Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Mark,
    I don't think "MJB" has it all wrong -or- all correct. In my opinion, many people are products of their environment. If you're raised saving for retirement ( my grandmother always told us kids to save 10% ) then that saving bug becomes firmly planted. However, if you're raised thinking the lotto is a retirement plan - need i say more? This is not always the case.
    Case in point - My employer matches are 401k 100% up to 5%. Then they add another 5% of our gross income every year for profit sharing. Very good deal. You would be shocked by how many don't take advantage of this. One day this fella told me that he buys gold because he believes that 401k's will crash. Not that the mutual funds would crash - but the 401k plan. L.O.L I'll keep on saving
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Mark,
    I don't think "MJB" has it all wrong -or- all correct. In my opinion, many people are products of their environment. If you're raised saving for retirement ( my grandmother always told us kids to save 10% ) then that saving bug becomes firmly planted. However, if you're raised thinking the lotto is a retirement plan - need i say more? This is not always the case.
    Case in point - My employer matches are 401k 100% up to 5%. Then they add another 5% of our gross income every year for profit sharing. Very good deal. You would be shocked by how many don't take advantage of this. One day this fella told me that he buys gold because he believes that 401k's will crash. Not that the mutual funds would crash - but the 401k plan. L.O.L I'll keep on saving
  • Dynamic Canadian Equity Income Fund DWGIX
    At fidelity if you are doing retirement accounts the min is only $500.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    I think in this day and age you might not even be able to count on your company pension plans. Like Delphi, Delta, World Com, Enron Guberment Motors, and many others. Also good pension plans are being changed as I write, along with what pension plan raiders have also done in the past on company buy outs and mergers. Companys have always preached "all is well - dont worry be happy" we'll take care of you - when you retire. We'll promise you something in the future that way we dont have to give it to you now. Too many chislers trying get in between you and your retirement as they have done with health insurance.
    The goverment pension plan that has been set up for bankrupt corperations is a farce at best!!!
    It will behove all of us that are able to remain working as long as we can. I have always tried to save as much as I can even to the extent of teaching financial management lessons to my childrin......... (You're much younger - get a Job).
    Will turn 65 soon you should see all of the mail I get on medicaid!!!!!!!! Funny thing they all want MONEY!!!
    End of My rant!!!!!!
    Gary
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Hi Guys,
    Experience is never out of style.
    I was somewhat taken aback by the many replies that emphasized the difficulties of securing gainful employment for older workers. Note that I included the qualifier term “gainful”. I certainly concur that being a greeter at WalMart is less than a gainful and meaningful job. Of course, I recognize and respect those at the lowest end of the wealth distribution curve who must do this task for basic survival necessities.
    Life is not necessarily fair, but surely some suffer this dire predicament because of their own life’s choices.
    Catch22 opined that “ For several decades, from the very large and well paid middle class in MI; this state was far ahead of any other states for the number of registered motorcycles, boats, snowmobiles, travel trailers/campers….”. Further, he observed that “The big money was coming into these households and headed right back out the door via a payment book.”
    This is a recipe for disaster in any state, especially in my high cost state of California. But this is a financial sin of the first magnitude that is not restricted to middle aged or senior citizens. It is pervasive throughout society, in particular a defect that government promulgates and practices.
    As a little aside, this reminds me of a description of California that I received recently from an East Coast friend. On July 4th 1850 California became a state. People had no electricity; the state had no money. Almost everyone spoke Spanish. Gunfights erupted in the streets. Not much has changed in the last 161 years.
    Even in the best of times, many folks are procrastinators; others are lazy; still others just want the good times to roll. These folks will likely, unless they win the lottery gamble which they frequently play to excess, never approach the magic Number that permits a safe and worry-free retirement. They are typically debt gluttons.
    I have very little empathy for such misguided souls. Some folks make poor decisions their entire life. You and I are not responsible for these decisions. They were always free to choose. Of course, I exclude from this grouping the truly unfortunate folks who suffered tragic, personal Black Swan events none of which were their design or doing. Bad stuff happens. I have great empathy for this unlucky cohort.
    I strongly believe that experience matters a lot in the business world. Not only does experience matter for the elite worker classes (doctors, scientists, engineers), but also for the more mundane, but essential, groupings (bakers, electricians, lumberjacks, plumbers, gardeners). The list whereby experience contributes to superior performance and outcomes is endless. I’m prepared to challenge you naysayers to identify a legitimate business endeavor where experience is not crucial to success.
