Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • MDY and IJH etf activity yesterday
    Does anyone know why the volume on these 2 mid-cap ETFs spiked yesterday so substantially? MDY was 5X average volume and I believe IJH was in the similar volume activity? I could not find any reason for it as MDY has had very low trading volumes recently.
    Thank you.
  • A single-silo credit allocator? In crisis, the Fed may swing the exit gate shut on you
    Many (most?) people who use MFs for fixed-income investing do so in diversified vehicles that to a greater or lesser extent are also multi-sector. There are also some who are more contrarian, who rotate successfully/opportunistically from one fixed-income asset class to another, as good value arises from dislocations. Some do both.
    This blog briefly notes the positives of both, in the context of how each approach could be impacted by measures the Fed Reserve is "considering" as part of a financial crisis action plan:
    http://blog.alliancebernstein.com/index.php/2014/06/17/multisector-plan-can-help-avoid-the-crowd-in-credit/
    You see, according to the Fed trial balloon leakthinking, under dire circumstances, retail investors in some transparent, open-end mutual funds might stampede for the exits in large sector-specific funds (the horror!); the degree to which this spasmic disorder would threaten the banking system of the country is so unpredictable, yet similar in impact to what one might expect to come from the "shadow banking system," that one should create contigency plans for a run on these funds as if they are part of the "shadow banking system." At least that's the way I'm interpreting what I've read here and elsewhere about this contrivance discussion:
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/290ed010-f567-11e3-91a8-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl#axzz34uHmImp0
    See what you think, esp. you dangerous single-silo credit allocators.
  • What do you think about these funds?
    Thanks, Crash!
    I took a look….two (2) things at $20 billion too big and it’s going to close. YAFFX just closed hard! It has $8.5 billion….I do like MAPOX on my short buy list on pullback.
    Yes, Ron, sometimes I do this too much. My wife says this too…..and about other things, too. So I say, “Sweetie, want to have sex (lol!)?” That ends that discussion. I’ve learned a lot over the years being married.
    The Puddn
  • Top Midcap Funds Of 15 Years Spotty Year-To-Date
    OJ, thanks; missed that. If you pay a whopping load you can get in for the usual small amount. And then your results will be much worse than FLPSX. Oh, wait, it's also closed. It also has lagged its Russell MCV index for 1/5/10y, huh? Guess I be stickin' with Tillinghast.
  • Top Midcap Funds Of 15 Years Spotty Year-To-Date
    FYI: The average midcap stock fund has preformed second only to small-cap funds the past 15 years and well beyond the broad stock market. Midcap funds are having a difficult time staying ahead of the large-cap-oriented S&P 500 this year
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTgxODI5Njg=
    Enlarged View Of Fund Graphic: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=WMUTO1_061714.gif&docId=704860&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=1063&caption=
  • Oil: Significent Iraq Disruptions, Unlikely, Morgan Stanley Says
    Oppenheimer senior energy analyst Fadel Gheit said the oil stocks are overpriced and are trading as if crude was going to stay at $110 per barrel.
    "It really depends on what the balance of power is going to be a month from now, a year from now," Gheit said. "The Sunnis are left basically with nothing but arms because they were excluded from the government. They have no oil resources. The Kurds took their share, and the Baghdad government wants to keep their share. Maliki is not an inclusive prime minister. he's doing what Saddam Hussein did but the opposite way. He favored his own tribe over another."
    An Alarmist's Worst Case?
    As the second-largest and fastest-growing producer in OPEC, Iraq has been pumping 3.3 million barrels a day. OPEC's quota is 30 million barrels. So far, oil production has not been disrupted, but a northern pipeline that takes oil from Kirkuk to Turkey has been damaged by militant assaults and has been out of service since March.
    "If they can hold onto Baghdad, and the south of Iraq, 3 million barrels will continue to flow and it won't be a big deal," said John Kilduff, energy analyst with Again Capital. "Any credible threat to central Baghdad or the oil fields— it's $150 just for starters."
    Kilduff said any spike higher would probably fade quickly, but consumer confidence would plunge, and it would launch an energy crisis because Saudi Arabia, the global swing producer, cannot make up that much lost capacity.
    Originally here.
    http://seekingalpha.com/news/1803223-some-analysts-say-energy-stocks-are-getting-too-hot
    More detail here.
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/101763888
    Other Energy News and Background.
