Apparently the narrow answer is "Invidia" and the broad answer is "tech." The Subversive Whale funds track the publicly disclosed stock trades of Republican and Democratic members of Congress. As we've noted before, the managers are seeking to highlight insider trading; they are not actually arguing that investing in their ETFs makes good financial sense.
Morningstar just published an analysis of the Republican and Democratic funds and their differences. Takeaways might be that everybody loves them their tech, and that the Republicans are otherwise more enamored of Old Economy sectors than an Dems.
For what interest it holds, David

Above-the-fold article on this morning's WSJ website. Also mentioned are concerns over new fees nickle-and-diming customers and how growth of AUM not leading to customer service/interface improvements.
(gift link)
https://www.wsj.com/personal-finance/vanguards-die-hard-customers-have-a-message-for-new-ceo-the-service-is-abysmal-c2da0491?st=79tslq2qz4mj6bi&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
Vanguard ranked last out of eight major brokerages for customer satisfaction with website performance and mobile apps in a recent survey of 2,700 investors conducted by Investor’s Business Daily, which is published by The Wall Street Journal’s parent company, Dow Jones. The asset manager has acknowledged the problems, which some analysts chalk up to an underinvestment in technology.
Former CEO Tim Buckley, who announced his retirement in February, said in 2019 that the firm would spend $1 billion a year to improve its technology. Vanguard rolled out a modernized app in 2021, but customers weren’t impressed and complained of bugs and dumbed-down functionality.
“The complaints go back years and years,” said Daniel Sotiroff, a research analyst who covers Vanguard at Morningstar. “Part of the issue is their size and how fast they’ve grown. It’s hard to turn the Titanic.”
< - >
For investors having web or tech issues, the lack of night or weekend service is a particular point of frustration. Vanguard’s customer-service line is open Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern time. Rivals Fidelity and Charles Schwab both offer 24/7 customer service by phone.
“They’ve always tried to keep costs low and service has suffered as a result,” said Jeff DeMaso, editor of the Independent Vanguard Adviser, a newsletter. “Long wait times are an issue.”
< - >
There’s a theory, and I’m not the only one to come up with it, that they’d rather move people onto the personal advisory service where they make more money or they’re just as happy if they go to another brokerage,” said Allan Roth, founder of Wealth Logic, a financial-planning firm.

OP, as of this writing, gold comprises 5.8% of my financial assets. Most of that is bullion in the form of 1oz Maple Leafs which I self-custody. A lesser portion is in the bullion ETF SGOL, in my IRA. Most of the bullion was acquired in 2000-2003. My investment framework does not consider gold to be an investment, but rather portfolio insurance. We insure our home, our car, our health, and our life. Seems like a no-brainer to insure the portfolio which makes these other assets possible. Unlike those other insurances -- where your premium is paid to an insurance company, gold is still your asset.
Have to laugh at the silly objections I sometimes read from the gold-haters.
Go to portfoliovizualizer.com. Run a asset comparison from 2000-current. Gold has actually outperformed the S&P. Its true if you stretch back the time to include the 80s-90's Superbull, the S&P outperforms. But keep in mind, the 'setup' for that 20 year period of outperformance was very cheap equities. We have no such setup for equities here. So the likelihood of a massive outperformance by equities vs gold strikes me as unlikely.
Some argue 'if you are a good stock trader, why buy gold'. Well, some people seem to inhabit Lake Woebegone, where everyone is 'above average'. I don't live there.Moreover, think back to the great traders of the 1990s. Where are they now? Consider, a lot of people who manage money professionally, are highly overrated, IMO. Consider Bruce Berkowitz (Fairholme). Or more recently, Kathy Woods Retail investors have increasingly moved to indexing because 'trading' is less of an investment strategy, and more of a hobby/recreational activity. Most professionals do not beat their best-fit index over time. Buy an index. And buy some gold.
I know, I know, Warren Buffet hates gold. You know who likes gold? The Federal Reserve, the BOJ, the ECB, the BOE, the Bank of China, and every other CB. Maybe they are just too dumb to understand that gold is a worthless 'barbarous relic'? More likely, they have an institutional understanding of long-term cycles of what we call 'money', and that gold is, ultimately, the "base money" on which every monetary system is based. Many Asian cultures prominently use gold as a way to store their household wealth. They do this because they know their govts end up ruining their fiat and banking systems. Gold is UNDER-owned bigly in the West, because no living person has experienced what it is like to have a major monetary reset. Maybe we won't experience it -- but taking out some insurance seems prudent to me.
Bringing it back to a more 'personal' perspective, the bullion which I self-custody is 'private money'. No custodian is telling the govt you have it. No future ex-spouse, can demand a chunk of the asset which she doesn't know about. No future creditor can lay claim to it, unless you volunteer the info.
My post is long in the tooth. It's late. I'm tired. So I will stop here.

