Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • A Fund That Trounces The S&P 500
    FYI: Though it’s easy to find a stock fund that beat the S&P 500 index, even over periods of 10 years or longer, buying such a fund seldom results in continued outperformance. But I’m going to tell you about a mutual fund that’s different. Let’s call it “Fund X” for now and later I’ll do the big reveal on the fund and toss in a key lesson.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://blogs.wsj.com/totalreturn/2014/12/23/a-fund-that-trounces-the-sp-500/tab/print/?mg=blogs-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.wsj.com%2Ftotalreturn%2F2014%2F12%2F23%2Fa-fund-that-trounces-the-sp-500%2Ftab%2Fprint&fpid=2,121
    M* Snapshot Of VTSMX: http://quotes.morningstar.com/fund/vtsmx/f?t=VTSMX
    Lipper Snapshot Of VTSMX: http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/vtsmx
    VTSMX vs. VFINX: http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/mutual-fund/compare?Tickers=VTSMX+VFINX&Compare=Returns
  • What Will Happen To Gold In 2015
    Howdy Doc,
    I'm with Mark. I still accumulate but speculating in this market in the near term is borderline suicidal Recall that historically, commodity bull markets range from 13-15 years. The bull market in gold has been running since 2002 [rono scrambles to get his calculator . . . . figger, figger, figger . . . yup, it's been a great run, TYVM.] However, it really doesn't look that promising a place to play for speculation.
    peace,
    rono
  • Bridgeway Large Cap Growth (BRLGX)
    Hi Pop Tart,
    In the LCG space, I prefer POGRX, which continues to produce with a relatively low expense ratio. The Primecap team has produced awesome results over the years at their funds: VPCCX, VPMCX, POAGX, POSKX and POGRX. Unfortunately, only the last two funds are open to new investors. We continue to own a 10% position in POAGX.
    Kevin
  • Bridgeway Large Cap Growth (BRLGX)
    Thanks Mark & Ted. Contrafund has been a core holding of mine for years, I'm just curious about other options as well.
    Thanks for the link Ted. I saw this link on your Contrafund post earlier today, which got me thinking about BRLGX.
    Happy Holidays to both of you!
  • In Defense Of Advisors Who Sell Variable Annuities
    Bob, thanks for your comments.
    Regarding TIAA - I realize you're talking about the fixed portion (TIAA traditional) - the TIAA portion also includes some variable options like TREA as well. The 10 year annuitization requirement is an issue, but strikes me as an apples and oranges comparison. TIAA Traditional is (primarily) available in employer-sponsored plans, while the other plans you mentioned (Schwab, Jeff Nat, etc.) are retail plans.
    I think a more accurate comparison would use TIAA-CREF's after tax product, Intelligent VA. That doesn't offer TIAA Traditional, just as the other plans named don't offer a useful stable value alternative. Thus no issue with 10 year annuitization.
    Over the long term, the fee on Jeff Nat for a $100K account may be higher than TIAA-CREF's. (TIAA-CREF charges 0.35% for ten years, then 0.10%.) But I do agree they're in the same ballpark, and significantly lower than the annuity fee of the other providers.
    Statements really are a problem with TIAA. At least when they produce them. It turns out that for their brokerage accounts, they don't generate 5498s if there have been no contributions, even if the account has RMDs.
    They fault Pershing for this, and I think they may be right - I took a look back at my old Vanguard IRAs; back when it still used Pershing (before about 2010) I did not seem to get 5498s. Now I do.
    As you wrote, nothing is perfect.
  • Chuck Jaffe: The Fund Mis-Manager of the Year — And More Lump Of Coal Awards
    Do not own this but have considered.....and glad we did not.
    VILLX was near the top of the moderate/balanced pile for several years and took a wrong turn somewhere this year. A -3.17% YTD. Bark, bark, bark.....
    M* performance link
  • Is It Time to Throttle Back Equities?
    @expatsp. Me too with BB. FAAFX a drag. WBMIX did not help either...neither did SIGIX, although it at least nicely beat in its category, as is usual for Mr. Foster.
    One day the Great Pumpkin will come to we loyal investors in FAAFX =).
    Fortunately, DODGX, did well. I remain fully invested (thanks for AKAFlack) versus DODGX/DODIX split...and will stay so as long as 10-mo SMA is positive.
