Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Fidelity Dogged Again By 401(k) Quid-Pro-Quo Allegations
    FYI: Fidelity Investments has again been accused of engaging in a quid-pro-quo type relationship with a 401(k) plan sponsor, which allegedly cost employee retirement savers millions of dollars in return for bigger profits.
    The latest episode involves the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which has been accused of retaining Fidelity's 401(k) record-keeping services and investment funds, despite counsel to do otherwise from attorneys and consultants, with the expectation that Fidelity and co-owner Abigail Johnson would make a large donation to the university.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=V_FLXdqSAs3VtAbs_qCQAw&q=Fidelity+Dogged+Again+By+401(k)+Quid-Pro-Quo+Allegations&oq=Fidelity+Dogged+Again+By+401(k)+Quid-Pro-Quo+Allegations&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3348.3348..4459...0.0..0.375.531.0j1j0j1......0....2j1..gws-wiz.....0.X31mYZ_KEgo&ved=0ahUKEwiamrnagPPjAhXNKs0KHWw_CDIQ4dUDCAc&uact=5
  • Widely Followed Risk-Return Measures For Stock Portfolios Debunked: Sharpe Ratio/Sortino Ratio
    I think all modern port stats fall into the "past performance is not predictive" category, as in, why would we even think they would or could be predictive? It's about probabilities, not prediction, and even in that realm their utility depends on market, manager, and portfolio factors being at least fairly consistent in the future with what they've been over whatever past period (3y, 5y, etc.) we're looking at.
    Their utility is also limited to comparing funds with similar characteristics, e.g., within similar categories. Accept the limitations, and they can be plenty useful.
  • Inflated Bond Ratings Helped Spur the Financial Crisis. They’re Back.
    Following are selected excerpts from a current lengthy and very detailed Wall Street Journal article. They have been significantly edited in the interest of brevity: a read of the entire WSJ article is suggested.
    Inflated bond ratings were one cause of the financial crisis. A decade later, there is evidence they persist. In the hottest parts of the booming bond market, S&P and its competitors are giving increasingly optimistic ratings as they fight for market share.
    All six main ratings firms have since 2012 changed some criteria for judging the riskiness of bonds in ways that were followed by jumps in market share, at least temporarily, a Wall Street Journal examination found. These firms compete with one another to rate the debt of borrowers, who pay for the ratings and have an incentive to pick rosier ones.
    There are signs some investors are skeptical. Some bonds in markets where ratings criteria have been eased don’t trade at the high bond prices their ratings suggest they should. Investors have also shown skepticism about ratings on some corporate and government bonds.
    “We don’t trust the ratings,” says Greg Michaud, director of real estate at Voya Investment Management, which holds $21 billion in commercial-real-estate debt.
    The problem is particularly acute in the fast-growing market for “structured” debt—securities using pools of loans such as commercial and residential mortgages, student loans and other borrowings. The deals are carved into different slices, or “tranches,” each with varying risks and returns, which means rating firms are crucial to their creation.
    The Journal analyzed about 30,000 ratings within a $3 trillion database of structured securities issued between 2008 and 2019. The Journal’s analysis suggests a key regulatory remedy to improve rating quality—promoting competition—has backfired. DBRS, Kroll and Morningstar were more likely to give higher grades than Moody’s, S&P and Fitch on the same bonds. Sometimes one firm called a security junk and another gave a triple-A rating deeming it supersafe.
    Two fast-growing structured-bond sectors are commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, and collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs. CMBS fund deals for hotels, shopping malls and the like. CLOs are backed by corporate loans to risky borrowers, typically to fund buyouts.
    In a May speech, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell compared CLOs to precrisis mortgage-backed debt: “Once again, we see a category of debt that is growing faster than the income of the borrowers even as lenders loosen underwriting standards.”
    Behind the ratings inflation is a long-acknowledged flaw Washington didn’t fix: Entities that issue bonds—state and local governments, hotel and mall financiers, companies—also pay for their ratings. Issuers have incentive to hire the most lenient rating firm, because interest payments are lower on higher-rated bonds. Increased competition lets issuers more easily shop around for the best outcome.
