Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Allocation funds
    I have 2 allocation funds, IVWIX and FPACX. Both long term holds over 5 years Both funds are 30%+ cash/bonds. On down days they sometimes have worse performance than some of my all stock funds. I am not seeing the advantage of having an allocation fund, at least my 2 choices. 7 of my 11 funds had better performance today. FPACX is in the middle of the pack YTD and IVWIX is my worst performer YTD. 3 year returns are not much different. Buy/sell/hold these funds? What are your thoughts? I am thinking separate stock and bond funds.
  • BBH Core Select Fund to liquidate
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1342947/000089109219009814/e6667-497.htm
    497 1 e6667-497.htm FORM 497
    BBH TRUST
    BBH CORE SELECT
    CLASS N SHARES (BBTEX)
    RETAIL CLASS SHARES (BBTRX)
    SUPPLEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 TO THE
    PROSPECTUS DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2019
    The following information supplements, and, to the extent inconsistent therewith, supersedes, certain information in the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
    I. FUND LIQUIDATION
    On September 23, 2019, the Board of Trustees of BBH Trust (the “Trust”) approved a Plan of Liquidation for BBH Core Select (the “Fund”) pursuant to which the Fund will be liquidated (the “Liquidation”) on or about the earlier of (i) October 9, 2019 and (ii) the date in which all shareholders that are not affiliated with the Adviser have redeemed their respective shares in the Fund (the “Liquidation Date”). Shareholder approval of the Liquidation is not required.
    Beginning on September 23 through the Liquidation Date, the Fund may depart from its stated investment objective and policies as it liquidates holdings in preparation for the distribution of assets to investors. During this time, the Fund may hold more cash or cash equivalents than normal, which may prevent the Fund from meeting its stated investment objective. Shareholders of record as of the close of business on the Liquidation Date will receive their proportionate interest in all of the net assets of the Fund in complete cancellation and redemption of all the outstanding shares of the Fund. Payment will be made in accordance with instructions from each shareholder. If a shareholder has not provided instructions by the time proceeds are distributed, that shareholder’s liquidation proceeds shall be distributed based on the payment instructions on file for such shareholder with the Fund’s Transfer Agent. For those accounts with no bank instructions on file with the Fund’s Transfer Agent, the Transfer Agent shall issue a check.
    Shareholders of the Fund may redeem their investments as described in the Fund’s Prospectus prior to the Liquidation Date. Effective after market close on September 23, 2019, the Fund has waived the redemption fee for all redemptions.
    If the Fund has not received your redemption request or other instruction by the Liquidation Date, your shares will be redeemed on the Liquidation Date, and you will receive your proceeds from the Fund, subject to any required withholding.
    The Adviser will bear all expenses of the Liquidation to the extent such expenses are not part of the Fund’s normal and customary fees and operating expenses, which the Adviser has voluntarily agreed to limit to 0.80%. However, the Fund and its shareholders will bear transaction costs and any potential tax consequences associated with turnover of the Fund’s portfolio.
    The liquidation of the Fund, like any redemption of Fund shares, will constitute an event upon which a gain or loss may be recognized for state and federal income tax purposes, depending on the type of account and the adjusted cost basis of the investor’s shares. The tax year for the Fund will end on the Liquidation Date. Please contact your tax advisor to discuss the tax consequences to you of the liquidation.
    II. CLOSURE OF THE FUND TO PURCHASES
    Effective as of the close of business on September 20, 2019, BBH Core Select (the “Fund”) was closed to purchases of Fund shares, however, the Fund’s closure to purchases of Fund shares does not restrict any shareholders from redeeming shares of the Fund.
    The Fund’s ability to enforce the closure of the Fund to purchases with respect to certain retirement plan accounts and accounts held by financial intermediaries may vary depending on systems capabilities, applicable contractual and legal restrictions and cooperation of those retirement plans and intermediaries.
