Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Target-Date Funds: Twice As Popular Vs. 15 Years Ago
    Note:
    For some reason, Ted's link to his original article disappeared or became inoperative after I wrote a response. Not good. Here's the original article to which I was responding:
    http://www.nasdaq.com/article/target-date-funds-twice-as-popular-vs-15-years-ago-cm425440
    The comparison is with 1998. That was an extraordinarily "euphoric" period for retail investors for many reasons. So, the rise in popularity of balanced funds in subsequent years doesn't surprise me.
    If I'm reading this article correctly, it's really about balanced funds "which include target-date funds" (quoting from article). I find this presentation a bit suspicious.
    That aside, it's unfortunate so called "target date" funds get lumped together at all by financial commentators like this one. They vary greatly in their approach to investing. If you want a good one, look to the fund family first. That's where it all starts with these things.
  • Barry Ritholtz: No Room For Feelings In The Market
    LATEST MEMO FROM OUR CHAIRMAN, HOWARD MARKS
    Memo to: Oaktree Clients
    From: Howard Marks
    Re: The Lessons of Oil December 20,2014 © 2007-2014 Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. All Rights Reserved.(excerpts)
    "Over the last year or so, while continuing to feel that U.S. economic growth will be slow and unsteady in the next year or two,
    I came to the conclusion that any surprises
    we're most likely to be to the upside. And my best candidate for a favorable development has been the possibility that the U.S. would sharply increase its production of oil and gas. This would make the U.S. oil-independent, making it a net exporter of oil and giving it a cost advantage in energy–based oncheap production from fracking and shale–
    and thus a cost advantage in manufacturing. Now the availability of cheap oil all around the world threatens those advantages. So much for macro
    forecasting!

    There’s a great deal to be said about the price change itself.
    A well-known quote from economist
    Rudiger Dornbusch goes as follows:
    “In economics things take longer to happen than you
    think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.”
    I don’t know if
    many people were thinking about whether the price of oil would change, but the decline of 40%-plus must have happened much faster than anyone thought possible.
    On the other hand
    –and in investing there’s always another hand–high levels of confidence,
    complacency and composure on the part of investors have in good measure given way to disarray and doubt, making many markets much more to our liking
    .
    For the last few years, interest rates on the safest securities–
    brought low by central banks
    –have been coercing investors to move out the risk
    curve. Sometimes they’ve made that journey without cognizance of the risks they were taking, and without thoroughly understanding the investments they undertook. Now they
    find themselves questioning
    many of their actions, and it feels like risk tolerance is being replaced by risk aversion.
    This paragraph describes a process through which investors are made to feel pain, but also one that makes markets much safer and potentially more bargain-laden.
    http://www.oaktreecapital.com/MemoTree/The Lessons of Oil.pdf
    Elsewhere; A look at the commodity bubble in the 2000-08 period.Just an observance of the past for me personally.I have no opinion on his bullish outlook for oil. Article from Seeking Alpha.
    Lawrence Fuller, Fuller Asset Management Dec. 20, 2014 2:55 PM ET
    The Oil Price Plunge - Fiction, Reality And Opportunity (excerpts)
    "Shortly after the tech bubble burst in 2000, institutions began to allocate billions of dollars into commodities through the futures markets in an effort to capitalize on growth in the developing world. Commodities became a new financial asset class. The continual and escalating flow of funds into a buy-and-hold strategy of a basket of commodities with no sensitivity to price led to a parabolic move upwards in prices prior to the financial crisis in 2008.
    The regulatory body for the futures exchanges (CFTC) exacerbated the volatility by exempting Wall Street banks from the limits under which traditional speculators operate. As a result, a hedge fund can use a Wall Street bank as a counter-party to speculate on commodity prices for financial gain with no limitations. It is important to recognize that the vast majority of oil futures contract holders never take delivery of a single barrel of oil-they simply roll over the contracts. As a result of these changes in market structure, futures prices now dictate spot prices.