Um, you missed my point. But worse, you seem to have twisted what I said.
"6% in six months would, in any other year, be considered an excellent performance. It is only in comparison to NVDA or QQQ that OAKMX looks bad."
I DID NOT compare value stocks to NVDA. I noted what I trust many posters here are NOT aware of in relation to some LCV funds this year. That is, chances are, the LCV OEFs that are significantly outperforming their peers YTD are slanted towards Growth and/or have names like NVDA in the fold.
Truth be told, OAKMX's 6% YTD performance thru 06/30/24 is far from "excellent" for this fund. It's 5-yr average annual TR is 16.5%, so it is trailing that on a 6-month basis. Its 10-yr average is 11.5%, so on par with that on a 6-month basis, or effectively an average TR for 6 months over the past 10 years.
But you REALLY lost me with this zinger:
"Almost nothing other than the Mag 7 has been up more than 5 to 10% this year."
Here are the 226/500, or 45+% of the S&P stocks that are UP over 6% YTD.
https://www.slickcharts.com/sp500/performance
Excerpt:
S&P 500 Component Year to Date Returns
# Company Symbol YTD Return
1 SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC SMCI 194.51%
2 NVIDIA CORP NVDA 147.72%
3 VISTRA CORP VST 127.67%
4 CONSTELLATION ENERGY CEG 76.36%
5 ELI LILLY + CO LLY 55.55%
6 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC MU 55.37%
7 ARISTA NETWORKS INC ANET 51.59%
8 CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A CRWD 50.81%
9 TARGA RESOURCES CORP TRGP 50.80%
10 NRG ENERGY INC NRG 50.66%
11 WESTERN DIGITAL CORP WDC 49.04%
12 APPLIED MATERIALS INC AMAT 48.61%
13 BROADCOM INC AVGO 48.49%
14 NETAPP INC NTAP 47.32%
15 KLA CORP KLAC 44.35%
16 HOWMET AEROSPACE INC HWM 44.25%
17 META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A META 43.94%
18 DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP DECK 40.72%
19 NETFLIX INC NFLX 39.58%
20 QUALCOMM INC QCOM 38.39%
21 TERADYNE INC TER 37.85%
22 LAM RESEARCH CORP LRCX 36.97%
23 AMPHENOL CORP CL A APH 36.29%
24 ORACLE CORP ORCL 35.90%
25 LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC LDOS 34.76%
26 GODADDY INC CLASS A GDDY 34.65%
27 ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD ACGL 34.64%
28 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC CMG 34.24%
29 TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC TT 33.18%
30 ALPHABET INC CL A GOOGL 32.61%
31 PROGRESSIVE CORP PGR 32.55%
32 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP BSX 32.42%
33 ALPHABET INC CL C GOOG 32.41%
34 DAVITA INC DVA 32.16%
35 DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC FANG 32.13%
36 AMAZON.COM INC AMZN 31.63%
37 FAIR ISAAC CORP FICO 31.39%
38 MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC MPWR 31.38%
39 GENERAL MOTORS CO GM 30.71%
40 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP COST 30.19%
41 EATON CORP PLC ETN 30.09%
42 INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC ISRG 30.07%
43 IRON MOUNTAIN INC IRM 29.82%
44 WALMART INC WMT 29.53%
45 KKR + CO INC KKR 27.86%
46 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO GE 26.50%
47 TRANSDIGM GROUP INC TDG 26.34%
48 MCKESSON CORP MCK 26.32%
49 CORNING INC GLW 26.08%
50 BROWN + BROWN INC BRO 26.07%
51 AMERICAN EXPRESS CO AXP 25.96%
52 FIRST SOLAR INC FSLR 25.80%
53 SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL SYF 25.77%
54 CITIGROUP INC C 25.74%
55 GARMIN LTD GRMN 25.63%
56 FIDELITY NATIONAL INFO SERV FIS 25.24%
57 CATALENT INC CTLT 25.08%
58 HARTFORD FINANCIAL SVCS GRP HIG 24.45%
59 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE HPE 24.38%
60 JUNIPER NETWORKS INC JNPR 24.05%
61 WELLS FARGO + CO WFC 23.87%