    Daniel Kahneman acknowledged the experience factor in his book “Thinking, Fast and Slow”. He gave numerous illustrations of how experience permits a worker to develop recognition skills and solution approaches. He used chess masters as one of his examples. In summary, he concluded that at last 10,000 hours of practical experience is needed to gain proficiency in many working assignments. Malcolm Gladwell also highlighted the 10,000 hour rule in his writings.
    Growing old is neither apocalyptic nor is it a Golden Age. Education, experience, prudent savings, and wise investing enhance the odds towards Golden and away from apocalyptic. Successful seniors adjust, adapt, and survive. Sometimes events force the retiree to reenter the employment marketplace. I agree that it is not an easy task, but it is doable and the national statistics support that assertion.
    Here is a Link to a government study that was completed in 2010:
    http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/summary_10_04/older_workers.htm
    The reference report shows employment data dating from 1948 to 2008.
    Yes, the over-55 unemployment rate has recently escalated, but it’s at a relatively low, single digit level (see figure 2). Yes, it does take an older worker a longer time to find a new position. But he does. Figure 3 demonstrates that the senior workforce participation rate has been increasing recently while the participation rate for the youngest cohort has been decreasing. Note the trendlines. I’m sure a part of that trendline is caused by poor investment decisions and a shrinking retirement nest-egg. Too bad.
    Please visit the reference and form your own interpretations of the data sets.
    There is little doubt that aging erodes most skill sets. Youngsters work faster; seniors work smarter. Youngsters work creatively; seniors work with consistency. Tradeoffs are plentiful that naturally include wage and benefits considerations. Some firms now seek senior employees. It is a shifting marketplace. When Bell telephone initially hired an operator staff it was all male. They soon learned that females were better and more reliable at that job and adapted accordingly.
    I have sympathy for those individuals who lost positions that reflected both economic realities and age discrimination. It is equally hard on the ego and hard on the pocketbook. I appreciate that it does happen. I never faced that stressful circumstance. I like to think that I avoided that forlorn scenario by planning ahead. I did work for outfits that suffered layoffs. I escaped by working harder, by working cheaper, by changing positions, by moving to other locations, and by continuing my education. I survived by being proactive, by being flexible, and, admittedly, by being a little lucky.
    Persistence can and often does win the day. There is some truth to the observation that “Those who know better don’t always do better”. Like Woody Allen remarked: “Eighty percent of success is showing up”. Just don’t abandon the hunt.
    Loads of great discussion and diverse viewpoints. I enjoyed all of them. Thank you.
    Best Wishes.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Reply to @Mark: Didn't mean to dismiss the suffering of those who got blindsided at just the wrong time - like your sister and others who bought homes in 2007. The housing wreck is having repercussions way beyond that even today. I was reacting more to the low 401k balances cited by Fidelity. As for having 100% in equities at retirement, guess that's what I meant by "not getting greedy" - way too aggressive for somebody whose left their job. And yep - do recognize that we're "preachin to the choir" here at MFO.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Option to work past 65? I'm seven years from that number, already pushed into retirement. Glad for the monthly checks, not so glad that the checks don't amount to doodly-squat. Work past 65? Hmmmmmm....... Employers are looking for a Purple Squirrel. That is to say, they want the one in a million who can be hired, sit right down, and already know which button to push. Being intelligent and capable counts for nothing anymore. Work? Laugh. With my background, I'm like a rotted onion in a watermelon patch. Is working past 65 an option? Hypothetically, yes.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Howdy Mark,
    I have read several articles during the past few years; and although I don't disagree with what MJG noted about some being able to be consultants after retirement in some areas; I am of the opinion that the vast majority of boomers without much saved in any type of account do or will find themselves between the rock and a hard place.
    When MI was in the boom days of auto production, there were many cases of both wage earners working for any of the big three and during several periods of time also working 6 or 7 days a week, or 5 days with overtime. These couples had very large combined gross and net incomes. The problem with many was that the good times were here and wouldn't disappear. We also know that the percent of folks who were good with household budgets, any understanding of investing and future planning is not a very high number. I recall two real estate folks I knew who noted on too many occassions about the high debt/equity ratio of many of the big three auto employees. When the numbers were crunched to attempt to obtain a home loan, the realtors would find a high gross income, but a poor net ration of monies available. The potential home buyers would have a stack of payment books for every type of toy and didn't always have much left for a larger mortgage payment.