    Please contact the Fund at 1-800-575-1265 if you have any questions.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
    From BBH Funds website:
    https://www.bbhfunds.com/resource/blob/38882/fd1538e953c3b25cb9677cdad467b3ef/notice-to-shareholders---bbh-core-select-fund-liquidiation-data.pdf
    or
    https://www.bbhfunds.com/bbhfunds-en-us/our-funds/bbh-equity-funds/core-select-fund
    BBH Core Select Fund Liquidation
    Notice to Shareholders
    September 23, 2019
    Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Announces Liquidation of BBH Core Select
    BBH CORE SELECT CLASS N SHARES (BBTEX)
    BBH CORE SELECT RETAIL CLASS SHARES (BBTRX)
    At a meeting held on September 23, 2019, the Board of Trustees of BBH Trust adopted a Plan of Liquidation (the “Plan”) for BBH Core Select (the “Fund”) based on the recommendation of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. through its separately identifiable department (the “Adviser”), and in consideration of various factors, including the recent launch of BBH Select Series – Large Cap Fund, a fund with the same investment team and substantially similar investment strategy.
    As previously announced, the Fund closed to new investments effective as of the close of business on September 20, 2019. As outlined in the Plan, the Fund will make a final liquidating distribution to its remaining shareholders equal to each shareholder’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Fund on or about October 9, 2019 (the “Liquidation Date”).
    In the period leading up to the Liquidation Date, the Adviser may manage the Fund in a manner intended to facilitate its orderly liquidation, such as by raising cash. During this time, all or a portion of the Fund may not be invested in a manner consistent with its stated investment strategies, which may prevent the Fund from achieving its investment objective.
    Shareholders have three options in advance of the Liquidation Date:
    (1) Redeem BBH Core Select shares;
    (2) Redeem BBH Core Select shares and purchase BBH Select Series-Large Cap Fund with the proceeds*; or
    (3) Take no action -- the Fund will redeem remaining shareholders on Liquidation Date.
    The Adviser will bear the expenses of the liquidation to the extent such expenses are not part of the Fund’s normal and customary fees and operating expenses, which the Adviser has voluntarily agreed to limit to 0.80%. The Fund has waived the redemption fee for all redemptions effective at market close on September 23, 2019.
    The liquidation of the Fund, like any redemption of Fund shares, will constitute an event upon which a gain or loss may be recognized for state and federal income tax purposes, depending on the type of account and the adjusted cost basis of the investor’s shares. To the extent that BBH Core Select Fund is required to provide any additional information, such information will be available via www.bbhfunds.com. Please contact your tax advisor to discuss the tax consequences to you of the liquidation.
    For additional details, please refer to the supplement dated September 23, 2019 to the BBH Core Select Prospectus dated February 28, 2019. If you have any questions or require any additional information regarding this announcement, please contact the Fund using the phone numbers or email addresses provided below:
    Financial Advisors/Institutional Investors: (800) 625-5759 - [email protected]
    Individual Investors: (800) 575-1265 - [email protected]
    -------------------------------------------------------
    * Direct Fund investors with accounts at ALPS Distributors, Inc. may request the redemption of the Fund and purchase of shares of BBH Select Series – Large Cap Fund or any other BBH Fund with the proceeds using the form available h­­­ere. Investors not holding the Fund directly may request the exchange be processed through the intermediary where their account is held.
    Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH”), a New York limited partnership, was founded in 1818 and provides investment advice to the BBH Trust through a separately identifiable department (the “SID”). The SID is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. BBH acts as the Fund Administrator and is located at 140 Broadway, New York, NY 10005.
    Shares of the BBH Funds are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc.
    For more complete information, visit www.bbhfunds.com or contact your investment professional for prospectuses. You should consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before you invest. Information about these and other important subjects is in the fund's prospectus, which you should read carefully before investing.
    Securities products are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal invested.
    NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
  • Invesco liquidates several funds
    Per Yahoo Finance BBBMX and TRBUX have better 3 and 5 year returns than OSDAX.
    I don’t know anything about BBBMX. But Lipper puts OSDAX solidly ahead of TRBUX for 3 and 5 years. (Neither has been around yet for 10 years.)
