DGAGX, EPCNX, FSDIX, GABAX, GABEX, GEVSX, LCEIX, MDFSX, PRBLX, SDVSX, SOPAX, STRAX, TOCQX, YAFFX. ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>How 3-D Printing Could Disrupt the Economy of the Future</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6568/how-3-d-printing-could-disrupt-the-economy-of-the-future</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:41:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bee</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6568@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA["Today, 3-D printing remains a small part of manufacturing. For mass-produced consumer products, injection molding is typically faster and cheaper. Increasingly, though, businesses will use 3-D printers to complement their old-fashioned equipment to make specialized goods. In a few decades, an aerospace company like GE could be manufacturing jets in silent factories, with rows and rows of 3-D printers churning out cutting-edge parts in proficient solitude, and not a human laborer in sight. "<br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-14/how-3-d-printing-could-disrupt-the-economy-of-the-future.html">how-3-d-printing-could-disrupt-the-economy-of-the-future</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>RSEMX/RSMCX - Royce Special Equity Multi-cap</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6577/rsemxrsmcx-royce-special-equity-multi-cap</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 07:21:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mcmarasco</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6577@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all, I have what some might call a silly/dumb question, but here it is!<br /><br />I have enough invested in RSEMX (Royce Special Equity Multi-cap) to exchange into the Inst. class RSMCX.  The annual fee difference is .15% (1.24%; 1.39%, respect..) according to the 2013 Annual report.<br /><br />Is my math correct; $100,000 * .0015 = $150 annual savings?  Is this enough savings to offset the inconvienence of the $75 transaction fee for purchasing RSMCX through FIDO?<br /><br />The performance difference (according to M*) is .1% last year (2012) and .15% YTD 2013.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Any and all thoughts are welcome!!<br /><br /> <br /><br />Matt<br /><br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>EVBIX (Kathleen Gaffney) is up 4.6% last month</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6588/evbix-kathleen-gaffney-is-up-4-6-last-month</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:00:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>andrei</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6588@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[There is an interview with Kathleen Gaffney in M*, <a href="http://www.morningstar.com/cover/videocenter.aspx?id=595337" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.morningstar.com/cover/videocenter.aspx?id=595337</a>, so I checked and found that her new fund suddenly jumped more than 4% during the last month. It is a very small fund, about 40M, and almost 60% is (or was) in bank loans. As she says, "Right now with my size, I’m very nimble and looking for great opportunities."]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Bespoke ... S&amp;P 500 Index P/E Ratio ... An Update</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6589/bespoke-sp-500-index-pe-ratio-an-update</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:05:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Skeeter</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6589@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[On a trailing earnings basis Bespoke is reoprting the current trailing P/E Ratio for the S&amp;P 500 Index is 16.13.  While some feel there is good value to be had presently in stocks, I am concerned about the revenue picture.  If companies can not grow their revenue landscape then they really are not growing. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.bespokeinvest.com/thinkbig/2013/5/17/sp-500-pe-ratio.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.bespokeinvest.com/thinkbig/2013/5/17/sp-500-pe-ratio.html</a><br /><br />Skeeter]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>No Las Vegas Eureka Moment</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6578/no-las-vegas-eureka-moment</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:58:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6578@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi Guys,<br /><br />My wife and I returned late yesterday from our combined Utah parks tour and attendance at the annual Las Vegas Money Show.  Both were exceptional experiences.  Zion, Bryce,  and Arches parks remain surprising even after several visits.<br /><br />At the Money Show we separately and together attended 25 presentations.  A few disappointed, but overall, the material informed and the talks were superior.  Away from the formal meetings, I managed to talk one-on-one with James Stack and Jack Ablin.  Between sessions, I shared somewhat divergent opinions with three financial advisors from three separate parts of the US.  Great fun.<br /><br />This year, the Las Vegas edition of the Money Show attracted over 7,000 folks, mostly active traders.  That’s down from a peak of over 10,000 attendees several years ago.  The program organizers announced that individual stock ownership has dropped from about 65 % of the adult population to roughly 52 % currently.  The memories of the 2008 meltdown have not yet been completely erased.<br /><br />To observe that individual opinions are distinct and somewhat divergent is an understatement.  The interpretations of identical data wildly diverged.  There surely was not a universal consensus, and just as assuredly there were no Las Vegas eureka moments.<br /><br />Since I believe in the inductive logic chain for decision making, I seek and evaluate diverse opinions.  They contribute to my investment decisions.  Majority perspectives should not automatically carry the day.  To a scientist, a consensus is not necessarily a good thing.  Challenging conventional wisdom can promote research and better understanding.  In the investment world nothing is forever.