    And, had couple individual stocks that have done well. Thanks to Ted for helping me double down on BAC. Ditto to Scott wrt/OAK. AA and HCP also had good years.
    Honestly, thanks to all the support and guidance I get from the board.
    To 2015...a new season.
    Go Yanks!
    c
  • Is It Time to Throttle Back Equities?
    @Charles: Thanks for sharing your (relative) pain, I too am way behind the S&P this year after a few years outperforming. Fairholme hit me hard, and great performance from Primecap and decent performance from Bridgeway (my other two big positions) weren't enough to compensate. My foreign funds (ARTKX, SFGIX, GPIOX) outpeformed their benchmarks but underperformed, of course, the S&P.
    Getting back to this general topic, I intend to remain close to fully invested in equities. The economy seems to be picking up speed, not slowing down, so I don't see any reason for a bear market any time soon. And as to the inevitable 5-10% corrections, I've learned that I'm not smart enough to time those, though I do have a little dry powder just in case some bargains appear.
  • Schwab ETFs Say No To Capital Gains
    Thanks for posting this, Ted, it makes me even more likely to put some money into their ETFs in the coming years, especially SCHD.
  • Express Scripts, AbbVie & Gilead
    FWIW, a relative took the injections about 5 years ago for Hep C. Super lucky to have very few side effects. All new oral drugs are much better. If patient is not suitable for Abbvie, doctor can request Harvoni. Best wishes for the uncle.
  • An Emerging Retirement Drawdown Controversy
    Hi Guys,
    Charles’ recent “Irrational Markets - Proof Positive” post prompted me to initiate this topic. That discussion highlighted the discordant opinions and recommendations made by supposedly financial and investment experts. The cacophony is loud, endless, and often much less than useful. Chaotic investing is a likely outcome.
    The Charles post emphasized the mind-bending character of old wisdom saws like “Out of the mouths of babes comes wise insights, yet, only with age comes wisdom”.
    If the latter is true, I have accumulated much wisdom. I guess you should seek investment advice from either young Wharton business school graduates or perhaps from older, more senior graduates. I listen to both, but weight them differently.
    For many years, an industry agreement seemed to have been reached with regard to an acceptable retirement portfolio drawdown rate. Portfolio survival for an extended retirement period is the obvious goal.
    These earlier studies mostly suggested something approaching a 50/50 mix of equity and fixed income holdings. High portfolio survival rates were estimated when withdrawal rates were limited to roughly 4% per year adjusted for inflation. The original work in this arena was done at Trinity University in 1998 and has been frequently updated.
    Here is a Link to one readable update written by Wade Pfau in 2010:
    http://wpfau.blogspot.com/2010/10/trinity-study-retirement-withdrawal.html
    The Pfau analysis didn’t much change the earlier study findings. However, some concern over the current overpriced marketplace, coupled with a very low interest rate environment, has persuaded a few gurus to shorten the recommended drawdown schedule from the standard 4% rule-of-thumb to an even lower 3% annually.
    Now for the controversial analysis and recommendation that wants to upset this comfortable apple cart. It will surely add to Charles’ distress over conflicting and competing financial advice. That’ll never change.
    It is a retirement study from the Director of Research at the Putnam Institute. Here is the Link to this cart upsetting 16-page, 2011 release:
    https://www.putnam.com/literature/pdf/PI001.pdf
    Please give it a road test. It merges portfolio returns uncertainty with life expectancy probabilities for both men and women separately. The methodology deploys a novel Retirement Present Value (RPV) model to project portfolio survival likelihoods.
    The RPV’s surprising and controversial output is that the retirement portfolio that offers the best survival prospects includes a much smaller fraction of equity holdings than does the original Trinity study and other follow-up Monte Carlo analyses. Check it out; controversy is good.
    Personally, I’m not comfortable with the Putnam work product. The manner in which the “optimum” portfolio equity/fixed income mix was determined escapes me. Certainly a portfolio with only a single Index-like equity position is retirement dangerous because of its volatility (standard deviation). But fixed income is likely more dangerous because of muted annual returns.
    The standing answer has been broad portfolio diversification that trades off a little annual return for a major decrease in overall volatility. Outcomes are definitely timeframe dependent, but I still trust this generic and time-tested approach.