    There was no greater evidence of commodity prices divorcing from fundamentals than the surge in oil to $147/barrel during the summer of 2008. That parabolic move occurred six months into what we now call the Great Recession. There were no lines at the gas pump. There was no outcry from oil-importing nations that they were unable to obtain the oil that they needed. That move was fueled by speculative investment flows into oil futures contracts in a herd mentality. The herd was being steered (over a cliff) in part by deluded research reports from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs that were forecasting prices of $150 and $200/barrel, respectfully. Just a few months later the price had collapsed to less than $60/barrel, but not because of a commensurate decline in demand or increase in supply. Institutional investors and speculators were being forced to deleverage and unwind long positions in the throes of the financial crisis and stock market meltdown"
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/2770205-the-oil-price-plunge-fiction-reality-and-opportunity?ifp=0
  • Target-Date Funds: Twice As Popular Vs. 15 Years Ago
    FYI: Many workers want to put their retirement accounts on autopilot.
    That's the lesson from new data that show that recently hired plan members flock to balanced funds — which include target-date funds
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTg3NzE2ODQ=
    Enlarged Graphic: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=webMFbalanc122214.png&docId=731592&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=562&caption=&id=731583
  • WHAT COLUMBUS MISSED: Royce Rediscovers India:
    FYI: In 1492, Italian explorer Christopher Columbus set sail to
    discover India. He missed his mark, however, landing in
    America instead. The rest, as they say, is history—with the
    exception that more than 500 years later India is still worthy of
    discovery for many Western investors.
    India is the world’s largest democracy and Asia’s third-largest
    economy. With its rapidly growing middle class, India is also the
    world’s third-largest economy measured by purchasing power
    parity, and with a median age of just 25 years old, it will also
    soon have a fi fth of the world’s working-age population.1 India’s
    median age is 10 years younger than the U.S.’s and nine years
    younger than China’s.2 This demographic dividend sets the
    stage for growth.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.roycefunds.com/insights/2014/02/pdf/INDIA-0213.pdf
  • Is there a good reason to be other than U.S. centric for equity investments, at this time?
    I have been on the global diversification bandwagon since the 90's. In the past several years though, I read more and more that by just holding US based companies, you already have good international exposure. @catch22, I think your 10% number is way low. I believe it is 20-30%. Perhaps I can find something later.
    I am more and more going in the direction of US based funds and investing internationally in areas that show future growth like Asia. Many of the funds I own have international components I them and my current international equity allocation is 36%.
    Good question and should make for a good discussion. Thanks @catch22.
  • Anybody Buy the Recent Dip in the S&P 500 Index?
    One of those years where it's been very hard to beat the S&P 500 index.
  • Top-Performing Midcap Funds
    d'oh! Thanks; I shoulda checked. Did not realize it was paltry.
    Also did not realize he was still so involved. Shoulda checked lots of things before suggesting.
    www.nicholasfunds.com/news/LA_Times-Nicholas-Fund.pdf
    My late father suggested it to me in college or grad school 40+ years ago, and I held it for a while but then got impatient, d'oh.
  • Top-Performing Midcap Funds
    NICSX's annualized 15 year return is 6.78% as of today (Dec 18th), well below SMCDX's 11.47% at the bottom of the linked chart. It's a fine fund, though I've wondered for several years how long A. Nicholas will keep going (he's worked in the industry since the 50s - okay, the late 50s).
  • crash...black swan?
    A questionable election result for President would be a spark for a black swan but it would have to expand beyond that. If the military commanders and /or the Joint Chiefs failed to recognize the new Commander in Chief, then that could be an event that triggers the black swan. A Constitutional Crisis in effect. I would hope it never came to that.
    Some here might remember the Nixon-Kennedy election. It was told in the years later on that Nixon felt he had won but Kennedy had some good help in Chicago that put him over the top. Rather than putting the country through the turmoil of contesting the election, Nixon conceded.
    Since this thread is under Fund Discussions, which fund would everyone go into in the case of such a predicament?
  • Top-Performing Midcap Funds
    @John Chisum: If I new where you lived, I'd send you a holiday greeting card. IBD only considered funds that were at least fifteen years old, ACMVX is only ten. You need a little work on graphic reading.
    Regards,
    Ted
  • Inflation and the value of the $
    The chart showing the old vs new CPI does show what we thought - there is inflation not reflected in the new CPI.
    I think low inflation will be for years.
  • Anybody Buy the Recent Dip in the S&P 500 Index?
