Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Josh Brown: In 2015 I Learned That…MFO's David Snowball Comments
    Josh wrote me (and presumably everyone else on the list) on December 30th, and asked us to complete the sentence, "In 2015, I learned that ..." Seized by uncontrollable whimsy, I sent him a rather longer answer than was publishable.
    Hi, Josh.
    In 2015 I learned that ...
    ... in the battle between a sensible strategy and a senseless market, the market wins (for now).
    Other things we learned that probably wouldn't fit in your column:
    Sometimes when they say dry-clean only they really mean it. Who knew?
    The longest 3 seconds in sports is when your kid is circling under a fly ball.
    When they describe a ghost pepper as insanely hot, they're telling the truth.
    And, that I can't see Trump without thinking Mussolini (Duce! Duce! Duce!).
    In 2016, I'm hoping to learn whether what they say about Irish milk chocolate is true.
    Cheers for a joyful new year.
    David
  • David Snowball's January 2016 Commentary
    Hi, David.
    Almost all of the winners in my retirement portfolio were Fidelity large growth funds (and Fido Japan Smaller Companies, bought some while ago at Ed's recommendation).
    In Mr. Danoff's case, his major winners were Facebook (up 34%), Amazon (up 120%), various flavors of Google (up about 45% depending a bit on share class), and Netflix (up 135%). Decent gains on smaller positions in Visa and MasterCard, services important to your use of all of the above.
    Berkshire Hathaway and Apple were negative and Chipotle was negative in oh so many ways.
    For what that's worth,
    David
  • David Snowball's January 2016 Commentary
    Reading the opening annus subsection, I wonder what explains Danoff's 6.5% w/ 45% turnover in a heeyuge fund.
  • Manning & Napier Buying Rainier
    I stumbled across this press release (http://rainierfunds.com/Documents/Rainier - Manning-Napier-press release.pdf) when looking into Rainier International Discovery. I had heard nothing of this proposed transaction. FWIIW, RISAX had a great year in 2015 and I was curious as to how they clocked my Grandeur Peak holdings. The big difference is in market caps; the Rainier fund, despite being classified as Sm-Mid Intl, holds 91% in lg-caps and mid-caps, and only 8% in sm-caps. GPIOX has no large caps and has almost all its holdings in small and micro caps. Apples and oranges, as the sage said. Grandeur Peak over-all has done very little since mid 2014, so GPEOX, GPGOX, and GPIOX are among my several bad ideas for 2015.
  • Barron's Cover Story: Get Yield Up To 9%
    FYI: (Click On Article Title At Top Of Google Search)
    There are still plenty of places to find decent income in stock and bond markets, even with many key interest rates at or near historically low levels. Investors can get yields of 4% to 9% on a range of investments, including junk bonds, utility stocks, telecom shares, and real estate investment trusts. These look appealing in an environment of sub-2% inflation, 1%-to-3% Treasury yields, and minuscule yields on bank deposits and money-market funds.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.google.com/#q=get+yield+up+to+9%+Barron's
  • Scott Burns: Beating The Index
    This sure seems more reasonable and plausible to do than most such advice articles:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/one-way-to-try-to-beat-the-sp-in-2016-2015-12-31
    It would be to track going forward, and/or back-test, with a dummy portfolio.
  • Josh Brown: In 2015 I Learned That…MFO's David Snowball Comments
    Hi Guys,
    Prolific Melody Beattie wrote: “The new year stands before us like a chapter in a book, waiting to be written. We can help write that story by setting goals”.
    In the investing world we can certainly set those goals, but we are powerless with regard to controlling the final outcomes. I have been investing for over 6 decades and I still do not find any consistent rhyme or any repeatable reasons why the marketplace does what it does.
    An excellent visual summary of the non-predictability of both the equity and the fixed income segments is available in the market’s periodic returns tables that are often referenced in these MFO exchanges. Here is a Link to an American Century version of these illustrative tables:
    https://www.americancentury.com/content/dam/americancentury/ipro/pdfs/flyer/Periodic_Table.pdf
    There is no rhyme, no reason to the steep yearly reversals in these category returns. Economies don’t change that rapidly; only investor sentiments are that volatile. If you can ferret some respectable pattern from these chaotic data, than” you’re a better man than I am Gunga Din” !
