Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • The Purisima Total Return and The Purisima All-Purpose Funds to liquidate
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1019946/000089418916009530/purisma_497e.htm
    497 1 purisma_497e.htm SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
    THE PURISIMA FUNDS
    Supplement dated May 6, 2016 to
    Prospectus dated December 31, 2015
    The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of The Purisima Funds has determined that it is advisable to liquidate, dissolve and terminate the legal existence of the Trust, including both of its series, The Purisima Total Return Fund and The Purisima All-Purpose Fund (each, a “Fund” and together, the Funds”). In connection with this determination, the Board has adopted a plan of liquidation. Please note that the Trust will be liquidating its assets on or about June 30, 2016 (the “Distribution Date”).
    In connection with the liquidation of the Trust, effective immediately, the Trust will CEASE SALES OF FUND SHARES. In addition, effective immediately, the Trust’s investment manager, Fisher Asset Management, LLC (the “Manager”), will begin an orderly transition of the Trust’s portfolio investments to cash and cash equivalents and each Fund will thereafter no longer be pursuing its investment objective.
    At any time prior to the Distribution Date, investors may redeem shares of the Fund. On or about the Distribution Date, the Funds will liquidate their assets and distribute cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders who have not previously redeemed their shares. If you still hold shares of the Trust on the Distribution Date, we will automatically redeem your shares and remit the cash proceeds to you (via check or wire) based on the instructions listed on your account.
    The redemption, sale, exchange, or liquidation of your shares may be a taxable event to the extent that your tax basis in the shares is lower than the liquidation proceeds per share that you receive. You should consult your personal tax advisor concerning your particular tax situation.
    If you are a retirement plan investor, you should consult your tax adviser regarding the consequences of a redemption of Fund shares. If you hold your Fund shares through a tax-deferred retirement account, you should consult with your tax adviser or account custodian to determine how you may reinvest your redemption proceeds on a tax-deferred basis. For example, if you hold your shares in an IRA account directly with U.S. Bank N.A., you have 60 days from the date you receive your proceeds to reinvest your proceeds into another IRA account and maintain their tax-deferred status. You must notify the Fund or your financial advisor prior to June 15, 2016 of your intent to reinvest your IRA account to avoid withholding deductions from your proceeds.
    Please contact the Trust at 1-800-550-1071 if you have questions or need assistance.
    Please retain this Supplement with your Prospectus and SAI for future reference.
  • Stan Druckenmiller: The Fed has no end game, and 'the chickens are now coming home to roost'

    Same theme not quite the alarm .
    Macro View
    Complacency in Uncharted Waters The next challenge for central bankers is changing monetary policy when the economy has come to depend on it.
    May 03, 2016 Global CIO Commentary by Scott Minerd
    ...Another market area that is clearly not behaving according to the central banks’ script is foreign exchange. Japan’s current laundry list of woes is topped by the strengthening yen, which is a major headwind for its moribund economy. The Bank of Japan is due to convene later this month, and may decide that the best course of action is to intervene directly to drive down the value of its currency. Such direct intervention basically will entail selling yen and buying U.S. dollars, and typically those dollars go to buy U.S. Treasurys. Europe is probably not far behind: It has tepid growth, a strengthening currency, and more potential downside to their policy rates. This means there is a high likelihood of a fairly good bid on Treasurys in the coming weeks that could be sufficient to push the 10-year U.S. Treasury note lower.
    My message to central bankers is the following: Although the waters at the present time might seem calm, they are still uncharted and there are risks beneath the surface. QE and negative interest rates, once thought to be extraordinary measures, have become the new monetary policy orthodoxy in the largest developed economies. The data on the long-run effects are limited, but real-time experience with these policies offers a few lessons.
    ...we learned from Japan that ever larger doses of unconventional monetary policy may be required in the absence of growth-enhancing structural reforms. Moreover, it is incredibly difficult to reverse these policies from an economy that has come to depend on them. Second, in Europe we are learning that such policies offer limited benefits unless paired with a coordinated fiscal plan. Finally, we have learned here at home that trying to “normalize” policy, even in a gradual manner, can strain financial markets.
    https://guggenheimpartners.com/perspectives/macroview/complacency-in-uncharted-waters
    Also
    Markets and life since 2006.
    10 Stats About the Last 10 Years
    May 02, 2016 By Nicholas Colas who is is Chief Market Strategist for Convergex.
    Summary: The headline today that Goldman Sachs’ stock has gone nowhere for a decade got us thinking about general market performance over the last 10 years. The key contours are straightforward: subpar price returns (a 4.9% compounded annual growth rate for the S&P 500) with increased volatility (a VIX that is 25% more volatile than average). From there, things get funky.