    For several decades, from the very large and well paid middle class in MI; this state was far ahead of any other states for the number of registered motorcyles, boats, snowmobiles, travel trailers/campers.....etc, etc. The big money was coming into these households and headed right back out the door via a payment book.
    As to consulting after retirement, I know of a few businesses in our area who do offer this from time to time for some professional areas. The businesses find the value of the retired employee, and will ask to work periodically on a per diem basis.
    Chatting witj various folks in the area; as should be expected in many places, niether the young ones seeking employment, nor the older ones may anticipate a high wage and worse yet, no full time employment which would usually bring along a benefit package for limited healthcare and a few other goodies. One should not be surprised to find enough job listings that fall a few hours short of a full time position. Of course, this is no accident, eh?
    'Course, the recent jobs report from Friday had some jumping for joy; but there remains many uncurrents that are not favorable. Tis all well and good about new job formations; but there have also been many recent downsizings of jobs that had a much higher pay level; and so the balance of "pure body counts" is not always meaningful. A couple today who may both have full time employment at $9/hr. finds about $37k/year gross income, and of course, much less after state taxes, Medicar, SS and perhaps some Fed. taxes. As you noted.........not a lot of cash for today's needs.
    I surely wish all of this were otherwise; but it is part of what may be "normal" for many years going forward.
    The current condition of the country is part of what tempers where our houses's investment find a nest.
    Take care,
    Catch/Mark in Michigan
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Reply to @hank: and again, the big "IF" Hank. In my initial post I noted that the folks who frequent MFO and similar are at least aware and interested enough to know that they must be doing something to prepare for the days ahead. But I don't think we are over-stating the effects of the market crash & housing bust.
    There are rumors out there that those who retired in the year 2000 with a one million dollar, all equity portfolio might become the first to find out that the 4% withdrawal rate isn't going to cut it. The short version - that portfolio is only worth $418K today. The housing situation, while appearing stabilized, is still throwing out some nasty, nasty side effects. For example, my sister who bought into a townhome complex just before the big oops, has seen neighboring units selling for less than half of what she paid after going through foreclosure. I'm pretty sure that she would love a do-over on her purchase. People who may have been counting on their home equity to fund their retirement are having to severly dial back those expectations assuming there's any meaningful possibility of actually using them.
    These are just the highlights and it will be interesting to see how history unfolds. best of luck to you.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Working beyond age 65 is a realistic option if the jobs are there for people at or near retirement age. That is a BIG IF. In this past Great Recession, many, many people over 55 lost their jobs, and many of those may never find another job or one that pays anywhere near what they were making before with benefits. I was forced into early retirement at 62 when my office was closed in mid-2011. The prospect of my finding a full-time job with benefits at that age was pretty slim. But I was lucky. I qualified for small pensions from that employer and a previous one, and I and my sister inherited enough money from my father's estate shortly thereafter that my sister and I could become debt-free and have a very tidy nest egg, that (when I add social security to the pensions) I will not have to touch for the foreseeable future. Most of my time is spent in volunteer work and an occasional part-time temporary job. I will say it again--I was lucky.
  • Our Funds Boat, Week + .57% , YTD + 8.75% , ...Crop Rotation... 8-4-12
    Howdy,
    A thank you to all who post the links, start and participate in the many fine commentaries woven into the message threads.
    For those who don't know; I ramble away about this and that, at least once each week.
    NOTE: For those who visit MFO, this portfolio is designed for retirement, capital preservation and to stay ahead of inflation creep. This is not a buy and hold portfolio, and is subject to change on any given day; based upon perceptions of market directions. All assets in this portfolio are in tax-sheltered accounts; and any fund distributions are reinvested in the funds. Gains or losses are computed from actual account values.