    Rating analysts say their firms have lost deals because they wouldn’t provide the desired ratings.
    In the first half of 2015, S&P’s share of ratings in the $600 billion CLO market hit a five-year low. That fall S&P changed its methodology to make it easier for CLOs to get higher ratings. When S&P again proposed loosening its criteria this year, a group representing more than 100 professional bond investors wrote a letter to the company, reviewed by the Journal, saying the changes “will lead to a weakening of credit protection for investors at a time where we need it most.” S&P proceeded.
    Moody’s ratings on riskier slices of these multi-borrower deals often weren’t as favorable as those of its competitors. By 2015, issuers “essentially stopped soliciting our ratings” on those slices, according to a January commentary from the company. In October 2015, Moody’s eased its rating methodology for single-asset CMBS deals.
    In 2016 Fitch [gave] itself wider latitude to use easier rating assumptions.
    Investors say ratings inflation is most evident in commercial-mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, of which investors hold about $1.2 trillion. When rating a security higher than their three big competitors, Morningstar, Kroll and DBRS were around two rungs more generous, on average. Some ratings were a dozen or more rungs higher, potentially the difference between junk bonds and triple-A.
    A group of professional investors in 2015 complained about inflated ratings to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Adam Hayden, who manages a $13 billion securities portfolio at New York Life Insurance Co.’s real-estate-investment arm, was among the investors who met with the SEC. He said inflated ratings were a risk to market stability, according to a meeting memo obtained by the Journal.
    The SEC didn’t implement their recommendations.

    Note: All bold emphasis was added.
  • Widely Followed Risk-Return Measures For Stock Portfolios Debunked: Sharpe Ratio/Sortino Ratio
    FYI: Two financial ratios Wall Street uses to rate different portfolios’ risk-adjusted performances have come under sharp criticism, including from one of the ratio’s own inventors.
    The better-known of the two, the Sharpe ratio, was first published in 1964 by William (Bill) Sharpe. It ranks portfolios by their “excess” return above holding low-yielding but safe Treasury bills. The ratio is adjusted for the amount a portfolio’s value deviates from a constant growth rate. In 1990, along with other economists, Sharpe won the Nobel Prize in Economics for this and additional formulas.
    A competing measure, the Sortino ratio, was announced in 1980. Developed by Frank Sortino, then a finance professor at San Francisco State University, it was considered an improvement for several reasons.
    Most notably, the Sortino ratio only counts a portfolio’s downside deviation against it. A portfolio is not penalized for upside surprises, which the Sharpe ratio does.
    In a rather shocking turn of events, Sortino has turned against both the Sharpe ratio and the formula that bears his own name. He’s developed an entirely new risk-adjusted ranking system that shows promise.
    In his latest book, “The Sortino Framework for Constructing Portfolios” (Elsevier), the now-retired professor announced an improved ratio named Desired Target Rate-alpha (DTR-a).
    Sortino and his book’s collaborators ranked the risk-adjusted returns of scores of mutual funds using all three ratios. The results are eye-opening.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/widely-followed-risk-return-measure-for-stock-portfolios-is-debunked-after-55-years-2019-08-07/print
  • Limbo ! Limbo! On CD Rates
    Hi sir @_Ted, my colleague at work pickup CDs few months ago ~> 2.7%, is this yield real?
    will buy ford bond YTM > 6% cusip 345370BS8 price 119
  • Limbo ! Limbo! On CD Rates
    FYI: Had Franklin SYN Bank CD 2.50% purchasd on 12/3//19 mature today. Replaced it with Bank Of China NY CD maturing on 11/18/19 at 2.00%. Anything more than 90 days less than 2%.
    Regards,
    Ted
  • The Breakfast Briefing: U.S Futures Higher, Stock Volatility Eases Despite Lingering Trade Worries
    I’m not seeing “U.S. Futures higher” ??
