Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Bond Funds
    @Catch: Thanks for the thoughts. The 2 funds I referenced above were/are part of my 75% "hold forever" position. Essentially, no changes are ever made in that "bucketed" group of half dozen or so funds except for very occasional rebalancing. The only caveat: With increasing age, I've gradually shaded that entire group more and more to the conservative side (and may continue doing so). So the move I noted above (from PRFRX into RPSIX) was in keeping with that risk reduction. Still, it hurts to sell a deadbeat and have it turn around on you.
    Hope I made a little sense. Regards
  • Bond Funds
    Morn'in @hank
    You noted: "Buying and selling rarely pays. Maybe a lesson in there for others."
    >>>Hell, this statement would take this house right out of the investment game, period.
    Everyone's buy and hold and/or rebalance period has various conditions, eh?
    Best case scenario, I suppose, would be a buy/hold of VTI and PIMIX 50/50% mix. Stir the pot once and let simmer.....
    Take care,
    Catch
  • How traditional retirement formulas fall short
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-traditional-retirement-formulas-fall-short-2015-07-15?page=2
    http://paulmerriman.com/retirement-distributions-2015/
    Of course the author doesn't ask the correct questions in this article:
    What are the chances of accumulating $1mm money by about 55 or 60? Answer small.
    Then again with the right amount of inflation many more people will be able to do so!
  • Bond Funds
    Many of the bank loan funds are having decent years over 3% YTD ala LSFYX and DBFRX. Same with many of the junk funds ala JAHYX.
    A year ago I bailed from Price's floating rate (bank loan) fund, PRFRX, after enduring about 3 years of very poor performance. Guess what? It's up around 3.5% YTD. Meanwhile, RPSIX, where I put the $$, is flat YTD. Another case of being "a day late and a dollar short."
    Buying and selling rarely pays. Maybe a lesson in there for others.
  • The Definitive Smart Beta ETF Guide
    FYI: Smart beta has emerged as one of the most exciting and hotly debated investment trends of the past 10 years.
    Going by many different names—strategic beta, Fundamental Indexing, factor investing and others—smart beta is a
    catchall term for rules-based, quantitative strategies that aim to deliver better risk-adjusted returns than traditional
    market indexes.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.etf.com/sites/default/files/smart-beta-guide-043015.pdf
  • Great Book on Investment Managers
    @MFO Members: Here's what Lukemon was commenting on. Thank, Lukemon for the heads-up.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.amazon.com/Great-Minds-Investing-William-Green/dp/3898799247/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1436962195&sr=8-1&keywords=great+minds+of+investing
    Another Book On Fund Managers Is "Value Investing With The Masters"
    Some of these money managers William Miller of Legg Mason Value Trust, David Dreman of Dreman Value Management and Martin Whitman of Third Avenue Funds are well-established advocates of the value approach. Others are relative newcomers, such as the Oakmark Funds' William Nygren and Jean-Marie Eveillard of First Eagle SoGen Funds. The general approach to the interviews is the same: a brief summary of the manager's background, including education.
    http://www.amazon.com/Value-Investing-Masters-Interviews-Market-Beating/dp/0735203210/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1436962899&sr=1-1&keywords=value+investing+with+the+masters
  • Never mind posted below - Fund Managers Holding Highest Cash......
    Yes - Fear must be rampant among many fund managers to drive them into cash at 1% (+-). Really kills return. As I posted a week or so ago, the normally sane and intelligent managers at Oakmark have nearly all of OAKBX's fixed-income allocation (typically around 30-35%) sitting in cash and short-term stuff as of last report. Highly unusual for a fund that likes to hold some longer-dated government bonds to off-set its equity positions.
    -
    Oops. Apparently Mark's is a duplicate post. Apologies to whomever I've offended by responding to it.
    Maybe we need a computer here that would detect duplicates and prevent their being posted? (as one who has made the same mistake in the past).
  • When Will Value Funds Revive?
    FYI: Value mutual funds did well in the first two of the past 10 years but have lagged their growth and core counterparts since then, leaving the style trailing for the whole period.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTk5MzkzOTE=
    Enlarged Graphic:
    http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=071515webLV.jpg&docId=761703&xmpSource=&width=986&height=1135&caption=&id=761693
  • MFO Fund Ratings Posted - Through 2nd Quarter 2015
    OK. Just could you note...