    While looking around..... A recent post noted that while another's portfolio was tilted towards growth; our portfolio was inclined towards income. Our house views whatever investment sectors lead to growth of one's portfolio during any period, is growth; regardless of what investment vehicles drive the journey. The answer is no; our house is not invested for income; although the bond portfolio would suggest such actions. Whilst I was in 7th grade (same time the pencil was invented) my chosen science project was farm crop rotation and the resulting benefits. Five sheets of paper represented a 5 year period of crop rotation, with color schemes indicating which crop type was in which location for each year. Michigan's soils and climate allow for many of the staple grain crops to be rotated: corn, spring/winter wheat, soybeans, barley, etc. Many other crops are also planted, and within the staple group there are still more varieties. Aside from these crops are the numerous speciality crops of vegetables, fruit crops and sugar beets. The crop combinations reminds me of one's choices today for investment vehicles. A recent answer from a friend indicated he was invested in several bond and equity index funds via his adviser. I asked, "What type/style are these index funds?" He didn't know the answer, but thought it was a good question to ask, with an explanation. We related the question with a similar answer of; one owns a car or a truck. But, what type of car or truck? Is your car a Camaro ZL-1 or a Fiat 500? Not unlike a crop farmer, we investment farmers seek one thing, too; and that is growth from whatever style of investment suits our tolerance for risk vs the reward. Crop farmers and we face similar uncertainties. Farmers dealing with unknown forward weather conditions, and we deal with unknown forward monetary situations. We do have one large advantage over crop farmers. They are placed into the buy (plant) and hold (hopefully harvest a growth) of the crop; while we may plant our monies when and where we choose; as well as harvest a profit as dictated. So, the next time someone thinks you are an income investor based upon your holdings, you may note to them that you are indeed a growth investor; regardless of the investment crop types you have planted. We're all really growth investors, eh? Always attempt to be prepared to rotate those crops for your risk/reward farm!
    The data/numbers below have been updated.
    As to sector rotations below (Fidelity funds); for the past week: (Note: any given fund in any of these sectors will have varing degrees of performance based upon where the manager(s) choose to be invested and will not directly reflect upon your particular fund holdings from other vendors.)
    --- U.S. equity - 2.3% through + .9%, avg. = - .02% YTD = +10.5%
    --- Int'l equity - .9% through + 2%, avg. = + .96% YTD = +7.3%
    --- U.S. eq. sectors - .1% through + 2.3%, avg. = - .04% YTD = +9.7%
    --- U.S./Int'l bonds - .9% through + .4%, avg. = +.08% YTD = + 3.2%
    --- HY bonds + .2% through + 1.5%, avg. = + .73% YTD = + 8.7%
    An Overview, M* 1 Week through 5 Year, Multiple Indexes
    I have added a few blips related to our portfolio and market observations at the below SELLs/BUYs and Portfolio Thoughts.
    SELLs/BUYs THIS PAST WEEK:
    NONE
    Portfolio Thoughts:
    Our holdings had a + .57 % move this past week. Sidenote: The average return of 200 combined Fidelity retail funds across all sectors (week avg = + .26%, YTD + 8.48%). The equity markets still appear a bit on edge; so our portfolio will stay in place for now. NOT SURE why the European markets popped so much on Friday. Perhaps there is some good inside private info finding its home. Our portfolio obtained much of its return this week, from the high yield and emerging markets bond areas. There were a number of large swing days for pricing in some bond sectors; further indicating the head scratching between the equity and bond kids. Two year Spanish bond yields moved down quite a bit, which indicates to this house that the "powers" may be attempting to stabilize this short term borrowing area and hope things settle down enough to buy time for the 10 year Spanish bond which keeps bumping around 7%. A country today can not afford to operate with a 7% yield on a 10 year bond. I will retain the below write from previous weeks; as what we are watching still applies.
    --- commodity pricing, especially the energy and base materials areas; copper and related.
    --- the $US broad basket value, and in particular against the Euro and Aussie dollar (EU zone and China/Asia uncertainties).
    --- price directions of U.S. treasury's, German bunds, U.K. gilts, Japanese bonds; and continued monitoring of Spanish/Italian bond pricing/yield.
    --- what we are watching to help understand the money flows: SHY, IEF, TLT, TIP, STPZ, LTPZ, LQD, EMB, HYG, IWM, IYT & VWO; all of which offer insights reflected from the big traders as to the quality/risk, or lack of quality/risk; in various bond sectors.
    I have retained the following links for those who may choose to do their own holdings comparison against the fund types noted.
    The first two links to Bloomberg are for their list of balanced/flexible funds; although I don't always agree with the placement of fund styles in their categories.
    Bloomberg Balanced
    Bloomberg Flexible
    These next two links are for conservative and moderate fund leaders YTD, per MSN.
    Conservative Allocation
    Moderate Allocation
    A reflection upon the links above; we attempt to establish a "benchmark" for our portfolio to help us "see" how our funds are performing. Aside from viewing many funds within the balanced/flexible funds rankings (the above links), a quick and dirty group of 5 funds (below) we watch for psuedo benchmarking are the following:
    ***Note: these week/YTD's per M*
    VWINX .... + .33% week, YTD = + 7.89%
    PRPFX .... + .02% week, YTD = + 2.71%
    SIRRX ..... + .17 % week, YTD = + 4.67%
    TRRFX .... + .42% week, YTD = + 7.16%
    VTENX ... + .29% week, YTD = + 6.64%

    Such are the numerous battles with investments attempting to capture a decent return and minimize the risk.
