Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Here’s why advisors may urge retirees to load up on equities
    I generally agree with this article (about counting annuities as part of the "safe" portion of your portfolio allocation). It does gloss over a couple of points that merit further thought.
    One is how to reduce to present value, i.e. how does one calculate the present value of an income stream in order to know how much one has in "safe" investments? It suggests using the commercial rate for an immediate annuity today that would be comparable to one's pension (if one is lucky enough to have one).
    This approach could also be applied to an annuity that one annuitied some time in the past. One might have paid $100K for an immediate annuity in 2014, while that same annuity might cost only $70K today. In part because one has fewer years of life left, but also in part because interest rates have risen slightly. In that sense, an income stream is very much like a bond portfolio - its day to day mark to market value fluctuates.
    Notice also that the value of social security isn't discounted to present value. That's because it is inflation adjusted. The value of $20K/year in 2020 is the same as the value of $20K/year in 2030. No need to discount. In the article, it appears that the writer assumed a 22 year life expectancy; $20K x 22 years = $440K shown for Client B.
    The other point to think about is why own bonds at all, if your guaranteed income stream (pension, annuities) is large enough to cover essential expenses. The article suggests that the reason is to let people sleep at night ("risk tolerance").
    This consideration is real but emotional (since by hypothesis the risk is minimal). If people have trouble addressing this, they will also likely continue ignoring the present value of their income stream for asset allocation. Because all one sees on one's monthly brokerage statements are the assets in the portfolio.
    Of course any form of insurance (social security, pensions, annuities) has a cost (overhead). This cost can be reclaimed via the flexibility to be more aggressive with the rest of one's portfolio. Similarly, keeping a cash reserve (see thread on how much cash to keep in retirement) allows one to be more aggressive with the remaining assets.
  • ANGL Provides Best Exposure To Junk Bonds In The ETF Universe
    I use FALN, not that small at 91mm, and save a bit on fees.
  • ANGL Provides Best Exposure To Junk Bonds In The ETF Universe
    https://seekingalpha.com/article/4269847-angl-provides-best-exposure-junk-bonds-etf-universe
    ANGL Provides Best Exposure To Junk Bonds In The ETF Universe
    Jun. 12, 2019 10:01 AM ETVanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL)5 Comments3 Likes
    Summary
    ANGL invest in bonds that were investment grade when issued but no longer are based on the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Fallen Angel High Yield Index.
    There are at least four other ETFs mirroring this strategy for "fallen angel," but others are new and very small in size.
    ANGL has out performed the other major junk bond ETFs and until the past year, the top investment-grade corporate bond fund; I consider it a buy.
    Anyone has ANGL?!
  • Here’s why advisors may urge retirees to load up on equities
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/12/heres-why-advisors-may-urge-retirees-to-load-up-on-equities.html
    Here’s why advisors may urge retirees to load up on equities
    Key Points
    With guaranteed income — pension, Social Security or income annuities — your client might have enough safety to step up his stock allocation in retirement, said Michael Finke, professor of wealth management at The American College.
    Consider guaranteed income sources as being similar as bonds, Finke said. That means you can increase your stock allocation elsewhere.
  • This S&P 500 Sector Is Having Its Best Month In About 4 Years, Trouncing Tech Stocks: (XLB)
    S&P sectors....okay.
    Guess its how one identifies a sector.
    Materials sector, XLB is 14.8% YTD. XLK, IT sector is +23.8 or so, YTD.
    Tech. broad based is doing fine.
    FTEC, Fidelity Tech. is +24.2% YTD.
    Don't believe June really matters all that much, eh?; in the grand scheme.
  • Bespoke: US Dividend Yields Significantly Lower Than Rest Of World
    Not saying these are the best global dividend payers; but, it is what I own in my global equity and global hybrid sleeves found in the growth & income area of my portfolio. In my global equity sleeve I own DWGAX which has a dividend yield of 2.04%, CWGIX which has a dividend yield of 2.16%, DEQAX which has a dividend yield of 2.36% and EADIX which has a dividend yield of 3.67%. In my global hybrid sleeve I own CAIBX whcih as a dividend yield of 3.15%, TEQIX which has a dividend yield of 3.71% and TIBAX which has a dividend yield of 4.35%. All these funds pay quarterly except TEQIX which pays annually and EADIX which pays monthly.
