Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • AAII
    This is an example of the tracking of the AAII Sentiment Survey that I do. It is available elsewhere and my intention is not to start the series here.
    AAII Sentiment Survey, 11/17/21
    For the week ending on 11/17/21, there was a decrease in the bullish sentiment but it remained the top sentiment (38.8%; now average) & bearish remained the bottom sentiment (27.2%; below average); neutral remained the middle sentiment (33.9%; above average). Early December deadlines loom for budget & debt-ceiling. The decision on Fed Chair (POWELL or BRAINARD?) has to be made soon with Powell's term expiring in February 2022. Electric-vehicles (EVs) remain a very speculative area (Rivian/RIVN, Lucid/LCID, etc).
    Date Bullish Neutral Bearish
    10-14-21 37.91% 30.33% 31.75%
    10-21-21 46.89% 25.36% 27.75%
    10-27-21 39.83% 30.74% 29.44%
    11-04-21 41.50% 32.50% 26.00%
    11-11-21 48.00% 28.00% 24.00%
    11-17-21 38.8% 33.9% 27.2%
    Observations over life of survey
    Avg 38.02% 31.43% 30.54%
    STD 10.01% 08.36% 09.50%
    LINK
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    “Grantham for all his long term predictions does not invest his funds in line with his predictions.“
    A legitimate point. But I don’t invest according to my own predictions either. Does anyone?
    Prediction
    does not = certainty. So some humility as investors is appropriate. What I attempt to do is tilt things in the direction I think will reduce overall portfolio risk while achieving best hoped for results under varying market environments. Not a perfect science. And beyond the scope of this discussion - except that philosophically it might help understand Grantham’s seeming hypocrisy. What may not be apparent in the list of Grantham’s investments (linked below) are derivatives he may have employed which are designed to offset losses in down markets.
    One thing that set me to thinking about all this was Dodge and Cox’s revelation in a recent portfolio report (for DODBX) that they hold a 5% short position in the S&P, which they think highly overvalued, while continuing to invest in the stocks they find attractive. Quite an unusual step for this very conservative house.
    And this from T.Rowe Price’s May 31 Annual Report for their Spectrum Allocation funds …
    “As we look ahead, the central question for investors—assuming the economy’s recovery from the pandemic continues apace—is whether the returns on financial assets will be as robust. Valuations are elevated in nearly all asset classes, and in some areas, there are clear signs of speculation. It is not an easy environment to invest in, but our investment teams remain rooted in company fundamentals and focused on the long term, and they will continue to apply strong fundamental analysis as they seek out the best investments for your portfolio.” https://prospectus-express.broadridge.com/summary.asp?doctype=ann&clientid=trowepll&fundid=77957L302
    Note: The above was written 6 months ago. Can we say valuations are better now than they were than? And the “signs of speculation” less apparent?
    Grantham’s Top Investments
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    Mr. Grantham's investments are quite aggressive despite his gloomy market predictions.
    “This is going on as far as the eye can see. It’s an unfair advantage for green investing, Grantham said.
    There may be a bubble that will affect this for a year or two, but it will come back bigger and better than other groups because of this tailwind. This is going to be the most important investment theme for the rest of your life.”

    "To exploit this green boom, Grantham is making risky bets.
    Venture capital and other private investments now compose more than three-quarters of the $1.4 billion in assets he manages across a foundation, a charitable trust and his personal holdings."
    "Grantham says his venture-capital portfolio has returned 19% annually over the past decade, including a 102% jump in 2020, a 'watershed' year."