<br /><br />In the 1830s, after touring the US for several years, Frenchman Alex de Tocqueville wrote: “ The French, under the old regime, held at for a maxim that the King could do no wrong.  The Americans entertain the same opinion with regard to the majority”.  In his book, de Tocqueville purportedly formulated “The Tyranny of the Majority” rule.  That is a very dodgy trait given the often demonstrated actions of crowd (mob) misbehavior.<br /><br />Total consensus is also a hazardous thing.  It is the stuff that directly leads to the tyranny of markets.  If everyone simultaneously approaches a 100 % consensus that is the substance of panics and manias.  Fortunately that happens infrequently in the pragmatic marketplace.<br /><br />When everyone is on the same page, a dramatic change in direction is increasingly likely; essentially, it is an unstable equilibrium.  If everyone is committed to equities, one minor event, rumor, or falsehood is likely to trigger a tipping point that cascades into an avalanche of either sells or buys.  The direction doesn’t matter; the mob psychology carries the day.<br /><br />Remember that’s what happened just before the Great 1929 stock market Crash when sophisticated market wizards like Irving Fisher and John Raskob made egregious misdirected predictions.  Both these gentlemen had a lot of explaining to do to salvage their self-inflicted damaged reputations.<br /><br />Forecasting is definitely a treacherous business.  Nobody hits the mark consistently.  On occasion, a random success leads to unwarranted adulation until the next forecast turns south.<br /><br />As early as 1932, Alfred Crowles asked and answered the ubiquitous question within the investment community: “Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?” <br /><br />Crowles performance data sets included individual market experts, media pundits, the Dow Theory itself, and insurance companies over an extended timeframe.   His study findings were negative among all groups.  He found little evidence of skill, and attributed its much fewer successes to luck.  Financial forecasters in yesteryear share the same abysmal record as today’s experts.<br /><br />I assembled this brief history as prologue to my informal survey conducted at the annual Las Vegas event.<br /><br />My burning question when joining the conference was “what are the likely equity market rewards for the remainder of the year”?<br /><br />Not unexpectedly a consensus was not reached.  In a restricted sense, that’s goodness since it shows independent thinking and some distancing from any group-think mentality.<br /><br />The overarching summary is that a much more numerous cohort, using economic, political, and financial convictions, anticipate a continuing bull market.<br /><br />The optimistic side team members include Steve Forbes, James Stack, Ron Muhlencamp, Hillary Kramer, Louis Navellier, Jack Ablin, John Buckingham, and a host of others.  The May 13 issue of Barron’s headlined “This Bull has Room to Run”.  The Investor’s Business Daily also currently rates the equity markets as a “confirmed uptrend”.  All these positive outlooks cautioned against sudden political and economic reversals so they seem timid when contrasted against the other side’s views.<br /><br />The pessimistic group is vigorously represented by a numerically smaller, but more firmly committed, cohort that includes Alex Merk and Peter Schiff.  Based on his assessment, Peter Schiff has replaced Nouriel Roubini as the new Doctor Doom.<br /><br />Everyone sees a long-term financial crisis caused by excessive government printing money without commensurate productivity gains.  This is not a Black Swan event; it is foreseeable.  The pessimists predict a cliff.  The optimists allow for a gradual descent, with demographics and productivity growth mitigating the downturn.  Construct your own scenario.<br /><br />A sector rotation strategy appears to be the composite wisdom of the professionals.  Many money managers emphasize sector rotation to enhance returns during different segments of a maturing bull market.  Most concurred that the present equity markets are getting late in the bull cycle.<br /><br />Given its current age, James Stack recommends a rotation into the Healthcare, Consumer Staples, and Utilities sectors.  Historically these play solid defense coupled into a safety-first strategy.<br /><br />Still market positive, but also in a defensive framework, economist Mark Skousen endorsed the Baron Growth (BGRFX) and the Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) mutual funds, and the Aberdeen Asia Global Partners Income Fund (FAX) and the Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income Trust (EFT) as part of an income protection portfolio.  I have not researched these recommendations myself.<br /><br />Louis Navellier is the single, most impressive stock-picker I currently follow.  Mark Hulbert has evaluated Navellier’s newsletters and mutual fund performance for years.  He has consistently scored Navellier highly both on an absolute returns basis and on a risk-adjusted scale.  Let me report two takeaways from his Las Vegas talk.<br /><br />First, Navellier recommends to stay completely away from International holdings.  The risk-reward tradeoffs are far too asymmetrical.  In a relative sense, the US equity marketplace is in a sweet-spot with an accommodative Fed and a strong US dollar.<br /><br />Second, you can get free access to Navellier’s stock judgments.  He assesses countless stocks and his website includes a comprehensive set of data and astute scoring.  His web address is:<br /><br /><a href="http://navelliergrowth.investorplace.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://navelliergrowth.investorplace.com/</a><br /><br />Enter the stock symbol (or symbols with a space between them) in the screen place indicated.  That will get an overall score.  For a more detailed profile, click on the symbol in the overall score box.  The assessment as a function of time is particularly useful to establish a trend.  <br /><br />Another separate aspect of the Money Show is the numerical distribution of sponsors.  One way to gauge the current investment climate is to simply count the number of presenters in any investment category, and the number of stalls purchased in the main exhibit hall.