Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • RMD Timing
    yogibearbull +1 I also got trapped in 2020 & decided not to reverse RMD . It cost be around $900. Live & learn, Derf
  • Brokerage experience with T. Rowe Price
    There 'Sales Charge' is $35 compared to Fido's $49.95 so that's better.
    As I understand it, that's $35 to buy or to sell, as opposed to Fidelity's fees, which range from a high of $75 (to buy shares of Vanguard, Schwab, and D&C funds), to $49.95 to buy most other TF funds, to $0 to sell shares of any fund. Adding to an existing TF fund position at Fidelity can be done with most funds for $5 (via automated investing).
    While there are some investing patterns for which TRP would come out less expensive, for most patterns Fidelity winds up costing significantly less.
    With respect to the signature guarantee requirement, changing title (ownership) of assets is tantamount to withdrawing assets and giving them to someone else. Change of control (including the ability to withdraw assets). Which is why institutions generally require POAs to be guaranteed.
    As yogi said, it's all for protection, though that may be more for protection of the institution than for protection of you.
  • When good transactions go bad - T. Rowe Price + Vanguard
    What I experienced was exasperating and not well handled, but it was the exception.
    So long as transactions have been ordinary and haven't deviated one iota from the norm, I've not had problems. But once one introduces even the slightest variation, that opens the door to errors, which in the worst case as here can cascade out of control.
    The variation I introduced was to invest in a closed TRP fund. If one wants to blame the victim (me), I did have a single clue that TRP wasn't fully set up to handle this.
    Online, one can usually prepare an IRA transfer form into TRP funds. But not into closed funds, even if one is an eligible investor. (In contrast, eligible investors can invest in a closed fund online via an internal fund exchange.) So something weird was going on with the IRA transfers to closed funds.
    I'll have to reread hank's recounting of his problems to see if there was anything "unvanilla" there or if TRP simply botched a run-of-the-mill transaction.
    My point is that I would not be too concerned about how TRP handles certain 529 plan withdrawals. That's precisely what these plans are set up to do. But I might watch carefully over a less common type of transaction or one new to TRP.
    For example, TRP says one cannot currently, online, initiate a payment directly to a school. It might not be wise to be first in line to try this out when it becomes available.
    Why isn’t there an online process to initiate a distribution payment directly to a school?
    We are always working to enhance the options available to our account holders and hope to offer this service in the future. For now, you will need to call our College Savings Specialists at 866-521-1894 or complete a Distribution form and mail it in.
    https://www.troweprice.com/personal-investing/troweprice-529/frequently-asked-questions.html
  • Brokerage experience with T. Rowe Price
    Yogi - you do understand that I wasn't withdrawing the money, only re-titling the ownership under terms of the trust. Also, I have $1.5M ADDITIONAL money in my account which they could have used as collateral. What is one supposed to do if they don't have an account at a commercial bank or brokerage house?
  • RMD Timing
    This year's RMD is based on 12/31/2020 ending balance. So let's say that prior to December 31st, 2020 you took distributions for income. Those T-IRA distributions would have lowered your 2020 end of year T-IRA balance impacting your RMD calculation.
    I am assuming you are referring to ST/LT capital gains distributions which often happen in December. If those distributions remain in T-IRA status then I would say, "no, there is no advantage".
    This article might be of help:
    Required minimum distributions (RMDs) are calculated off of last year’s end of year value and need to be taken out by the end of the year. That means you could take the RMD out as early as January 1st or as late as December 31st, but when should you?
    There are a lot of differing opinions when it comes to this question. Most articles on the subject definitively say either “you should take it early in the year” or “you should take it late in the year” with no qualification and not much justification. In reality, the answer is: it depends.
    the-complete-guide-to-timing-your-rmd
  • Brokerage experience with T. Rowe Price
    I saw this post by accident, and I would like to share my recent TRP experience by repeating the comment I sent to them:
    " I'm writing this in hope that it will be forwarded to someone with the authority to act upon it.