    Think back over the last 10 years - how different was your life in April 2006? While you may think your daily existence is largely the same (maybe the kids are older or you’re married now, but that about it…), consider what was actually different about your life in the spring of 2006:
    No iPhone. Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone in January 2007, and it didn’t ship until June of that year.
    No Facebook (unless you were in college at the time). Facebook only opened to the general population in September 2006.
    No Twitter. The full version of the product launched in July 2006.
    No Instagram. The picture sharing site only launched in 2010.
    No Kim Kardashian. “Keeping up With The Kardashians” debuted in October 2007.
    No Uber. The company received its seed funding in 2009.
    No iPad. Apple started taking pre-orders on the first-gen product in March 2010.
    It feels like April 2006 demarcates the last days of some Dark Age, or at least a simpler time without the manifold distractions of today. And while you might opt for a world without the Kardashians, imagine it without your smartphone, Facebook/social media, and an iPad to entertain the kids (or yourself). It’s ok – don’t panic. You have them now.
    The journey from April 2006 to April 2016 in financial markets has, of course, been a wild ride. But just as it is hard to remember what daily life was like a decade ago, it is also easy to forget some of the important waypoints that capital markets took from there to here.
    Here are 10 data points about the last 10 years we hope you will find useful:
    http://www.convergex.com/the-share/10-stats-about-the-last-10-years
  • Retail shares VS Institutional shares
    Sometimes you can do a distribution in kind from your IRA to your taxable account and bootstrap an institutional share account that way. (Occasionally the fund company will require you to pony up enough to meet the high minimum or it will convert the shares to retail shares.)
    If you do a distribution this way, you can even avoid IRA tax consequences by replacing the shares removed with their cash value within 60 days (i.e. a 60 day IRA rollover).
    I've posted before that I think the question of whether there's a 12b-1 fee is a red herring.
    Retail funds are going to collect money from the fund one way or another to pay for servicing the account. A fund uses this money to pay a third party brokerage to do the selling and generate account statements, or to do these tasks itself if selling direct.
    It may or may not break the cost out as a separate line item, but either way, that's a reason why the retail funds cost more. The TRP fund has no 12b-1 fee, but included in "other expenses" are "administrative fees" of up to 0.15%:
    The funds may make payments to retirement plan recordkeepers, broker-dealers, and other financial intermediaries (at a rate of up to 0.15% of average daily net assets per year) for transfer agency, recordkeeping, and other administrative services that they provide on behalf of the funds. These administrative services may include services such as maintaining account records for each customer; transmitting net purchase and redemption orders; delivering shareholder confirmations, statements, and tax forms; and providing support to respond to customers’ questions regarding their accounts.
    See Prospectus.
  • The Super Rich Were The First To Bail During The Financial Crisis
    FYI: When the going gets rough, the 1 percent start selling.
    That’s the finding of a new paper that says people with the highest income bailed from stocks disproportionately on the worst days of the financial crisis. The share of selling by the biggest earners rose “sharply” in days following spikes in volatility, according to data on millions of sales reported to the government in 2008 and 2009.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-03/super-rich-were-first-to-bail-when-lehman-collapse-ripped-stocks
  • Fidelity: 2016 Q2 Sector Scorecard
    @OLd_Skeet FYI:
    Sector SPDR Funds YTD As of 4/29/16:
    S&P 500 Index +1.05%
    Consumer Discretionary (XLY) +1.33%
    Consumer Staples (XLP) +3.58%
    Energy (XLE) +11.90%
    Financial Services (XLFS) -3.21%
    Financials (XLF) -2.18%
    Health Care (XLV) -3.11%
    Industrials (XLI) +5.94%
    Materials (XLB) +8.48%
    Real Estate (XLRE) +0.63%
    Technology (XLK) -1.63%
    Utilities (XLU) +11.88%
    Regards,
    Ted
  • Flying Autopilot With Target-Date Funds: Points To Consider
    I believe Target (allocation) funds can be used quite effectively to not only get you to "work retirement", but also as a tool to get you through until your "earthly retirement" aka death. Something I have shared before and I am still refining are these investment thoughts:
    bee's Target Date Strategy:
    I've often thought there are really two target dates, one targeting retirement from "work" and one targeting retirement from "earth".
    Fully funding a retirement dated (glide path allocation) fund makes perfect sense. As a retirement dated fund glides towards its maturity date it attempts to provide a smooth landing for your investment at that date.