    My three highest dividend paying funds within my portfolio are PCLAX with a dividend yield of 17.23%, PMAIX with a dividend yield of 5.77% and FKINX with a dividend yield of 5.33%. PCLAX pays quarterly while PMAIX and FKINX pays monthly.
    My portfolio contains four areas of investment which includes a cash area, an income area, a growth & income area and a growth area and overall has a dividend yield of better than 3.2%. When I include capital gain distributions it tops out at better than a 5% distribution yield. My current asset allocation is 20% cash, 40% income and 40% equity. This portfolio generates more than enough income to meet my needs plus I have some residual left over for new investment opportunities. Going forward, should I not be able to make enough interest in my cash area to offset inflation then I'll reduce cash by 5% and raise my income area by 5%.
    My investment focus since I retired five years ago has been to invest for income generation over growth of principal. However, since I retired I have also been able to grow my principal.
  • Chou Opportunity and Chou Income Funds to liquidate
    Update:
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1486174/000143510919000266/chou497.htm
    497 1 chou497.htm
    CHOU AMERICA MUTUAL FUNDS
    Supplement dated June 12, 2019 to the Prospectus dated May 1, 2019, as supplemented
    On June 5, 2019, the Board of Trustees (“Board”) of Chou America Mutual Funds (the “Trust”) approved a Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution (the “Plan”) pursuant to which the assets of the Chou Opportunity Fund and the Chou Income Fund (the “Funds”) will be liquidated and the proceeds remaining after payment of or provision for liabilities and obligations of the Funds will be distributed to shareholders.
    Each Fund will seek to complete the liquidation on or around the close of business on July 31, 2019 (the “Liquidation Date”). Shareholders will be permitted to redeem from the Funds prior to the Liquidation Date, according to the ordinary procedures for redemptions from the Funds described in this Prospectus. Francis Chou, the Portfolio Manager to the Funds and Chief Executive Officer of the Adviser, owns and controls a company that owns shares of each Fund (the “Chou Affiliated Shareholder”). Mr. Chou intends for this company to remain invested in each Fund in an amount that would enable each Fund to have sufficient cash to satisfy any redemptions by the other shareholders.
    The Adviser anticipates that there may be certain portfolio holdings that will not be sold for cash prior to the Liquidation Date, such as the 1.75 Term Lien Loans of Exco Resources, Inc. (“Exco”) owned by each of the Funds. As further background, Exco is involved in an insolvency proceeding and, those loans have been deemed to constitute illiquid investments.
    In order to mitigate concentration and liquidity risk, the Board has approved for the Chou Affiliated Shareholder to receive an in-kind distribution (i.e. redemption-in-kind) of the 1.75 Term Lien Loans of Exco in exchange for shares of the Funds owned by the Chou Affiliated Shareholder. In connection with this approval the Chou Affiliated Shareholder agreed to remain invested in each Fund in an amount that would enable each Fund to have sufficient cash to satisfy any redemptions by the other shareholders. Following receipt of the 1.75 Term Lien Loans of Exco, the Chou Affiliated Shareholder will own those investments and will accordingly have exposure to appreciation and depreciation in the value of those investments.
    * * * *
    For more information, please contact a Fund customer service representative toll free at
    (877) 682-6352.
    PLEASE RETAIN FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
  • Wasatch Global Select & Wasatch International Select Funds in registration
    I agree with @Crash; I have let Grandeur Peak go and used some of the dough in WAGOX. As it stands now, from my quick review of their international and global funds, there's only one (Emerging Markets Select) that seems to invest in anything but small and micro caps. Maybe the two new offerings will also venture into larger cap holdings. The high ERs kept me away, but my reluctance may have been penny foolish. My final sale of GP funds was GPGOX, which I bought almost at inception. As others here have pointed out, GP lost its momentum a couple of years ago. WAGOX caught GPGOX in late 2017 and hasn't looked back since.