    My bad on the Alarm Rating column...basically, latest legacy Fund Alarm Ranking...HR - Honor Roll, TA - Three Alarm, ND - No Designation (ie. In between), Dash - Less Than 5 Years Old, so not ranked in legacy system.
    The output is from the MFO premium site, which I'm coming to rely on more and more.
  • MFO Fund Ratings Posted - Through 2nd Quarter 2015

    Hey, income funds on my mind lately, just past the 59.5 mark.
    A look back at some notables this past year, sorted by APR highest to lowest:
    Hi Charles,
    I am having a problem understanding the numbers in your 1-Year Display Period.
    Mona
  • Bond King Jeff Gundlach Feuds With Unlikely Foe M*
    FYI: Jeffrey Gundlach is locked in a protracted stare-down with an unlikely foe: Morningstar Inc.
    Gundlach, who formed his investing firm DoubleLine Capital LP in 2009 and built it into one of the most successful fixed-income fund companies, is sparring with the research firm over what DoubleLine says have been a series of false and misleading statements about its flagship fund, according to people familiar with the matter.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bond-king-jeff-gundlach-feuds-with-unlikely-foe-2015-07-14/print
    WSJ Article: (Click On article Title At Top Of Google Search)
    https://www.google.com/#q=Bond+King+Gundlach+Feuds+With+Morningstar+wsj
    M* Snapshot DBLTX: http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/DBLTX/quote.html
  • Bond Funds
    Bonds currently make up 32% within the portfolio:
    ABNDX ... 0.2% ... -0.5%
    AIBAX ... 0.5% ... 0.6%
    AHITX ... 1.1% ... 1.9%
    TAFTX ... 5.7% ... 0.1%
    AMHIX ... 5.7% ... 0.5%
    ABHIX ... 0.3% ... 1.4%
    RPHYX ... 17.4% ... 1.2%
    LSBRX ... 1.4% ... -2.6%
    The whole mess is up 0.6%, same as Skeet.
  • Bond Funds
    Hi, @willmatt72,
    Bonds are a part of my overall asset allocation and carry a weighting range of 20% to 40% within my portfolio with a neutral weighting being 30%. Currently, bonds make up about 20% of my portfolio; and, with this, I bubble at the low range. The bond funds that I currently own are GIFAX, LALDX, LBNDX, NEFZX, THIFX & TSIAX. I have representations to bank loans, short term securities, high yield securities and other type of bonds and income generating securities through my multi sector income funds. As from review of my last Instant Xray (June 26th) analysis my fund managers collectively have reduced bonds, within the portfolio, by a couple percent and raised stocks by a like amount while keeping cash and the other asset classification the same. However, short positions within the portfolio were increased form 6% to 8%.
    As I write, my fixed income sleeve year-to-date is up 0.6% while a bond index fund that I track is down 0.5%. My hybrid income sleeve which consists of AZNAX, ISFAX, CAPAX, FKINX, PASAX & PGBAX is up year-to-date 0.9%. Both sleeve's total return have not been able to keep pace, thus far this year, with their distributions made resulting in a decline in sleeve valuation. However, other sleeves within the portfolio are showing net positive total returns resulting in positive results for the portfolio as a whole after accounting for all gains and distributions taken.
    Hope this information is helpful.
    Old_Skeet
  • I don't quite follow some of Ed Studzinski's comments on FPA...
    FPA Crescent Fund
    Q2
    2015 Update
    Positioning:
    Gross exposure to equities is circa 57%
    and net exposure is approximately 53%
    . Fixed Income remains low at around 2.3%
    Added
    to private investments, specifically
    real estate partnerships
    Cash is approximately 43%.
    Outlook:
    Challenging to find opportunities that meet our investment criteria.
    We are looking at
    coal, for profit education and aerospace/defense
    *******
    http://www.fpafunds.com/docs/fpa-crescent-fund/q2-2015-crescent-update-w_o-cpi-docx.pdf?sfvrsn=2
    *******Not exactly a politically liberal view of the future economy in those industries, is it.
    .
  • Female Mutual Fund Manager Study
    @MJG- When dealing with a ponderous and awkward url such as the one above, try using the url widget (in the header just above: the next to the last icon). Write a short title, such as Link to Professor's paper, select (highlight) that title, click on the url icon, and simply paste the url into the little box that appears.
