It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I would venture a guess that life expectancy of 83 year old women who are wealthy enough to seek out the services of a financial planners is higher than 50%.If life expectancy is currently at 83 for women, that means 50% will live beyond age 83, and a good portion of those will live way beyond 83. As we tell folks all the time, "Tell me when you are going to die, and we will tell you exactly the path to take."


@Crash: Well, historically you can make a very good case for religion(s) promoting what we would generally call ethical behavior in the general population, at least. I could even be persuaded that without the overall influence of religion, civilization would be in a lot worse shape than it is now, although that may hardly seem possible. But I still submit that religion is about some people attempting to control the beliefs and/or conduct of other people, by whatever means is expedient. That, of course, may not necessarily always be a bad thing.
Mixing religion and politics, or religion and financial affairs, is fraught with danger to all parties concerned. Gilead Eventide is an abomination, to keep this train on the correct track.
There are two aspects missing - 1. will there be jobs for under 75 y/o and 2. if there is a job will an employer higher them? I don't think there will be, especially when you take into account automation, artificial intelligence and outsourcing of jobs. I'm sure there are many 63 y/o today who would like a job but can't get one.If today's college graduates live to age 105 or 110, I don't see working to age 75 as a bad thing, assuming health continues to improve as it has over the last 50 years. There have always been a percentage of people who must work past what they would like to be their retirement age because of financial issues. That is not going to change.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla