Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • RPHYX / RSIVX= CASH POSITION 12/31/2015
    To each his/her own. My expectations for this fund were much higher. For this fund to lose nearly 5% in one year is totally unacceptable to me. There are better options with a lower ER.
  • Leuthold Core Investment Fund Reaches 20-Year Milestone: (LCORX)
    David and our colleague Sam Lee are admirers of Leuthold.
    All its funds have beaten peers since inception on absolute return ... below are its four long funds:
    image
  • Changes To Asset Allocation
    Short Answer: Slowly
    Pie charts are a lot of fun. Used to play around slicing and dicing in the early years. Good way to visualize your allocation and determine what makes sense to you.
    Past 10 years (excluding '08-'09) my only significant changes have been to gravitate slowly to a more hands-off approach. 15 years ago that was maybe 50% When the '08 debacle began it was around 60% (but I violated those guidelines in early '09 by loading up on global stock funds out of desperation.) Today I'm 80% hands off. The primary value (assuming there is any) is that it prevents me from tinkering around much and, hence, protects me from my own stupidity.
    Not recommending any of this. Not an expert. Last couple years I've looked more like an idiot.
    $29 oil? Who would've thunk?
  • Changes To Asset Allocation
    Hi Catch,
    About 75% of my portfolio is in taxable accounts because I inherited a rather good sum of money. I do max out my Roth IRA and contribute to a 401K as well. But they will have a less substantial effect on my overall portfolio than my taxable accounts.
  • Leuthold Core Investment Fund Reaches 20-Year Milestone: (LCORX)
    FYI: The retail share class of The Leuthold Group’s domestic tactical allocation fund, the Leuthold Core Investment Fund (NASDAQ: LCORX), recently marked its 20th anniversary. The Fund pursues U.S.-equity market-beating returns with substantially less risk. It is also available in an institutional share class (NASDAQ: LCRIX).
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160115005612/en/Leuthold-Core-Investment-Fund-Reaches-20-Year-Milestone
    M* Snapshot LCORX:
    http://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/lcorx/quote.html
    Lipper Snapshot LCORX:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/lcorx
    LCORX Is Ranked #1 In The (TA) Fund Category By U.S. News & World Report:
    http://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/tactical-allocation/leuthold-core-investment-fund/lcorx
  • Changes To Asset Allocation
    @willmatt72
    Some may or will argue that the "tax status" of current investments will/can also affect what one sells to change the balance of a portfolio. With the exception of "Roth" type investments, most of us will eventually pay taxes of some form and amount from our investment sales or required minimum distributions from a variety of money sources.
    Even those with annuities will eventually be required to have RMD at age 95, if they obtain that goal.
    You didn't note as to the tax status of your investments that may be considered for a sale to re-balance your portfolio.
    Is the tax gain or loss also a consideration for the portfolio mix sells?
    I am not able to offer any advice in this area, as the vast majority of our portfolio is tax sheltered; and therefore, sales are not taxable considerations.
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Bond King Musical Chairs: Gundlach Replaces Gross On Barron's Roundtable
    FYI: (Scroll down to read Barron's Roundtable)
    Jan 16 In recent years, bond investor Jeffrey Gundlach has been outperforming his rival Bill Gross. He has even been dubbed the "Bond King" by the media - a title Gross has held for many years. Now, Gundlach has replaced Gross on a high-profile investor panel.
    Weekly financial magazine Barron's said on Saturday that Gross decided to quit its Barron's Roundtable. Instead, Gundlach, who has often been critical of Gross's investment calls, was added to the panel - which meets at the beginning and middle of each year - and he features prominently in the magazine's Roundtable latest cover story published on Saturday.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.reuters.com/article/usa-bonds-kings-idUSL2N1500FE
  • Scott Burns: Couch Potato Investing 2015: Disappointing, But Above Average
    FYI: Couch Potato investors, like most investors, have no reason to celebrate 2015. The most basic Couch Potato portfolio is a 50/50 mix of a total domestic market index fund and an inflation-protected Treasury securities index fund. It’s a simple mix: if you can fog a mirror and divide by the number “2” you can do this. And, yes, you can use a hand-held calculator!
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://assetbuilder.com/knowledge-center/articles/couch-potato-investing-2015-disappointing-but-above-average
  • what has held up well?
    @little5bee I got lucky and read the tea leaves right. Sounds like your timing was good too! I can't give any advice about if the market's going to stay down, but my gut says it'll be extreme upswings and downswings for much of this year.
  • what has held up well?
    PopTart:
    By moving to 65% cash in November 2015, inadvertently or otherwise, you have avoided being toasted. :-)
  • what has held up well?
