Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Snowball's great commentary
    "a low tolerance for risk"
    Ummm ... you might reflect on that conclusion in light of the positioning of my portfolio, which I publish annually. In the non-retirement portfolio, about 50% of my money is in equities and 50% in income-producing securities. Within the equity sleeve, 50% is international and within international more than 50% is a combination of small, emerging and frontier. Domestic is overweight small- to micro-cap which a distinct value pitch. I have no savings account (0.01% APR does nothing for me) but instead balance very conservative income-oriented investments (the aforementioned RPHYX) with quite aggressive ones.
    It might be a bit misleading to point to one fund and generalize from it. I mean, really, why is substituting RPHYX and RPSIX for CDs and a savings account "risk averse"?
    My self-description would be closer to this: "I will accept no risk unless I perceive a serious assymetry, in which the probable upside is substantially greater than the probable downside." One measure of the ability of a manager to achieve that goal is to look at a risk-return ratio over a meaningful period of time. My default is Sharpe over a full market cycle. The FMC orientation simply reflects the fact that I have better things to do than try to time my portfolio; I have neither the interest nor the discipline to pull that off. Some folks do, although the evidence suggests a far larger number simply thinks they do.
    So, if you start with my premise - high risk-return ratio over meaningful periods - which small caps should I be looking at? When I screen for open, retail small cap funds - domestic, global, international - no-load or load-waived at Scottrade and sort by descending Sharpe, the top ones are:
    1. Intrepid Endeavor, first by a lot. ARIVX is a near-clone in terms of risk-return but it doesn't have a full cycle record.
    2. Westwood Mighty Mites
    3. Homestead Small Cap
    4. Pinnacle Value
    5. Tributary Small Cap.
    If you play with the risk-reward measure (Sortino, Martin, Ulcer Index) you get a slight shuffle of the top ten with the addition of Queens Road SCV and Royce Special.
    I'm not enamored with the Royce or Gabelli organizations. Love Homestead's low minimum initial investment ($500), don't love the $1.2 billion size as much. Queens Road is very much worth a look. Tributary really would qualify as "in the shadows." And still the numbers point most consistently to ICMAX and the much-derided ARIVX.
    I bet you're wondering why I buy and sell funds so rarely. Briefly, I go through this sort of pondering with every single one.
    David
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    where to find a good source for a total return chart.
    Here's one source. Stockcharts.com shows total return charts by default. You can also view price-only charts.
    Here's a video that explains how to view both kinds of chart:
    http://stockcharts.com/articles/mailbag/2014/01/how-can-i-plot-dividend-adjusted-data-and-unadjusted-data.html
  • Vanguard Account
    Hi @Old_Joe
    I thought you were also going to "trust" me; so that I might fund/direct monies to the local high school music/band program. Sadly, not much money arrives any longer from state education funds for such functions.
    What is directing you towards Vanguard for this trust? And/or is Vanguard only one of several areas for these monies?
    Edit: a quick look at Fido trust services indicates an annual fee range of: .85-1.70%, variable upon acct. and a minimum of $200k.
    Thank you and take care,
    Catch
  • Vanguard Account
    No experience with trusts (though I did open an estate account with them), but here's where it seems you can find an account form:
    - On the Vanguard (personal investor) home page, look to Forms at top right
    - On the forms page, "open a nonretirement account", Trust
    - Select Trust only form (which is really an all-purpose new account form)
    On the form:
    1) Type of account is trust
    3-4) Trustee and trust info
    11) Signature(s)
    In #4 (and in the reminder at the end of the form) it says that you need to provide a copy of the trust agreement including trustee names and signature pages
    I've no idea if this is sufficient, but this does appear to be the account-opening form you're looking for.
