Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • IOFIX
    Sorry, guys I just don't get you. Look at the link below.
    http://schrts.co/WwJmK5
    I mentioned earlier it spiked in August. Now it spiked down. If it hadn't done either, it is not too hard to see the NAV would land where it is today.
    I don't own this fund but I can't understand suddenly and only when fund drops like this there is a lot of analysis and speculation about it, while it is no problem when a fund spikes - no one asks why it could have, we just celebrate.
  • All Dodge & Cox Funds Trending Down
    Current Morningstar rating of the 6 Dodge&Cox funds show 4 funds with a 5 Star rating and 2 funds with a 4 Star rating. Not too many fund companies with multiple funds can beat that.
    I think their “gross” underperformance in ‘08 was likely a one-time occurrence. But, can’t say for certain. However, D&C’s funds will normally give you a rougher ride for sure. Not for the “queasy”.
    Long term (10+ year out) if one has a lot of patience they’re a hard act to beat IMHO. A lot of that is due to their very competitive ERs. Not many investors today possess that degree of patience. Actually, now in my 70s, I don’t possess that degree of patience either. I continue to hold slices of DODBX, DODIX and DODLX, but now avoid their equity funds.
  • All Dodge & Cox Funds Trending Down
    Current Morningstar rating of the 6 Dodge&Cox funds show 4 funds with a 5 Star rating and 2 funds with a 4 Star rating.
    Not to many fund companies with multiple funds can beat that.
  • 2018 Mutual Funds preliminary capital gain distribution estimates
    @Mark,
    Here is the earlier post about Harbor's large CG forthcoming.
    https://mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/43072/m-taking-a-bath-lessons-from-a-big-fund-s-9-billion-capital-gains-distribution-hainx
    Also check Principal and Transamerica Funds links above for extremely large CGs. Even BRAGX paid a $5 per share CG this year after all of the years it had carry forward losses.
  • All Dodge & Cox Funds Trending Down
    @Mark is correct. D&C was a train-wreck during the late ‘07 to early ‘09 market collapse. One of the worst performers across all their equity funds. Some of their funds lost more than 50% during that 2-3 year period. Their balanced fund, DODBX, held up better, but also was hammered relative to peers. Reading their commentaries back than, D&C management blamed unanticipated and unusual government intervention during the crisis, in part, for their poor performance.
    I’m sorry I can’t remember exactly what transpired, but believe it had to do with the government and courts’ failures to hold accountable issuers of (defunct) obligations D&C held. D&C got stung good on some of that paper. I believe they contested it in court to no avail.
    I stuck with them, shifting more and more into their most beaten-up funds as markets crumbled. At the end of the mess I had 100% in DODWX, which bounced nicely in ‘09.
    Personally, I don’t understand or pay much attention to moving averages. But I do believe in spreading risk around. That means D&C is but one of several houses I entrust my life savings to. I’ve always considered them a bit more aggressive than the average fund manager in their equity and balanced funds. So you need to be prepared to take a little bigger hit in down markets.
    You can read about the 2008 misery in the linked Dodge & Cox Annual Report, dated December 31, 2008: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/29440/000119312509037454/dncsr.htm
    In the report, reference is made to their failure to foresee “the likelihood of government interventions” in the crisis as one cause of their poor performance.
  • IOFIX
    Adding to @Junkster and his note about the (14 day RSI in the 90s). The "teal" color at the top of this chart is the RSI section above the 70 number. One finds the available range of 100 (overbought, too hot to handle/buy) to 0 (oversold, dying or dead) for a FULL RSI scale.
    3 year IOFIX chart
    --- A more typical chart for a well performing fund, being FSMEX, and one will see the periodic moves above the "70". I reference this particular fund for its long term performance overview and typical bumps in the road. The 10 year annualized = 19.3%.
    3 year chart, FSMEX
    I suspect that Junkster will agree that the IOFIX chart and the implication is very exceptional to the rule.
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Discussion with a Portfolio Manager
    @PBKCM: I see you've been doing very well over the last year with KCMTX !
