Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Trump Pushes To Study An End To Quarterly Earnings Reports
    @davidrmoran Fine for Singer, but it's this that I have a real problem with:
    Like many financiers who have achieved his level of success, Singer sees himself as more than a skillful player in the markets; he conducts himself like a public intellectual whose ideas on policy—on everything from taxation to regulation, education, and foreign affairs—should be heeded by politicians and other decision-makers on both a national and a local level.
    That makes about as much sense as asking a pediatrician how to fix your plumbing, yet I see it again and again in the financial sphere--because people are good at making money by any means necessary they assume they should be running the country. Their me-first Ayn Randian inspired philosophy is exactly the opposite of what you need in the public-servant sphere. The other thing I've discovered through long experience is that many of these superb investors aren't exceptionally bright in general, just good at the one thing--making money--and crass ignoramouses otherwise. I won't name names, but you've named a couple yourself in the past.
  • Charles Schwab vs. Vanguard
    Over the past couple of decades, there have been a few $0 TF services. Not surprisingly virtually all have fallen by the wayside. Mutual funds are generally not sold short, so there's no money to be made in lending the shares. Unlike Fidelity offering up a couple of loss leaders (losing but a few basis points) to draw profitable business traffic, providing a full menu of competing products below cost won't drive customers to proprietary products and services.
    A good reference for 2001 brokerages and rates (I take 0 TF funds offered to mean all are NTF):
    https://www.aaii.com/journal/article/discount-broker-shopping-guide-mutual-fund-supermarkets
    At the time, Baker & Co, NetVest, Scottrade, and York Securities sold all the funds they offered without a transaction fee. I've never heard of the first two. Scottrade offered all funds NTF from roughly 2001 (based on skimming Wayback Machine pages) to the end of 2004.
    I do recognize the name York Securities, but never tracked it. It's still around, though no longer selling all its fund offerings without commissions.
    FWIW, here's Baker & Co's site (I think). Finding NetVest is trickier. The website listed with NetVest in 2001 takes you to an investing app startup. Possibly NetVest became NetVest Financial. In any case, Baker and NetVest Financial are now focused on financial services, not low cost brokerage services.
    Apparently, Firstrade also offered all the funds it sold without commissions in the early 2000's (though not in 2001). That rings a faint bell with me.
    Other financial institutions have tried to offer all funds without transaction but only to investors keeping significant assets with them:
    WellsTrade required you to keep a PMA account ($25K+) with Wells Fargo to get 100 trades/year. Grandfathered accounts, no new ones for the past several years.
    Scudder Preferred Investment Plus ($100K+ in assets) - 1998-1999 unlimited trades
    Vanguard: 25 free trades/year for Flagship customers ($1M+ in Vanguard funds), 100 trades/year for Flagship Select customers ($5M+ in Vanguard funds).
    Vanguard looks to be in it for the long term, but think about how they're doing it. You must funnel seven figures to their money managers, not just into their brokerage account. Fidelity may offer some good funds, but I don't see their customers having the same loyalty to their proprietary funds. Their customers are not likely to commit $1M to Fidelity funds just to be able to trade non-Fidelity funds without a fee.
    Who else could make a go of this business model? T. Rowe Price? It recently upped its min in proprietary funds from $100K to $250 for a free M* membership. Would its customers spring for $1M to invest in outside funds w/o a fee? Or could they make a go of it with a min below $1M?
  • Q&A With Jeffrey Saut, CIO, Raymond James: Market Sweet Spots: Small & Midcaps
    FYI: Jeffrey Saut is chief investment strategist for Raymond James & Associates, which has more than $750 billion in assets under management. He is well-known for his insightful commentary regarding the stock market, and makes regular appearances on major financial news networks. ETF.com recently spoke with Saut to discuss his outlook for the U.S. economy and stocks.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.etf.com/sections/features-and-news/market-sweet-spots-small-midcaps
  • Identifying a good financial planner
    @MikeW
    Our house has been with Fidelity for 40 years and we're "self-educated" regarding investing. Our family backgrounds provided for learning and experiences from our parents which allowed both of us to be prudent in the area of personal finance and investing. No financial planners or advisors.
    Thank you for being gracious enough to share your particular investment needs.