    BlackRock’s Russ Koesterich thinks energy stocks will benefit:
    The recent unrest in the Middle East and the potential for higher oil prices confirms our views on two sectors: positive on energy while negative on U.S. retailers and other consumer stocks. Year-to-date, energy has been one of the best-performing sectors while consumer discretionary has trailed the broader market.
    http://blogs.barrons.com/stockstowatchtoday/2014/06/16/buy-energy-sell-consumer-discretionary-as-higher-oil-prices-set-to-linger/
    I have energy positions in GAGEX ,CRZAX ,CSHAX and NORW.Also two small Canadian plays CDLRF and CESDF .All are at or near Y T D or all-time highs. Blind Hog !
    Energy Statistics and World View.
    Oil remains the world’s leading fuel, with 33% of global energy demand, but lost market share to other fuels for the 14th consecutive year.
    China surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest net oil importer, bringing in 7 million barrels a day.
    Coal consumption increased by 3% in 2013, below its yearly average of 3.9% but enough to put coal’s share of world energy consumption at 30%, its highest since 1970, BP said in its 63rd annual statistical review on Monday. The review is an industry benchmark.
    http://blogs.marketwatch.com/energy-ticker/2014/06/16/renewable-energy-demand-rises-to-record-2-7-of-global-consumption/?mod=WSJBlog
    For 63 years, the
    BP Statistical Review of World Energy
    has
    provided high-quality objective and globally consistent data on
    world energy markets. The review is one of the most widely
    respected and authoritative publications in the field of energy
    economics, used for reference by the media, academia, world
    governments and energy companies. A new edition is published
    every June.Highlights:
    World proved natural gas reserves at end-2013 stood at 185.7 trillion cubic metres (tcm), sufficient to meet 54.8 years of global production.
    Total world proved oil reserves reached 1687.9 billion barrels at the end of 2013, sufficient to meet 53.3 years of global production.
    World proved coal reserves in 2013 were sufficient to meet 113 years of global production, by far the largest R/P ratio for any fossil fuel.
    World coal production increased by 0.8% in 2013, well below the 3% increase in global consumption. Indonesia (+9.4%) recorded the largest production increment – the
    first time since 1998 that China did not have the largest growth increment. Global consumption growth was below average but was once again the fastest among fossil
    fuels. China and India accounted for 88% of global growth
    World nuclear power generation increased by 0.9%, the first increase since 2010. Gains in the US, China, and Canada more than offset declines in South Korea, Ukraine,
    Spain and Russia. Global hydroelectric output grew by a below-average 2.9%. Growth in China, Russia, Spain and India was partly offset by large declines in Brazil and
    the Nordic countries
    48 Page Review:
    http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/statistical-review-2014/BP-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2014-full-report.pdf
  • Barry Ritholtz: Curate Your Personal Investment Resources
    Hi Ted,
    It appears that you have decided to continue the march, at least for now. That's good. Thank you.
    Indeed you have been doing this form of research for years, and I have benefited from it since the early FundAlarm days. Compared to your time on the job, Barry Ritholtz is a rookie. He was likely in the 4th grade when you posted your first listing.
    I’m happy that you have elected to basically ignore the MFO naysayers except for your very perceptive summary sentence. This too reflects your overarching experience level.
    I suspect some segment of these naysayers adhere to the following advice which was published about 7 months ago by Ritholtz titled “Reduce the Noise Levels in Your Investment Process”:
    " (1) Constantly consume mainstream media. Financial television is an excellent source of actionable investing ideas.
    (2) Play down data. It’s overrated. Stick with anecdotes from people you know personally and your gut instincts.
    (3) Pay attention to pundits. They exist for the sole purpose of helping you reach a comfortable retirement.
    (4) Get the inside dope. All of the important information about the stock market — especially when it is going to crash or rally — is known only to handful of secret insiders. If you can’t get their magic knowledge, blame them for any losses you incur.
    (5) Stress about this. Exert lots of energy, spend lots of time and create lots of tension about all of the following: Federal Reserve and the Taper, the Dollar versus the Euro, the Tea Party and Congress, Hyper-Inflation, European Sovereign Bank Debt, Gold, China, Deflation, Austerity and the Hindenburg Omen.
    (6) Don’t do the math. Numbers are vastly overrated, and probability analysis is for geeks anyway.
    (7) Stay in your comfort zone. Focus only on those news sources that are in sync with your politics. Seek out sources that confirm your preexisting opinions and investment postures. Never read anything that challenges your beliefs.
    (8) Think fast. Trading is where the big money is made! Don’t worry about the long term — it’s way off in the future. Measure your success in hours and days, not years and decades.
    (9) Have a Super Happy Fun Time. There is no reason that you cannot also have a good time with your retirement account: It’s tax -deferred, so you have no capital gains consequences. Have fun with it — that’s what it’s there for anyway!