    Regards,
    Ted
    Fund Return: Category Return: S&P 500: %Rank: Quntile:
    YTD 4.68% -4.63% 0.84% 5% 1
    1yr 8.85% -3.55% 3.95% 2% 1
    3yr2 10.11% 2.46% 10.48% 1% 1
    5yr2 7.67% 1.38% 10.34% 1% 1
    10yr2 8.32% 6.29% 15.15% 14% 1
  • emerging markets value: a rare ray of sunshine from GMO's strategists
    Thanks to David for doing all the leg-work on researching these EM value funds. I find the performance comparisons among the several funds surprising in that Seafarer seems to be a laggard. This is surprising to me, a former shareholder, and maybe to MFO participants who have voiced quite steadfast support for Mr. Foster. Over the last 25 years, when I have been a market participant, I haven't made much money in EM and I certainly have not been compensated for the risks. Grandeur Peaks's latest letter to shareholders, a "mea culpa," says they had too much exposure to EMs. Granted, there's no place to hide these days; EMs seem to offer the least protection, but never fail to attract the soothsayers who prod the unwary to catch the next wave up. The TRP EM value fund does have a good, though short, record.
  • GMO 7-Year Real Return Asset Class Forecast (Oct2018)
    I offer this post (my follow-up) info from a few days ago; relative to "the smart folks" gett'in investment things correct or not.
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/45519/worst-is-yet-to-come-for-stocks-morgan-stanley
  • All Dodge & Cox Funds Trending Down
    Through October, all six Dodge & Cox funds below 3- and 10-month simple moving averages (SMAs), including its Income fund DODIX. Its closed International Stock fund DODFX is trending 8.5% below is 10-month SMA.
    image
  • Which Markets Are Closed On Thanksgiving?
    Okay, the financial markets are closed on Thanksgiving. (I think we all knew that.)
    Here's some information on the retail markets: Stores Closed on Thanksgiving Day
    It contains links to a list of stores open Thanksgiving Day, and to Black Friday hours.
    Those are some of the regular markets. Supermarkets may vary :-)
  • emerging markets value: a rare ray of sunshine from GMO's strategists
    GMO monthly issues their "7‐Year Asset Class Real Return Forecasts" for 10 - and, beginning this month, 11 - asset classes. Their method is fairly simple: assume that things - P/E ratio, profit margin, sales growth and dividend yield - will revert to "normal" over the next 5-7 years and sketch the line from here to there. The "real" part is that you deduct the effect of inflation from the resulting "nominal" returns.
    Several scholars have examined their predictive validity and found it to be pretty robust. One, examining projections from 2000-2010 then comparing them with Vanguard index funds concluded:
    The correlation between the GMO predicted returns and the Vanguard realized returns for equities, bonds, and all assets taken together are 0.954, 0.959 and 0.677 respectively. (Tower, 2010)
    Others found that even when the absolute values are off (i.e., GMO was too pessimistic during the frothier parts of bull markets), the relative values are right: GMO's top-ranked asset class tends to outperform its second-ranked class, and so on. Ben Inker, their chief strategist, claimed a 94.5% accuracy (2012).
    As recently as September, the real return projections were negative for every asset class except cash. They were least negative about the emerging markets. The newest projection released today begins to factor-in the effect of the recent market turbulence. Bad news: cash remains the most promising US asset class, with US equities in the red over the next 5-7 years and US fixed income breaking even. Good news: there is one asset class now poised for historically exceptional returns, emerging market value equity. GMO projects a 7.7% annualized real return for EM value, well above the historic 6.5% real return in the US stock market. Emerging equity, as a whole, is the second-highest asset class (4.4% real) and emerging debt (2.8%) is third. The one caveat: these asset class return projections are not risk-adjusted; that is, there's no suggestion about how much volatility you'll need to accept in return for your hoped-for 7.7% real.
    Traditionally value investing in the emerging markets has been painful and, mostly, unprofitable. Managers at Seafarer and elsewhere argue that structural changes in the emerging markets - largely marked by local investor activism - has fundamentally changed that equation and that long-ignored value plays offer ... well, exceptional value. As a result, there are relatively few EM value funds though their ranks are growing.
