Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Another Kodak Moment: SEC Probing Kodak Loan Disclosure, Stock Surge
    Love OJ's pictures.
    Shares of Kodak plunged Monday after a US agency suspended a loan intended to support the former photo giant's launch of a new pharmaceutical venture.
    ...
    The Wall Street Journal has reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating Kodak's disclosures about the loans and is expected to probe the company's awarding of stock option grants to executives on July 27.
    Agence-France Presse wire story.
    https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/kodak-shares-slump-us-loan-195029583.html
    WSJ article cited in report:
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-agency-sidelines-planned-765-million-loan-to-kodak-amid-probes-11597018204
  • how the Dow, S&P trade in the three months into Election Day
    How stocks traded 3 months ahead of election day
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/10/how-the-dow-sp-trade-in-the-three-months-ahead-of-election-day.html
    Since 1992, how the Dow, S&P trade in the three months into Election Day
    PUBLISHED MON, AUG 10 20208:39 AM EDTUPDATED MON, AUG 10 20209:01 AM EDT
    Eric Rosenbaum
    The 2020 presidential election is just about three months away.
    Some investors are worried about a potential change from a Trump to a Biden administration.
    History shows politics, and changes in the political parties in power, have rarely been a good way to measure the market’s potential.
    Mixed pictures I suppose
    Maybe more volatile this year since we may not know winner until late Nov20
  • Payroll Tax Holiday Boosts Most U.S. Markets - Tech Lags - Silver Climbs - Gold Mostly UNCH
    Article On How More Take-Home Pay Might Boost Equity Valuations
    Today’s Red-Hot Numbers
    The DOW led the charge, picking up 357 points or 1.30%
    Interestingly, the NASDAQ lost about a half-percent - possibly on China tensions. One Bloomberg pundit suggested today the U.S. might break off diplomatic relations with China before year‘s end (unconfirmed speculation).
    Other Markets (from Bloomberg)
    CRUDE +2.0%
    GOLD -0.51%
    SILVER +2.49%
    MINERS -0.82%
    10-GOVT YIELD 0.58%
  • MFO Ratings Updated Through July 2020 … New Bull Market
    All ratings have been updated on MFO Premium site, including MultiSearch, Great Owls, Fund Alarm (Three Alarm and Honor Roll), Averages, Dashboard of Profiled Funds, and Fund Family Scorecard. The site now includes several analysis tools, including Correlation, Rolling Averages, Trend, Ferguson Metrics, Calendar Year and Period Performance.
    Lots to point out this month ... recovery, quants, Wisdom Tree, and new MultiSearch screening features, including Refinitiv's new smart beta factors and ESG scores.
    https://www.member.mfopremium.com/2020/08/10/mfo-ratings-updated-through-july-2020-new-bull-market/
  • Goldman Sachs analysts upgrade their 2021 forecasts
    A bullish but plausible projection with a couple of big caveats.
    “We now expect that at least one vaccine will be approved by the end of 2020 and will be widely distributed by the end of 2021Q2,” Goldman Sachs economist Joseph Briggs wrote on Sunday.
    ...the availability of a vaccine is key to giving consumers the confidence to go back out there and spend.
    Goldman’s increased optimism about the vaccine led the firm to increase its 2021 GDP growth forecast to +6.2% (from +5.6%) and lower its 2021 year-end unemployment rate forecast to 6.5% (from 7.0%).
    ....even if Goldman is correct about the timing of the vaccine, the firm’s forecasts also assume consumers continue to get aid until public health conditions are more normalized.
    image
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/goldman-sachs-2021-forecast-gdp-unemployment-rate-earnings-morning-brief-100115722.html
  • Stock-market expert sees a ‘monstrous’ rally taking hold next week, if one recent trend holds
    "Morgan Stanley forecasts a 2.8% average annual return over the next 10 years for a 60/40 portfolio. The average has been nearly 8.0% since 1881 and about 6% over the last 20 years ."