    Sensible market actions are mostly an illusion. Our market experts are still trying to explain the Great Depression and coupled market meltdown. Some folks place blame on the Smott-Hawley tariff tax bill; others take exception. However, we’re all very inventive at generating seemingly plausible, but mostly wrong, causes.
    Some folks believe that we were just due for a market correction after a rather long run of positive outcomes. That’s a fallacy; it is more superstition than factually based. Just because a coin toss has come up heads ten times in succession doesn’t alter the base rate odds that the next toss has a 50/50 chance of yet another head.
    Historically, equities have returned positive results about 70% of the time annually. Although that didn’t happen this year, I expected that outcome and am disappointed. Next year, I expect that the positive return odds remain at the 70% likelihood.
    I don’t change my portfolio construction based on forecasters. In 1933 Alfred Cowles published a paper with a questioning title, “Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?”. He answered in the negative. Not much has changed in the intervening decades. In that spirit, I agree with the comments submitted by MFOer vkt.
    My contribution to a lessons learned list would not be new for 2015, but it surely would be persistent: Forecasters can’t forecast.
    Best Wishes for a healthy and profitable New Year.
  • Josh Brown: In 2015 I Learned That…MFO's David Snowball Comments
    Thanks Ted...a nice start to the new year...and little5bee with that go blue nonsense is probably happy as well as that team up north destroyed Florida.
    Happy New Year to you as well Ted.
  • FPBFX (fido Pac. Basin) or MAPIX (Mathews Asia Div.)
    Also posted on M*.
    I'm a long-time investor in MAPIX and have gotten in and out a couple of times; I am "in" right now. BUT, I'm not sure I'm getting the most bang-for-the-buck (pardon the cliche').
    Absolute returns are good, not great, the downside has been okay, but not what I'd hoped, so I have been exploring other options in the Divers. Asia Pacific category.
    I find myself looking closely at FIDO's Pac. Basin fund,FPBFX (my wife owns it in her 401K). It has a new manager since late 2013, so his track-record is very short and difficult to evaluate. When I compare it's returns and metrics to other funds (3 years and less), in particluar, MAPIX, FPBFX comes out mostly on top.
    Returns favor FPBFX significantly; slight nod to MAPIX for M* "risk"/SD; Alpha, Treynor, upside/downside capture ratio favor FPBFX.
    Furthermore, when I look at the "downside" Quarterly returns for 2013-2015, I find no real difference, if anything, it may favor FPBFX a bit.
    Bottom line, what thoughts, suggestions and opinions do you have? Am i being too impatient and possibly "performace chasing"?
    Thank you for any and all comments!!
    Matt
  • Nice story about GLRBX
    Can't let it go, can you?
    You asked how many of the 162 funds M* calculated this year. I'd say all of them. The vast majority of current bond quality averages were calculated for the past quarter (9/30/15). Though you're right, some fund families are more helpful than others.
    Fidelity seems to have provided data ahead of what's legally required. M* was able to compute the average quality of Fidelity's conservative allocation funds as of 10/31/15, a month more recent than most.
    There's a reason why you wander over to the reference section of your library. You put in time and effort assimilating information because you find value in the M* subscription material. Let's just leave it at that.
  • Josh Brown: In 2015 I Learned That…MFO's David Snowball Comments
    If anyone can DEFINE what a sensible (or senseless) market is in a sensible way, I would love to hear it. Predictable? Amenable to simple explanations? Always goes up? Follows some simple metrics or thumb rules? Behaves as I expect it to? Then only does it make sense to opine if it was a sensible market or not. :)
    Perhaps we can have our own "In 2015 I learned that..." list here. Serious or silly just to entertain.
    To start, here is what I learnt in 2015...
    Not only are most predictions wrong but most explanations of why something happened in the markets are also wrong (or non-falsifiable).
  • Josh Brown: In 2015 I Learned That…MFO's David Snowball Comments
    Agree that 2015 seemed like a senseless market.