62 TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY TSCO 23.72%
63 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC MSI 23.53%
64 JPMORGAN CHASE + CO JPM 22.77%
65 WABTEC CORP WAB 22.52%
66 MICROSOFT CORP MSFT 22.14%
67 EBAY INC EBAY 22.08%
68 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC TYL 21.74%
69 BANK OF AMERICA CORP BAC 21.56%
70 VALERO ENERGY CORP VLO 21.51%
71 WILLIAMS COS INC WMB 21.45%
72 GE VERNOVA INC GEV 21.29%
73 UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES B UHS 21.18%
74 ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD RCL 20.94%
75 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS STX 20.80%
76 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC GS 20.70%
77 COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO CL 20.59%
78 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO IP 20.33%
79 PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GP PEG 20.33%
80 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORP EW 19.65%
81 DOMINO S PIZZA INC DPZ 19.50%
82 RTX CORP RTX 19.34%
83 REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS REGN 18.94%
84 DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES DFS 18.81%
85 ECOLAB INC ECL 18.81%
86 NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV NXPI 18.44%
87 HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS IN HLT 18.40%
88 SYNOPSYS INC SNPS 18.40%
89 MARATHON OIL CORP MRO 18.29%
90 HCA HEALTHCARE INC HCA 18.11%
91 FEDEX CORP FDX 17.89%
92 MODERNA INC MRNA 17.72%
93 WELLTOWER INC WELL 17.52%
94 WESTROCK CO WRK 17.51%
95 TJX COMPANIES INC TJX 17.47%
96 MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP MPC 17.38%
97 ONEOK INC OKE 17.25%
98 INGERSOLL RAND INC IR 17.22%
99 MERCK + CO. INC. MRK 17.15%
100 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC RSG 17.13%
101 RALPH LAUREN CORP RL 17.02%
102 INTL FLAVORS + FRAGRANCES IFF 17.01%
103 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC WM 16.96%
104 CINTAS CORP CTAS 16.87%
105 UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS INC UAL 16.82%
106 FOX CORP CLASS B FOX 16.82%
107 ARTHUR J GALLAGHER + CO AJG 16.51%
108 VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC VRTX 16.44%
109 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC TXN 16.40%
110 CADENCE DESIGN SYS INC CDNS 16.31%
111 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP BK 16.23%
112 FOX CORP CLASS A FOXA 16.21%
113 DELTA AIR LINES INC DAL 16.11%
114 NEXTERA ENERGY INC NEE 16.02%
115 XYLEM INC XYL 15.66%
116 HP INC HPQ 15.65%
117 PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC PANW 15.45%
118 JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATION JCI 15.06%
119 DOVER CORP DOV 15.05%
120 ANALOG DEVICES INC ADI 14.95%
121 CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP CINF 14.88%
122 QUANTA SERVICES INC PWR 14.82%
123 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC UBER 14.78%
124 VERALTO CORP VLTO 14.70%
125 ALLSTATE CORP ALL 14.43%
126 FREEPORT MCMORAN INC FCX 14.42%
127 APPLE INC AAPL 14.41%
128 PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC PRU 14.31%
129 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC AMP 14.23%
130 EXXON MOBIL CORP XOM 14.20%
131 ALTRIA GROUP INC MO 14.15%
132 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B BRK.B 14.14%
133 VERISK ANALYTICS INC VRSK 14.02%
134 ELEVANCE HEALTH INC ELV 13.65%
135 DIGITAL REALTY TRUST INC DLR 13.62%
136 KIMBERLY CLARK CORP KMB 13.56%
137 AXON ENTERPRISE INC AXON 13.49%
138 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP CL A ZBRA 13.43%
139 AIRBNB INC CLASS A ABNB 13.37%
140 CHUBB LTD CB 13.08%
141 UNITED RENTALS INC URI 12.64%
142 ROLLINS INC ROL 12.55%