    3 years: OSDAX: 3.33% TRBUX: 2.32%
    5 years: OSDAX: 2.48% TRBUX: 1.80%
  • How To Profit From The ‘Best Of Both Worlds’ In Stock Investing: (AFOIX)
    I just wasted a lot of time thanks to M*'s dropping of the "Purchase" tab for researching MFs. Going to both Schwab and TDA I found that AFOIX is available only to institutional investors at the former and not at all at the latter. My surfing to Alger finally got me the the symbol AFOZX, which is the share class for mere mortals. This mortal was interested in the fund, in part due to reading the MarketWatch piece on mid-caps linked above. Zhang spent 14 years in small and mid caps at Brown Capital before Alger hired her away in 2015. I can't think of a better place to train. Her Alger small-mid fund has been great. In any event, AFOZX is currently available NL but with the transaction fee at the two above brokerages, a deterrent for me. Maybe the fund will become NTF if it grows.
  • Invesco liquidates several funds
    Per Yahoo Finance BBBMX and TRBUX have better 3 and 5 year returns than OSDAX. Sorry, I can't post numbers as my internet access frequently drops due to router issues!
  • Invesco liquidates several funds
    All valid comments by @msf & @carew388 above. Oppenheimer became the poster child for bad faith investment management re the monies investors had entrusted to some of their bond funds when things went south in 2008. Their high income fund may have set some kind of “record” for year-over-year losses. A real shame. As I recall, there were some successful lawsuits.
    I’ve not been much impressed over the years with Oppenheimer’s offerings. I started a small IRA with them in the mid 90s after they introduced one of the first commodities funds. Soared like an eagle for a few years before crashing and burning (now closed). The initial investment has grown decently over those 20-25 years. I do use their OPGSX, OREAX and OQGAX (which msf mentioned). While the last one hasn’t done well since they acquired it a couple years ago, it had a stellar record, as I recall, before that time.
    What prompted me to post here again is that I think I’ve actually uncovered a pretty competive offering while digging through Invesco’s lineup. It’s their ultra-short OSDAX which is offered at no-load and carries a .29 ER. Miracle of miracles! It’s rare that these guys can top the offering of TRP in any category. Price’s (very similar) ultra-short, TRBUX, actually carries a higher ER. I’ve shifted a bit into OSDAX in part because it would facilitate doing a transfer at some future point from Invesco to T. Rowe.
    PS - It strikes me that the low fees on OSDAX may amount to somewhat of a “loss leader” for them. If you move no-load money from it into another of their funds, you’re likely to pay a load for whatever you choose to go into.
  • How To Profit From The ‘Best Of Both Worlds’ In Stock Investing: (AFOIX)
    FYI: After a 10-year rally for large-cap stocks, a way to diversify your investments and reduce short-term risk is to increase exposure to mid-cap shares.
    We recently discussed the long-term outperformance of value stocks and equally weighted index funds — two areas to consider if you wish to cut risk by diversifying beyond the market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 Index SPX, -0.49%. (The S&P 500 isn’t as diversified as its name implies because the index’s five largest companies — Microsoft MSFT, -1.16%, Apple AAPL, -1.46%, Amazon AMZN, -1.50%, Alphabet GOOG, -0.71% GOOGL, -0.72% and Facebook FB, -0.11% — make up 17% of the market value.)
    Leaving cap-weighting aside, mid-cap stocks are often overlooked, despite good performance characteristics.
    Amy Zhang, who manages the Alger Small Cap Focus Fund AOFAX, -0.05% (which has had an incredible performance run) launched the Alger Mid-Cap Focus Fund AFOIX, -0.40% in June. In an interview at her office in New York, she said mid-cap stocks offered “the best of both worlds,” with quality “close to large-cap” stocks, while the group’s growth “is closer to small-cap.”
    She also discussed, below, three of the companies held by the Alger Mid-Cap Focus Fund.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-to-profit-from-the-best-of-both-worlds-in-stock-investing-2019-09-20/print
    Alger Website:
    https://www.alger.com/Pages/Products.aspx?productCode=5040
  • Blackstone's Byron Wien: 15 Percent Yearly Gains on S&P 500 to End Soon Read Newsmax: Newsmax.com -
    I agree that sometime in the next 10 years the market will gain only 5% and possibly lose up to 25% but its not clear how believing that will make me money or even save me some. Getting the level right is useless if you get the time wrong.
  • Blackstone's Byron Wien: 15 Percent Yearly Gains on S&P 500 to End Soon Read Newsmax: Newsmax.com -
    https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/933604/16
    Blackstone's Byron Wien: 15 Percent Yearly Gains on S&P 500 to End Soon
    Investing guru Byron Wien warned savvy market watchers that he predicts the S&P 500 won’t be posting double-digit percentage gains in 2020 and beyond.