    (10) Ask: What Have You Done For Me Lately? Never listen to people with good long-term track records who may have had a losing period. When Warren Buffett underperformed in 1999, you should have written him off. Investing is about recent performance!"
    Of course, Ritholtz was just showing off his sarcastic side. He meant and believes just the opposite. He called this subsection of his article “How to Get More Noise and Less Signal”. I love it! In this arena you and Ritholtz share some common characteristics.
    Thanks once again for doing this arduous task. It has saved me and many other MFO members countless hours of searching time while wisely directing our attention to meaningful candidate articles that will positively inform us in most instances.
    Continue to continue the march.
    Best Wishes.
  • 5 Smaller Foreign Funds Worth A Look
    Morningstar's funny. "Smaller" = "our smallest medalists." The sizes here range from $1 - 8 billion and Kinnel himself admits "the last two [Causeway at $5B and Manning & Napier at $8B] are a little too big to count" as "below the radar" but includes them anyways. Why? Because Morningstar doesn't know of five good international funds "below the radar."
    I agree with Ted's judgment and might have a chance to listen to Ms. Ketterer in the week ahead. I'll let you know what I hear.
    David
  • Scott Burns: Can You Buy Investment Performance ?
    Hmm. Never heard of such a thing in 35 years of investing, at least in Mass., and my in-laws neither, in Conn. $3k on $100k? Maybe we're spoiled by Fido, but even when I was wrapped with PW, old ML, and Bear-Stearns, long ago, that was not the case. It is true that if you calculated in the awful trading commissions and other fees, the total was high, though not 3% effective.
  • What do you think about these funds?
    Hi Crash!
    I saw high cash….looks good now. Will only buy on pullback….have little cash now….that’s why I’m looking to sell WPFRX. I rode R2K (Russell 2000) hard last year….looking to get rid of mid caps and small caps. MAPOX - would cost $50. PRWCX - also $50 fee with Fidelity. Also, I can’t find any information on PRWCX at Fidelity (tried to research it). But I like the look of MAPOX. Better bonds than BERIX….like that. Thank you for your time.
    ***********************
    Here you go: :)
    (From Fidelity:) https://fundresearch.fidelity.com/mutual-funds/summary/77954M105
  • What do you think about these funds?
    @Puddnhead
    This link will take you to Fido and the PRWCX info you seek.
    Regards,
    Catch
  • What do you think about these funds?
    Hi David!
    Well, moron me….to just let $50 stand in the way (brings out the Amish in me!). I have GLRBX and I like it. I’m not into bonds now…..it’s that short of cash thing. I need to sell something.
  • What do you think about these funds?
    Hi Scott!
    FSPHX - had nice run in 2013. This year, it nose-dived earlier. I guess, to put it simply, its about too much beta (ups and downs). This fund was great last year…..can it perform as well 2 years running…..I don’t know. Looking more for slow and sure…..I guess healthcare is where its at, but I want a sleeper. I think LOGSX might be that….less biotech (4.8% bio) and more Obama (what he pushes is where their money will follow). What do you think? Also, fund is small (less than $50 million) … nimble maybe versus $5.5 billion and 30% bio. Less beta I guess is what I’m looking for. Hope this makes sense…..the Puddnhead might have had one too many beers…..
    Now, for interest rates: lower is where we’re going. See Europe, Japan and China as the new normal (lol!). But I think he’s right about that stuff …..it isn’t all that good, the talking heads say, because everybody has their own agenda. Where I work, we went to 10% temp work force. Since 2000, anyone hired after that gets NO pension. Things have changed, so now I believe we are going lower as far as interest rates go. As for MLP, I can’t find a better way to play fracking...so this is my energy part of my portfolio.
  • What do you think about these funds?
    Hi Crash!
    I saw high cash….looks good now. Will only buy on pullback….have little cash now….that’s why I’m looking to sell WPFRX. I rode R2K (Russell 2000) hard last year….looking to get rid of mid caps and small caps. MAPOX - would cost $50. PRWCX - also $50 fee with Fidelity. Also, I can’t find any information on PRWCX at Fidelity (tried to research it). But I like the look of MAPOX. Better bonds than BERIX….like that. Thank you for your time.
  • The Four Best Bond Funds To Own Now
    @rjb112
    Another footnote you might what to check out is Footnote (c) under the assets described for D&C Global Bond. It may surprise you. [I'm still quite positive about the new fund, but it may bear closer scrutiny for awhile; be vigilant, assume nothing]
    Here it is:
    c) "Data as presented excludes the effect of the Fund’s short position in Treasury futures contracts (notional value = 15.4% of the Fund’s net assets). If exposure to Treasury futures contracts had been included, the effective maturity would be 1.3 years lower."