    Derf
  • Howard Marks - Time For Thinking
    Hi @hank
    The below video (Bob Prince) remains a bond head scratch and a valid concern for me. Some items discussed have been part of conversations here but his path of thought process and overview helps me in the "listen to him speak" mode.
    Bob Prince, Bridgewater, 11 minute video, Aug. 7
    You noted:
    Bloomberg has been posting “futures” all day long (Sunday). But it’s my understanding they open sometime after 7 PM - at least where the U.S. is concerned.
    If I happen to view Bloomberg in the evening, their ticker with the bond prices and yields generally reset after 7pm, EST........otherwise the previous business day info is shown. Tonight (Sunday) this info reset once from previous close and is stuck at unchanged.....system burp?
    I use this Barchart below for a quick check. Example: Third line down, UDU20 Sept. '20 (long duration bonds) is the current contract trading (see volume to the right). The change colum...........I want to see this GREEN, meaning price up and yield down. That's how the money is made. Other duration bonds are down the graph page.
    FINVIZ futures that I think you look at too, are generally close for the bond prices/yields.
    Barchart futures, bonds
    I'm not a trader.....day type; but attempt to see and understand the data to tell me when I should think more about a buy or sell. A large observation of this is when the credit markets became "stuck" during the initial equity melt in February, and did not provide the normal safe haven. Eventually the FED fixed this for now.
    If one drives the same road long enough and pays attention to the normal seasonal changes, one can expect to minimize surprises. You're aware of this in your part of the state.......there's always a given number of nasty roadway areas when the wind is blowing the snow from a particular direction, eh? No surprises, eh?
    ADD: Real time broad etfs (when U.S. markets are open). A nice list to watch and ponder, and I find the technical "opinion" column to be quite accurate. Lots of other stuff on this page, too.
    ADD: Real time, global
    Okay. Almost pillow time from a long work day.
    Catch
  • Article from The Atlantic on CLO's and the health of banks.
    Dinky linky.
    The point being that they are the new CDO's. And banks own more of them than may be good for their health.
    Since 2008, banks have kept more capital on hand to protect against a downturn, and their balance sheets are less leveraged now than they were in 2007. And not every bank has loaded up on CLOs. But in December, the Financial Stability Board estimated that, for the 30 “global systemically important banks,” the average exposure to leveraged loans and CLOs was roughly 60 percent of capital on hand. Citigroup reported $20 billion worth of CLOs as of March 31; JPMorgan Chase reported $35 billion (along with an unrealized loss on CLOs of $2 billion). A couple of midsize banks—Banc of California, Stifel Financial—have CLOs totaling more than 100 percent of their capital. If the leveraged-loan market imploded, their liabilities could quickly become greater than their assets.
    There's more at the link. Check it out. Buy a subscription if you can afford it.
  • The Fed is expected to make a major commitment to ramping up inflation soon
    >> The way it's currently done
    Posted inflation data are chronically 4y out of date? That seems the conclusion, but I wonder; you'd think that would be bruited everywhere all the time.
    I think what it's saying is that while the 2016 CPI is computed using 2016 prices, the weights in the 2016 basket are based on consumer surveys asking what people spent money on in 2013. (And 2017 CPI is based on 2014 weights.)

    relative of mine formerly at one of the noncoastal federal reserves recalls that "2019 data get reported in Q1 2020. ... the various inflation indices used by FOMC are updated monthly, then revised up or down as more data become available."
  • Stock-market expert sees a ‘monstrous’ rally taking hold next week, if one recent trend holds
    Perhaps an insightful article from Barrons would be more informative. Joyce Chang is the Chair of Global Research at JP Morgan. Her comments on the impact of COVID pandemic are well articulated. Also some suggestion on investment opportunities at the end of the article.
    Question: You’re not predicting outstanding returns from equities either.