    You get to choose your own poison. My head spins off-axis as often as Charles’ does. Let MFO members know your thinking on this matter.
    Best Regards and Happy Holidays.
  • Is It Time to Throttle Back Equities?
    I have no issue with people who have all manner of strategies. I'm a believer in "do what works for you."
    Personally, I've turned into much more of a "buy and hold" investor in the last few years from the standpoint of it's just not very enjoyable to me to have to frequently rebalance and tweak.
    There may be some variation in the desired holding periods for me, ranging from multi-decade (railroads fall within this, as well as some other things including Archer Daniels, International Flavors and Fragrances and Jardine Matheson), to 5-10 year (Ecolab, Visa, WP Carey as examples) and a lot that I have a 3-5 view on.
    Things change, absolutely, but I think the Buffett quote of "Buy what you would feel comfortable with if the market closed for 10 years" is a good filter in the decision making process.
  • The Various Flavors of Long Short Equity Funds.
    GENIX has been open less than 2 years (since May 31, 2013). Classic pattern for many of these boutique funds with high fees. Tailor a hot combination of investments (in this case 99.5% equities) and ride the wave. Watch the money pour in (already over 1.5 BL). Pump that new money into the currently hot sectors. A year (or two or three) later, the market climate changes and the fund starts to swoon. The money pours out as fast as it came in and everybody is convinced the fund's losses are attributable to "bloat" (missing the larger issue).
    As usual, those who were last in and last to leave suffer the losses.
    Seen this over and over with these funds.
  • Target-Date Funds: Twice As Popular Vs. 15 Years Ago
    Note:
    For some reason, Ted's link to his original article disappeared or became inoperative after I wrote a response. Not good. Here's the original article to which I was responding:
    http://www.nasdaq.com/article/target-date-funds-twice-as-popular-vs-15-years-ago-cm425440
    The comparison is with 1998. That was an extraordinarily "euphoric" period for retail investors for many reasons. So, the rise in popularity of balanced funds in subsequent years doesn't surprise me.
    If I'm reading this article correctly, it's really about balanced funds "which include target-date funds" (quoting from article). I find this presentation a bit suspicious.
    That aside, it's unfortunate so called "target date" funds get lumped together at all by financial commentators like this one. They vary greatly in their approach to investing. If you want a good one, look to the fund family first. That's where it all starts with these things.
  • Barry Ritholtz: No Room For Feelings In The Market
    LATEST MEMO FROM OUR CHAIRMAN, HOWARD MARKS
    Memo to: Oaktree Clients
    From: Howard Marks
    Re: The Lessons of Oil December 20,2014 © 2007-2014 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. All Rights Reserved.(excerpts)
    "Over the last year or so, while continuing to feel that U.S. economic growth will be slow and unsteady in the next year or two,
    I came to the conclusion that any surprises
    we're most likely to be to the upside. And my best candidate for a favorable development has been the possibility that the U.S. would sharply increase its production of oil and gas. This would make the U.S. oil-independent, making it a net exporter of oil and giving it a cost advantage in energy–based oncheap production from fracking and shale–
    and thus a cost advantage in manufacturing. Now the availability of cheap oil all around the world threatens those advantages. So much for macro
    forecasting!

    There’s a great deal to be said about the price change itself.
    A well-known quote from economist
    Rudiger Dornbusch goes as follows:
    “In economics things take longer to happen than you
    think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.”
    I don’t know if
    many people were thinking about whether the price of oil would change, but the decline of 40%-plus must have happened much faster than anyone thought possible.
    On the other hand
    –and in investing there’s always another hand–high levels of confidence,
    complacency and composure on the part of investors have in good measure given way to disarray and doubt, making many markets much more to our liking
    .
    For the last few years, interest rates on the safest securities–
    brought low by central banks
    –have been coercing investors to move out the risk
    curve. Sometimes they’ve made that journey without cognizance of the risks they were taking, and without thoroughly understanding the investments they undertook. Now they
    find themselves questioning
    many of their actions, and it feels like risk tolerance is being replaced by risk aversion.