<br /><br />Energy exploration and pipeline Limited Partnerships were plentiful.  Natural gas was heavily supported.  A few Real Estate outfits were represented.  A larger than usual number of wealth management services were proffered.  In general, these varied investment “opportunities” increased over last year’s  Money Show sponsors.<br /><br />That’s my incomplete summary of the Vegas sessions.  Given the communities uneven forecasting record, a vigilant investor must receive their projections with measured skepticism.<br /><br />It’s always a prudent policy to put things in context.  Mark Twain cautioned that “whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect”.<br /><br />I hope this summary is useful.<br /><br />Best Regards.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>MPGFX</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6576/mpgfx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:31:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MaxBialystock</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6576@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The M&amp;P "flagship" fund. Anyone holding it and loving it enough to recommend it? Semi-annual pay-out... I'd rather find a domestic fund to throw some new money into. I'm grossly overweighted overseas. Thanks, all. ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Rich Dad</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6562/rich-dad</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 22:17:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Investor</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6562@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Do you remember Robert Kiyosaki? He was quite popular pre-2007. He peddled real estate as investment strategy and pushed numerous books with anectods, broad generalizations and few actionable stuff. There was even allegation that his rich dad did not actually exist. It was imaginary.<br /><br />He still does all that but the popularity apparently waned since then. I came across with the following in which one of his companies declared bankruptcy. I guess he is demonstrating how to get out of debt a la his book buddy Trump did.<br /><br /><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=17463158" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=17463158</a><br /><br />Here is a link to remind who Kiyosaki really is: <a href="http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html</a><br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>What has happened to Ted?</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6566/what-has-happened-to-ted</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:58:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Zolta</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6566@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It's been a long time since I read (and enjoyed) Ted's links and/or<br />comments.  I considered him a MFO bulwark, offering actionable<br />information. Hope he's doing well, or enjoying a vacation. ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Screening my Mutual Fund Brokerage for needles</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6585/screening-my-mutual-fund-brokerage-for-needles</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:42:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bee</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6585@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I sometimes like to screen my brokerage offerings. Today at (USAA Brokerage) I searched for some interesting funds with low expense ratios (less than 1.2%), relatively low minimums ($3k or less) along with some other filters. Here are my results and a short list of funds (36) that I would like readers to comment on if interested.<br /><br />Of the nearly 9000 fund offered at USAA, only 998 are offered NFT (no transaction fee). Great funds from Fidelity, Vanguard, T Rowe Price and Dodge and Cox and probably others fall off early because they requie a TF (transaction fee...about $45 at USAA). Interestingly, I can get USAA funds at Vanguard brokerage NTF, but not the other way around. So I have a conversation (with myself) about ways to maximize my NTF choices especially with funds I particularly like…sometimes this means changing brokerage companies...a different topic.<br /><br />Advisor shares show up as NTF choices and I noticed that T. Rowe Price and Fidelity offer Advisor share class funds that are NTF at USAA brokerage. These share classes have a higher ER (expense ratio) than their mother ship fund. For example, T. Rowe Price’s Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX which is TF at USAA) is offered NTF as PACLX with an ER .36% higher (roughly 1/3) than PRWCX. Just like TFs, higher ERs can significantly impact your profitability over longer time frames. <br /><br />One thing I do like about USAA brokerage is they don't have 30, 60 ,or 90 day repurchase stops, or early redemption fees for trading. I have a habit of taking 10% profits from my funds regardless of the length of time I have own a fund. Early redemption fees can hurt profitability when you either want to sell to take profits (gain) or sell to stop losses (think PM funds). Basically, I don’t like early redemption fees. I probably am a good candidate for etfs that can be transacted for free at certain brokerages such as, Vanguard...again, another topic.<br /><br />Anyway, to make a long story …longer, of the 998 NTF funds at USAA brokerage only 743 funds have an ER of less than 2% and a minimum of $3K. Only 410 funds screen out with a 1.2% max ER and a $3k minimum. Still a lot of choices but not nearly the 9000 fund choices I started with. Of these, only half (220 funds) have managers that have been around for 5 years or more. Only 102 funds have a medium to low standard deviation. Only 53 funds have a medium to high Alpha which means to me that the manager has made some bets and they have paid off. Of these 53 funds, 36 funds have a medium to low beta. <br /><br />So I identified 36 funds from nearly 9000 funds I started looking at…that’s about 3 fo every 1000 choices. Not sure if they are the needles in the USAA brokerage fund haystack, but take a look and any comments on this list would be appreciated.