    -- S&P futures are 1% lower as of 9:05 AM.
    -- Currency war heated up overnight in asia.
    -- Partially in response, 10-year’s around 1.63% this morning.
    -- Gold’s up. But most commodities down.
    -- Treacherous markets. Grab an umbrella.
  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up
    Howdy,
    As noted in an earlier post, I started a momentum play in the metals as week or so back. I am particularly riding the junior silver miners as that's where the most leverage is from my perspective. As I type, we're breaking resistance at 1500 and 17. If this holds fasten your seat belts.
    And so it goes,
    Peace,
    Rono
  • The Breakfast Briefing: U.S Futures Higher, Stock Volatility Eases Despite Lingering Trade Worries
    FYI: • Asian stocks slip
    • Crude prices decline
    • U.S. Treasury yields tick lower
    U.S. stock index futures higher Wednesday morning, amid simmering trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.
    U.S. shares gained overnight after President Donald Trump downplayed worries of a lengthy trade war and senior adviser Larry Kudlow said Trump's administration is planning to host a Chinese delegation for talks in September. Wall Street futures gauges also rose.
    European stocks climbed Wednesday following a downbeat session in Asia, as worries over U.S.-China trade tensions lingered in markets.
    The Stoxx Europe 600 was up 0.7% after the opening bell, with gains led by the technology and chemicals sectors.
    ABN AMRO Bank ABN -3.32% and UniCredit were both down by around 3.2%, following the release of second-quarter earning reports. ABN AMRO Bank warned of pressure on its margins from low interest rates, and UniCredit cut its revenue guidance for the year.
    In Asia, the Shanghai Composite Index and Japan’s Nikkei both declined around 0.3% and Korea’s Kospi dropped 0.4%.
    The moves came a day after U.S. stocks regained some ground from recent heavy losses, as China backed away from a further escalation in the trade row and the yuan stabilized.
    lsewhere, the New Zealand dollar fell by 1.6% against the U.S. dollar after its central bank unexpectedly cut interest rates beyond economists’ forecasts. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand lowered its official cash rate by 50 basis points and signaled it could soon adopt unorthodox policy amid a deteriorating global-growth outlook.
    The move hit the Australian dollar, where bets on lower interest rates in September jumped higher. It also sparked talk of a “race to the bottom” in interest rates, said Neil Wilson, analyst at Markets.com.
    The WSJ Dollar Index, which measures the U.S. currency against a basket of its peers, was up 0.1%.
    The yield on 10-year Treasurys fell to 1.678% on Wednesday, from 1.740% on Tuesday, when it hit its second-lowest level in 2019. Bond yields and prices move in opposite directions.
    In commodities, the global oil benchmark Brent crude was down by 0.2% to $58.84 a barrel, as investors anticipated weaker demand during a period of global economic uncertainty. Gold gained 1%.
    Regards,
    Ted
    MarketWatch:
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dow-looks-to-extend-gains-as-global-central-banks-ease-monetary-policy-2019-08-07/print
    WSJ:
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/european-stocks-rise-while-gloom-lingers-in-asia-11565164273
    Bloomberg
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-06/asia-stocks-to-start-mixed-u-s-shares-climb-markets-wrap
    IBD:
    https://www.investors.com/market-trend/stock-market-today/dow-jones-futures-disney-stock-market-rally-match-group/
    CNBC:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/07/stock-markets-wall-street-in-focus-amid-lingering-trade-war-concerns.html
    Reuters:
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-dollar-china/u-s-dollar-when-will-bulls-turn-to-bears-idUKKCN1UX0AF
    U.K.