  • This S&P 500 Sector Is Having Its Best Month In About 4 Years, Trouncing Tech Stocks: (XLB)
    FYI: Quick — what’s the best performing sector in the S&P 500 so far in June? No, it isn’t the highflying information technology sector — that’s second best.
    The materials sector is by far having the best month of any of the 11 sectors in S&P 500 groups, up 9.5% in the June to date, according to FactSet data, as of Wednesday afternoon trade (see charted attached).
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-sp-500-sector-is-having-its-best-month-in-about-4-years-trouncing-tech-stocks-2019-06-12/print
    M* Snapshot XLB:
    https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/ARCX/XLB/quote.html
  • Bespoke: US Dividend Yields Significantly Lower Than Rest Of World
    FYI: When it comes to dividends, the US may not be the best country for investors to look for a higher yield. US equities currently have a dividend yield of only 1.98%, well below the average of 3.51% for the 22 other major global economies that we track in our Global Macro Dashboard. The only country with a lower dividend yield is India with a 1.21% yield. A potential reason for this comparatively low yield in these two countries is simply higher equity prices. India runs away with the highest valuation of their equities with a P/E of 28.56; the highest among the 23 countries in our Global Macro Dashboard. The US similarly is not cheap relative to the rest of the world as it possesses the fourth highest valuation of 18.33x earnings. That compares to a world average of only 15.72.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.bespokepremium.com/interactive/posts/think-big-blog/us-dividend-yields-significantly-lower-than-rest-of-world
  • Technology Stocks Have Dominated June Rally
    Today’s technology companies, and their shares, look nothing like the speculative stocks of that bubblicious era, when tech accounted for more than 30% of the Standard & Poor’s 500 index. Today, it is only 22.5%, albeit well above weightings of about 14% for both financials and health care. Financial stocks have been among the main beneficiaries of funds flowing out of tech.
  • Hedge Fund Managers' 7 Favorite Stocks of 2019
    The technology giant’s stock AAPL, -0.17% rose 1.2% Tuesday to post a sixth straight gain. That would be the longest win streak since the six-day stretch ending April 23, which followed a nine-day win streak through April 8.
  • MFO Ratings Updated Through May 2019
    As this decade comes to a close, legendary investor Bruce Berkowitz appears to be getting things right again.
    Please see Fairholme Rebounding.
  • Volatility 101: An Introduction To Market Volatility
    FYI: Why are certain times more volatile than others?
    In the short term, volatility is driven by changes in demand, which is largely related to changes in earnings expectations. These expectations can be affected by:
    Earnings reports
    New economic data
    Company leadership changes
    New innovations
    Herd mentality
    Political changes
    Interest rate changes
    Market sentiment swings
    Other events (economic, political, etc.)
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.visualcapitalist.com/intro-market-volatility-101/
  • Technology Stocks Have Dominated June Rally

    Technology Stocks Have Dominated June Rally
    IA
    Investopedia Chart Advisor
    Tue 6/11/2019 9:38 PM
    Junk Email
    To
    Chart Advisor | Focus on the Price
    By John Jagerson, CFA, CMT
    Tuesday, June 11, 2019
    1. Tech Stocks Continue to Lead the Way Higher
    2. S&P 500 Stalls After Stellar Week
    3. UTX and RTN Crash and Burn After Acquisition Announcement
    Major Moves
    In a market that has been negatively impacted by so much geo-political uncertainty, it’s amazing just how consistent the performance of the Technology sector has been.
    There’s a strategy in investing that draws on the same principle found in Newton’s first law of motion – an object in motion tends to stay in motion and an object at rest tends to stay at rest unless acted upon by an outside force.
    This strategy is called momentum investing. In momentum investing, you look for the sectors and stocks that are doing well, and you put your money into those sectors and stocks with the anticipation that they will continue to do well in the future unless acted upon by negative news.
    One way to find which sectors and stocks are doing well is to conduct a relative-strength analysis. This is an exercise where you compare how well a sector or stock has done in the past compared to other sectors or stocks or to a broad-based index, like the S&P 500.
