Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Any Chart Readers Here - Down Trend
    Not an expert, but looking back over the last 2 years (S&P 500) I would say it has been range bound between 2100 on the upside and 1850 on the downside.
    image
  • Salary deduction/reduction for a young person
    Just wanted to chime with regard to Roth 401K plans.
    Roth 401k plans grow tax free and can be withdrawn tax free, but must follow RMD (required minimum distributions) rules after age 70.5.
    Individual Roth IRA plans do not have RMD requirements.
  • Fidelity: 2016 Q2 Sector Scorecard
    Thanks @Ted for posting the year-to-date performance for the S&P 500 sectors.
    It will be intesting to see how the year progresses and those sectors now leading will finish the year.
    I am thinking energy, materials and industrials (said by some to be the old economy sectors) will continue to rebound. And, if they do then about 20% of my portfolio will be weighted towards them and about 33% towards the defensive sectors (health care, consumer defensive and utilities) to help provide some needed support during a downdraft. Then add communications and real estate that also has helped, at times, to provide support during pullbacks puts me at about 45%. With the markets selling on a TTM P/E Ratio of about 24 (as reported overall earnings) I have decided to take some cautionary positioning while affording myself some upside opportunity as well. Throw in technology at +2%, for me, tilts me to about 55% towards sectors that do well in pullbacks. Although, I have included healthcare in my defensive positioning it might not perform, this time, as expected.
    Think I'll stay with my positioning as summer will soon arrive and coming with it perhaps a soft period for stocks.
  • Fidelity: 2016 Q2 Sector Scorecard
    @OLd_Skeet FYI:
    Sector SPDR Funds YTD As of 4/29/16:
    S&P 500 Index +1.05%
    Consumer Discretionary (XLY) +1.33%
    Consumer Staples (XLP) +3.58%
    Energy (XLE) +11.90%
    Financial Services (XLFS) -3.21%
    Financials (XLF) -2.18%
    Health Care (XLV) -3.11%
    Industrials (XLI) +5.94%
    Materials (XLB) +8.48%
    Real Estate (XLRE) +0.63%
    Technology (XLK) -1.63%
    Utilities (XLU) +11.88%
    Regards,
    Ted
  • Flying Autopilot With Target-Date Funds: Points To Consider
    I believe Target (allocation) funds can be used quite effectively to not only get you to "work retirement", but also as a tool to get you through until your "earthly retirement" aka death. Something I have shared before and I am still refining are these investment thoughts:
    bee's Target Date Strategy:
    I've often thought there are really two target dates, one targeting retirement from "work" and one targeting retirement from "earth".
    Fully funding a retirement dated (glide path allocation) fund makes perfect sense. As a retirement dated fund glides towards its maturity date it attempts to provide a smooth landing for your investment at that date.
    Effectively, at "work" retirement, an investor would have most of their assets in low risk investments. This might be helpful if the markets happens to severely correct in the first 5 years of retirement, but this portfolio must also be re-allocated the prepare for longevity risk (your money needs to last as long as you do). So, during the first few years of retirement a portion of this retirement portfolio needs to reallocated into investments that attempt to achieve portfolio longevity in retirement.
    In a sense, a retiree could reallocate a percentage of their retirement portfolio into target date funds that target the incremental need to reach "earthly" retirement. Much like laddering CDs, a retiree could ladder target date funds in 5 year increments that will be used for spending if the retiree is lucky enough to reach that target date.
    I could envision a retiree owning 6 separate retirement dated funds, each maturing 5 years further into the future (funding years 65-95 or 70-100) and each needing differing amounts of initial funding based on financial needs during that 5 year period in the future. The last fund matures on your date of death and pays your funeral expenses.
    Sorry if some of this sounds a bit morbid to the reader.