143 NEWS CORP CLASS A NWSA 12.55%
144 FISERV INC FI 12.46%
145 SERVICENOW INC NOW 12.40%
146 EMERSON ELECTRIC CO EMR 12.27%
147 T MOBILE US INC TMUS 12.26%
148 AT+T INC T 12.16%
149 WR BERKLEY CORP WRB 12.01%
150 MARSH + MCLENNAN COS MMC 11.89%
151 METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL MTD 11.88%
152 PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE PG 11.85%
153 KINDER MORGAN INC KMI 11.79%
154 HASBRO INC HAS 11.75%
155 CUMMINS INC CMI 11.68%
156 STRYKER CORP SYK 11.63%
157 COPART INC CPRT 11.61%
158 EQUITY RESIDENTIAL EQR 11.51%
159 CHURCH + DWIGHT CO INC CHD 11.51%
160 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES AMD 11.46%
161 HUBBELL INC HUBB 11.21%
162 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP AIG 11.19%
163 AUTOZONE INC AZO 11.00%
164 CATERPILLAR INC CAT 10.85%
165 WW GRAINGER INC GWW 10.77%
166 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP PH 10.71%
167 M + T BANK CORP MTB 10.69%
168 SOUTHERN CO/THE SO 10.60%
169 NEWS CORP CLASS B NWS 10.50%
170 BOOKING HOLDINGS INC BKNG 10.40%
171 KROGER CO KR 10.33%
172 TAPESTRY INC TPR 10.13%
173 CORTEVA INC CTVA 10.12%
174 ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST INC ESS 10.10%
175 RESMED INC RMD 10.07%
176 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP GD 10.07%
177 CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP CFG 9.78%
178 CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST CPT 9.71%
179 INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE IN ICE 9.65%
180 RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC RJF 9.49%
181 GEN DIGITAL INC GEN 9.38%
182 CARRIER GLOBAL CORP CARR 9.36%
183 BUNGE GLOBAL SA BG 9.34%
184 O REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC ORLY 9.16%
185 MOODY S CORP MCO 9.08%
186 AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC AVB 9.07%
187 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC VZ 9.02%
188 PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA PKG 8.96%
189 THE CIGNA GROUP CI 8.84%
190 WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC WTW 8.67%
191 STEEL DYNAMICS INC STLD 8.64%
192 WALT DISNEY CO/THE DIS 8.53%
193 INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP IBM 8.41%
194 AFLAC INC AFL 8.40%
195 CENCORA INC COR 8.34%
196 PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL PM 8.04%
197 VULCAN MATERIALS CO VMC 7.96%
198 AMGEN INC AMGN 7.90%
199 AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER AEP 7.88%
200 SCHWAB (CHARLES) CORP SCHW 7.78%
201 LOEWS CORP L 7.69%
202 NISOURCE INC NI 7.61%
203 OTIS WORLDWIDE CORP OTIS 7.24%
204 FIFTH THIRD BANCORP FITB 7.22%
205 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS MLM 7.20%
206 COCA COLA CO/THE KO 7.16%
207 TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP TFC 7.15%
208 CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP COF 7.14%
209 CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC A STZ 7.11%
210 ABBVIE INC ABBV 7.09%
211 UDR INC UDR 7.05%
212 TRAVELERS COS INC/THE TRV 6.91%
213 MORGAN STANLEY MS 6.86%
214 TE CONNECTIVITY LTD TEL 6.72%
215 TEXTRON INC TXT 6.67%
216 CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC CNP 6.62%
217 MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC MHK 6.60%
218 NVR INC NVR 6.57%
219 TYSON FOODS INC CL A TSN 6.46%
220 MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL CL A MAR 6.42%
221 T ROWE PRICE GROUP INC TROW 6.42%
222 AVERY DENNISON CORP AVY 6.41%
223 GENERAC HOLDINGS INC GNRC 6.24%
224 L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC LHX 6.16%
225 EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO EMN 6.16%
226 JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC J 6.14%