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-stocks/ftse-breaks-six-day-losing-streak-though-earnings-disappoint-idUKKCN1UX0OI
    Europe:
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-stocks/german-chemical-deal-lifts-european-shares-ftse-lags-idUSKCN1UX0OK
    Asia:
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/asian-markets-mixed-after-china-moves-to-stabilize-yuan-2019-08-06/print
    Bonds:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/07/us-treasury-bonds-china-sets-the-yuan-below-expectations.html
    Currencies:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/07/forex-markets-japanese-yen-us-china-trade-in-focus.html
    Oil:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/07/oil-markets-us-china-trade-in-focus.html
    Gold:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/07/gold-markets-us-china-trade-in-focus.html
    Cuirrent Futures:
    https://finviz.com/futures.ashx
  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up
    Howdy folks,
    The Chinese do not want to lose face. The Fed raising rates 25 bps, gave Trump cover to raise the tariffs on the Chinese. They must respond or lose face. Weaponizing the currency and stopping the purchase of Roundup ready Soybeans enables them to save face. Now Trump loves this because he WANTS to devalue the dollar because in his economic world view this would be a good thing - sort of like trade wars and higher tariffs are good things.
    We're spiraling down the rat hole and hopefully, all y'all realize the Chinese nuclear option is to sell Treasuries . . . of which they own a whole steeenking pot full. Geez, that might also devalue the dollar.
    Tariffs are a tax on your people and trade wars have ALWAYS ended in economic disaster - at least for the last 2,500 years or so. Read the Frogs some time about a government debasing their currency.
    Idiots,
    and so it goes,
    peace,
    rono
  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up
    OK, so before China imposed tariffs on soybeans & other ag goods. Now they've totally stopped importing ag goods. Doesn't seem to make much sense. But heck, I wish Trump would up the tariffs to 50% or more on ALL Chinese goods...watch the yuan tumble & it's people cry out. The US will be ok, the Chinese need our consumers more than we need theirs, just look at the trade imbalance.
  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up
    Treasury Department designates China a ‘currency manipulator,’ a major escalation of the trade war
    Following are selected excerpts from a current Washington Post news article. The article has been substantially edited for brevity.
    BREAKING: A Treasury Department statement said that China had manipulated the exchange rate between its currency and the U.S. dollar to gain an “unfair competitive advantage.”
    The move follows the biggest one-day stock market loss of 2019, and stoked fears that a commercial dispute with no end in sight would do significant damage to a slowing global economy. China answered President Trump’s latest tariffs on Monday by allowing its tightly-controlled currency to slide to an 11-year low against the dollar, a move that threatened to turn the U.S.-China trade conflict into a global economic contagion.
    Treasury’s view was potentially even more important on Monday, because Trump alleged China was manipulating its currency, a practice that is expressly in the department’s purview.
    The currency shift also will effectively counter the Federal Reserve’s recent interest rate cut by leading to tighter financial conditions in the United States, said Robin Brooks, chief economist of the Institute of International Finance.
    As of midafternoon, all three major U.S. stock indexes were having their worst day of 2019, falling more than 3 percent — fresh off having their worst week of the year. The Dow Jones industrial average was down more than 800 points, or more than 3 percent. The Standard & Poor’s 500 was off by nearly 93 points, or 3.1 percent, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq was down nearly 303 points, or nearly 3.8 percent. — a six-day losing streak. Trade bellwethers Caterpillar and Boeing were down 2 percent.
    The yuan’s move will likely make it difficult for developing countries that need to cut interest rates to spur growth, such as India. Instead, they will pressure to raise interest rates to attract investment, a move that would further curb growth.
    China’s central bank said it was confident it could keep the currency at a “reasonable and balanced level.” Beijing is expected to try to prevent an unrestrained plunge by the yuan, fearing it would encourage Chinese citizens to take their wealth out of the country, economists said.
    The yuan has actually held up better against the surging dollar than most U.S. trading partners. Its year-to-date decline against the dollar of 2.4 percent is much less than the currencies of two U.S. allies, the Taiwan dollar at 3.4 percent and the South Korean won at 8.6 percent.
    Beijing appeared to mount other forms of retaliation on Monday. The government has asked state-owned firms to stop their U.S. agricultural purchases, according to a Bloomberg report Monday that was widely cited by Chinese media. The crop purchases, which came from states that comprise Trump’s political base, were supposed to be a sign of Chinese goodwill as trade talks progressed.