    As I learned from 2008, cash ain't trash! Late last year I also learned that I should have diversified my investments more than I had, but I got lucky on that one.
    I was heavily into health care until Hillary's August tweet attacking drug pricing sent these funds & individual equities spiraling down, down, and down some more. They came back and I sold these funds/equities in Nov. when I broke even. I kept that cash (about 65% of my folio) in cash as I didn't care for being whipsawed & I saw Hillary continuing on the populist warpath against health care. Nor did I like the global economic outlook & the environment of the fed raising rates. After being whipsawed, I really liked the feeling of a smooth ride and didn't immediately put that cash to work. And I still haven't!
    In retrospect it was pure luck that I put so much of my portfolio into cash when I did. I thought the market would sell-off a bit, but I wasn't expecting what 2016 has given us. I have a shopping list for that cash, but I'm holding off until, well, whenever...
  • RPHYX / RSIVX= CASH POSITION 12/31/2015
    Per Morningstar -- rphyx 43.57 % -- rsivx 18.22 %
    ps- rsivx 12 MO. LOSS =4.91%
  • Changes To Asset Allocation
    Obviously, the past few weeks have been a reality check for investors who thought they had the proper asset allocation for their portfolio but were wrong. I consider myself part of that group. Multiple years of gains can make one complacent and oblivious to the downside, especially when it hits hard. I have a fairly large portfolio (just about 7 figures) and my asset allocation is about 40% equities, 50% bonds and 10% cash. However, I realize that my equity portion is too aggressive and my bond weighting is geared more toward high yield bonds. So, my equity portion feels more like 60% equities, which is way too high for me given that my goal first and foremost is a low risk, income oriented portfolio. With a million dollars in my portfolio, I would be happy with 3-5% returns on average over the next 15 years, when I hope to retire.
    My question is - what is the best way to change your asset allocation, slowly over a period of a year or two or drastic changes over a period of a few months? I know it's not the best time to make those changes, but maybe I should wait for the market to settle down.
  • what has held up well?
    Hi Puddnhead!
    LandShark? I admire your taste in carbonated beverages :-)
    Brilliant call? Not until I decide when to re-enter the market and "there is the rub". Is this a garden variety 10% to 12% correction, an unusually steep correction (20% or so) in an ongoing secular bull market (as in April thru October 2012) or are we in the 3rd or 4th innings of a full blown bear market that will drop the S&P 500 30% to 50% from its high of 2134 on June 2015?
    All I know is what I have stated on a different thread - it was far too difficult to make too little money from June 1 to December 31st 2015 and I felt it was time to step to the sidelines for a bit. It still does not feel right.
  • Investors Snub Money Managers For Market Clones
    An argument for index funds is that active managers in part are going into cash That will be good for performance until the market turns around I don't have the data but suspect few large cap managers outperformed the S+P500 index between March 9 2009 and and may of that year..
  • Dow Set For Triple-Digit Drop As Oil Breaks Under $30
    FYI: Wall Street was setting up for a struggle on Friday, with stock futures falling sharply as China entered a bear market and oil prices traded below $30 a barrel.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dow-set-for-triple-digit-drop-as-oil-breaks-under-30-2016-01-15/print
    Currrent Futures: Ugly
    http://finviz.com/futures.ashx
  • Tactical Asset Allocation
    The concept is doomed to failure because shifting large allocations is not very practical or cheap even if you are able to time it well. Any fund with over $200-$250 million in assets is going to find it difficult to move their allocation significantly within a time frame that allows it to exploit the strategy. But that number is also the number that fund managers will tell you is about the minimum to make the fund viable for them to spend their time. Most are aiming for the fat fees of a much larger fund.
    So new funds come up, some do well, get bloated and do tactical allocation in the edges which does not even move the needle of an otherwise buy and hold fund. Some funds may get lucky being in an overweight position in a sector that shot up but they find it difficult to then take profits and be overweight somewhere else to repeat the performance.
    Individual investors or investment groups with enough time and skills are in a better position to do this than in the structure of typical mutual funds.
    At best they can position it for smaller returns in long term trend changes, but returns are much less attractive as one wrong bet can throw it off.
  • Tactical Asset Allocation
    In an ideal world investors should have their funds invested in Tactical Asset Allocation funds within their risk range. Wouldn't everyone like a fund that makes shifts between equity classes, and between equity, cash,bonds, commodities, currencies etc. and makes the right move at more than, say 65% of the time? Are there any funds out there that have a record of doing this? If there are I suspect they are few in number. I've seen David sight BBALX and others, MDLOX, and there are high hopes for the relatively recent offering from T Rowe Price. Wouldn't it be great to select say three choices and just re-balance every now and then.
    Any other candidates?