  • The Closing Bell: Stocks Turn Lower In Final Day Of A Bumpy Trading Week
    FYI: U.S. stocks turned lower Friday after reports that a Chinese trade delegation would be returning home earlier than expected, souring hopes that Washington and Beijing were moving toward a trade deal.
    The news capped off an eventful week that featured turmoil in money markets and an attack on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia that triggered dramatic swings in crude prices.
    The blue-chip index fell 160 points, or 0.59%, in afternoon trading. The S&P 500 dropped 0.50%, while the Nasdaq Composite slumped 0.80%.
    Stocks had opened higher but then dropped sharply after news agencies reported that Chinese agriculture officials had canceled a planned trip to Montana and were returning home.
    All three indexes are on pace to close the week lower, after three consecutive weeks of gains. Still, both the Dow and S&P 500 are within 1.5% of their closing records reached in July.
    Investors snapped up assets seen as safe havens. The yield on U.S. 10-year Treasurys fell to 1.758%, from 1.777% on Thursday.
    Stock moves were muted this week, but volatility broke out in the oil market and an obscure corner of the financial system that banks rely on for short-term funding.
    Rates on short-term repurchase agreements briefly jumped from around 2% to nearly 10% at the beginning of the week. The spike was caused by technical factors: corporate tax payments came due to the U.S. Treasury just as Treasury debt auctions settled, leading to large transfers of cash from the banking system.
    U.S. crude oil slipped less than 0.1% to $58.09 a barrel on Friday after days of major price swings. Following an attack on key Saudi production facilities last weekend, oil futures spiked nearly 15%--their largest one-day move in years. But since then they have pared gains as Saudi officials have pledged to restore production to regular levels.
    Netflix was one of the worst-performing stocks in the S&P 500 on Friday, down 6.2%. The streaming company has been under pressure in recent months amid a decline in its U.S. subscribers.
    Overseas, the benchmark Stoxx Europe 600 gained 0.3%. In Asia, the Shanghai Composite and Japan’s Nikkei both rose 0.2%.
    Regards,
    Ted
    Bloomberg Evening Briefing:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-20/your-evening-briefing
    MarketWatch:
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dow-and-sp-500-set-to-test-record-highs-as-trump-administration-said-to-exempt-china-products-from-tariffs-2019-09-20/print
    WSJ:
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/global-stocks-rise-at-the-end-of-a-bumpy-week-11568968985
    Bloomberg:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-19/asia-stocks-set-to-edge-higher-bond-yields-drift-markets-wrap
    IBD:
    https://www.investors.com/market-trend/the-big-picture/stock-market-falls-on-china-trade-setback/
    CNBC:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/stock-market-wall-street-in-focus-as-us-china-trade-talks-resume.html
    Reuters:
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/wall-street-drops-after-china-cancels-visit-to-montana-farmland-idUKKBN1W51B6
    U.K:
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-stocks/british-blue-chips-dented-by-sterlings-brief-brexit-uplift-idUKKBN1W50NQ
    Europe:
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-stocks/european-shares-log-fifth-week-of-gains-novo-nordisk-shines-idUSKBN1W51WY
    Asia:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/asia-pacific-stocks-set-to-trade-mixed-amid-us-china-trade-jitters.html
    Bonds:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/bonds-treasury-yields-fall-as-traders-monitor-us-china-trade-talks.html
    Currencies:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/forex-markets-federal-reserve-brexit-in-focus.html
    Oil
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/oil-markets-middle-east-in-focus.html
    Gold:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/gold-markets-dollar-us-china-trade-in-focus.html
    WSJ: Markets At A Glance:
    https://markets.wsj.com/us
    Major ETFs % Change:
    https://www.barchart.com/etfs-funds/etf-monitor
    SPDR's Sector Tracker:
    http://www.sectorspdr.com/sectorspdr/tools/sector-tracker
    SPDR's Bloomberg Sector Performance Pie Chart:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/sectors
    Current Futures:
    https://finviz.com/futures.ashx
  • Invesco liquidates several funds
    We all look at different things and have our own biases, which is my way of saying that what follows are my less than complimentary thoughts about Rochester and Steelpath (two of Oppenheimer's acquisitions, including some of the terminated funds above). So the comments aren't about all of Oppenheimer's funds, just a couple of significant segments.