    Maybe we are headed for a great deflationary collapse - which raw materials prices appear to suggest. Or maybe the year was more a lesson in trend persistency. Not much other than tech and (possibly) health care seems to have prospered. Even my ultra-conservative "safe" funds like RPSIX, DODIX and TRRIX all took hits. Looking at TRP, their Ginny Mae made a little $$, despite rising rates, and their HY fund fell - but hardly the rout one would surmise from the media hype.
    If anybody can explain why this was a sensible market I'd love to hear.
  • A Painful Year for Contrarian Trades
    Is FCNTX, the original nominally contrarian fund, too big to be called that anymore? I wonder when the first article will appear this year about how Danoff cannot keep it going, owing to size. (Just observing today how much better Contrafund did for 2015 than RPG, SCHD, NOBL, SPX, ....)
  • Josh Brown: In 2015 I Learned That…MFO's David Snowball Comments
    FYI: Wait – 2015 is already over? How the hell did that happen?
    It’s been quite a year, even though it feels like it flew by in an instant. Let’s hurry up and preserve the lessons learned lest we forget them all as 2016 gets underway.
    You’ve already heard enough from me this year, so now, with a little help from my friends…
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://thereformedbroker.com/2015/12/31/in-2015-i-learned-that/
  • Burton Malkiel: Investing For 2016 In An Expensive Market
    FYI: (Click On Article Title At Top Of Google Search)
    How do you invest when everything is expensive? U.S. stocks are selling at more than 25 times their cyclically adjusted earnings. Bond yields are unusually low (the 10-year U.S. Treasury yields about 2.25%), and interest rates are likely to rise. Money-market funds and savings deposits yield next to nothing. Property markets are also richly valued. There are no “door busters” available in world financial markets.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.google.com/#q=Investing+for+2016+in+an+Expensive+Market
  • Q&A With Patrick Kelly, Co-Manager Alger Spectra Fund
    FYI: Patrick Kelly has the Alger Spectra Fund in a coveted spot. As portfolio manager since 2004, he has led the fund to the No. 1 ranking of 900 large-cap growth mutual funds tracked by Morningstar over the last decade
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MjEyMjg5Nzk=
    M* Snapshot SPECX: http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/SPECX/quote.html
    Lipper Snapshot SPECX: http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/Fund/SPECX?countrycode=US
    SPECX Is Ranked #115 In The (LCG) Fund Category By U.S. News & World Report:
    http://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/large-growth/alger-spectra-fund/specx
  • This Guy Had A Great Year Betting Against A Favorite Tool Of Mom-And-Pop Investors
    FYI: (This is a follow-up article)
    The Michigan-native is betting against one of the most popular investment vehicles for mom-and-pop investors: exchange-traded funds. The bets have paid off, turning Miller’s little known Catalyst Mutual Funds into one of Wall Street’s most successful players in 2015.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/get-there/wp/2015/12/31/this-guy-had-a-great-year-betting-against-a-favorite-tool-of-mom-and-pop-investors/
    M* Snapshot MCXAX: http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/MCXAX/quote.html
  • Guru Picks: Best Funds And ETFs For 2016
    FYI: Many investors prefer the idea of buying a basket of stocks through a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund rather than picking and choosing individual stocks but the task of selecting the right fund can be a bit overwhelming. According to the Investment Company Institute, there are more than 8,100 mutual funds in the U.S. with combined assets of $15.94 trillion and more than 1,500 ETFs with total assets of $2.1 trillion. For some help in narrowing the field for investors, we asked some of our top fund and ETF gurus for their best investing ideas for the next 12 months. Their picks are included below.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/investor/2015/12/31/guru-picks-best-funds-and-etfs-for-2016/print/
  • The Year Nothing Worked: Stocks, Bonds, Cash Go Nowhere
    @ BobC, don't forget about OSMAX (I have the Inst. version), it's been my winner this year.
    Foreign mid-cap growth funds had a great 2015 (OSMAX, AOPAX, PRIDX, etc.) ... so great, that those with the highest P/E's might be ripe for a stallout. (Same with the FI cef rally I mentioned above ... it's been a terrific 6m run, but more than a few are getting up there on relative premium/discount.)