  • Sequoia Fund Stunk; Here’s Your Chance To Buy Sequoia Again
    When you sell shares, you realize a capital gain or loss regardless of how you're paid (in cash or in stocks that Sequoia gave you instead). If you get stocks, their basis is what you "paid" for them, i.e. the value of the Sequoia shares you just traded in. So if you flip those stocks immediately, you have no additional gain or loss.
    So where did the gain on the underlying stocks go? The general rule is when a company (such as a mutual fund) sells stocks it owns, it recognizes a gain or loss. It might sell stocks to raise cash for your redemption. Or it might "sell" you those stocks directly (redemption in-kind) to meet your redemption request.
    But there's one special line in the tax code (IRC 852(b)(6)) that says this general rule doesn't apply to redemptions in kind for registered investment companies (mutual funds, ETFs). Poof! No cap gain - no gain passed through to you, no gain for the fund.
    Your "on the other hand" description is right, but usually not as much of a problem as it might appear. If you've owned the shares awhile, your shares may have gone up 25% since you bought them, while the fund is planning a 20% gains distribution. If you were to redeem your shares, you would wind up recognizing a 25% gain, rather than get the 20% distribution. So you might grin and bear it - at least you're not recognizing more gain than you actually made with the investment. Expensive, but not really unfair.
    Investors who held their shares for fewer years (say their share prices are up 15%) are the ones who would be inclined to sell. Otherwise, they would recognize gains greater than what they'd made in the fund. As you wrote, that means that more gains would be distributed to the remaining shareholders. So instead of a 20% distribution, the fund might wind up making a 23% distribution. Still not enough to induce you (with 25% share appreciation) to sell, but there could be a few other shareholders with 22% appreciation who would now decide to sell. Ultimately, an equilibrium point is reached.
    All this assumes people are astute about their tax situations and act rationally. That's your laugh for the day.
  • Flying Autopilot With Target-Date Funds: Points To Consider
    FYI: What's in your 401(k)? For more of us, the answer is just a single fund.
    Target-date retirement funds aim to make investing simple, and that's why their popularity is exploding. Just pick one pegged to the year you plan to retire, put money in steadily, and it will take care of loading up on high-growth, riskier stocks when you're young and moving into more conservative investments as you age.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://bigstory.ap.org/article/7a02eac1ec15481ab7abc85153e8ca65/flying-autopilot-target-date-funds-points-consider
  • Sequoia Fund Stunk; Here’s Your Chance To Buy Sequoia Again
    One of the "complaints" investors were raising is that their larger ($250K+) redemptions were being paid in-kind. Just like an ETF. While it is quite likely you're correct about the existence of gains, it's not so clear that the gains have remained inside the fund (to be distributed this year).
    I have no idea how to estimate how much gain was offloaded this way. Holding off (in a taxable account) is certainly prudent. It will be interesting to see how much in gains are left in the fund to be distributed to remaining shareholders.
  • Large Cap/All Cap dividend investing, need input
    One thing I really like about a couple of Skeet's funds is that they are load funds from load families. Not just ordinary load families, they're run by insurance companies. And they merit consideration.
    Principal offers some pretty solid funds through retirement plans, but they're also available at the retail level, NTF, at some brokerages.
    Here's the Fidelity NTF listing for PMDAX (it's a Fidelity fund pick).
    Don't get thrown off by its 3* rating; that's because M* ratings incorporate the impact of loads, and M* overweights that impact for funds with shorter lifetimes (this fund is rated on its three year record only). Instead, see it as a 4* noload fund:
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/PMDAX.lw/quote.html
    I'm less familiar with SunAmerica - I tend to associate it with VAs, and apparently it's now (since 1998) a subsidiary of AIG. Talk about queasy feelings. Yet the fund seems solid. You can purchase it NTF through TDAmeritrade.
    American Century funds, like funds from PIMCO and a variety of other families are sold both load and noload. The noload version of TWEAX is TWEIX. (When one drops the load, whether on TWEAX or TWEIX, the fund gets bumped to a 5 star fund; TWEIX is less expensive as it doesn't have a 12b-1 fee.) One downside is that it's not particularly tax efficient, even allowing for its emphasis on dividends.