    Effectively, at "work" retirement, an investor would have most of their assets in low risk investments. This might be helpful if the markets happens to severely correct in the first 5 years of retirement, but this portfolio must also be re-allocated the prepare for longevity risk (your money needs to last as long as you do). So, during the first few years of retirement a portion of this retirement portfolio needs to reallocated into investments that attempt to achieve portfolio longevity in retirement.
    In a sense, a retiree could reallocate a percentage of their retirement portfolio into target date funds that target the incremental need to reach "earthly" retirement. Much like laddering CDs, a retiree could ladder target date funds in 5 year increments that will be used for spending if the retiree is lucky enough to reach that target date.
    I could envision a retiree owning 6 separate retirement dated funds, each maturing 5 years further into the future (funding years 65-95 or 70-100) and each needing differing amounts of initial funding based on financial needs during that 5 year period in the future. The last fund matures on your date of death and pays your funeral expenses.
    Sorry if some of this sounds a bit morbid to the reader.

  • Fidelity: 2016 Q2 Sector Scorecard
    Thanks @Ted, for posting Fidelity's latest sector rankings and outlook. I found the link to be beneficial.
    One of the things I have done is that I strive to maintain certain sector allocations within my portfolio. In the minor sectors of materials, real estate, communication and utilities I strive to maintain at least a five percent weighting. In the major sectors of consumer cyclical, financial, energy, industrials, technology, consumer defensive and healthcare I strive to maintain at least a nine percent weighting in each. When combined these base weightings add up to 83%. This leaves 17% that can be moved around to overweight sectors that are more in favor than others.
    Currently, I am overweight, from my base weightings, financials by +2%, communication by +2%, industrials by +1%, technology by +2%, consumer defensive by +4% healthcare by +3% and utilites by +3%.
  • Larry Swedroe: Ignore Gundlach’s Forecasts
    FYI: When I worked as an investment banker selling, among other things, economic forecasts, I was given the following advice: If you are going to forecast, forecast often, because eventually you’ll get one right—even a blind squirrel occasionally finds acorns.
    The financial media anoints as an “expert” any forecaster who happened to get the last forecast right. However, as Jason Zweig, a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, pointed out: “Pigs will fly before you’ll ever see a full list of the expert’s past forecasts, including the bloopers.”
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.etf.com/sections/index-investor-corner/swedroe-ignore-gundlachs-forecasts?nopaging=1
  • Valley Forge Fund to liquidate
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/102681/000116204416001738/valley497201604.htm
    497 1 valley497201604.htm
    [valley497201604001.jpg]
    Valley Forge Fund, Inc.
    TICKER: VAFGX
    Supplement dated April 20, 2016 to the Prospectus dated April 22, 2015
    The Board of Directors of the Valley Forge Fund, Inc. (the "Fund"), has concluded that due to the relatively small size of the Fund, it is in the best interests of the Fund and its Shareholders that the Fund cease operations. The Board of Directors has chosen to close the Fund and redeem all remaining outstanding shares on May 27, 2016.
    Effective as of the date of this Supplement, the Fund will no longer pursue its stated investment objective. The Fund will liquidate its portfolio and will invest in cash equivalents such as money market funds until all shares have been redeemed. Any required distributions of income and capital gains will be distributed as soon as practicable to Shareholders. Shares of the Fund are not available for purchase.
    Prior to May 27, 2016, you may redeem your shares, including any reinvested distributions, in accordance with the "How to Redeem Shares" section in the Prospectus. Unless your investment in the Fund is through a tax-deferred retirement account, any redemption is subject to tax on any taxable gains. Please refer to the "Taxes" section in the Prospectus for general information. You may wish to consult your tax advisor about your particular situation.
    ANY SHAREHOLDERS WHO HAVE NOT REDEEMED THEIR SHARES OF THE FUND PRIOR TO MAY 27, 2016, WILL HAVE THEIR SHARES AUTOMATICALLY REDEEMED AS OF THAT DATE, AND PROCEEDS WILL BE SENT TO THE ADDRESS OF RECORD. If you have questions or need assistance, please contact your financial advisor directly or the Fund toll-free at 1-800-869-1679.
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR RETIREMENT PLAN INVESTORS
    If you are a retirement plan investor, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the consequences of any redemption of Fund shares. If you receive a distribution from an Individual Retirement Account or a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) IRA, you must roll the proceeds into another Individual Retirement Account within sixty (60) days of the date of the distribution in order to avoid having to include the distribution in your taxable income for the year. If you receive a distribution from a 403(b)(7) Custodian Account (Tax-Sheltered account) or a Keogh Account, you must roll the distribution into a similar type of retirement plan within sixty (60) days in order to avoid disqualification of your plan and the severe tax consequences that it can bring. If you are the trustee of a Qualified Retirement Plan, you may reinvest the money in any way permitted by the plan and trust agreement.