    My wife and I had an AB Living Trust. Upon her death, as permitted in the trust, I chose to disclaim her half of the trust value, and create an Irrevocable Trust. I received an new EIN for Trust A of the Living Trust, as recommended by my attorney.
    I contacted T. Rowe Price, and after many discussions with the Life Change Events people, I was able to fill out the forms to retitle two of my accounts, valued at $500,000, to the Irrevocable Trust A. Now the fun began.
    Your Ownership Change form requires a Medallion Signature Guarantee. The credit union
    where I do my banking could only guarantee up to $100,000. Of the five commercial banks I tried, four turned me away outright because I didn't have an account, the fifth said they could, but their limit was $250,000. I came home unsuccessful after spending the entire afternoon in the rain.
    I called T. Rowe Price, and got to speak to a very sympathetic Jenna Johnson. I explained my anger and frustration over the situation. I said I was able to retitle accounts worth $2,000,000 at Vanguard, online and on the phone, in less than an hour, without even a notary. Jenna put me on hold for a short time, then came back to say Price would waive the Medallion Guarantee and accept a notarized signature. She gave me a case number to write on the form.
    Why does T. Rowe Price still ask for a Medallion Signature Guarantee in an era when many people bank at CU's, or online entirely, and can't qualify for one? It's an archaic form of identification in the 21st century. If Vanguard can do business without it, why can't Price?"
    It's been a week, and I haven't received an acknowledgement, let alone a response.
  • World Stock Funds-Are they a viable alternative?
    To followup on my 11/10 comment, I may actually dump MGGIX and go with BST instead, to rotate into some large cap tech+income (ie, adding more 'value' and less 'growth') versus a more growth/tech-oriented 'world stock' fund as the markets continue to tread water and churn going into 2022. Not 100% sure I'll make the move, but that's my current thinking ahead of annual distributions on Friday ... battening down the hatches a bit, so to speak.
  • Best Biotech Fund?
    Here and Now broadcast a worthwhile report on Biogen and Aduhelm, the Alzheimer’s drug.
    https://www.wbur.org/news/2021/12/10/biogen-aduhelm-reckoning-alzheimers-drug
    It’s not surprising that the whole biotech sector is under pressure when one its guiding lights really screws up. The report talks of 1000 layoffs at Biogen and great disruption. There’s a link in the report to an in depth published article on the debacle in STAT.
    The Times reported on Sunday that a large chunk of the contemplated increase in Medicare Part B premiums is due to the projected cost of this new drug, which according to many, does not work.
  • DSEEX Drop?
    Not sure that's a good comparison, but there is a ton to read here about possible issuers' defaults:
    https://doc.morningstar.com/docdetail.aspx?clientid=schwab&key=84b36f1bf3830e07&cusip=258620822
    vs
    https://www.finra.org/investors/alerts/exchange-traded-notes-avoid-unpleasant-surprises
    and maybe the fund does have risk 'advantages'.
  • JPMorgan Hedged Equity -JHQDX (JHQAX)
    Also JHDAX and JHTAX remain open, but I have no idea how they compare with JHDAX .

    carew, I assume you meant to say: "how they compare with JHQAX."
    Hopefully, the excerpt below from the M* Fund Analysis report of 9/2/2021 by Erol Alitovsky will be helpful:
    JHDAX and JHTAX "have the same objective of providing smoother returns by tempering downside and upside returns via a systematically implemented options strategy. The newer funds follow the same approach of the original Hedged Equity strategy, however, instead of purchasing options on the last business day of the quarter, Hedged Equity Fund 2 purchases three-month options on the last business day in January, April, July, and October, and Fund 3 trades its options on the last business day of February, May, August, and November.
    The team purchases put options 5% below the S&P 500's value. To offset the cost of the put option, the team first sells put options 20% out-of-the-money. This structure should generally protect the fund from thre-month losses in the 5-20% range; if markets fall less than 5%, the fund should fall in line with the market, and if the market falls more than 20%, the fund should incur the same incremental losses beyond negative 5%. The team also sells call options to generate enough option premium income to cover the remaining cost of the hedges. [...]