<br /><br /><br /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://content.screencast.com/users/smhag/folders/Jing/media/6d2d40af-31f0-45c7-8c0f-fe0d50bd83ac/2013-05-18_0930.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/smhag/folders/Jing/media/6d2d40af-31f0-45c7-8c0f-fe0d50bd83ac/2013-05-18_0930.png" width="565" height="519" alt="image" style="border: 0px;" /></a><br /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://content.screencast.com/users/smhag/folders/Jing/media/bd5671cc-b911-4751-95c9-a64242c6bb06/2013-05-18_0931.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/smhag/folders/Jing/media/bd5671cc-b911-4751-95c9-a64242c6bb06/2013-05-18_0931.png" width="556" height="401" alt="image" style="border: 0px;" /></a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>ETF Deadwatch 5/8/2013</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6587/etf-deadwatch-582013</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:33:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Investor</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6587@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://investwithanedge.com/etf-deathwatch-for-may-2013-first-increase-in-8-months" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://investwithanedge.com/etf-deathwatch-for-may-2013-first-increase-in-8-months</a><br /><br />"STREAM S&amp;P Dynamic Roll Commodities Fund (BNPC) was the single ETF delisted in April.  It provides a real-time example of why investors should sell shares prior to delisting and avoid the liquidation process.  BNP Paribas, the sponsor of the ETF formerly known as BNPC, did not liquidate the portfolio and has not announced any plans to do so.  The BNPC website has been taken down.  Technically, the fund still exists as CUSIP 86324B103.  If you own shares, good luck trying to find a buyer at a fair price."<br /><br /><a href="http://investwithanedge.com/bnpc-to-delist-no-liquidation-plans-announced" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://investwithanedge.com/bnpc-to-delist-no-liquidation-plans-announced</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>P-I-N-G Skeeter</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6560/p-i-n-g-skeeter</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:56:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6560@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Skeeter,   Market Leadership Strategy has not updated this week. Has this happened before?<br /><br /> Website says "Data Updated Every Monday by 12:00 pm Central Time ". Not this week.<br /><br />Art]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>good news for munis</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6586/good-news-for-munis</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:52:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>johnN</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6586@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.fmsbonds.com/News/bond_article.asp?id=442" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.fmsbonds.com/News/bond_article.asp?id=442</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.fmsbonds.com/News/bond_article.asp?id=442" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.fmsbonds.com/News/bond_article.asp?id=442</a><br /><br />4 reasons to hold HY<br /><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/1441971-4-reasons-to-still-hold-high-yield" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/1441971-4-reasons-to-still-hold-high-yield</a><br /><br />5 reasons to avoid bonds<br /><a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/article/investing/T041-C007-S000-5-reasons-to-avoid-buying-bonds-directly.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.kiplinger.com/article/investing/T041-C007-S000-5-reasons-to-avoid-buying-bonds-directly.html</a><br /><br /><a href="http://investorplace.com/2013/05/bond-funds-safety-fixed-income-retirement-risk/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://investorplace.com/2013/05/bond-funds-safety-fixed-income-retirement-risk/</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Trust and taxes</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6579/trust-and-taxes</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:23:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6579@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Some of you may be a trustee of a trust and are aware of the tax issues. In 2013, "The maximum income tax rate for trusts with income over $11,950 increases to 39.6 percent. The 3.8 percent unearned Medicare surtax will also apply to trust income." Are there any thoughts or comments on how an irrevocable trust might be invested by a trustee or investment manager?  My daughter and her husband have a trust with a sister as trustee and the account is at a brokerage. This is because the original insurance policy was cancelled and converted to cash.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>-Ping- Scott...</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6563/-ping-scott-</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 22:59:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Old_Joe</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6563@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA["Additionally, I don't get the new insanely expensive line of headphones. It's all about branding. I'd rather spend less on something like Sennheisers that aren't slick or stylish but just provide very good audio. "<br /><br />Hi Scott- I've felt the same way about the insanely expensive units but hadn't looked at the Sennheiser models. Since you mentioned them, I see that Amazon has at least four different Sennheiser models, and I've been reading the specs to try and make a decent decision.<br /><br />Have you any experience with any of their wireless models? I have a very significant hearing loss, so this type of headphone is a real help. Currently I have an older cheapo infrared Sony, but the range is quite limited. Because my hearing loss is very asymmetrical (right ear loss about 50% / left maybe 80 or 85%) I drive the transmitter unit with a small stereo line-level booster, which I've modified with a balance control and high-frequency emphasis circuitry. I should be able to drive any headset transmitter with the same setup. Pretty decent results all-in-all, but I've been thinking about an RF model for quite a while so as to eliminate the line-of-sight problem.