    This paragraph describes a process through which investors are made to feel pain, but also one that makes markets much safer and potentially more bargain-laden.
    http://www.oaktreecapital.com/MemoTree/The Lessons of Oil.pdf
    Elsewhere; A look at the commodity bubble in the 2000-08 period.Just an observance of the past for me personally.I have no opinion on his bullish outlook for oil. Article from Seeking Alpha.
    Lawrence Fuller, Fuller Asset Management Dec. 20, 2014 2:55 PM ET
    The Oil Price Plunge - Fiction, Reality And Opportunity (excerpts)
    "Shortly after the tech bubble burst in 2000, institutions began to allocate billions of dollars into commodities through the futures markets in an effort to capitalize on growth in the developing world. Commodities became a new financial asset class. The continual and escalating flow of funds into a buy-and-hold strategy of a basket of commodities with no sensitivity to price led to a parabolic move upwards in prices prior to the financial crisis in 2008.
    The regulatory body for the futures exchanges (CFTC) exacerbated the volatility by exempting Wall Street banks from the limits under which traditional speculators operate. As a result, a hedge fund can use a Wall Street bank as a counter-party to speculate on commodity prices for financial gain with no limitations. It is important to recognize that the vast majority of oil futures contract holders never take delivery of a single barrel of oil-they simply roll over the contracts. As a result of these changes in market structure, futures prices now dictate spot prices.
    There was no greater evidence of commodity prices divorcing from fundamentals than the surge in oil to $147/barrel during the summer of 2008. That parabolic move occurred six months into what we now call the Great Recession. There were no lines at the gas pump. There was no outcry from oil-importing nations that they were unable to obtain the oil that they needed. That move was fueled by speculative investment flows into oil futures contracts in a herd mentality. The herd was being steered (over a cliff) in part by deluded research reports from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs that were forecasting prices of $150 and $200/barrel, respectfully. Just a few months later the price had collapsed to less than $60/barrel, but not because of a commensurate decline in demand or increase in supply. Institutional investors and speculators were being forced to deleverage and unwind long positions in the throes of the financial crisis and stock market meltdown"
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/2770205-the-oil-price-plunge-fiction-reality-and-opportunity?ifp=0
  • Target-Date Funds: Twice As Popular Vs. 15 Years Ago
    FYI: Many workers want to put their retirement accounts on autopilot.
    That's the lesson from new data that show that recently hired plan members flock to balanced funds — which include target-date funds
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTg3NzE2ODQ=
    Enlarged Graphic: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=webMFbalanc122214.png&docId=731592&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=562&caption=&id=731583
  • WHAT COLUMBUS MISSED: Royce Rediscovers India:
    FYI: In 1492, Italian explorer Christopher Columbus set sail to
    discover India. He missed his mark, however, landing in
    America instead. The rest, as they say, is history—with the
    exception that more than 500 years later India is still worthy of
    discovery for many Western investors.
    India is the world’s largest democracy and Asia’s third-largest
    economy. With its rapidly growing middle class, India is also the
    world’s third-largest economy measured by purchasing power
    parity, and with a median age of just 25 years old, it will also
    soon have a fi fth of the world’s working-age population.1 India’s
    median age is 10 years younger than the U.S.’s and nine years
    younger than China’s.2 This demographic dividend sets the
    stage for growth.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.roycefunds.com/insights/2014/02/pdf/INDIA-0213.pdf
  • Is there a good reason to be other than U.S. centric for equity investments, at this time?
    I have been on the global diversification bandwagon since the 90's. In the past several years though, I read more and more that by just holding US based companies, you already have good international exposure. @catch22, I think your 10% number is way low. I believe it is 20-30%. Perhaps I can find something later.
    I am more and more going in the direction of US based funds and investing internationally in areas that show future growth like Asia. Many of the funds I own have international components I them and my current international equity allocation is 36%.
    Good question and should make for a good discussion. Thanks @catch22.
  • Anybody Buy the Recent Dip in the S&P 500 Index?
    One of those years where it's been very hard to beat the S&P 500 index.
  • Top-Performing Midcap Funds
    d'oh! Thanks; I shoulda checked. Did not realize it was paltry.
    Also did not realize he was still so involved. Shoulda checked lots of things before suggesting.
    www.nicholasfunds.com/news/LA_Times-Nicholas-Fund.pdf
    My late father suggested it to me in college or grad school 40+ years ago, and I held it for a while but then got impatient, d'oh.