    Based on YTD performance (as of 11/21/18), here are the top 10 EM value funds available to domestic investors:
    • BlackRock EM Equity Strategy
    • American Beacon Acadian EM Managed Volatility
    • ICON EM
    • T. Rowe Price EM Value
    • Schwab Fundamental EM Large Company Index Fund
    • Pzena EM Value
    • Dreyfus Strategic Beta EM Equity
    • State Street Disciplined EM
    • SA EM Value
    • Seafarer Overseas Value
    Pzena, T Rowe and Dreyfus sport five-star ratings from Morningstar. Dreyfus and T Rowe have also earned Great Owl designations from MFO for their consistently top-tier risk-adjusted returns. State Street and SA (for Strategic Advisers, a set of funds offered to certain Fidelity clients) trail with two-star ratings. BlackRock and Seafarer are relatively new funds.
    On the your choices in the upcoming December issue of Mutual Fund Observer.
    Take care,
    David
  • GMO 7-Year Real Return Asset Class Forecast (Oct2018)
    This forecast may be of interest. Its my recollection it is the first time in a few years any of the asset classes in one of their 7-year forecasts has exceeded the 6.5% Long‐term Historical U.S. Equity Return base line used for comparative purposes. And, the October 2018 timing means the forecast precedes the November market declines.
    Stocks
    US Large -3.9%
    US Small -0.4%
    Intl Large 0.8%
    Intl Small 1.2%
    Emerging 4.7%
    Emerging Value 7.7%
    Bonds
    US Bonds 0.1%
    Intl Bonds Hedged -1.9%
    Emerging Debt 2.8%
    US Inflation Linked Bonds 0.1%
    US Cash 1.0%
    Here is a link to their pretty chart. It may be necessary to register to see it.
    https://gmo.com/docs/default-source/research-and-commentary/strategies/asset-class-forecasts/gmo-7-year-asset-class-forecast-(oct2018).pdf?sfvrsn=2
  • Possible change to nature of Comstock Capital Value Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/830779/000119312518332066/d655023d497.htm
    497 1 d655023d497.htm COMSTOCK FUNDS, INC.
    Filed Pursuant to Rule 497(e)
    Registration No. 033-40771
    COMSTOCK FUNDS, INC.
    COMSTOCK CAPITAL VALUE FUND (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated November 21, 2018, to the Fund’s Summary Prospectus, Prospectus and
    Statement of Additional Information for Class AAA Shares, Class A Shares, Class C
    Shares, and Class I Shares, dated August 28, 2018
    After careful consideration, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Fund approved calling a special meeting of shareholders, to be held as soon as possible, to consider a proposal to change the nature of the Fund’s business from a mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) to an operating company, and to de-register the Fund as a registered investment company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Proposal”).
    This conclusion was based in substantial part on the Board’s belief that the appropriate business strategy to be pursued by the Fund would be becoming an operating company that owns interest in one or more operating businesses and/or to acquire assets other than securities, and try to maximize the utilization of the Fund’s accumulated capital loss carryforwards. If shareholders of the Fund approve the Proposal, the conversion to an operating company is expected to take effect in the second quarter of 2019.
    Shareholders of the Fund will receive a combined proxy statement with additional information about the shareholder meeting and the Proposal. Shareholders should read the proxy materials carefully, as they will contain a more detailed description of the Proposal.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
  • Gabelli Funds To Launch Two New Open End Funds, Media Mogul™, Pet Parents™: (MOGLC) - (PETZC)
    FYI: Gabelli Funds, LLC (the “Adviser”), a subsidiary of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (NYSE: GBL) (“GAMCO”), announced today that, after considering the recommendation of the Adviser, the Board of Trustees for each of the Gabelli Media Mogul NextShares™ and the Gabelli Pet Parents’™ NextShares™ (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”) determined that it would be in the best interests of Fund shareholders to reorganize each Fund as a no-load, open-end mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”). As part of a Reorganization, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of each Fund would be transferred to a new series of a new trust to be created at a future date (a “New Fund”).