<br /><br />Thanks, as ever!<br />OJ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Fidelity Cleared to Launch Active ETFs: Report</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6584/fidelity-cleared-to-launch-active-etfs-report</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:33:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Investor</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6584@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.etftrends.com/2013/05/fidelity-cleared-to-launch-active-etfs-report/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.etftrends.com/2013/05/fidelity-cleared-to-launch-active-etfs-report/</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>On A Roll...SPY Up Another 2.2% This Week...Once Again, No Distribution Days...Bonds, Not So</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6583/on-a-roll-spy-up-another-2-2-this-week-once-again-no-distribution-days-bonds-not-so</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:48:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6583@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[ <a rel="nofollow" href="http://content.screencast.com/users/charlespics/folders/Jing/media/7943c59b-474d-4529-a711-832b5480527b/2013-05-17_2002.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/charlespics/folders/Jing/media/7943c59b-474d-4529-a711-832b5480527b/2013-05-17_2002.png" width="689" height="408" alt="image" style="border: 0px;" /></a><br /><br />Here's same data for BOND:<br /><br /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://content.screencast.com/users/charlespics/folders/Jing/media/707be697-e654-49a2-8824-01972d0b186b/2013-05-17_2225.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/charlespics/folders/Jing/media/707be697-e654-49a2-8824-01972d0b186b/2013-05-17_2225.png" width="689" height="409" alt="image" style="border: 0px;" /></a> ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Just How Useless Is the Asset-Management Industry?</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6582/just-how-useless-is-the-asset-management-industry</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:48:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pat_F</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6582@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/fox/2013/05/just-how-useless-is-the-asset-.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.hbr.org/fox/2013/05/just-how-useless-is-the-asset-.html</a><br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>10 global strategies/couple of reads</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6580/10-global-strategiescouple-of-reads</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:33:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>johnN</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6580@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.onwallstreet.com/gallery/fp/10-global-investing-strategies-for-2013-2684824-1.html?ET=onwallstreet:e13716:245043a:&amp;st=email" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.onwallstreet.com/gallery/fp/10-global-investing-strategies-for-2013-2684824-1.html?ET=onwallstreet:e13716:245043a:&amp;st=email</a><br /><br />Disciplined and Quality Selective<br /><a href="http://www.123jump.com/mutual-fund/Eaton%20Vance%20Atlanta%20Capital%20Select%20Equity%20Fund/844/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.123jump.com/mutual-fund/Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Select Equity Fund/844/</a><br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Scout International Discovery Fund to liquidate</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6570/scout-international-discovery-fund-to-liquidate</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>TheShadow</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6570@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1105128/000145079113000102/rule497e.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1105128/000145079113000102/rule497e.htm</a><br /><br /><br />Scout Funds <br /> <br />Scout International Discovery Fund<br /><br /><br />Supplement dated May 16, 2013 to the Prospectus dated October 31, 2012, as revised April 11, 2013<br /><br /><br />Upon the recommendation of Scout Investments, Inc. (the “Advisor”), the Scout Funds Board of Trustees has adopted a Plan of Liquidation to cease operations of the Scout International Discovery Fund (the “Fund”) and liquidate the Fund.  The Advisor has determined that it is no longer economically viable to continue operating the Fund in view of its size and future prospects for growth.  The liquidation is expected to be completed on or about June 28, 2013.<br /><br /><br />The Fund will be closed to new investors effective May 17, 2013.  After May 17, 2013, if you sell all of the Fund’s shares in your account, you will not be able to buy additional shares of the Fund.  Shareholders may sell Fund shares or exchange Fund shares for shares of other Scout Funds at any time prior to the liquidation date.  Procedures for selling or exchanging your shares are contained in the “Selling Shares” and “Exchanging Shares” sections of the Fund’s Prospectus.  Any shareholders that have not sold or exchanged their shares of the Fund prior to the liquidation date will have their shares automatically redeemed as of that date, with proceeds being sent to the address of record.<br /><br /><br />All holdings in the Fund’s portfolio are being liquidated.  Any capital gains will be distributed as soon as practicable to shareholders and reinvested in additional shares, unless you have requested payment in cash.<br /><br /><br />The liquidation of the Fund will constitute a taxable event for purposes of federal income taxes, except to the extent the Fund’s shares are held in a tax-advantaged product, plan or account.  You also may be subject to state, local or foreign taxes on any liquidation proceeds you receive.  By the liquidation date, the Fund expects to declare and pay one or more dividends to its shareholders to the extent necessary to avoid entity level tax. You should consult your financial or tax advisor for further information about the impact any tax consequences may have to your own circumstances.