  • Ed Yardeni: There’s A Lot More To The Stock Market’s Slide Than Trump And Trade Wars
    FYI: Something is wrong with the global economy. It's not functioning as it "should," or traditionally has. Actually, the world economy seems downright dysfunctional. This distortion relative to past norms reminds me of the skewed, tragi-comedic worldview of Garp in John Irving's best-selling 1978 novel “The World According to Garp,” about a man born out of wedlock to a feminist icon.
    The U.S. economy, meanwhile, is showing some signs of similarly unusual behavior, but it doesn't appear as abnormal as the rest of the global economy — so far. I am using the objective meaning of the word "abnormal" without drawing any subjective implications just yet. In other words, for investors, the world is what it is. Our investment conclusions must be derived based on how it is, not on how it ought to be.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/theres-a-lot-more-to-the-stock-markets-slide-than-trump-and-trade-wars-2019-08-05/print
  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up
    Those farm aid packages are worth less than a placebo for cancer treatment unless you're a mega-farm operator.
    The Toll of the Trade War (at least so far)
  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up

    Lashing back, China lets yuan drop, halts US farm purchases
    Following are selected excerpts from a current SF Chronicle/Associated Press news article. It has been edited for brevity.
    WASHINGTON (AP) — China decided Monday to meet President Donald Trump's latest tariff threat with defiance, letting its currency drop to an 11-year low and halting purchases of U.S. farm products.
    The moves, which came four days after Trump threatened more taxes on Chinese imports, knocked stock markets worldwide into a tailspin. On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down more than 850 points by mid-afternoon. Earlier, stocks tumbled from Shanghai to London on fears the escalation in U.S.-China trade tension will drag down a global economy that is already weakening.
    Also Monday, China's official Xinhua news agency reported that Chinese companies have stopped buying U.S. farm products — a direct shot at Trump supporters in rural America. Together, the currency devaluation and suspension of farm purchases suggest that China has decided to stand tough, rather than cave in Trump's threats.
    "The Chinese side won't submit to the US," tweeted Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of China's hardline Global Times newspaper.
    The weaker yuan makes Chinese exports less expensive in foreign markets. It also helps offset the impact of U.S. tariffs on Chinese products. Trump promptly took to Twitter to denounce the move as "currency manipulation." He added, "This is a major violation which will greatly weaken China over time."
    China's central bank blamed the yuan's drop on "trade protectionism" — an apparent reference to Trump's threat last Thursday to impose tariffs Sept. 1 on the $300 billion in Chinese imports to the United States in addition to the $250 billion he's already targeted.
    It appears "the currency is now also considered part of the arsenal to be drawn upon," Robert Carnell of ING said in a report. He said Monday's move might be part of "a concerted series of steps aimed at pushing back at the latest U.S. tariffs."
    The yuan has lost 5% since February.
    Globally, a weaker yuan might lead to more volatility in currency markets and pressure for the dollar to strengthen, Louis Kuijs of Oxford Economics said in a report. That would be "unwelcome in Washington," where Trump has threatened to weaken the dollar to boost exports.
    A weaker dollar "would be bad news" for Europe and Japan, hurting demand for their exports at a time of cooling economic growth, Kuijs said.
    The Chinese are well aware of the pain the trade war is causing American farmers, a loyal part of Trump's political base. Their retaliatory tariffs on $110 billion in U.S. products targeted soybeans and other key agricultural products. To ease the pain in rural America, Trump has rolled out two packages of farm aid worth a combined $27 billion.
    Monday's Xinhua report said that Beijing would "not rule out the possibility of levying additional tariffs" on U.S. farm imports. Xinhua said Trump's plan to tax another $300 billion in Chinese imports "seriously violated" a ceasefire agreed to in June by Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

  • Another Hit As The Trade War With China Heats Up
    The following is a current NPR news article. It has been lightly edited for brevity.
    Stocks continue to tumble around the world Monday after China allowed its currency to slide, in the latest sign of economic tensions between Beijing and Washington.