    Answer: No, but you will have some returns. The traditional 60/40 equity/bond split, which earned 10% a year over the past 40 to 50 years, is now down to 3½%. Even if you’re tilted to equities, you’re still not going to get 10% again. You’re going to get something below 5%, but investors really have to contemplate what their overall asset-allocation parameters will be. In a world of zero yields, Is 80/20 the way to go? Asset classes that are a hybrid between “safe” bonds and equities—such as high-yield bonds and loans, collateralized loan obligations, commercial mortgage-backed securities, convertibles, and equity and mortgage REITs—offer equity-like returns. There’s a case for emerging market debt, because I think yields will have to come down further in emerging markets as well. China is going into [J.P. Morgan’s global bond] index this year, and our longer-term view is that China is going toward zero yield.
    How the pandemic will change financial markets forever
  • M* - How to Create Cash Flows in Retirement
    I read the article and laughed. The first 4 pay under 1.9% which I wouldn't call great cash flow.
    VYM pays about 3.6%..BUT WAIT...The higher yield stock style investing must be debunked all the time. VYM trails the SP500 for YTD, 1, 3, 5, 10 years. VYM recovery was way behind. YTD: SP500=VFIAX made 14.7% more than VYM.
    I guess you missed the FAANGM and instead concentrated in higher income stocks (T???). Why not look at all stocks and select the best regardless of higher income.
    So, what is more important, higher income or higher total return? of course higher returns is better and what I have been practicing since the start, even at retirement.
    If I need more cash than my monthly dist (usually bond funds) I just sell some shares when I need to.
  • MetWest Flexible Income Fund - MWFEX, MWFSX
    MWFSX performance continues to lag and relates to lower daily distributions.
    Its performance for 1-4-12 weeks per M* Multi category is 85-97-88. Basically, it's in the bottom 15%-3%-12%.
    The last several distributions are:
    As of Date Ticker Dividend Rate Accumulated Dividend Rate
    8/9/2020 MWFSX 0.001256647 0.012160065
    8/8/2020 MWFSX 0.001256647 0.010903418
    8/7/2020 MWFSX 0.001256647 0.009646771
    8/6/2020 MWFSX 0.001189266 0.008390124
    8/5/2020 MWFSX 0.001149859 0.007200858
    8/4/2020 MWFSX 0.001163833 0.006050999
    8/3/2020 MWFSX 0.001201751 0.004887166
    Reminder: just several weeks ago in July the dist were 2-3 times higher.
    At 0.0012 per day it's about 4.4% annually. I'm taking it off my list.
  • Howard Marks - Time For Thinking
    I suspect, as one's time frame allows; most here always have a "time for thinking" about the investments. For me, this is a weekly (at a minimum) control and view period to observe "trends". At some point, I will not desire to do this and will have to choose an active managed fund(s) that I am comfortable with and bite my tongue when I see a missed opportunity in a particular equity or bond sector.
    For those so inclined, the investing table and ease of electronically investing has never been so complete to focus your investments within your risk tolerance.
    A recent example I posted is a 529 account that is 50/50 VITPX and VBMPX (note: moving money around is very restricted with a 529). Had this been a personal account of another form, I still would have felt comfortable holding this position, as the normal market function is to support bond prices if and when the equity side takes a big face slap, and the reverse of this. The case so far this year is with VITPX having a YTD of +4.7% and VBMPX at +8.1%. A pleasing +6.4% combo, YTD. "Thinking time" is part of this thought process (what sectors are changing, and why).
    Yes, indeed; time for thinking should be rewarding and part of one's "work" if you choose to remain an active individual investor.
    Note: I've never been a re-balance a portfolio once a year, just because it seems like the right thing to do (so-called pundit talk, eh?).
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Muni Yields Hit Lowest Since 1952 as Fiscal Crisis Tests a Haven
    https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2020/08/05/muni-yields-hit-lowest-since-1952-as-fiscal-crisis-tests-a-haven?topic=covid-19-coronavirus-coverage
    Muni Yields Hit Lowest Since 1952 as Fiscal Crisis Tests a Haven
    by Amanda Albright, 8/5/20
    /America’s municipal bondholders have never been paid so little for taking on so much risk.