To those who would rather not discuss politics in this forum I understand. The discussion can and will likely mirror our national discourse or lack there of. And while politics might not impact our collective portfolios in the next quarter,,,, the possible collapse of our democracy will impact all aspects of our lives,,,, our portfolios includes. So we can bury our heads in the sand or try to understand what is happening and how it will inevitably impact our financial future. Just my opinion.

Edit: I read links in @msf post. I decided to pay off the CC. Please do not assume your situation will be similar to mine. Please do your DD. I do not want my posts resulting in financial draw backs (incl opportunity costs) for others. I am inclined to suggest you take advantage of opportunities but monitor (unlike me) and adjust as necessary after that.
Well said. No argument. Everybody’s situation is different. Thanks for sharing.

Well, this thread has legs. So many different facets of financial planning to ponder….

Yes, that kind of steep insurance increase is an eye-grabber. Let us know if you are able to confirm a link between the insurance increase and credit. I’m thinking probably not.( But I specialize in denial).
Thanks for sharing @BaluBalu.

There is no way for me to confirm causation of insurance increases to credit score, other than to make conclusions from reading whatever links you guys post. When I shopped for a new home insurance, I was required to give my DOB. I asked the agent why he needs my DOB when I am making a single upfront payment and he said his system will not allow him to quote without the DOB. I did not know what correlation there is between age and home insurance. (My presumption is that they need to check credit history if you are paying premiums in installments.)
I already confirmed that my credit score dropped ~ 7% (the only change in my life is carrying balances on that one credit card). That is a good enough motivation for me to pay off. I want to keep a high credit score so I can use it, if I need to, for something meaningful and not for deferring credit card payments for 18 months.
I Just looked into the alerts in my Experian account and see that after the second statement period close date for that CC, the credit rating dropped from Exceptional to Very Good. In many months, after I started that credit card account, the FICO score has been dropping about 10 points per month. June change is not posted yet. At this rate, by Fall, the rating can go to Good (<740) from Very Good.
Starting last month, Experian has been alerting an increase in balance in that credit card as soon as the CC statement period closed, which tells me Experian thinks it is a concern for them (Your BANK OF AMERICA account balance increased to $XX,XXX.00). Whether that is a correct assessment by the credit system or not, I am not one to quarrel with the weather. "Law or Not" is the operative phrase here for me.
For me to pay off seems to be a good answer. I can increase the credit score back and shop for home insurance again.
Edit: I read links in @msf post. I decided to pay off the CC. Please do not assume your situation will be similar to mine. Please do your DD. I do not want my posts resulting in financial draw backs (incl opportunity costs) for others. I am inclined to suggest you take advantage of opportunities but monitor (unlike me) and adjust as necessary after that.