    Buy the S&P 500 Index? No. I don't do indexes. I've been buying energy producers through a diversified natural resources fund. There's some S&P 500 companies among the refiners it holds. I though by just one measure - gas at the pump for under $1.50 (after taxes) - oil prices had gotten a bit distorted. At those prices half the population would be crusin around on our deteriorated highways in big fuel guzzling Hummers in a couple years. Just can't forsee that happening.
    Albeit, my "bottom up" perspective (from the pump) is just one take. There are larger issues affecting oil prices than what Joe 6-pack pays for a gallon of gas. I do also read about those larger global issues - many of which are discussed here.
    Am not ruling out the dire predictions here and elsewhere that we're heading into some type of global deflationary collapse. However, it's an "outlier" IMHO. I'd give it no more than a 35% chance of happening anytime soon. So, I don't invest to protect against deflation, but rather, to hedge against inflation.
    -
    *The $1.50 after-tax pump price cited is probably a little lower than today's actual prices. Remember that oil "leads" (comes down faster than the price of retail fuels) during periods of falling prices.
  • Merry Christmas
    Rono, totally flashback !! Merry Christmas to you and your family, and thanks for all of your outstanding contributions over the years at FA and MFO !!
    Kevin
  • Morningstar's Portfolio Manager Price Updating Concern ...
    The number of 'REPLYS' over on the MORNINGSTAR DISCUSS FORUM is now- UP TO
    ---- 140, SINCE 5/15/2013. and still no where near solved by M* tech. team !!!!
    m* Portfolio Manager Price Updating PROBLEM HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR
    several YEARS !!!!!! & is "SLOUCH" TREATMENT OF m* POSTERS.
    Ralph
  • Bill Gross Calls An Invesment 'Great' Less Than A Week After Jeff Gundlach Says It's For 'Losers'
    I like whoever said let them fight their own war.
    As for Gross, let's not hold his Soap Opera departure from PIMCO against him. I'll cut him some slack there. Been through a couple "sordid affairs" myself over the years. It happens. Pick up the pieces and move on. :)
  • crash...black swan?
    We want the highest confidence statistical outcomes via a large data sample on our side as we can have so as to develop a "gist" of what the year will look like historically and have emotional preparedness, if necessary.
    Component 3 of our model identifies the risk profile for the year during the 3rd week of Januarys. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/18kMFJrq_F384HhHUS-lU1C8ec4NdmmjkCrCsye_shE8/edit?usp=sharing
    You can see from the slides that the preponderance of steep decline years occurred in the high risk profile years, a couple in the neutral profile years, and a one in the Favorable "invested first half" profile. 2014 is shaping up with an above average performance in the context of having been a neutral risk profile year.
    The rest of components for model are here: http://stockmarketmap.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/market-map-basic-version/
    In terms of economic validation, the economic conditions index can alert us of drastic economic slowing and affect on stock prices ( we only use this as a confirmation of the model as the data sample is not robust enough, although it has done a good job none the less )
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IqXuggnKY7fDH-i_96uMIOlmhzS7ei-dreUZ_8dpatc/edit?usp=sharing
    We'll see the results of component 3's calculation for 2015 during January
  • The *real* smart money is shorting junk bonds
    At least SJB tracks better than RYILX and AFBIX. I think this is something like the third time in the past 25 years Rydex (RYILX) has tried an inverse junk bond fund and all with terrible results. As for AFBIX the worst of the worst as an inverse junk fund. 2008 alone was a disaster when it was suppose to shine. I am biased against junk bond ETFs including munis, so I wouldn't touch them with a 10 ft pole - JNK, HYG, HYD. I am also biased against shorting (anything) so shorting junk is never on my radar screen. Had I shorted every time I was bearish over the years (equities or bonds) I would probably now be a pauper begging for coins with a tin cup.
    I'm worried about the junk munis wondering if I should rotate some to investment munis. But will let price dictate my actions not my mood.
  • Bill Gross Calls An Invesment 'Great' Less Than A Week After Jeff Gundlach Says It's For 'Losers'
    Differences of opinions is what makes markets I guess. I have no prediction on TIP's but I tend to think more highly of Gundlach. His calls have been far more accurate in the last couple of years to anyone following him.
    I respect Gross immensely, but Gundlach seems to be in the prime of his investment life right now.