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20181120005559/en
    M* Snapshot MOGLC: (ETF)
    https://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/MOGLC/quote.html
    M* Snapshot PETZC: (ETF)
    https://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/PETZC/quote.html
  • Vanguard change coming
    Here are the VG funds in registration for the Admiral class:
    Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1004655/000093247118007445/merged.htm
    Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund
    Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/857489/000093247118007443/merged.htm
    Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/794105/000093247118007444/lt_bondindexmerge.htm
    Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/52848/000093247118007442/worldmarvel485a.htm
  • A Historically Bad Q4 So Far: S&P 500 Down 9.08% QTD
    FYI: With the S&P 500 falling 9.08% QTD, it has been the sixth-worst start to the fourth quarter in the history of the S&P 500. The only worse Q4s (through 37 trading days) came during some of the worst years for the stock market (1929, the 1930s, 1973, 1987, and 2008).
    Below is a table showing the worst starts to Q4 for the S&P 500 through 37 trading days. Any drop of more than 2% at this point in the quarter made the list. As shown in the table, the average change for the S&P for the remainder of these years has been a gain of 2.77% with positive returns 78.26% of the time. For all other Q4s in the S&P’s history, the average change for the remainder of the year has been +1.61%.
    Of course, it’s not all good news. If you look at the window of Q4s that were down between 8% and 12% like we are this year, the S&P actually declined for the remainder of those four years.
    And in case you don’t remember, at this point in Q4 2008, the S&P was down 35.5%! In that year, the S&P ended up rallying 20% for the remainder of the year before plummeting to new lows again in the first quarter of 2009.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.bespokepremium.com/think-big-blog/a-historically-bad-q4-so-far/
  • Vanguard change coming
    Do the number of shares remain the same? That depends on the price of the investor shares and the admiral shares. There's some well defined dollar value of your fund holding (number of shares x investor share price). You're going to end up with the same value after conversion. Obviously if the admiral share price is higher you can't get as many shares as you had before, else you'd be making a profit on the conversion.
    You only get the same number of shares if the prices of the two share classes are the same. I've done a few conversions; only once have I lucked out like that.
    For example, VBMFX and VBLTX are trading at the same price. So you'd have the same number of shares after conversion.
    But VTSMX is trading at $60.96 while VTSAX is trading at $60.99. If you had 100 shares of VTSMX (worth $6,096), don't expect to get upgraded to 100.000 shares of VTSAX (worth $6,099). Expect to get about 0.049 shares less (that makes up the $3 difference). At least if I've kept track of my decimal places correctly.
    It's not a big deal. If you paid $5,000 for the investor shares, then the total cost of your admiral shares after conversion is still $5,000. If you sell all your shares, you declare your cost basis as $5,000 regardless of how many admiral shares that is.
    In the end, regardless of what Vanguard or any other financial institution reports to the IRS, it's your responsibility, not theirs, to get the numbers right. If you think Vanguard has erred, the IRS has a box where you can say so and put down your figure.
    ----
    You're suggesting two completely different buy/sell sequences:
    1) Buy admiral shares (doubling your exposure), wait one month (presumably to avoid wash sale rule), and then sell investor shares
    2) Sell investor shares before distribution (bringing your exposure to zero), wait until ex-div date, and then buy admiral shares
    If you have gains, then #2 might make some sense. Though you're be recognizing all the gain. In contrast, if you do a direct conversion, you'll have the divs to deal with (they're usually qualified), but that should be relatively small compared to the cap gains you'd be deferring by doing the conversion.
    Still, if you're adamant on keeping your records simplified, it has some merit. (You'd only be deferring taxes on the cap gains by doing the conversion, not eliminating them permanently.)
  • Lipper: Healthcare/Biotechnology Sector Funds Post Near-Historic Net Inflows
    FYI: Healthcare/biotechnology sector funds (including both mutual funds and ETFs) took in $1.8 billion of net new money for Lipper’s fund-flows week ended Wednesday, November 14, 2018. It was the group’s second largest weekly net inflows ever (Lipper began tracking fund-flows data in 1992) and its largest since the fund-flows week ended November 16, 2016, when it had net inflows of $2.7 billion.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://lipperalpha.financial.thomsonreuters.com/2018/11/healthcare-biotechnology-sector-funds-post-near-historic-net-inflows/?utm_source=Eloqua&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=00008DM_NewsletterLipperAlphaInsightFundInsightsWeekly_Other&utm_content=Newsletter_FundsWeekly_19Nov2018&elqTrackId=441CF6581E15C42DA196BE9FA1A29F04&elq=dda1f42a06064de190e2f7259012eb63&elqaid=37609&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=166