<br /><br /><br />IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR RETIREMENT PLAN INVESTORS.  If you are a retirement plan investor, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the consequences of a redemption of Fund shares.  If you hold shares in a tax-deferred account, please consult with your retirement account trustee or custodian to determine how you may be able to re-invest your liquidation proceeds on a tax-deferred basis.  If you receive a distribution from an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) or a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) IRA, you must roll the proceeds into another IRA within 60 days of the date of the distribution in order to avoid having to include the distribution in your taxable income for the year.  If you receive a distribution from a 403(b)(7) Custodian Account (tax-sheltered account) or a Keogh Account, you must roll the distribution into a similar type of retirement plan within 60 days in order to avoid disqualification of your plan and the severe tax consequences that it can bring.  If you are the trustee of a Qualified Retirement Plan, you may reinvest the money in any way permitted by the plan and trust agreement.<br /><br /><br />You should keep this Supplement for future reference.  Additional copies of the Prospectus may be obtained free of charge by calling (800) 996-2862.<br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Oppenheimer Discovery Fund to close</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6581/oppenheimer-discovery-fund-to-close</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:37:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>TheShadow</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6581@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/777547/000072888913000742/discovery497.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/777547/000072888913000742/discovery497.htm</a><br /><br />OPPENHEIMER DISCOVERY FUND<br /><br /> <br />Supplement dated May 17, 2013 to the <br /><br />Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated January 28, 2013<br /><br /> <br />This supplement amends the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) of Oppenheimer Discovery Fund (the “Fund”) dated January 28, 2013.<br /><br />The following information is added to the sections titled “More About Your Account” beginning on page 9 of the Prospectus and “How to Buy Shares” beginning on page 53 of the SAI:<br /><br />Effective as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on June 28, 2013 (the "Closing Date"), the Fund will no longer accept purchase orders from new investors and existing Fund shareholders will no longer be able to purchase new shares or exchange shares of other funds into the Fund, subject to the following exceptions:<br /><br /> · Existing shareholders can continue to purchase shares through dividend and capital gain reinvestments. <br /><br />· Existing shareholders in broker/dealer wrap-fee programs can continue to purchase shares and exchange into the Fund. Existing broker/dealer wrap-fee programs can add new shareholders. The Fund will not be available to new broker/dealer wrap-fee platforms. <br /><br />· Existing shareholders in the following types of retirement plans can continue to purchase shares and exchange into the Fund: defined contribution (DC), 401(k) (including “Single K”), 403(b) custodial plans, pension and profit sharing plans, defined benefit plans (including “Single DB Plus”), SIMPLE IRAs and SEP IRAs. New participants in such plans that currently offer the Fund as an investment option can elect to purchase new shares of the Fund. However, the Fund will be closed to new retirement plans. New retirement plans that are authorized prior to the Closing Date will have until September 30, 2013 to fund the account. <br /><br />· Existing shareholders that have an investment allocation to the Fund through an OppenheimerFunds Portfolio Builder account prior to the Closing Date can continue to purchase shares and exchange into the Fund. <br /><br />· Existing registered investment advisor (RIA) and bank trust firms that have an investment allocation to the Fund in a fee-based, wrap or advisory account, can continue to add new clients, purchase shares, and exchange into the Fund. The Fund will not be available to new RIA and bank trust firms. <br /><br />· Existing shareholders in private banks can continue to purchase shares and exchange into the Fund. Existing private banks that have an investment allocation to the Fund can add new clients. The Fund will not be available to private banks or private bank platforms that are not already invested in the Fund.  <br /> <br />· Existing 529 Plans that currently include the Fund within one or more of their investment options can continue to purchase shares and exchange into the Fund. The Fund will not be available to new plans or existing plans that do not currently invest in the Fund. <br /><br />· Funds-of-funds, including those affiliated with the Fund’s investment adviser and non-affiliated funds-of-funds, that have an investment in the Fund as of the Closing Date can continue to purchase shares of the Fund. The Fund will not be available to new funds-of-funds. <br /><br /> · The Fund reserves the right, in its discretion, to accept purchases and exchanges from institutional investors which may include, among others, corporations, endowments, foundations and insurance companies. <br /><br />Existing shareholders as of the Closing Date who later sell all of their shares of the Fund will not be permitted to establish new accounts or reinvest in the Fund.<br /> <br /><br />Present or former officers, directors, trustees and employees (and their eligible family members) of the Fund, the Fund’s investment adviser and its affiliates, its parent company and the subsidiaries of its parent company will not be permitted to purchase additional shares of the Fund after the Closing Date unless such purchase is through an exception listed above.