    Link
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    @sma3 - Thanks for posting the Bloomberg interview. Had forgotten I’d viewed it recently.
    Yeah - Hussman’s a perma-bear. Somehow think Grantham’s a little sharper. GMO must have some good supporting talent & research capability. A bit more here than just some old man crying wolf. Hope he’s wrong. I’d like everybody to be rich, and making money has been easy for many years now.
    March 2009 is when things started to move. Dow has climbed from around 6,000 than to over 36,000 of recent. Just 2 or 3 brief hiccups along the way. The thing some of us who survived ‘07-‘09 might think about is whether at 15 years additional age we’d be willing / able to ride out a storm like that again - possibly something worse. Not a prediction. Just something I thought might add some balance to the general euphorism here.
    @Old_Joe / A nickel for your subscription is in the mail. Am confident I’ll get my money’s worth.
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    +1 @MikeM
    Thanks for those stats. I realize he’s been early / wrong / or whatever for quite a while.
    To dump some fuel on the fire here, the new EV truck maker, Rivian, that went public about a week ago now has a market cap greater than that of either GM or Ford. I don’t think they’ve sold a single production model yet, although Amazon (who has a stake in the company) has ordered 100,000. Nuts!
    (At least Mike’s wearing a helmet in case everything goes to hell …) :)
  • now, here's an unusual financial calculator need
    TIAA has 2 kinds of RMD services.
    1st is informational RMD calculation but TIAA doesn't act on that. If one has multiple 403b, their RMDs can be combined and taken from any one 403b. TIAA doesn't know about investors' plans.
    2nd is contractual RMD service where TIAA calculates, makes RMD withdrawals, and sends them to designated accounts.
    So, don't waste money on lawyers before knowing this.
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    I didn't see in the article what inflation factor is used in these predictions. Did I miss it?
    Grantham has been doing this so long there are now reality checks for those predictions. I found this one from 2018 where on Dec. 31, 2010 this 7 year prediction was made. Below, prediction and actual 7 years later.
    2010 prediction... 2018 actual
    US LC predicted +0.4%... actual was +12%
    US SC predicted -1.9%... actual was +10%
    Int LC predicted +2.1%... actual was +5%
    Int SC predicted -1.4%... actual was +4%
    EM predicted 4.1%... actual was 0%
    https://www.mymoneyblog.com/gmo-asset-return-forecasts-vs-actual-returns-2011-2018.html
    Not sure what to make of it but this obviously smart man has had trouble with his predictions in the past. Why adjust based on future predictions? Yeah, we may be in a value bubble and a bear market is always on the horizon somewhere down the road, but sounds like his algorithms were saying the same thing in 2010. Remember, his predications have to not only predict the global equity markets, but also the rate of inflation. Impossible task maybe? But A+ for the effort.
  • November Commentary is live!
    Make use of stable-value (SV) within 401k/403b/457. Good options at TIAA, OK at Federal TSP & elsewhere.
    Don't overlook I-Bonds although limited in amounts - but $30k/yr possible for an average US family of 3.15.
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    A pity that this guy has to be hocking his investment program around Grantham's advice. The question of when we have a crash is hard, perhaps impossible, to answer. Grantham's been right a few times timing wise--2000 especially--but wrong a lot lately. I'm more interested in figuring out what kind of crash it might be, what will trigger it, how to recognize it once it's begun, how much of a decline it could be, how long it might last, and what to do when it happens. GMO's 7-year Inflation-Adjusted Forecast:
    image
  • Asset transfers to Vanguard
    People should of course be careful. But realistically, some 3rd party may be involved in such back-office/processing fin-tech stuff. Not every institutions will have in-house/internal capabilities on this fin-tech. So, it comes down to the trust one has in the 2 institutions involved.
    I use Zelle and don't think it is a solution. Zelle transactions are limited by banks to $200-2,000 (small potatoes). Transactions/mistakes are NOT reversible/fixable - and users accepted that condition on sign up. Try sending $100K or $1 million by Zelle (-:).
  • SS increase: what to do
    We got our boosters at our local CVS. They schedule appts 15 minutes apart and their process went flawlessly for us who happened to get ours on two different days, so we saw it happen twice there. That said, the pharmacist who we've known for years did express a lot of angst though over how taxing the process is on their staffing.
  • Fidelity's Joel Tillinghast to retire from active management in 2023
    I think @stillers meant to post this PV chart, LINK .
    Yes, YBB, that is the PV Chart I was trying to link. Thanks!
    And anyone who happened to look at the LINK I incorrectly posted might just want to take a look at the LINK YBB correctly posted for me.
  • Asset transfers to Vanguard
    I have had good luck (and speed) to transfer asset to/out of Vanguard. Typically, it takes about 10 days from start to finish. The most time consuming part is having to mail in the form to Vanguard. T. Rowe Price requires signature guarantee from a bank and credit union which takes another day to complete.
  • 10 Mistakes...
    13 years is long enough to make a few investors rich along the way. Who are the current Peter Lynches in their 3rd or 4th innings?
  • Grantham’s at it again …
    I guess he’s been spilling his guts on CNBC. But CNBC has become impossible to link or view without a paid subscription. (Interview referenced was in late September)
    Here’s a decent article summarizing Grantham’s comments.
    Here’s a 10-minute discussion / analysis based on a few clips from the CNBC interview. The presenter is decent - but clearly promoting his internet based investor service,.

    My advice would be to exercise due diligence and look at your holdings one by one. I’m mostly a bottom feeder, so tend to own things that are pretty beaten up and out of favor. The biggest exception I could find is my commodities fund, BRCAX, up 32% for one year. However, looking back 5 and 10 years the fund has only garnered single digit returns. And, as @BenWP will testify, my single largest holding, TMSRX, appears to be anything but a euphoric bubble. :)
    Bonds are a bit troubling. Not sure what kind of duration my allocation funds have, but my direct bond fund holdings are intermediate term (generally 2-5 years). My issue here with Grantham (and other experts) is that I think if equities hit the bricks, the economy will grind to a near halt and intermediate / long bonds will rise in value - albeit for a brief period. But - might be wrong.
    However, I agree with most of what Grantham says and respect his knowledge. For defense, I’ve been looking at various defensive funds. None is a “panacea”. All are problematic in some way - - perhaps the reason he stresses cash for defense.
  • Fidelity's Joel Tillinghast to retire from active management in 2023
    @stillers - it auto defaults to 1985 but the results themselves are constrained by the earliest fund in the comparison. Because I chose SPY vs. Vanguard 500 Index, it started from 1994 vs. 1990 if I had chosen Vanguard. Nevertheless (as opposed to nonetheless)- the results are just impressive all the same. The graphs look a bit different on PV vs. Stock Charts but the results are the same. FWIW I own 2 of the 3 funds mentioned and couldn't be happier. Let's hope the good times continue to roll. Cheers.
    Edit Add: May nothing ever change with FDGRX. Has been just stellar for me for many years.
  • Fidelity's Joel Tillinghast to retire from active management in 2023
    @catch22 yes the PV chart looks a bit different but those funds are impressive all the same.
    JT and Peter Lynch are the two PMs most responsible for my early retirement.
    Not sure why your PV link uses 1985-2021. FLPSX incepted 12/27/89. So I changed the Start Year to 1990.
    Also, your use of SPY as a Benchmark is noted on the results to limit its data to 01/90-10/21. So I changed the Benchmark to the VG 500 Index.
    Here are the revised, far more impressive results that compare FLPSX to the three other funds since FLPSX's inception, a time at which my wife and I had it and Magellan as our only two funds. We shortly thereafter parted with Magellan.
    EDIT: Deleted previous LINK. Having trouble getting the correct link posted here. See LINK at YBB's post below. Thanks YBB!