    Not knowing your background or comfort level with investing; I tend to agree with @slick
    that: "I think you are on the right track of finding a fee only planner but managing the assets yourself with occasional meetings to make sure you stay on track."
    You noted, Schwab. I'm aware of the roboadviser, but not familiar with its functions as used by Schwab for guidance for an individual investor.
    You also mentioned changing investments. Do you feel your current portfolio mix is not suitable?
    Making a decision to use an investment advisor , would be a tough chew for me today (not to be confused with other estate planning functions). He/she would soon become tired of my questions.
    Got to get pillow time. Perhaps other tomorrow.
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Identifying a good financial planner
    @Mikew, I hired an advisor who was a certified financial planner ar ML whom I knew for a few years with my work for a nonprofit after I inherited money from my spouse. It was more than I had managed previously so I thought it wise. She created a plan for me and transferred my assets from Fido. There were some funds that would not transfer so substituted a few, which were perfectly good funds. We did buy stocks, but she was not a fan of etfs as I was. There were some funds I wanted that I could not buy because they were not compensated, and frankly I found I was better at fund picking than she was. I ended up transferring back to Fido after 3 years, and manage my own assets, but do have use of an advisor with whom I meet with quarterly, no charge. I had more of an issue with ML than my advisor there, and we are still friends. I think you are on the right track of finding a fee only planner but managing the assets yourself with occasional meetings to make sure you stay on track. Fido also has advisors for half the cost of ML if you choose that route.
  • Identifying a good financial planner
    Edelman does this kind of thing all the time and I have heard various of their CFPs talk (they have a good weekly radio show) about just this subject. However, they are a bit more than 1%, I think. Like any good CFP outfit they are plugged into local trust and estate and special situations attorneys. I am not saying they are better than what you can find elsewhere, but they are honest and low-key from all repute and their radio show is good.
    https://www.edelmanfinancial.com/financial-planner-offices/washington-dc/north-bethesda
    https://www.edelmanfinancial.com/financial-planner-offices/washington-dc/
  • Identifying a good financial planner
    @catch22,
    Great to connect with you again Catch. So I was referred to ML and specifically to an advisor that specializes in working with families with special needs kids -- my situation. I haven't decided to go with this person at ML which is why I was asking the question about identifying other advisors. But that's a great suggestion to ask for people's experiences with ML. I'm curious -- as I recall you work with T Rowe Price. Did you work with a financial planner there and if so what were your experiences? thanks.
  • Identifying a good financial planner
    @slick,
    Thanks very much for the advice. This gives a good set of questions to ask. I'm curious if you hired a planner or did your own financial planning. Reading thru a number of the planners, it seems like its difficult to find a planner that doesn't also look to manage your assets. I'm also considering using the roboadviser service offered by Schwab to do a sanity check on my asset allocation and then using the tools available on this site to pick new funds.
  • Identifying a good financial planner

    A place to start might be reading the info on this link to NAPFA , https://www.napfa.org/financial-planning/how-to-find-an-advisor
    the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors. Good luck, they can develop a plan for you based on your needs and maybe review quarterly or semi-annually. They most likely will charge a flat rate for the plan and hourly for review.
  • Identifying a good financial planner
    HI folks,
    I wonder if I could ask for the board's advice on how to identify a good fee-only financial planner. I have had an initial meeting with an advisor at Merrill Lynch and he seems to be good. However, he only provides financial planning if I turn over my assets to him. He will create a financial plan and then charge me 1% for assets under management on an ongoing basis. I'm not sure that I want to go that route. I need to do some retirement planning that will evaluate my financial picture with the intention of retiring in 10 years. But I'm more of a buy and hold investor. I think that I might want to go the route of working with a financial planner who can develop the plan but that I would continue to manage my own assets. I'm not sure that the ongoing fee of paying 1% for someone else to manage my assets is worth it. I'd value your thoughts on how to identify a good planner. If anyone has had good experience with someone in the Washington DC area please message me.. Thank you.
  • Charles Schwab vs. Vanguard
    I agree that Schwab offers a broader range of products, though a choice between the two when investing beyond Vanguard is not as clear cut as it might appear:
    "Schwab offers a broader range of no fee mutual funds and ETFs through its OneSource program, with hundreds of candidates compared to Vanguard’s 129 mutual funds and 56 ETFs."