<br /><br />May 17, 2013 <br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>MPACX profits</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6575/mpacx-profits</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 05:58:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MaxBialystock</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6575@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[MPACX  Matthews Asia Growth......No year-end distribution in 2012? At least M* does not show it. What's up with that? Anyone? ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Douglas Rao to manage Janus 40</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6567/douglas-rao-to-manage-janus-40</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:02:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>andrei</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6567@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Those who followed Marsico Flexible Capital (MFCFX) remember its beautiful performance, but then its manager Douglas Rao left Marsico and joined Chautauqua Capital Management, <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chautauqua-capital-management-names-a-douglas-rao-partner-and-co-portfolio-manager-166119886.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chautauqua-capital-management-names-a-douglas-rao-partner-and-co-portfolio-manager-166119886.html</a><br /><br />It seems that he decided to return to fund management, at Janus. This is from M*: <br /><br />The firm also has hired Douglas Rao to manage Janus Forty, which should differentiate it in the future from the previously identical Janus Twenty. Rao worked at Marsico Capital Management (founded by former Janus manager Tom Marsico) as an analyst and manager from 2005-12, steered Negative-rated  Marsico Flexible Capital (MFCFX) to a fine record in a five-year tenure, and comanaged Neutral-rated flagships  Marsico Growth (MGRIX) and  Marsico Focus (MFOCX) for 2.5 years. Janus Forty is now expected to have a larger stake in non-U.S. stocks than Janus Twenty.<br /><br />I wonder what do you think about it, in view of many recent manager departures from Janus, see <a href="http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=597235" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=597235</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Note to Investment News and NerdWallet: share classes are not the same things as funds</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6558/note-to-investment-news-and-nerdwallet-share-classes-are-not-the-same-things-as-funds</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:11:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David_Snowball</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6558@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The nice folks at NerdWallet have produced a list of what they describe as "the 12 most expensive and worst-performing mutual funds."  What follows is a list of fund names, ticker symbols (mostly) for specific shares and (frequently) inaccurate expense ratio reports.  They report the worst of the worst as<br /><br />1. Oppenheimer Commodity Strat. Total Return (QRACX): 2.2% e.r.<br /><br />Actually QRACX is the "C" class for the Oppenheimer fund.  Morningstar reports the e.r. at 2.09%.  The "A" shares have a 1.26% e.r.   Morningstar describes the "C" class ratio as "below average" and the "A" class as "low."  How does Morningstar reach that conclusion?  Well by comparing these fees to the category average of 1.32% but 2.09% is <i> obviously</i> below . . . hey, wait!  It ain't.  What about the "group median expense" of 1.74%?  No, not below that, either.  <br /><br /><blockquote><div> I queried Morningstar on the matter.  Their first reply explained that "below average" expenses are those in the bottom 20th - 40th percentile.  I've written back, asking how that applies to funds whose expenses are above average but whose label is "below average."  Their second response: "The C shares are considered Above Average with the broad rank and  Below Average on the distribution rank."  It turns out that they have a third set of expenses, which are neither of the two reported on the website, called the "Morningstar Fee Level Group Median - Distribution," which is 2.40%.  Okay ... there are 117 funds in the "broad commodity basket" group.  Exactly one has an expense ratio about 2.40% and isn't that the very definition of median?  "Second highest." So now I've written John Rekenthaler, who is wise and grouchy, to see if he can help me understand this.<br /><br />Mr. R responded. "'Below average' means that QRACX has below average expenses for a C share that is an Alternative fund."  And so if you were choosing between the "C" class shares of this commodity fund and the "C" shares of a leveraged-inverse equity fund and a multicurrency fund, you'd know that you were probably getting a bargain for your money.  Why on earth you'd possibly benefit from the comparison of such of group of wildly incomparable funds remains unknown. </div></blockquote><br /><br />At least they're targeting the largest share class of the Oppenheimer fund, since the "C" shares have $68M in assets while the "A" shares have only $228M in . . . oh . . .<br /><br />Okay: how about this: at least we can agree that all six of the Oppenheimer share classes produce pretty much suck results.  Accounting for their various sales loads, over the last decade you'd have pocketed between 0.02% - 1.26% per year, before taxes, on your investment here which is only slightly worse than the 1.5% return on the average money market fund over the past decade.  You can tell money markets are a good idea, since they represent 30% of the Oppenheimer fund's portfolio.<br /><br />So NerdWallet mistakes classes for funds and, they report, "it seems it was an error on the part of our data provider."  Morningstar might be a little unclear on the distinctions between "above" and "below."  Oppenheimer, which has cycled through eight managers at the fund this decade, is doing the best they can.  (sigh)<br /><br />NerdWallet is a new operation, so you can understand their goof as a matter of a young staff, start-up stumbles and all that.  It's less clear how you explain Investment News's <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.investmentnews.com/gallery/20130514/FREE/514009999/PH&amp;Params=Itemnr=12">mindless reproduction of the results</a> (what? verify stuff before we publish it?  Edit for accuracy?  