    We live and invest in interesting times, eh? Hey, I probably forgot something; and hopefully the words make some sense. Comments and questions always welcomed.
    Good fortune to you, yours and the investments.
    Take care,
    Catch
    ---Below is what M* x-ray has attempted to sort for our portfolio, as of June 1, 2012---
    From what I find, M* has a difficult time sorting out the holdings with bond funds.
    U.S./Foreign Stocks 1.9%
    Bonds 93.9% ***
    Other 4.2%
    Not Classified 0.00%
    Avg yield = 3.72%
    Avg expense = .55%
    ***about 16% of the bond total are high yield category (equity related cousins)

    ---This % listing is kinda generic, by fund "name"; which doesn't always imply the holdings, eh?
    -Investment grade bond funds 28.2%
    -Diversified bond funds 22.4%
    -HY/HI bond funds 14.5%
    -Total bond funds 32.4%
    -Foreign EM/debt bond funds .6%
    -U.S./Int'l equity/speciality funds 1.9%
    This is our current list: (NOTE: I have added a speciality grouping below for a few of fund types)
    ---High Yield/High Income Bond funds
    FAGIX Fid Capital & Income
    SPHIX Fid High Income
    FHIIX.LW Fed High Income
    DIHYX TransAmerica HY
    ---Total Bond funds
    FTBFX Fid Total
    PTTRX Pimco Total
    ---Investment Grade Bonds
    ACITX Amer. Cent. TIPS Bond
    DGCIX Delaware Corp. Bd
    FBNDX Fid Invest Grade
    FINPX Fidelity TIPS Bond
    OPBYX Oppenheimer Core Bond
    ---Global/Diversified Bonds
    FSICX Fid Strategic Income
    FNMIX Fid New Markets
    DPFFX Delaware Diversified
    LSBDX Loomis Sayles
    PONDX Pimco Income fund (steroid version)
    PLDDX Pimco Low Duration (domestic/foreign)
    ---Speciality Funds (sectors or mixed allocation)
    FRIFX Fidelity Real Estate Income (bond/equity mix)
    ---Equity-Domestic/Foreign
    NONE outright, with the exception of equities held inside of some of the above funds.
  • Is Working Past Age 65 a Realistic Option?
    Hi Mark,
    Yes, working beyond age 65 is indeed a realistic option. Unfortunately, for some reluctant non-savers and some reckless spendthrifts, it is mandatory. The other side of that coin is that they can work and recover. As our life expectancy has increased, so has our potential for workplace longevity.
    Technology and the Information miracle offer positions that are less demanding manually, but more demanding mentally. Age need not be a handicap while experience becomes more highly rewarded. Education and continued learning is a paramount and sometimes decisive factor.
    Chasing the Holy Grail, the magic Number (net total wealth that permits a reasonable likelihood that your resources will survive you) can be illusive, given the housing meltdown, a nervous investment marketplace, an uncertain economic environment, and high unemployment levels. These are challenging times, especially when preparing to make a retirement decision.
    For many folks, their 401(k) contributions have been reduced to a 201(k) plan, and their home values have been substantially slashed. But alterative options exist. Especially if we subscribe to what Greek philosophers advised: Know Thyself. Identify and capitalize on what you do best while acknowledging and honoring your shortcomings.
    The Number is an ever-changing target. If much of that Number is dominated with investment portfolio holdings, diversification is a prerequisite for ultimate success. Conscientious savings, both in good times and bad times, must be considered a compulsory task. To accomplish this, the pre-retiree needs to be flexible in his spending habits. If already in retirement, the retiree needs to adjust downward his planned withdrawal rate when anticipated returns are not realized.
    I have completed a mountain of Monte Carlo simulations that demonstrate the survival robustness of a portfolio when minor drawdown adjustments (like don’t cover inflation rate increases) are exercised during spotty investment periods. In the final analysis, it returns to the Know Thyself axiom. Patience and persistence are also useful attributes that permit the making of lemonade from bitter lemons. The conventional wisdom of the baseline 4 % annual drawdown rule requires constant monitoring and some fine-tuning that is situational and event dominated. By adroitly adjusting to a poor period, that withdrawal rate could be stretched by an additional 1 %.