The conference felt very odd to me. The impression that I'd share here, but not in the July issue, is of a dowager ... the woman of a certain age who's decided to show them all that the old girl still has it, so she buys a party dress, gets a new 'do, practices her Gen Z ("I've got the tea on that boujee NPC!") and heads out ... to cut a rug.
The keystone address was cued up with pounding music and a disembodied voice urging up to put our hands together for Ivanna Hampton, a Morningstar podcaster and senior multimedia editor, who was wearing a bright yellow suit and brought the energy and affect of a Ted talk to a room full of folks who look ... well, pretty much the way you'd think of roomful of financial planners would look. She promised to help us "soothe your clients" if we'd just "Evolve Ahead Together" which would happen if we "were all ready to hear Savita's bullish outlook on the markets!!"
The keynote speaker was a senior person at BoA/Merrill who ran through her slide deck (with four - six graphs per slide), didn't leave time for questions and left the conference despite the published plan to have her meet the media afterwards (which might speak to the importance of the conference to her schedule). The room was (mostly) full at least in part because Morningstar waived the registration fee for financial planners who agreed to sit through at least three sponsored meetings (which were definitely not sales pitches).
Most of the events other than the keynotes took place in a single, echo-y room the same of an airplane hanger. The Morningstar sales and service people occupied the center of the floor, with other exhibitors on three sides of them. (Fidelity reserved one five-foot folding table which was unstaffed most of the time, several others likewise with stalwarts like Ariel absent). Breakout sessions took place along one wall in a series of little corrals where the amplified speakers' voices rang out across the whole space. The sessions tended to earn CE credits and the ones I lingered near had a distinct podcast feel. Little data, lots of affirmation.
Pretty noticeably absent were, you know, portfolio managers. Messrs. Herro and Jain, in the conference's last time slot, were among the few distinguished exceptions.
I chatted with some of the Morningstar analysts, who allowed that conference attendance (and, presumably, sponsorship) had taken a hit since Covid and they were scrambling to find ways to rebuild its relevance. I like the Morningstar folks and respect their efforts to revitalize. I hope they succeed. I'd be curious to know, though, why they even bother with the conference? That is, is it primarily a way to market Morningstar's myriad services (one adviser reported being blindsided by a $13,000 price increase for exceeding the limits of his Morningstar Direct subscription) and connect with current and potential subscribers? If so, fine ... but don't be surprised if the investing community is increasingly reluctant to underwrite the enterprise. And as their enthusiasm for attending dwindles, the conference's draw might follow.
I'll share actual substance in another post or two.

My portfolio is taxable and is primarily buy and hold. High yield stock and utility stock sleeves were added to it in 2020 and were funded during 2020 and the first part of 2021. Most of the dividends earned are released for personal use. Fido says the portfolio is currently 73% invested in stocks. It is overweight in REITs, Financials, Energy, and Utilities (the Financial and Energy sector investments include BDCs and LPs). The portfolio's YTD total returns have averaged between perhaps 40% and 75% of the SP500 with the direction of its trend line in general corresponding with the trend line of the SP500. The portfolio fares better on a relative basis when the bond market focuses on the prospect the Fed may begin to cut interest rates sooner rather than later (or "never"). It will probably benefit more on a relative basis if the Fed actually does begin to cut interest rates as the REIT sector will likely stop being shunned.

M* is dumping its TAMP business for RIAs. There goes its reach for financial advisors.
It will stick to its own knitting - rating stuff (funds, stocks, bonds), making lots of money from its advise-platforms, managing assets in-house. Oh, and that ESG by Sustainalytics turned out to be another mistimed dud.
https://riabiz.com/a/2024/6/24/morningstars-sale-of-tamps-12-billion-book-of-business-to-assetmark-ends-two-year-run-that-fell-short-on-growth-whether-rias-stick-or-flee-will-determine-fate-of-deal

@BaluBalu, it should be no surprise that M* got it wrong. The numbers are as @BenWP reported.
I'm guessing some percentage would have been Super Micro, which graduated to the 500. There were probably others.
I'll grieve about it during the long winter nights.