    You’ve seen me do this a number of times in the Chart Advisor when I show the relative performance of the S&P stock sectors.
    For example, if you look at the first sector comparison chart below, you will see that the Technology sector (lime green line) – as represented by the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) – has been the clear winner on Wall Street since the market pulled back in February 2016.
    Knowing this, it should come as no surprise that the top performing sector since the market started rebounding on June 4th has been the Technology sector. You can see this in the second sector comparison chart below where XLK (lime green line) is leading the way higher.
    Of course, the Technology sector has experienced just as much volatility as the other sectors on Wall Street as trade war rhetoric has flared up and cooled down and as threats of tariffs have materialized over night and vanished just as quickly, but the out-performance by the sector has remained consistent.
    Unless something fundamentally changes in the outlook for the U.S. economy, I wouldn’t be surprised to see this trend continue.
    Image
    Image
    S&P 500
    The S&P 500 has stalled just above the former resistance level that formed the right shoulder of the index’s head-and-shoulders bearish reversal pattern. This level is currently serving as support, but it is barely holding on.
    For two straight days, bullish traders on Wall Street have tried to push the S&P 500 higher, only to see the index fall before the closing bell.
    It appears we’re seeing another classic example of the old market adage, “Buy the rumor. Sell the news.”
    Last week, traders were buying hand over fist in anticipation that the Trump administration wouldn’t impose tariffs on Mexico and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) would start preparing to cut rates.
    Now that President Trump has decided not to impose tariffs and multiple members of the FOMC have stated they are considering rate cuts, traders are starting to take some of last week’s profits off the table.
    Advertisement
    Smart Index Fund Investors Ask Questions
    Investors have a lot of choices when picking index funds, but smart investors ask these 3 questions first.
    Learn More »
    SPONSORED BY VANGUARD
    Risk Indicators - UTX and RTN
    Mergers and acquisitions are typically a bullish sign on Wall Street. They signal that corporate management believes the economic outlook and the “synergistic benefits” of the merger or acquisition are strong enough to offset the risks that accompany the endeavor.
    Typically in an acquisition, the stock of the acquiree (the company being bought) will jump higher and the stock of the acquiror (the company doing the buying) will drop on the announcement.
    The acquiree’s stock usually jumps because the acquiror is often paying a premium for the acquire. The acquiror’s stock usually drops because traders get nervous about the additional risk – and oftentimes debt – the acquiror is taking on.
    When it comes to mergers, the performance of the related stocks depends on how the deal is structured. Often one of the companies will be viewed as getting the majority of the benefits from the transaction, and that company’s stock price will rise.
    Interestingly, in the case of the United Technologies (UTX) merger with Raytheon (RTN), both stocks are plunging.
    This tells me that traders have no confidence that the “synergies” outlined by the two management teams will materialize in a meaningful way.
    Seeing this is important not only as it relates to the future performance of these two stocks but also as it relates to investor sentiment. Traders who are confident in the future of the market love “synergies” and tend to pay a premium for them. The fact that they are not paying a premium for these “synergies” tells me we’ve got a long way to go before we solidify bullish trader sentiment on Wall Street.
    Bottom Line - Cautious Optimism
    Traders continue to practice cautious optimism as they approach the U.S. stock market. They are optimistic about the bullish impact rate cuts and a possible increase in geo-political stability could have on the markets, but they are cautiously focusing that optimism on fundamentally strong companies.
    Traders aren’t chasing long shots at the moment. They only want the sure things.
    Read more:
    Why General Motors Could Be the Robotaxi King
    Will New SEC Regulations Change Anything for Retail Investors?
    Learn the basics of investing
    How can we improve the new Chart Advisor? Tell us at [email protected]
    Enjoy the Chart Advisor? Copy and share the link below to invite friends to sign up
    ht tp://link.investopedia.com/join/53o/00-fwd-chartadvisor
  • Hedge Fund Managers' 7 Favorite Stocks of 2019
    Hedge Fund Managers' 7 Favorite Stocks of 2019
    https://money.usnews.com/investing/stock-market-news/slideshows/hedge-fund-managers-favorite-stocks
    Apple
    Microsoft
    Bac
    Wellsfargo
    Fb
    Cocacola
    Amazon
    Once every quarter, investors get a glimpse inside the minds of some of the wealthiest and most successful investors in the U.S. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requires any funds with more than $100 million in assets under management to file public quarterly updates on their stock holdings on form 13F.