    This Supplement, and the existing Prospectus dated April 22, 2015, provide relevant information for all Shareholders and should be retained for future reference. Both the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information dated April 22, 2015, have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are incorporated by reference, and can be obtained without charge by calling the Fund toll-free at 1-866-869-1679.
  • Lewis Braham: How To Use Sector Funds To Create A Winning Portfolio
    FYI: Why combining the Vanguard Utilities ETF with the Burnham Financial Services fund looks like a winning trade for today’s market.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.google.com/#q=How+to+Use+Sector+Funds+to+Create+a+Winning+Portfolio+Barron's
  • Confused about FPACX
    @Ralph
    Dr. Snowball very politely exposed the weaknesses of FPACX, and the responses from the FPACX reps were essentially "FundSpeak" as far as I am concerned. I honestly do not care how actively managed fund managers justify huge cash positions, as such allocations objectively represent market timing -- or market guessing -- which has never worked over long periods.
    One question I have for the FPACX team: Why has the management fee remained a constant 1% despite the ballooning of AUM ? The answer, unfortunately, is that FPACX is the cash cow for the firm, and asset gathering is in their best financial interest, but obviously not in the best interest of investors. The cow must be milked.
    I would avoid FPACX solely for fund stewardship, which is poor in my opinion.
    Instead of FPACX, I would consider using the Backtest Tool of Portfolio Visualizer to construct a viable alternative.
    Two attractive combinations would be an 80/20 mix of VWIAX with either VIG (preference) or VYM. Since 2007, each of these combinations would have had higher total returns, lower standard deviations, lower maximum drawdowns, higher sharpe ratios and higher sortino ratios than FPACX. And both combinations have an average expense ratio of 0.15%, as compared to 1.11% for FPACX.
    At this time, I would never, ever recommend FPACX to friends or family.
    Kevin
  • What (De)Regulation Q Means For Your Portfolio
    FYI: Federal laws and regulations that are enacted can last decades, but they tend to change after a major financial crisis. After the sub-prime mortgage meltdown in 2008, a slew of new regulations were pressed into law. The most far-reaching new regulation was the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was passed in 2010,
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://mutualfunds.com/education/what-deregulation-q-means-for-your-portfolio/
  • Larry Swedroe: Unconstrained Bond Funds: Not Worth The Risks
    FYI: Faced with a low interest rate environment since the financial crisis of 2008, many investors have begun to seek higher returns than those available from safe fixed-income investments such as Treasuries and FDIC-insured CDs. The ongoing pursuit for higher bond returns has led many investors to investments known as “unconstrained” bond mutual funds (also referred to as multi-sector, absolute return, strategic income and opportunistic fixed income). In 2010, these funds attracted more than $170 billion in assets. In the succeeding four years, assets in unconstrained bond funds rose to $223 million, $275 million, $416 million and $462 million, respectively.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://mutualfunds.com/news/2016/04/12/unconstrained-bond-funds-not-worth-the-risks/
    M*: Mulitsector Bond Fund Returns:
    :http://news.morningstar.com/fund-category-returns/multisector-bond/$FOCA$MU.aspx
  • Big Banks begin the confessional--- everyone to the $FAZ-mobile?
    @heezsafe:Yes, the banks will be having a bad quarter, but as 15% of the S&P 500 the financial sector will be supported by the other sectors. A rising tide lifts all boats. Are you predicting this ?
    Regards,
    Ted
  • Oakmark Equity Income Fund - OAKBX
    @bee - Interesting graphic
    Can't help wondering ...
    How many investors sold BRUFX around 2002 and bought OAKBX based on OAKBX's preceding 5 years' outperformance?
    Than moved back into BRUFX around '07 based on its preceding 5 years' outperformance?
    Than dumped BRUFX again in early '09 in favor of OAKBX, after sensing that their fund's drawdown over the preceding 1-2 years (a period of financial panic) had been much greater peak to trough than that of OAKBX?
  • Very happy with Seafarer(SFGIX) but any other suggestions
    @prinx Very happy...but any other suggestions
    Smoking out the right way to invest in the marijuana movement
    Advisers keeping their distance from high-flying pot stocks
    By Jeff Benjamin | April 11, 2016 - 1:20 pm EST
    InvestmentNews
    Meanwhile, it is easy to understand how some could get caught up in the pot-investing buzz.
    There are literally dozens of cannabis-related companies already trading over the counter, and many of them share similarly volatile stock-price histories.
    “It seems clear that cannabis is on the way to becoming legal across the country, either for medical or recreational use,” said Chris Chen, a wealth strategist at Insight Financial Strategists.
    “However, given that there are still a number of legal uncertainties regarding cannabis, an investment in that field would be classified as aggressive,”
    http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20160411/FREE/160419993?template=printart
  • Hello ! Hello! Is There Anyone There ? Calling NO BS Ron Muhlenkamp: From White House To Out House
    ( Ron is working hard for you ! Right !)
    (From Muhlenkamp Website)
    We are professional investment managers. We are not accountants, auditors, brokers, custodians, financial planners, or tax experts. We do not file tax returns, prepare legal documents, or churn out black box financial plans. We seek to maximize total returns, after taxes and inflation, to our clients by taking advantage of the opportunities provided when markets periodically misprice assets.
    Our motto is “intelligent investment management” to emphasize that we remove the emotion from investing. We might also be described as “no BS” or “common sense” investment managers—you get the idea. Investing other peoples’ money is a rational profession and we apply ourselves to it on a continuous basis.
    We invest money for people who want their money to work as hard for them as they’ve had to work for it—and who want their money to grow over periods of time best measured in years and generations. Our clients and shareholders hire us to help protect what they have, help make it grow, and help ease their minds.
    Regards,
    Ted
    Let's See How Hard Ron Is Working For You: MUHLX Performance:
    15 Years 92 Percentile, 10 Years 100 Percentile, 5 Years 99 Percentile, 3 Years 99 Percentile, 1 Year 98 Percentile, YTD 99 Percentile. At least Ron your consistent.
    M* Snapshot MUHLX:
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/muhlx/quote.html
    Lipper Snapshot MUHLX:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/Fund/MUHLX
    MUHLX Is Ranked #226 out of #483 (LCB) Funds By U.S. News & World Report)
    http://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/large-blend/muhlenkamp-fund/muhlx
    Larry Swedroe 2011 Article:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/does-muhlenkamp-add-value/
  • Lewis Braham: Choosing The Best Dividend ETFs
    Yes, good article. Lewis always digs deeper than most in the financial press.
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    Here are some Muni C E F's with current Premium/
    Discounts to nav ( Pricey ?)
    NUW + 2.34
    NMZ +1.29
    OIA -0.26
    NBH +1.04
    Good spots for further research.
    Nuveen Tax-Exempt Municipal Debt - National Municipals
    http://www.nuveen.com/CEF/DailyPricingTaxExempt.aspx
    Source for C E F reseach
    http://www.cefconnect.com
    I have OIA on my watch list and own @fundalarm mentioned BGH
    From Bill Gross
    In a world of barely visible interest rates, it pays to borrow, rather than invest, Bill Gross tells Barron's. One way to do that is are closed-end funds which borrow and lever assets 35-50%, and his fund,:JUCAX, has 8-9% of its money in CEFs trading at a discount to NAV. Two favorites are the Nuveen Preferred Income Opportunities fund (NYSE:JPC) and the Duff & Phelps Global Utility Income fund (NYSE:DPG). (These two are not muni's)
    http://seekingalpha.com/news/3172321-bill-gross-let-others-borrow
    Mr Gundlach has also mentioned C E F's in recent commentaries as viable income producers in the current investment environment.
    Speaking of Mr Gundlach,maybe he'll be clear on his outlook for High Yield and other financial assets in the coming week.Usually fun to listen to in this format.
    image
    Asset Allocation Webcast
    Please join us for a live webcast titled "Asset Allocation Webcast" hosted by:
    Jeffrey Gundlach
    Mr. Gundlach will be discussing the economy, the markets and his outlook for what he believes may be the best investment strategies and sector allocations for the DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX/DLFNX) and Flexible Income Fund (DFLEX/DLINX).
    Tuesday, April 12, 2016
    1:15 pm PT/4:15 pm ET /3:15 CT
    Register here
    https://event.webcasts.com/starthere.jsp?ei=1085514
  • Q&A With Bill Gross: Why Interest Rates Must Rise
    a bit more subdued for Bill.
    one item that caught my attention is his recommendation of munis -- something that is discussed on another thread. he still likes access those through closed end fund structure since leverage is cheap and helps increase yields. he does name three other securities he likes (2 CEFs and a reit) JPC - financial preferreds, DPG - utilities and NLY. it so happened that i purchased JPC on friday for its relative discount compared to all other similar offerings... don't think Bill's recommendation nowadays carries as much weight as it had before though, but it might have a short-lived price spike monday. ..