I have been reading his blog an WSJ column for decades. His "Humble Dollar" provides good, if somewhat basic financial advice, and the comments and guest commentaries are always interesting
Last Saturday in a post " The C Word" Clements disclosed he has stage 4 lung Cancer with brain mets.
Typical of Jonathan, he followed the details of his diagnosis and treatment with a discussion of financial advice for someone facing death in a time sooner than he expected before the diagnosis.
He now is starting a forum where readers can post, changing from his previous format of longer articles edited with reader comments.
IF you don't know the site "Humble Dollar" it is worth looking at, especially for folks with limited financial experience. An equally f good reason is to boost the site views and support Jonathan in his upcoming treatment.

The fees are definitely significant. A few families refuse to pay even the 10 basis points charged for TF funds. This is why Schwab and Fidelity have started charging TFs of $74.95 and $100 respectively for a few fund families such as Vanguard.

Most TF funds pay Schwab an annual asset-based fee, typically 0.10% annually of the average fund assets held at Schwab, although the fee can range up to 0.25% annually.
...
Most NTF funds pay Schwab's standard OneSource/NTF fund fee of 0.40% per year; however, the annual fee can range up to 0.45% of the fund assets held at Schwab.
...
The information on this website was last updated May 1, 2024 and is subject to change without advance notice.

https://www.schwab.com/legal/financial-and-other-relationships#panel--text-49651

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/92500/000119312524165867/d854673d497.htm
497 1 d854673d497.htm 497
STEWARD FUNDS, INC.
on behalf of its series
Steward Covered Call Income Fund
Steward Equity Market Neutral Fund
Steward Global Equity Income Fund
Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
Steward Large Cap Core Fund
Steward Large Cap Growth Fund
Steward Large Cap Value Fund
Steward Select Bond Fund
Steward Small Cap Growth Fund
Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund
Steward Values-Focused Small-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
(the “Funds”)
Supplement dated June 21, 2024 to the Currently Effective Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated August 28, 2023
This Supplement reports the following changes to information in the Funds’ Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated August 28, 2023.
A.Upon the recommendation of Crossmark Global Investments, Inc., Steward Small Cap Growth Fund’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”), the Board of Directors of Steward Funds, Inc. has authorized, on behalf of Steward Small Cap Growth Fund, the Fund’s liquidation and termination, which will be effective on or about August 23, 2024 (the “Liquidation Date”). Accordingly, the Fund will redeem all of its outstanding shares on the Liquidation Date. The liquidation will be effected pursuant to a Plan of Liquidation and Termination. The operational costs of the liquidation, including the mailing of notification to shareholders, will be borne by the Fund but reimbursed by the Adviser, after taking into account applicable contractual expense caps then in effect by the Adviser to waive or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund. As the Liquidation Date approaches, the Fund’s assets will be converted to cash or cash equivalents and the Fund will not be pursuing its investment objective.
The Fund will be closed to new investors effective at the close of business on June 28, 2024. After that date, existing shareholders may continue to invest in the Fund and retirement plans that currently offer the Fund as an investment option may continue to offer the Fund to their participants until the Liquidation Date.
Prior to the Liquidation Date, shareholders may exchange their shares for shares of the same class of another Steward Fund or redeem their shares prior to the Liquidation Date, in each case at net asset value. Shareholders whose shares are redeemed by the Fund on the Liquidation Date will receive the net asset value per share for all Fund shares they own on the Liquidation Date. The exchange or redemption of Fund shares, on or before the Liquidation Date, generally will be a taxable event for shareholders, other than shareholders that hold Fund shares in a tax-advantaged account (e.g., an individual retirement account, 403(b), 401(k) or other defined contribution or defined benefit plan), but it is important that you consult your personal tax advisor and/or plan provider if you have any questions.
Shareholders that hold Fund shares through a financial intermediary should contact their financial intermediary if they have questions.,,