    The yields on state and local government bonds have steadily dwindled over the past month, even as the resurgent coronavirus pandemic is threatening to prolong the deep recession that’s dealing a financial setback to borrowers in virtually every corner of the $3.9 trillion market./
    Anyone buy more munis recently? Maybe one of safer bets out there. More may have jumped ship to munibonds
  • L.SONDERS -1. Market perspectives and 2.Policy of Truth: Fed Holds Rates Steady Amid Somber Outlook
    https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/market-perspective
    https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/fomc-meeting
    Policy of Truth: Fed Holds Rates Steady Amid Somber Outlook
    By Liz Ann Sonders
    Key Points
    The Fed left rates unchanged and reiterated its pledge to increase its holdings of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.
    There was no mention in the statement of inflation targeting, new forward guidance or yield curve control; but heavy emphasis on the “course of the virus.”
    The Fed reiterated that it will use its “full range of tools” to support the economy.
    Maybe slow V shape, W or crash coming. No one really knows, but having a diverse investment lobg term approach geared portfolio maybe helpful.
  • Stock-market expert sees a ‘monstrous’ rally taking hold next week, if one recent trend holds
    I suppose right in-line with monstrous Covid-19 numbers, monstrous investor euphoria, and monstrous national debt?
  • Trump extends unemployment payments, defers payroll tax
    Obama reduced (admittedly not down to zero) social security taxes without reducing the amount of money going into SS. Trump virtually never provides details of how anything works ("I'm sure he's too ill-informed to know that"). So, unlike many others, I'm not willing to say that terminating social security taxes must entail defunding SS.
    The temporary reduction in the Social Security payroll tax for employees and the self-employed has drawn mixed reactions from policymakers. Some observers express concern about the potential impact of the payroll tax reduction on Social Security’s long-term finances, despite the general revenue transfers to protect the trust funds from a loss of payroll tax revenues. These observers point out that, although the payroll tax reduction is temporary, the possibility remains that Congress could continue to extend the payroll tax reduction or make the payroll tax reduction permanent in response to political or other pressures. In addition, they maintain that the general revenue transfers to the Social Security trust funds introduce an element of general revenue financing to the Social Security program, signaling a departure from the self-financing mechanism that has been in place since the program’s enactment in the 1930s that could jeopardize the future of the program.
    https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R41648.html
    I do however completely agree with last sentence above concerning a subsequent risk to social security. FDR supposedly said:
    We put those pay roll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and their unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.
    https://www.ssa.gov/history/Gulick.html
  • Trump extends unemployment payments, defers payroll tax
    "If I'm victorious on Nov. 3, I plan to forgive these taxes." This is buying votes, pure and simple. Apparently perfectly legal. Still, I find such crude quid pro quo odious:
    To quote Justice Brennan of the United States Supreme Court, in his 1982 majority opinion in Brown v. Hartlage (456 US 56):
    We have never insisted that the franchise be exercised without taint of individual benefit; indeed, our tradition of political pluralism is partly predicated on the expectation that voters will pursue their individual good through the political process, and that the summation of these individual pursuits will further the collective welfare. So long as the hoped for benefit is to be achieved through the normal processes of government, and not through some private arrangement, it has always been, and remains, a reputable basis upon which to cast one's ballot.
    To follow the terminology of Pamela Karlan (1994), the Constitution permits candidates to buy votes wholesale, from many voters with a single promise of political action, but not retail, from a single voter with a promise of a private side-payment.
    Kochin, Michael S., and Levis A. Kochin. "When Is Buying Votes Wrong?" Public Choice 97, no. 4 (1998): 645-62. Accessed August 9, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30024452.
  • Stock-market expert sees a ‘monstrous’ rally taking hold next week, if one recent trend holds
    Could surge 30%!? Seems unrealistic to me. As a counterweight I offer the editorial by Ian Bremmer from Time magazine: The Next Global Depression Is Coming and Optimism Won’t Slow It Down
    “This liquidity support (along with optimism about a vaccine) has boosted financial markets and may well continue to elevate stocks. But this financial bridge isn’t big enough to span the gap from past to future economic vitality because COVID-19 has created a crisis for the real economy. Both supply and demand have sustained sudden and deep damage. And it will become progressively harder politically to impose second and third lockdowns.”