    Only for another week. Then Vanguard pulls ahead with its 3419 NTF funds (from its search engine) and over 1800 ETFs. Schwab's fund screener shows Schwab has 4342 funds in its OneSource (NTF) program, and Schwab offers "more than 250" ETFs through OneSource. Not that I think number of NTF funds is a particularly good metric.
    Investopedia is correct that Vanguard's banking services are close to nonexistent. While its 0.25% rate (the article is out of date) on checking is better than TBTF banks', it's well below what many banks pay. Schwab uses cash accounts as a significant source of revenue.
    "Vanguard has no automatic sweep into money market funds so free cash in the brokerage account won’t earn interest unless the customer buys the funds manually."
    Why would you need a sweep when the VBS settlement account is VMFXX, with a current SEC yield of 1.89%, over 9x what Schwab pays?
    An important factor for me is reducing minimums to get into institutional funds. For example, you can get into PIMIX with $25K at Vanguard. At Schwab, you'll need $100K.
    These days, I use Schwab primarily for its worldwide, foreign-transaction-fee free, fee-rebate ATM card. In addition, a very small number of financial institutions insist on ACH transfers only from a "real" bank and not a brokerage account. Schwab Bank is a real bank.
    Finally, I think Schwab has significantly better service than Vanguard; fortunately that's something I haven't had much need for with either one of them.
  • Serious Mutual Fund Returns: 40 Years Of Annual Returns: (FMAGX) - (SPECX) - (ACRNX)
    FYI: If you have any clients retiring today, and they’ve had money working for the past 40 years, large caps were their best bet. Ideally, large-cap growth.
    With all due respect to small-cap enthusiasts, high-yield fanatics or gold bugs, large caps have dominated a rollicking good ride from the late 1970s to today. These funds powered through good times and bad: sky-high inflation, bull markets, crashes and irrational exuberance. There were low points along the way, of course. That’s why we added both the best, and worst, annual performances for each fund, in addition to the 40-year annualized average.
    Spoiler alert, the worst year for each one was 2008, the year of the financial crisis. The best year for 11 of 20 of these funds was either 1979 or 1980. But before you get too envious of the days of disco, bear in mind that the 30-year mortgage rate reached 16% in 1980, according to numbers from FreddieMac.
    To be sure, a lot of funds aren’t eligible for this list. Any fund launched in the past 40 years obviously won’t be here, impressive gains notwithstanding. The biggest case in point: There are no ETFs on this list because they’re too new for our time frame in this analysis. The first ETFs made their appearance on the scene in the early 1990s.
    So which funds have posted the best performance for the past 40 years? Scroll through to see the top 20. All data is from Morningstar as of 12/31/2016.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://bic.financial-planning.com/slideshow/top-funds-for-the-past-40-years
    FMAGX annual return since inception, 2/5/63, is 16.04%
  • iofix
    Hi Mark. Yes, I'd like to get Junkster's position here as well. In my case, I'd rather avoid dealing with spreads and limit trades, if possible. And, I take comfort in expecting that traditionally (I know there can be exceptions, but so far I consider them extreme) a mutual fund exchanges precisely at the closing NAV, especially on a heavy transaction that can be particularly sensitive to trade volume. The downside, particularly if you're trading on trend, you're forced to live with the position a-whole-nother day once it crosses a trade threshold. May not sound like a lot, but it was during the financial crisis even for "tight-channel" funds like PIMIX. c
  • Charles Schwab vs. Vanguard
    FYI: Vanguard Group and Charles Schwab opened their doors to the public at nearly the same time in the 1970s, but with different approaches to investing. Vanguard pioneered mutual fund ownership and is now the world’s leading provider of this financial segment while Schwab pioneered the concept of discount brokers, allowing Main Street investors to buy and sell securities at lower prices.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.investopedia.com/ipf/charles-schwab-vs-vanguard/?partner=YahooSA&yptr=yahoo
  • Mutual fund early redemption penalty at TD Ameritrade and other brokerages
    The question appeared to be about the investor's financial situation, not about the investment's performance. How to sell out of any investment cheaply in an emergency. I agree with Ted's sentiment - that mutual funds (including target date funds and index funds) are not investments you should be considering if you might sell in the short term.
