Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • couple of reads - kiplinger & other articles/commentary ...
    * Goldberg's Picks: Top Funds for Investing in Emerging Markets
    http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/value/archive/fund-picks-for-investing-in-emerging-markets.html
    [sorry if this is a repost]
    * big gains on exotic bonds
    http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/fundwatch/archive/tcw-emerging-markets-income-fund.html
    * commodities watch
    http://247wallst.com/2011/04/06/commodities-watch-us-oil-supply-surges-refiners-post-yearly-highs-cotton-jumps-to-limit-copper-gold-silver-shine-snp-vlo-tso-wnr-fcx-jjc-copx-gld-gdx-gdxj-slv-sil/
    * copper is still king
    http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2011/Copper-Is-Still-King-JJC-LIWA-SCCO-COPX-CU0406.aspx?partner=tickerspy
    * Don’t buy stocks. Don’t buy bonds [just buy gold - j/k]
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/story/print?guid=936B744C-5FC7-11E0-AE42-00212804637C
    * etf to watch - MOO market vectors agriculture business
    http://etfdb.com/2011/wednesdays-etf-to-watch-market-vectors-agribusiness-fund-moo/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+etfdb+(ETF+Database)
    * gold miners ETFs breakdown all the options [article is few days late but worth a 2nd look]
    http://etfdb.com/2011/gold-miner-etfs-breaking-down-all-the-options/
    I am thinking of buying a small portions of SCCO - Southern Copper 5.5% dividends
    courtesy of Ron Rowland from investwithanedge weekly commentary
    Even the Fed is Confused
    Ron Rowland
    We are sad to report that one of the leading financial news services (which shall remain nameless but begins with Bloom and ends with berg) seems to be losing its editorial direction. We say this because of today’s near-simultaneous reports that stocks were weak because the Fed’s stimulus program may end and that bonds were weak because the Fed’s stimulus program may continue.
    It is true that there is presently much speculation about future Federal Reserve policy. The Fed itself seems to be of two minds, in fact. Minutes of the March 15 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, released on Tuesday, said that “a few” members were leaning toward tighter policy later this year while “a few” thought policy could remain loose beyond 2011. The news coverage simply reflects the fact that even the deciders are undecided. We suspect this will still be the case when Ben Bernanke holds his first-ever press conference later this month.
    Not surprisingly, then, we see continued consolidation in the stock benchmarks. The S&P 500 is still bumping up against resistance near 1340 and has been unable to break above its February peak. Bond yields have been firm, but at 3.54% the ten-year Treasury is still not reflecting major inflationary pressure. This lack of concern regarding inflation is a bit odd given that gold just posted a new high and oil moved over $108.
    The answer may be that price inflation is a problem only when people are willing and able to pay higher prices. Strapped U.S. consumers, faced with flat income, tight credit and rising gas and food bills, really have only one choice: reduce expenditures elsewhere. Retailers respond by cutting prices of discretionary goods, which offsets the inflation pressure. Hence we have the current situation. Prices are on the rise in some sectors and falling in others.
    Can this go on indefinitely? Probably not. Central bankers usually don’t spring last-minute surprises, so we suspect they really are undecided. They cannot remain so. QE2 ends in June, and by then we will know whether more stimulus is coming or not. Lacking that clarity, we expect to see more low-conviction, low-volume trading the next few weeks. Corporate news and geopolitical events will be the main drivers until the Fed makes up its mind. Earnings season is getting underway, so there should be no shortage of corporate news in the coming weeks.
    Sectors
    Our Sector Edge graphic looks much different than it did just a few weeks ago. Energy had a significant lead over everything else, to the point that all other sectors looked almost flat in comparison. Energy is still in the lead, but we see a much more linear falloff between sectors. The momentum scores fall more or less equally from Energy at 53 to Technology at 6. Materials was the big winner this week as gold prices hit new highs. Industrials held on to the #3 spot. Health Care gained ground thanks to biotechnology stocks, but it still fell behind Telecom which is now in fourth place. Technology dropped to the bottom of the list.
    Styles
    Our Style rankings continued to show more diffusion as the spread between the top-ranked and bottom-ranked categories increased from 21 to 31. Small Cap Growth remained in the lead; this group recently eclipsed its 2007 peak and is now challenging its all-time high from March 2000. Small Cap Value, which had been lagging, moved into the upper half of the rankings. Mega Cap remained in last place. We still have inconsistent readings on Growth vs Value; Value holds a slight edge in the Large Cap segment while Growth dominates in Small and Mid Caps.
    International
    The Global rankings have a shake-up this week. Emerging Markets is the new #1 category. Analysts attribute the rally to strength in materials, a growing appetite for risk by investors, and weakness in the U.S. Dollar. Strong energy and commodity prices were positive for Canada, but it still slipped into a tie with China for second place. The dollar weakness boosted almost every foreign category and caused the U.S. to slip out of the top half of the chart. Japan is still out of sync with the rest of the world and was the only category to lose momentum last week.