    The major mutual fund houses have invested a fortune to develop programs and tools that will help plan and achieve a comfortable retirement. Of course they aim to profit from client accumulation and fees. It can be a win-win game for everyone.
    To illustrate, Fidelity saw the future, and developed an organization and a definitive set of private investor-friendly tools in 2002. Today, its 401(k) division is huge and services millions of customers, both individual and institutional.
    On an anecdotal level, I retired before this impressive array of financial planning tools became commonly available. Hence, I did much of the heavy lifting myself. I remember arguing with a financial planner with respect to the merits of Monte Carlo simulations before they were popularly recognized. I was a believer, he was not. About a year later he called and apologized for his shortsightedness. I never did do business with him.
    For those still struggling with the retirement decision, I would encourage you to stay the course. Keep learning and keep the information exchange network active.
    Age alone does not demand any specific retirement date. Again, on an anecdotal basis, incremental retirement is an attractive option, especially if you enjoy work interactions. For the first five years of my retirement, I worked as a paid aerospace consultant. Since that time, I still consult; however, now I do the consulting on a volunteer freebie basis.
    The outfits that still seek my service offer to pay for that service, but I reject the monies. I am financially secure and want to give-back to the industry and, yes, even to the Country. I enjoy teaching the younger engineers who benefit from my experience. I feel good about being a “lamp of history” that lights the way and mostly avoids costly pitfalls.
    As I age, I do not wish to be judged by how much I made, but more importantly, how much of a difference I made. Everyone sets his own measures of performance. Don’t be shocked that they change over time.
    This topic has endless avenues to explore that demand an eternity of time. But for now, enough from this quarter.
    Best Wishes.
  • PIMCO's Gross prophesies death of equities in August outlook
    Dessauer investment outlook...
    http://www.johndessauerinvestments.com/uploads/August_2012.pdf
    personally I think if you are near retirement or have < 5 yrs to go, maybe best to have 70% bonds/30% stocks portfolio to be more safe than sorry...
  • Yield Hungry Funds Lend $2 Billion to Ukraine
    Reply to @hank: Yep. And I think the thing becomes that this period of "quest for yield" could go on longer than anyone could imagine, making the end result even worse.
    I think it's really tough, especially for those in retirement age. I kind of agree with what Mark Cuban wrote - "3. I always laugh at all the pundits /analysts who try to tell you what any non-dividend paying stock is worth. Its a function of supply and demand. Its never fundamentals. Read what I wrote a long time ago about the stock market. In the case of facebook they put an ENORMOUS number of shares into the market. Too much supply. Valuation has no relevance what so ever. Conventional wisdom says the buyers of stocks will try to determine the value of a stock before they buy or sell and make the appropriate rational decision. Not even in a Richie Rich cartoon does that happen." (http://blogmaverick.com/)
    I think yield is really important, but it's difficult to find real *value + yield* when everyone and their cousin is desperate for any sort of yield whatsoever.
  • Yield Hungry Funds Lend $2 Billion to Ukraine
    Reply to @scott:
    It looks like we have an answer:
    http://www.mauldineconomics.com/landing/yield-shark-4/MEC005ES0712A
    "Time for action: Our three-pronged strategy to investment income can help you dramatically ratchet up your returns – and help you ADD THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OF INCOME to your bottom line, month in and month out."
    John Mauldin, Chairman, Mauldin Economics
    Washington is trampling all over
    your investment income and
    retirement prospects.
    Here's how to get out from under it and add
    thousands of dollars of investment income
    to your bottom line, month in and month out.
  • Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Income Fund (NYSE: INF)
    Dan, I own BIP in my retirement account, and according to my research, in such accounts, the K-1 amount is treated like any other money earned and taxable only when you start withdrawals.
    Kevin
  • Any insights on Thomas White International (TWWDX)?
    My favorite in this space continues to be SGOVX which is available NL/NTF at Schwab for minimums of $2500 and $1000 in retirement and taxable accounts, respectively.
    Kevin
  • EM Allocations.How much??
    Yes, I'm not adding to my EM bonds or equity funds for the time being. As always, the EM piece is already too big a piece of my pie. I'm letting divs and cap gains ride and grow. I'm semi-retired, which means I'm unemployed, having taken retirement early. But I ENJOY money coming to me for doing....ummmm... NOTHING! Yes!!!