    Rochester funds often show up at the top of muni fund performance screens. In a category of funds that should be sedate, these are high octane funds without adequate warning labels. From Oppenheimer's own PR: "Unlike many of its competitors, the team chooses to invest across the entire credit spectrum and its historic results have often been driven by the high levels of tax-free yield that non-rated and below-investment-grade securities have offered."
    http://www.mfwire.com/article.asp?storyID=21319&template=article&bhcp=1
    The lack of warning labels has landed these funds in hot water.
    Shareholders accused OppenheimerFunds, a New York-based unit of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co, of misleading them about the safety of six funds, ignoring the funds’ stated objectives and risk guidelines, and inflating asset values. ...
    The six funds were: AMT-Free Municipals, Rochester Fund Municipals, Rochester AMT-Free New York Municipal, New Jersey Municipal, Pennsylvania Municipal and Rochester National Municipals.
    Rochester National specialized in high-yield securities, and remains one of the biggest funds in its class, with about $5.7 billion of assets as of July 31.
    The other five funds were designed to preserve shareholder principal by investing in high-quality securities.
    According to Morningstar Inc, the six funds’ Class A shares fell between 29 percent and 48.9 percent in 2008, ranking near the bottom of their respective categories.
    Reuters, Aug 29, 2013, OppenheimerFunds settles crisis-era muni fund lawsuits for $89.5 mln
    SteelPath strike me as a way to vitiate the tax advantages of MLPs (in the pursuit of simplicity), leaving no compelling reason to invest in them.
    Once MLPs are wrapped in a mutual fund or an ETF, their distributions are taxed at the fund's corporate rate, and what is left is paid to shareholders as a distribution. That payment then is taxed as dividend income, thereby effectively nullifying the main reason for investing in an MLP in the first place.
    https://www.investmentnews.com/article/20130414/REG/130419957/mlps-in-mutual-funds-pose-hazards
    I'd guess it's more a combination of small size and poor performance that's driving the closures. Oppenheimer created its own MLP fund ILPAX a couple of years after acquiring Steelpath, and it's still a tiny fund. But it's been doing better than the similarly microscopic OMLPX, which Oppenheimer is shuttering.
    https://news.morningstar.com/fund-category-returns/energy-limited-partnership/$FOCA$LP.aspx
    Invesco is leaving in place its two non-MLP infractructure funds, one home grown (GIZAX), and one from Oppenheimer (OQGAX). So there seems to be more considerations than just overlap in doing this housecleaning. Also given Oppenheimer could have merged funds together and shielded investors from tax consequences of liquidation if it felt the closed funds overlapped enough with the surviving funds.
    Invesco fund lineup
    Related (another tiny MLP fund at the bottom of the performance rankings):
    James Alpha MLP Portfolio to cease selling of shares
    https://mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/52746/james-alpha-mlp-portfolio-to-cease-selling-of-shares
  • Introduction To Primary Share Class
    "A prime example of this would be Franklin Templeton’s Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund. The fund’s Class A (TEBIX), Class C (TEMEX) and Class Z shares (BEGRX) all launched in 1962."
    Some of us remember Michael Price's Mutual Series funds, including Beacon. They were all no load until he sold them to Franklin Templeton. Franklin created the load shares (then called Class I and Class II) in 1996, and grandfathered the original shares as class Z shares. The load classes date from then, not from 1962. Data quality?
    Here's an excerpt from a 1996 fund filing:
    The Fund [i.e. the Mutual Series Funds, collectively] began offering multiple classes of shares on November 1, 1996: Mutual Shares Fund - Class Z, Mutual Shares Fund - Class I, Mutual Shares Fund - Class II, Mutual Qualified Fund - Class Z, Mutual Qualified Fund - Class I, Mutual Qualified Fund - - Class II, Mutual Beacon Fund - Class Z, Mutual Beacon Fund - Class I, Mutual Beacon Fund - Class II, Mutual European Fund - Class Z, Mutual European Fund - Class I, Mutual European Fund - Class II, Mutual Discovery Fund - Class Z, Mutual Discovery Fund - Class I, and Mutual Discovery Fund - Class II. All shares purchased before Novembe 1, 1996, are considered Class Z shares.