    Regards- OJ
  • Mark Mobius Stepping Down as Chief of Templeton Emerging Trust.
    Peter Smith, chairman of the Templeton trust, acknowledged that the fund’s performance was “very disappointing,”
    Möbius has been lagging the emerging market index for some time while the fund carries high expense ratio (A shares has a 5.75% load with ER at 1.8% for example) relative to its peers. So this no surprise the transition takes place.
  • MFO Fund Ratings Posted - Through 2nd Quarter 2015
    Our risk and return performance metrics through quarter ending June 2015 have been posted to the Search Tools, including updates to Three Alarm, Honor Roll, and Great Owl funds, and well as Dashboard of all funds profiled.
    I think we need another category: Funds that will out perform in their category over the - next 5, 10, 15, 20+ years
  • Neuberger Berman Global Thematic Opportunities Fund to liquidate
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/44402/000089843215000896/a497.htm
    Neuberger Berman Equity Funds®
    Supplement to the Summary Prospectus and Prospectus, each dated December 15, 2014, and the Statement of Additional Information, dated December 15, 2014 (as amended February 5, 2015, April 14, 2015, and June 17, 2015)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Neuberger Berman Global Thematic Opportunities Fund
    Class A, Class C and Institutional Class
    The Board of Trustees of Neuberger Berman Equity Funds (the “Trust”) has approved the liquidation of Neuberger Berman Global Thematic Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”), a series of the Trust. Accordingly, the Fund will cease its investment operations, liquidate its assets and make a liquidating distribution to shareholders of record.
    The date of liquidation for the Fund currently is anticipated to be on or about August 21, 2015 (the “Liquidation Date”). Shareholders may continue to redeem their Fund shares through the Liquidation Date. As of the close of business on July 22, 2015, the Fund will no longer accept orders to purchase Fund shares from new investors or existing shareholders (including purchases through dividend reinvestments). In connection with the liquidation, the Fund may depart from its stated goals, strategies and techniques as it begins to convert all portfolio securities to cash or cash equivalents in preparation for the final distribution to shareholders. Any shareholder who purchased Class A or Class C Fund shares on or after June 25, 2015, will be reimbursed any applicable sales charge paid and will not be subject to any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. If any such sales charge has already been paid, that amount will be reimbursed to the shareholder.
    Shareholders who elect to redeem their Fund shares prior to the completion of the liquidation will be redeemed in the ordinary course at the Fund’s net asset value per share. Shareholders may exchange their Fund shares for shares of another fund in the Neuberger Berman mutual fund complex in accordance with the terms of the Fund’s prospectus at any time prior to the Fund’s cessation of operations. Each shareholder who does not choose either of those options and remains in the Fund will receive a liquidating cash distribution equal to the aggregate net asset value of the Fund shares that such shareholder holds at the time of the liquidation. Shareholders are encouraged to consider options that may be suitable for the reinvestment of their liquidation proceeds, including exchanging into another fund in the Neuberger Berman mutual fund complex.
    The liquidation of the Fund will result in one or more taxable events for shareholders that are subject to federal income tax. A redemption or exchange of Fund shares prior to the Fund’s cessation of operations will generally give rise to a capital gain or loss (depending on the shareholder’s tax basis in the shares) for federal income tax purposes. In connection with the liquidation, the Fund will declare taxable distributions of its previously undistributed net investment income and net capital gain, if any, in advance of its normal annual distribution schedule. All liquidation proceeds paid to shareholders will generally be treated as received by them in exchange for their Fund shares and will therefore generally give rise to a capital gain or loss, again depending on their respective tax bases in their shares.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Shareholders who hold their Fund shares through a retirement plan or account (such as a 401(k) plan or individual retirement account) should consult their tax advisers regarding the consequences of a redemption of Fund shares prior to the completion of the liquidation or the receipt of a liquidating cash distribution. Upon the receipt of a distribution from the Fund, whether in the form of a redemption or a liquidating cash distribution, such shareholders may have a limited time within which to reinvest the distribution proceeds to avoid adverse tax consequences.
    The date of this supplement is July 13, 2015.
    Please retain this supplement for future reference.
    NEUBERGER BERMAN
    Neuberger Berman Management LLC
    605 Third Avenue 2nd Floor
    New York, NY 10158-0180
    Shareholder services: 800-877-9700
    Institutional Services: 800-366-6264
    Website: www.nb.com