    Over the short term, the return profile of Fund 2 and 3 may vary from the original Hedged Equity fund depending on the price path of the S&P 500, but over the long run all three funds should have very similar risk/reward characteristics. Investors looking to make an allocation to this strategy would be wise to pair both Hedged Equity Fund 2 and 3 as this lowers market price path dependency, or the investment's sensitivity to short periods of market volatility.
    Reasonable fees coupled with JPMorgan's transparent process make these funds an interesting option."
    Good luck,
    Fred
  • Tech giants Microsoft, Amazon and Others Warn of Widespread Software Flaw
    What a surprise. (NOT.) Microsoft is buggy and deficient. Microsoft has pretty much always been buggy and deficient.
    For all of Oahu, the bus system and the handicap service, the HandiVan, is still not 100%, after a cyberattack last week. Service is running, but the fare-card readers still don't work. Criminal suck-holes. Find them. Execute them.
    https://www.kitv.com/news/crime/cyber-attack-shuts-down-servers-at-thehandi-van-thebus/article_5ed63970-5920-11ec-ab97-675ae372cdca.html
  • When good transactions go bad - T. Rowe Price + Vanguard
    +1 crash That's why I keep the majority of my investments at Fidelity and Schwab, and use my Vanguard brokerage to mostly hold Vanguard Funds only.
    That's a good point. The Vanguard brokerage seems to handle exchanges between Vanguard funds smoothly and quickly. By the way, several people have suggested here that an In Kind transfer might be a guarantee of a smooth exchange. Maybe into TRP, I dunno. But the Vanguard brokerage made a mess of an In Kind transfer I made from another fund company into their brokerage. The money was supposed to be transferred into a Vanguard Fund. The Vanguard brokerage agent on the phone told me to make an In Kind transfer and they would move it into the designated fund. Nope. The money arrived without problems and Vanguard put it in the same fund within their brokerage and left it there and didn't tell me. It took a very long time to get them to even acknowledge the mistake. And it took even longer for them to move it to a Money Market Fund. From there I was supposed to move it via their website to any open Vanguard fund. Did they bother to tell me this? No. That would take effort and a sense of responsibility.
  • DSEEX Drop?
    >> I have not and never will touch one
    >> I've owned DSEEX since inception

    You still have not gone into your reconciliation of these two opposing statements of faith, have you? Since the mfund sorta is / sorta is not half (+/-) composed of the dreaded, could-totally-fail ETN.

    I do not and would not own an ETN. If a mutual fund owns an ETN it may or may not be an issue for me, but I am unaware that DSEEX is half ETN as you imply, or if the ETNS are a basket as contrasted with only one. For comparison, while I am willing to buy a HY bond fund, I would not put sizable assets into a single HY bond. Generally speaking, there is little reason to risk issuer failure for an ETN when similar products are available in an ETF or CEF wrapper (if you want leverage) with no such risk.
  • PRWCX
    @teapot After listening to only part of that podcast so far, I am reconsidering opening a position in PRFRX. bank loans and some junk. Giroux sang its praises.
    EDITED TO ADD: I've never owned a bank loan fund before. Why do I see NO BANKS listed in the portfolio? ( at Morningstar.)
    Bank loans are issued by below investment-grade companies and pay a floating rate typically pegged to LIBOR.
    From a credit perspective, they are similar to high-yield bonds but have a senior position in the capital structure.
    Multiple industries (health care, IT, etc.) make up the bank loan market.
    Here's a M* article with additional bank loan details and specific information regarding PRFRX.
  • When good transactions go bad - T. Rowe Price + Vanguard
    +1 crash That's why I keep the majority of my investments at Fidelity and Schwab, and use my Vanguard brokerage to mostly hold Vanguard Funds only.