    LCEIX (now LCEAX) has been on my short list for years, in part because it is more tax-efficient than some of the other funds that pop out in the LCV space.
    FWIW, Fidelity added several families (including Invesco) to its load waiver list about three years ago. Here's my post on the Fidelity waivers:
    http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/6048/fidelity-waives-loads
  • Large Cap/All Cap dividend investing, need input
    Two funds that I have in my domestic equity sleeve found in the growth and income area of my portfolio that I favor are FDSAX and SVAAX.
    I have linked the Morningstar reports for these funds below along with their fact sheets.
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/SVAAX/quote.html
    http://www.federatedinvestors.com/FII/daf/pdf/product_profile_performance/investor_fact_sheet/fluctuating_funds/G28220-35.pdf?title=Strategic Value Dividend Fund - Investor Fact Sheet
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/fdsax/quote.html
    https://www.safunds.com/pdf/Fund-Fact-Sheets/asset_upload_file952_8358.pdf
    In the small and mid cap space a fund that I own and favor is PMDAX.
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/PMDAX/quote.html
    https://www.principal.com/allweb/docs/RIS/investments/factsheet/PMDAX.pdf
    And, another fund that I favor but do not currently own is TWEAX. It's reports are linked below.
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/TWEAX/quote.html
    https://www.americancentury.com/content/dam/americancentury/ipro/pdfs/factsheet/EqIncome_multi.pdf
    To get a feel for their style orientation along with sector allocations you might wish to do an Instant Xray analysis on each fund through the below link. Just enter the funds ticker symbol along with an amount and click view instant xray.
    http://portfolio.morningstar.com/Rtport/Free/InstantXrayDEntry.aspx?entrynum=10
  • Large Cap/All Cap dividend investing, need input
    If VZ and T seem attractive, another option is a telecom etf. Those two stocks make up almost half the cap-weighted index - 22% each in VOX, the Vanguard fund, with lesser amounts of several other t'com stocks to spread the risk. (Quoted yields at M*: 3.75 TTM, 2.94 SEC.)
    Be aware, though, that the sector has been red-hot since the selloff, up nearly 10% in only 3 months. How much further it can go, who knows?
  • Large Cap/All Cap dividend investing, need input
    @mcmarasco: If yield is a high priority with you, might I suggest individual stocks rather than equity mutual funds. The average so called dividend growth fund, or equity-income fund offer about half of what a quality stock dividend can yield. Two stocks that I own VZ and T yield 4.41% and 4.89% respectively and capital appreciation of 12.66% and 15.61% YTD.
    Regards,
    Ted
  • Salary deduction/reduction for a young person
    My daughter has a 403b and I advised her to put in as much as she can. The match is only around 5%, but she contributes about 25% a year of her salary.
  • Salary deduction/reduction for a young person
    @Hawkmountain: One nice thing about a roth is that if she holds it for 5 years, she can use up to $10,000 (one time limit) towards the purchase of her first home. Admittedly, you lose the compounding of that money if you withdraw it, but for some, it's a nice option to have. You can also withdraw principal at any time for the same purchase.
  • Salary deduction/reduction for a young person
    As Hank wrote, salary reduction is a pre-tax contribution to an employer-sponsored retirement plan (401(k), 403(b), SIMPLE IRA, etc.) that allows you to defer income. In contrast, salary deduction does not reduce your current income.
    A salary deduction is a contribution to the retirement plan made by having the employer "deduct" the money from your paycheck. What isn't clear from the question is whether the employer is treating this as a "classic" (pre-Roth-era) after-tax contribution to the plan or a contribution to a "Roth Option" within the plan. See IRS's "Types of Employee Contributions" here.
    The old-style after-tax contributions come out tax free (like Roth contributions), but their earnings are taxable (like traditional contributions). The good news is that a fairly new (2014) IRS rule makes it easier to roll over those pre-tax contributions (still not the earnings, though) into a Roth IRA. So once you leave the company, you can move the pre-tax money into a Roth making future earnings tax-free.