    The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down nearly 600 points in midday trading, a drop of more than 2%. The blue chip index has fallen more than 5% from last month's all-time high, while the S&P 500 index lost ground for the sixth day in a row. Technology stocks such as Apple and IBM were hit especially hard.
    Earlier in the day, China allowed its currency, the yuan, to drop to more than seven per dollar, its weakest level in a decade.
    China also said it asked state-owned firms to stop buying U.S. agricultural products, Bloomberg reported. It's the latest blow to American farmers, who have seen prices fall sharply as a result of friction between the U.S. and its major trading partners.
    The decision to let the yuan fall was widely seen as an effort by China to stem the effects of President Trump's decision last week to impose stiffer tariffs on imports from China, which also sent stocks falling on Thursday.
    The decline makes Chinese imports to the United States less expensive, and thus makes U.S. companies less competitive. It also lowers profits for U.S. companies that do business in China. People's Bank of China Governor Yi Gang said China won't let the yuan become a casualty of the trade war. "I am fully confident that the yuan will remain a strong currency in spite of recent fluctuations amid external uncertainties," he said.
    Still, Trump's tariffs, coupled with the yuan depreciation, have left investors concerned that the trade war is spiraling out of control. As a result, investors poured money into safe assets such as government bonds, and the yield on U.S. Treasury debt fell to its lowest level since 2016.
  • When is the Right Time to Invest?
    unless you are retired then place everything in bonds
    The problem with putting 100% into “bonds” at retirement is that some of us may spend 30 or 40 years in retirement. Do you really want to settle for relatively low bond-like returns over all those years? The other problem with the statement is that “bond” can mean anything from “safe” U.S. Treasury bonds (yielding very little) to speculative C rated junk bonds having very high yields, high risk, and capital appreciation potential similar to that of equities.
    Ol’Skeet is correct. I see inflation near everywhere I look. Don’t forget that higher taxes, government imposed fees, and tariffs on imports constitute a form of inflation - as well as the aggregate CPI items. For the life of me I don’t understand the low inflation figures the govt. reports. Just replaced the top boards on my deck with new treated 2x6s. Couldn’t believe the cost of materials alone. The original deck went on the house the first year I was retired. Grateful I wasn’t invested 100% in bonds over those 20 years as the price of lumber was doubling or tripling.
    Best answer to those low govt. inflation figures is that technology has gotten cheaper. You can buy a 50”-60” color TV today for no more than a good 27” color set would have cost you 20-30 years ago. (But try munching on a TV for supper).
  • An "All-American" 9.7% Dividend Trading At A 16% Discount: (GAM)

    GAM's CAGR (ave annual return) since Jan 2010 is 9.89%. Vanguard's S&P fund returned a CAGR of 12.97%. So "Mikey" at Forbes has provided an "income" idea by sacrificed almost 25% of the total return by owning GAM. GAM may be a "stockpicker's" vehicle, but the stockpicker is generating negative alpha...
    Per CEFconnect, GAM distributed $2.25 during 2018. -- Or about 6.2% of GAMs price on 8/2/19. All of it paid on a single calendar day in December. Now 6.2% is a pretty good "yield", but most income-oriented investors prefer to be paid monthly, or at least quarterly. And, of that $2.25 distribution, the overwhelming amount was from L/T cap gains. L/T cap gains are not reliably predictable. And moreover, if an income investor spends those cap gains, he is "eating his seed corn". An investor in SPY could just harvest a few shares and distribute the proceeds to himself, and do better than GAM. The actual income disty was a puny $0.30. Embarrassing.
    Mikey also cites GAM as having "lower volatility". Portfoliovisualizer indicates GAM has experienced 117% of the volatility of the S&P. The same source indicates GAM had a bigger drawdown AND a worse "worst year" than the S&P.
    It appears that every material assertion which Mikey makes about GAM is factually wrong. The advice Mikey is tossing out their for public consumption is Kr@p. Forbes should be sued for financial malpractice.