    Sure, it's best to evaluate a fund over a full cycle before even buying it. However, if you've done that and like the fund, still don't buy it with the expectation that you might flip it "in case something comes up and you need to sell".
    I read "need to sell" in the question as meaning "need to raise cash". I can see what I think is your interpretation: "need to sell because one can't stomach the three month dip". Still, index ETFs don't offer any better guarantee of avoiding that dip than do actively managed funds which you've fully researched and watched. Don't buy either if you might sell quickly.
  • What are you folks adding buying?
    One more aside on K-1s....preferred stocks of K-1 issuing companies, could sometimes have higher amounts of UBTI (only need to worry if held in a tax-advantaged account) than its common share cousin. This is just a generality, and therefore not always the case. So just something to be aware of.
    And I just learned this, this year.....anywho, back to adding/buying.
    Added to the growth sleeve (even though growth has outperformed for a ridiculously long time)...such things as FINX (financial tech), SKYY (the “cloud”), ARKK (tech, high tech products, and life science tech), PSCH (small cap health), and some of the healthcare service and equipment ETFs. Would love to buy more AMZN but there’s no stopping it’s upward march.
  • How To Invest In A Mutual Fund That Is Closed To New Investors
    This starts by saying "choose the manager not the fund", but goes on to explain how you can struggle to buy the fund. Why not simply follow this advice and consider other funds run by the same manger?
    "Whoever you give a fund share to then becomes an existing investor who can also make additional investments and give away fund shares."
    That might work for a fund like EISMX, where the prospectus reads:
    The Fund has discontinued all sales of its shares, except shares purchased by: (1) existing shareholders (including shares acquired through the reinvestment of dividends and distributions and those who received Fund shares in connection with a reorganization);
    but will it work with a fund like BCSIX? For some funds, in order to buy more shares you not only need to be an existing shareholder now, but also as of the date the fund closed. The prospectus for BCSIX reads:
    Existing shareholders as of October 18, 2013, the Fund’s closing date, are permitted to make additional investments in any account that held shares of the Fund on that date
    But not into a younger account.
    The article says that 17 out of 23 funds that "passed muster" were open. Then goes on to say that the five managers listed here are the ones running the closed funds.
    I always wonder about anonymous financial writers who say that 23 - 17 = 5 :-)
    Maybe these five managers ran all six closed funds? (So what's the sixth fund?) Is it saying that Fried (Primecap) is the only manager of POAGX that "passed muster"? Seems it is really listing funds (five of the six), not managers.
  • Here comes Vanguard’s global credit bond fund: News Scan Money Management Executive
    https://www.financial-planning.com/news/vanguard-files-paperwork-to-launch-a-global-credit-fund-news-scan?feed=00000153-9f90-d098-a37b-dfb9d93c0000
    August 15
    Money Management Executive Bond funds International funds Asset management Alternative investments ETFs Vanguard BMO Global Asset Management
    Our weekly roundup of industry highlights
    Vanguard proposes global credit bond fund
    Vanguard filed preliminary registration for a global credit bond fund, which the firm expects to launch in November.
  • Why The Most Important Idea In Behavioral Decision-Making Is A Fallacy
    The author seems to have a different notion of risk aversion than I would, especially when he equates financial decisions with sports choices, or draws any conclusion about a $10 gain/loss.
    What I'd consider as risk aversion, he dismisses as rational behavior. Well, yeah -- that's why I'm averse to that risk.
    The author is a professor of marketing, not a psychologist. He could be very knowledgeable on this subject, but this blog entry is not very convincing. I think it's very difficult to know what motivates people.
    David
  • Einhorn's Greenlight Cuts Back Many Top Holdings, Slices Apple: Fund Down 19% Through July
    FYI: Billionaire investor David Einhorn, whose Greenlight Capital is posting some of the hedge fund industry’s worst returns, cut back several long-term holdings, including Apple Inc (AAPL.O), Voya Financial Inc (VOYA.N) and Consol Energy Inc (CEIX.N), a filing made on Tuesday shows.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-investments-funds/einhorns-greenlight-cuts-back-many-top-holdings-slices-apple-idUSKBN1KZ1K3