    Emphasis added.
  • M*'s David Blanchett: Mixed Target-Date Fund Investors Is There A Method To The Madness?
    FYI: There are potentially over 10 million participants in defined contribution plans today combining a target-date fund with other plan investments, commonly referred to as “mixed target-date fund investors.”
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.morningstar.com/content/dam/marketing/shared/pdfs/workplace/wp_Mixed_TDF_082019.pdf?cid=EMQ_&utm_source=eloqua&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=&utm_content=18456
  • M*: The Best Value Funds
    "Today we’re shining a spotlight on those that land in the U.S. large-value, mid-value, or small-value Morningstar Categories and that earn Morningstar Analyst Ratings of Silver or better. (We expect such highly rated funds to outperform over a full market cycle...) "
    Mechanically at least, that explains why TRVLX (bronze) isn't mentioned, while PRFDX (a silver T. Rowe Price fund) is included.
    Since the ratings are based on projections for a full market cycle, it seems literally a bit shortsighted to be looking at the short period of just the past eight months (as in chart you linked to). FWIW, here's M*'s chart comparing it with DODGX (the other fund in the chart you linked to) over the full tenure of PRVLX's manager starting at the end of 2009.
    Virtually a dead heat. Total returns are 199.26% for TRVLX vs 199.55% for DODGX. The latter costs less (0.20% vs. 0.78%), has lower turnover (0.20% vs 146%!), and is truer to style (its current portfolio sits in value corner vs. TRVLX's blend portfolio).
    Not that I'm a fan of M*'s analyst ratings. IMHO they are of dubious value. More importantly, when M* restricts articles to the relatively few funds that receive analyst ratings it necessarily excludes many better, smaller funds. Following your theory, that's because these other families aren't "paying someone off". But T. Rowe Price is not among the excluded families. Their funds, including PRSVX, do get analyst ratings.
  • Invesco liquidates several funds
    Invesco Tax-Exempt Cash Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/909466/000119312519249346/d798757d497.htm
    Invesco OFI Pictet Global Environmental Solutions Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/725781/000119312519249345/d807204d497.htm
    Invesco Strategic Real Return Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1112996/000119312519249343/d807048d497.htm
    Invesco Alternative Strategies Fund
    Invesco Multi-Asset Inflation Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/202032/000119312519249344/d806912d497.htm
    Invesco Emerging Markets Flexible Bond Fund
    Invesco Oppenheimer Global Unconstrained Bond Fund
    Invesco Oppenheimer Preferred Securities and Income Fund
    Invesco Oppenheimer SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund
    Invesco Oppenheimer SteelPath Panoramic
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826644/000119312519249342/d807534d497.htm
  • Jim Grant Is a Wall Street Cult Hero. Does It Matter If He’s Often Wrong?

    Part of GS forward forecast for markets in 2011
    Interest rates won't be hiked until 2013
    Goldman Sachs
    While interest rates won't move until 2013, the yield on the U.S. 10-year will rise from 3.0% to 3.75% by the end of 2011, and 4.25% by Q4 2012.

    >>>10 year yields below
    --- Jan. 2011 @3.4%
    --- Jan. 2012 @1.9%
    --- Jan. 2013 @1.9%
    --- Jan. 2014 @3.0%
    --- Jan. 2015 @2.0%
    --- Sep. 19, 2019 @1.78%
    The above forecast by GS, versus what happened, caused some serious winners and losers, depending on where one was invested or NOT in bonds.
    @hank
    Mostly agree with you regarding Mr. Grant. Have read him over the years, but don't find I would have made more money following his thoughts.
    We investors have our luck periods, sprinkled with some actual properly thinking and observations, including power houses like Goldman Sachs.
    I remain, "this time is different."
    As of recent, I'm still trying to get my head around how the "repo transactions" sector functions and statements from those who understand this area regarding current interventions by our Fed. reserve system.
    Have a good remainder.
    Catch
  • M*: The Best Value Funds
    FYI: Value is striking back--for now. These value-focused funds all earn Morningstar Analyst Ratings of Silver or better.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.morningstar.com/articles/946456/the-best-value-funds