Who do you think we are, journalists?) or MFWire's touting of the article (<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mfwire.com/article.asp?template=article&amp;storyID=43884&amp;wire=MFWire&amp;wireID=2">Investment News Unveils Mutual Fund Losers List</a>) which might be better-titled "Investment News Reproduces Another Press Release".<br /><br />Before the Observer publishes a fund profile, we give the advisor a chance to review the text for factual accuracy.  My standard joke is "I'm used to making errors of judgment, but I loathe making errors of fact and so would you please let us know if there are any factual misstatements or other material misrepresentations?"  I entirely agree with NerdWallet's original judgment: these are pricey under-performers.  I just wish that folks all around were a bit more fastidious about the facts.<br /><br />Okay, now I'll go back to grading.<br /><br />David]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Double Line&#039;s new equity funds</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6574/double-line039s-new-equity-funds</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:06:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MaxBialystock</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6574@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Who has formed an opinion about those guys so far? Anyone say yea or nay about them? Input desired. Thanks. DLESX and..... DMLAX--- how come different share classes, all of a sudden? No thanks. ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>M* Fund Times 5/16/2013</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6573/m-fund-times-5162013</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:27:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Investor</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6573@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=597235" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=597235</a><br /><br />* A Raft of Portfolio Manager Changes at Janus<br />* Vanguard Launches Emerging-Markets Bond Fund Amid Strong Category Inflows <br />* Milano Leaves T. Rowe Price<br />* FPA's Ekstrand to Retire<br />* Northern Funds Drops Cohen &amp; Steers as Subadvisor to Real Estate Fund<br />* Neuberger Berman to Launch China Fund<br />* Manager Departure at Forward Fund<br />* Manager Change and New Fund at USAA<br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Matthews Emerging Asia Fund</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6572/matthews-emerging-asia-fund</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:10:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JimJ</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6572@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Matthews Emerging Asia Fund is now trading under the ticker MEASX. I found a good, free article from Blackrock on the potential of Frontier markets - younger population, fast GDP growth, expanding equity markets, etc.<br /><br /><a href="https://www2.blackrock.com/webcore/litService/search/getDocument.seam?venue=PUB_INS&amp;source=CONTENT&amp;ServiceName=PublicServiceView&amp;ContentID=1111130731" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www2.blackrock.com/webcore/litService/search/getDocument.seam?venue=PUB_INS&amp;source=CONTENT&amp;ServiceName=PublicServiceView&amp;ContentID=1111130731</a><br /><br />And from a fund company dedicated to Asian markets. Could be a good long term investment although I'm sure it will be a wild, rocky ride.<br /><br />Jim]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>2013 and Q2 Country Returns...anyone investing in Individual Country EFTs?</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6571/2013-and-q2-country-returns-anyone-investing-in-individual-country-efts</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:00:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bee</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6571@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Wow...Greece up 22% YTD. Just like business cycles, I wonder if countries follow performance cycles?<br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bespokeinvest.com/thinkbig/2013/5/15/2013-and-q2-country-returns.html">2013-and-q2-country-returns</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>John Hussman Presentation</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6569/john-hussman-presentation</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:49:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bee</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6569@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[PermaBear explains his otherwise positive outlook:<br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://greenbackd.com/2013/04/26/hussman-on-record-corporate-profit-margins-and-the-stock-market/">hussman-on-record-corporate-profit-margins-and-the-stock-market/</a><br /><br />"stock do proposterously bad during the timeframe when inflation rates move from low to high..they eventually price in inflation and do well from that point."]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Primecap Rides Health to Top Growth Fund/   D&amp;C recent moves</title>
      <link>http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/6565/primecap-rides-health-to-top-growth-fund-dc-recent-moves</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:34:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>johnN</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6565@/discuss/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-15/primecap-rides-health-to-top-growth-fund-riskless-return.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-15/primecap-rides-health-to-top-growth-fund-riskless-return.html</a><br /><br /><br />D&amp;C recent moves<br /><a href="http://www.nasdaq.com/article/813b-dodge-cox-three-sell-outs-and-19-reduced-positions-cm246509" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasdaq.com/article/813b-dodge-cox-three-sell-outs-and-19-reduced-positions-cm246509</a>]]></description>
   </item>
<div class="SFBox SFVCBox"><span>Total Views</span>2.0M</div><div class="SFBox SFUBox"><span>Total Users</span>1.1K</div><div class="SFBox SFTBox"><span>Total Topics</span>6.2K</div><div class="SFBox SFPBox"><span>Post Count</span>28.8K</div>   </channel>
</rss>