    The Roth Option that's attached to an employer plan (401k, etc.) is still part of that plan and still has the same withdrawal restrictions as the pre-tax (salary reduction) money. It's not the same as a Roth IRA. As the IRS writes: "the same restrictions on withdrawals that apply to pre-tax elective contributions also apply to designated Roth contributions."
    It is important to keep the vehicles straight: there are employer plans (401k, etc.) and IRAs. Roth is a modifier meaning "after tax, and earnings may be tax-free". There are Roth 401(k)s (and 403(b)s, etc.), and there are Roth IRAs. In employer plans, in addition to Roth option contributions there are "classic" after-tax contributions.
    The total contributions you make to an employer plan via pre-tax and Roth Option moneys is limited to $18K (plus possible catch-up). This is independent of whatever you contribute to an IRA, which has its own limit.
    The "classic" after-tax contributions are not restricted by this limit. They are subject to a total defined contribution limit (employer plus employee contributions) of $53,000.
    In case I've been as clear as mud, here's M*'s writeup of pre-tax vs. Roth vs. after-tax:
    Should You Make Aftertax Contributions to Your 401(k)?
  • Any Chart Readers Here - Down Trend
    http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^RUT+Interactive#{"range":"10y","allowChartStacking":true}
    http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^GSPC+Interactive#{"range":"5y","allowChartStacking":true}
    http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^IXIC+Interactive#{"range":"5y","allowChartStacking":true}
    Sometimes you have to step back and look at the big picture. It looks like a down trend to me.
  • T. Rowe Price Shareholders Reject Climate Change Proposal
    Is Your Mutual Fund a Climate Change Denier or Climate Champion?
    http://ecowatch.com/2016/03/15/mutual-fund-climate-change/
    T. Rowe Price increased its support for company climate change proposals (not just the disclosures discussed in the original article) from 11% in 2014 to 24% in 2015, though I have my doubts about any significance in that trend. More important is that while T. Rowe Price's record was much better than families like Vanguard, Fidelity, and American Century that supported not a single shareholder resolution, it was way behind other families like Allianz and GMO that supported resolutions over 70% of the time.
    See article for full data and background info.
  • First It Was Obama. Now Cameron Speaks Out On Fund Fees
    FYI: I must say I didn’t see it coming. But yesterday brought a highly significant development in the campaign for greater transparency in asset management. Speaking at Prime Minister’s Question Time, David Cameron expressed concern that lack of understanding of the true costs of investing is “sapping people’s enthusiasm” for saving for retirement.
    He was responding to a question by the Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat, who recently discovered that the total charges on his own investment portfolio were “more than 5% a year” as a proportion of his assets, or “about triple what I had originally calculated”.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.evidenceinvestor.co.uk/first-it-was-obama-now-cameron-speaks-out-on-fund-fees/
  • Salary deduction/reduction for a young person
    Hi hank,
    Although the purists will shoot me, the 403B is sort of the municipal version of the 401K of the private sector and the 457 at the state level. All forms of deferred compensation, albeit with minor differences (much less today than in the past).
    Hawk has the first question. Is there any employer match they she can capture (e.g. Michigan's DC pension puts in 4% and will match up to 3% more if the employee contributes equaling a total of 10% going in.
    The second question is about investment choices and transparency as to fees.
    Third is trading platform choices.
    Michigan was the cat's ass. I had online brokerage options via the Fido network for both my 401K and my 457 and it cost me $50 a year for each.
    At the other end of the spectrum was wife's original with Ma Bell. 5 choices of 'house' funds without ticker symbols and trading was limited to once a month on the last day of the month. Take it or leave it. teehehe ;-) I still parlayed Iraq I into a sizeable gain buying after the market puked.
    feh, only lemons? anyone got any vodka?
    and so it goes,
    peace,
    rono