    Hedge funds made some big profits in a red-hot U.S. stock market in the first quarter of 2019. Novus recently compiled the following list of the top seven largest stock investments among fundamental equity managers that filed 13F forms.
    1. Apple (ticker: AAPL). Apple is the top overall pick among hedge fund managers. After a hot start to the year, Apple shares dipped in May due to the company’s exposure to the U.S. trade war with China.
    However, the stock still shows 22% gains for the year, outpacing the 15.4% rise of the S&P 500 index. D.E. Shaw & Co. and Adage Capital Management are top investors, each owning more than $1 billion in AAPL stock. Hedge funds reported owning a total of $57.9 billion in AAPL stock at the end of the first quarter.
    2. Microsoft Corp. (MSFT). The company that overtook Apple as the most valuable public company is also the second top pick among hedge funds. Microsoft has been a market leader in 2019, gaining more than 32% year-to-date and pushing its market cap to more than $1 trillion.
    In April, Microsoft reported fiscal third-quarter revenue growth of 14%, including 41% growth in commercial cloud sales and 71% Azure revenue growth. Top Microsoft investors include TCI Fund Management ($2 billion) and Tiger Global Management ($1.5 billion). Hedge funds reported $31.6 billion in total MSFT stock holdings. – Wayne Duggan
  • Junk bonds at all time highs - S@P next?
    @Ted: I would have hoped that a former teacher would understand the difference between "duplicates" and "expands upon". Evidently not, at least in your case. We can only hope that English or grammar were not your primary teaching assignments.
    That Boeing thread has now run for over three months, with over twentyseven hundred views. Your typical quantity vs quality posts barely last one day, and are lucky to get 27 views. How would you have any idea what "the majority of MFO Members" eyes are looking at? In any case, certainly not at your links.
    By the way, I note that linter has just posted a comment in the Boeing thread which you might find of interest.
    Regards,
    OJ
  • Junk bonds at all time highs - S@P next?
    "Just because the banks are safer doesn’t necessarily mean the financial system is"
    Here's a few selected excerpts from davfor's Bloomberg link, just above. The entire article is well worth a read.
    Leveraged lending has raised eyebrows partly because of how lightly it’s regulated. Fueled in large part by demand from collateralized loan obligations that offer interest rates that approach 9% on some riskier portions of the debt, the market for leveraged loans has more than doubled since 2012.
    One of the ironies of the boom is that much of the risk-taking decried by central banks and regulators is largely of their own making.
    Years of ultra-low rates have made it easier than ever for less-creditworthy companies to borrow large sums of money, all while pushing investors toward riskier investments. At the same time, post-crisis bank regulations have fueled the rise of shadow lenders, which helped facilitate the growth of leveraged lending. Then, financial watchdogs appointed by the Trump administration started encouraging Wall Street to dial-up more risk last year by easing guidelines to limit lending to deeply indebted companies, which freed banks to compete more directly with non-bank firms to underwrite the riskiest loans.
    • “Whenever you give children toys, you know they’re going to keep playing with them until they break them,” said Phil Milburn, a fund manager at Liontrust Asset Management in Edinburgh, Scotland. “Someone has to come into the room and say put your toys down.”
    • Wells Fargo research suggests buyers of CLOs include U.S. banks, insurers and hedge funds, as well as a large number of non-U.S. financial firms.
    • Pimco, the world’s largest bond investor, said last month the credit market is “probably the riskiest ever.”
    • When the credit cycle finally does turn, UBS estimates investors in junk bonds and leveraged loans could lose almost a half-trillion dollars, more than any downturn since at least 1987.
    • Just because the banks are safer doesn’t necessarily mean the financial system is, says Karen Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics, a regulatory-analysis firm.
    Comment: Well, it certainly won't be this administration that tells anyone to put their toys down.