    Yeah, another one you found. What is that doing in the fine print that almost nobody reads? Again they need to be more transparent. They should come right out and say, in the part that everyone can see without microscopic vision: "We are 15.4% short Treasury futures contracts" !!
    I've got my eye on that fund as a possible investment candidate in the future.
  • Is Information Ratio Useful to Gage Mutual Funds?
    Hi Guys,
    The perennial question is what number or numbers (statistics) are most useful in the mutual fund decision making process beyond the time-tested cost criterion?
    Okay, in the complex investment world, the search for a single decisive parameter might well be pure folly. I tend to subscribe to that belief, but although a single parameter is likely never sufficient be itself, it might well serve as an extremely useful sorting mechanism.
    What might that parameter be? Recently a lot of attention has been centered on the Active Share percentage that an actively managed mutual fund maintains. Active Share percentage has many attractive features like segregating a truly actively managed fund from a sleeper Index matching alternative. However, much research suggests that actively managed funds do not outperform their more Index duplicating brethren; and they often cost more.
    How about Information Ratio as a substitute selection criterion? Or perhaps they can be used in a complementary fashion? What do you think?
    The Information Ratio statistic has some persuasive characteristics. Here is a Link to a JP Morgan article that defines and discusses Information Ratio:
    https://www.jpmorganfunds.com/blobcontent/518/497/1279234170856_II-IR-KNOW.pdf
    Why risk an investment in an actively managed fund product that has not delivered positive Excess Returns? At yet another level, why not invest in a fund that has a low standard deviation in its annual or quarterly Excess Returns? The standard deviation is frequently called Tracking Error and is in the denominator of the Information Ratio.
    It seems to me that Information Ratio is superior to the Sharpe’s Ratio as a measure of performance. The Sharpe Ratio is merely a yardstick against the risk-free government bond option investment, whereas the Information Ratio gages performance against a relevant benchmark, so it’s a more demanding test.
    Of course, by introducing the need to identify an appropriate benchmark, the Information Ratio adds an uncertainty as to the applicability and the stability of the selected benchmark. There are no free lunches, but this is a hurdle that is frequently addressed and nicely resolved by using available portfolio constituent research tools (I’m thinking of some of Bill Sharpe’s work here)
    A constant concern is how much of a manager’s results are luck or skill? Most likely, it is a mixed continuum. There are some stock picking and timing skills within all of us. The Sharpe Ratio likely represents both luck and skill; but the Information Ratio, especially since it must be positive to be included in the sorting process and if the Tracking Error is a small, stable level, is an improved measure of skill alone.
    Tracking Error for a talented, skilful fund manager should be a relatively small value. Historical data suggests that the denominator Tracking Error changes slowly over time. That is a skill signal. A reasonable interpretation of this statistical data is that the larger it is, the less skilled and more lucky is that fund manager.
    So a high value of positive Information Ratio is an excellent screening indicator when choosing a fund manager (recall that my focus is on the management team and not the fund name).
    A remaining issue is the persistence of Information Ratio. Unfortunately, this parameter suffers the slings and arrows of outrageous misfortune. Studies show that it too erodes over time.
    There are no permanent free lunches so investing demands investor vigilance. That’s the bad news; the good news aspect of these same studies is that the erosion is usually slow moving. A solid manager doesn’t develop bad habits overnight; sometimes the market just runs away from his style; sometimes irrational exuberance causes unpredictable events.
    Here is a Link to a Vanguard study that was designed to explore the Active Share issue, but concurrently examined the impact of the Information Ratio (it’s a rare twofer):
    https://pressroom.vanguard.com/nonindexed/active_management.pdf
    I hope you find these two references meaningful and useful to assist your mutual fund manager selection process. I actually use these data myself in conjunction with other criteria, some not very rigorous or amendable to analyses. In truth, investing decisions can never be reduced to a single factor that applies with equal weight to everyone or every decision.
    Incorporating Information Ratio in your screening matrix just might tilt the odds a little more towards more profitable investment fund manager decisions.
    Please share your comments on this topic. I seek your opinions. Note that the title to my posting ended with a question mark.
    Best Regards.
  • on maintaining a vibrant and civil community
    Hi STB65. Perhaps a poor choice of words on my part. So, here's what David actually said: "Sniping, whether about the quality of another poster's portfolio or argument: don't."
    I don't disagree with your take here. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't misrepresenting David's remarks.
    Regards