(Other firms charge transfer fees, so not a big surprise per se....but probably noteworthy for Vanguard)
Vanguard, the country’s second-largest financial-advisory firm, will start charging brokerage-account holders a slew of new fees starting July 1 — including a $100 processing fee to close an account or transfer assets to another firm. That fee, however, will be waived for customers with at least $5 million in assets.
The account-closure fee is a first for Vanguard, long a provider of low-cost investing options and a pioneer in passively managed index funds.
< - >
In addition to Vanguard’s new account-closure fee, the company will also charge $25 for broker-assisted trades of Vanguard funds (unless the customer holds $1 million or more in Vanguard assets or is enrolled in a Vanguard advisory service); $100 to process the deposit of physical share certificates; a 20% fee on funds recovered from class-action settlements on clients’ behalf; a 1% fee on gross dividends paid on foreign or American depository receipt assets held in U.S. dollars; and a $250 processing fee for research and removal of a restriction on securities in brokerage accounts.
< - >
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/vanguard-the-low-cost-investing-pioneer-will-now-charge-100-to-close-an-account-unless-youre-a-multimillionaire-09ef461c?mod=newsviewer_click

excluded are ... Treasury stock (buybacks that aren't cancelled).
Treasury shares are usually not counted (in the US) even before making a free-float adjustment. This is because indexes start with outstanding stock and Treasury shares are not outstanding. (They're issued but not outstanding, due to the buyback.)
From S&P Global Index Mathematics Methodology:

Shares Outstanding. This is the given company’s shares outstanding and provides total company level shares, as reported by stock exchanges, company press releases, and financial documents. Treasury shares are excluded

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/methodology-index-math.pdf
OTOH, S&P's Float Adjustment Methodology gives a much more detailed and nuanced description of what is and isn't included in free float. Regarding Treasury stock it notes:

Due to local reporting patterns in some markets, S&P Dow Jones Indices may include treasury shares in total shares outstanding but exclude them from float.

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/index-policies/methodology-sp-float-adjustment.pdf
What it means by "local reporting" is country by country. Some countries include treasury shares in their outstanding stock calculations, others don't. MSCI clarifies this somewhat:

For most countries, treasury shares are included in the determination of the total shares outstanding, and therefore MSCI includes them in the calculation of free float. In countries like United Kingdom, USA, Canada where treasury shares are excluded from the determination of the total shares outstanding, they are accordingly not included in the calculation of free float.

https://www.msci.com/index/methodology/latest/FreeFloatData (pdf)
Conceptually, yogi's first sentence says it all:
The use of free-float in indexes is sensible as that is the float that is publicly available.
If one cares about the nitty gritty, see pp. 3-4 of the S&P Float Adjustment Methodology doc. (FWIW, it's fairly short but still more than I care to know.)

@stillers. Perhaps another universe is oddly phrased, but my financial life would be entirely different if I had a pension check roll in every month. Many decisions would be looked at differently.

Oh, now I get it!
And agreed, our collective SS and Pension incomes result in negligible, if any in some years, annual income gap. Makes a world of difference in all of our financial and investment decisions. We played it close to the vest in our first five years of retirement, but have swung for the fences in our last seven. To our credit though, we started planning for our retirements and this very situation on Day 1 of our first professional jobs in 1980. Well, I did at least. The missus got on board a wee bit later!

@msf said, ”If China is doing so well, should one be investing more in China, despite the political risks involved?”
That would be a contrarian bet for sure. All my sources (various financial writers / commentators / pundits) are really down on China as an investment, chiefly because of what they see as deterioriating relations with the U.S. However, in Orwell’s 1984 alliances were constantly shifting - sometimes overnight. So one never knows. And TMWOT the pundits as a group are wrong more often than they are correct on the big issues.