    Note:
    The charts above depict both the relative strength and absolute strength of various market sectors, styles, and geographic locations on an intermediate-term basis. Each grouping is sorted (top to bottom) by relative strength. The magnitude of the displayed RSM value is a measure of absolute strength, which is our proprietary method of measuring and reporting the intermediate-term strength as an annualized value.
  • When do you fire your fund manager
    There are a number of reasons we would sell a fund. The top reason is if we are unable to talk to the manager or a member of the team. Since we spend a lot of time on the front end of the decision of hiring a manager, not being able to talk to them after we invest client money is a deal killer.
    Second is if a manager is less than truthful. For example, one of the managers at Longleaf Partners gave me an answer to a question, which turned out not only to be false, but it was an obvious lie. We immediately pulled all client dollars.
    Third would be if we get vague answers or run-arounds when we ask direct questions about performance. I don't want to hear how investors are stupid not to appreciate how great the fund's stocks are. Most fund managers have specific theses for every stock they own, which include expectations (both short and long-term). We expect the manager to do what they say they will do.
    Fourth would be if the manager leaves and we are not told ahead of time. We are major shareholders for a number of the funds we own. To find out that a manager has been fired or is leaving by reading it in the financial press is another deal killer. Even if we are told ahead of time, we want to know why the manager is leaving. And we want to be able to talk to the new manager as soon as possible, too. Unless the new managers has a similar strategy (and, we hope, has already worked with the previous manager), we probably will not stay.
    Fifth is if the fund or fund company is sold. Very seldome is this positive. Columbia was sold to Ameriprise. Gag! We had very little with Columbia, but we now have none. We do not see this as a positive change in any way. Higher expenses, fund mergers, managers leaving, and lots of unknowns.
    Last is performance. All great managers have periods of underperformance, some as long as 2-3 years, so we really do give them some slack...as long as they do not change their strategy, and that is what caused the underperformance. We ignore the M* ratings, style box comparisons, and M* category rankings, since our view of a fund's style might be very different from M* or Lipper or the other rating services. WE compare funds based on what management tells us their strategy is and how THEY benchmark their fund (and don't change the benchmark on us, either).
    I say all of this knowing that individual investors do not have the kind of access we do, but these really do apply to everyone. Even if you cannot talk directly to management, you can call the fund company and talk to one of the fund's marketing staff, and, occasionally someone from the management team. Don't be afraid to ask questions of the fund companies (or your advisor) that fit what I outlined above. These are YOUR dollars; no one will watch them more than you unless you want to pay someone to do that. Even then, you still need to be responsible to some extent.
    As for the article, I really don't put much faith in so-called "style drift", since I don't use style boxes. Some of the best managers do not limit themselves to small cap stocks, or large cap stocks. I want great managers, great stock pickers, not people who are forced into a style box, then who we must fire if they are suddenly moved to a different box by a computer! Size can indeed be an issue, so I really like smaller, undiscovered funds. But I want the manager to be able to close a fund if he/she says it's time to do it. The article says performance is not a factor, but I beg to differ. At some point, underperformance DOES become a factor. I am not willing to wait forever for a fund manager to produce good numbers. As I mentioned, give 'em some slack, but hold their feet to the fire over time.
    As I tell our clients, what we do is NOT rocket science. But it DOES take time. There is no such thing as a for sure buy-and-hold anymore (if there ever was).
  • mornin'cofe -added a few new articles evening 5/6/11 at end of link - lip
    5/6/2011
    * Should You Buy These Fast Growers?
    http://www.fool.com/investing/mutual-funds/2011/04/05/should-you-buy-these-fast-growers.aspx
    * 5 Best Mutual Funds for the First Quarter
    http://www.investorplace.com/35891/mutual-funds-401k-fund-investing-investments/
    * IBD MF quaterly link ****
    http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport/567974/201104041741/Mutual-Fund-Quarterly.aspx
    * from russia w/ cautions [got this from the financial advisor]
    http://www.bnn.ca/News/2011/4/5/From-Russia-with-caution.aspx
    * HY delenmas
    http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=375783
    * undervalue stocks w/ big dividends
    http://blogs.forbes.com/wallaceforbes/2011/04/05/undervalued-stocks-with-big-dividends/
    * Energy funds enjoying outsized returns
    http://blogs.forbes.com/wallaceforbes/2011/04/05/undervalued-stocks-with-big-dividends/
    * should you chase absolutely return funds?
    http://www.mint.com/blog/investing/absolute-return-funds-04052011/
    * [ot] 6 things to expect from your CFA
    http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-smarter-mutual-fund-investor/2011/04/05/6-things-to-expect-from-your-financial-adviser
    ---------------------------------------------
    5/5/2011
    * Stocks Will Keep Climbing Wall of Fear: Fund Manager
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/42428519
    * John Mauldin weekly commentary - birthdays & investment risk
    http://www.johnmauldin.com/images/uploads/pdf/mwo040411.pdf
    * for fund investors - timing is everything
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/for-fund-investors-timing-is-everything-2011-04-03?siteid=nwhpf
    * slightly OT/commodities news - is yemen next
    http://moneymorning.com/2011/04/05/rising-oil-prices-is-yemen-next/
    * ot - world trade center bonds offering next wk
    http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110404-709373.html