    Here's a really old (2007) M* thread that seems to be consistent with the above. It notes that you'll also want to look at a change of ownership form if you're trying to transfer assets already at Vanguard into the trust once the account is open.
    http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSocialize/forums/t/192493.aspx
    (There was another way mentioned in the thread on how to do this - use a lawyer :-) )
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    Macro View
    The Global Liquidity Trap Turns More Treacherous

    April 07, 2016 Global CIO Commentary by Scott Minerd © 2016 Guggenheim Partners,
    As options for further QE diminish, negative rates have become the shiny new tool kit of monetary policy orthodoxy.
    If Dr. Draghi and Dr. Kuroda do not get the outcome they want from their QE prescriptions—which is highly likely—then more negative rates will be on the way.
    It would not be a surprise to see the overnight rates in Europe and Japan go to negative 1 percent or lower, which will in turn pull down other rates along their respective yield curves.
    Negative rates at these levels would make U.S. Treasurys much more attractive on a relative basis, driving yields even lower than they are today.
    If the European overnight rate were cut to minus 1 percent from its current level of negative 40 basis points, German 10-year bunds would be dragged into negative territory and we could see 10-year Treasurys yielding 1 percent or less.
    https://guggenheimpartners.com/perspectives/macroview/the-global-liquidity-trap-turns-more-treacherous
    @DanHardy
    As @Junkster has observed,High Yield Muni's may be a bit pricey here.But an investor has to measure the possible tax advantages against current risks,I'm going to see my tax accountant tomorrow and I think that subject will come up.
    Closed End Option
    Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund Price Premium +1.37% to N A V 52 Wk Avg -0.42%
    NMZ Distribution Rate
    Market (As of 04/06/2016) 6.48% Seeks to provide:
    Attractive monthly tax-free income
    image
    Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/nmz/stock-chart#ixzz45CK2V9m5
    E T F Option Div/yield Monthly /4.47%
    SPDR Nuveen S&P High Yield Municipal Bond E T F Stock Chart (E T F)
    HYMB
    imageimage
  • M *: It's Flowmageddon!
    This is actually pretty stunning. I'd bet Russell Kinnel did a double-take, if not a triple, on some of these.
    From a Barron's blog note on this report:
    Each year, editors at Morningstar pick the best 500 funds from the universe of roughly 8,000 that they cover and create a list known as the Morningstar Mutual Fund 500. Nearly half of these funds have seen at least a 10% decline in assets under management in the 12 months ended February. Some 61 have seen at least a 25% drawdown, while another 18 have seen at least a 40% reduction in assets. Here’s Kinnel:
    “If we had just endured a brutal bear market, then the wave of redemptions would be par for the course. But this comes after a tremendous equity rally and therefore is unprecedented.”
    http://blogs.barrons.com/focusonfunds/2016/04/07/unprecedented-outflows-from-u-s-stock-funds-could-leave-remaining-investors-holding-the-bag/?mod=BOLBlog
    Of course, doesn't this suggest just how little worth a great many investors find in M* recommendations? :)
  • RPHYX downgraded by Morningstar (to three stars)
    ------ M* PORTFOLIO ALERT = RPHYX & FPACX
    Portfolio Name: all
    04/05/2016
    FPACX: FPA Crescent
    The Morningstar Star Rating for this fund has changed from 4 stars to 5 stars. For details, click here
    RPHYX: RiverPark Short Term High Yield Retail
    The Morningstar Star Rating for this fund has changed from 4 stars to 3 stars. For details, click here
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    @TSB_Transfer I always thought it was nuts that European countries such as Italy had lower 10 year yield than the USA.
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    When the article came out three months ago sentiment in junk bonds was at its most negative in recent memory - even more negative than in 2008. Gundlach was calling for a junk crash as he has for much of the past 9 months. So naturally what transpired was a vicious rally in junk bonds now positive for the year and leading the major market equity indexes in 2016.
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    Junk Sovereigns ?? A Real Reach?
    Markets | Thu Apr 7, 2016 4:46pm EDT
    After 15 years, Argentina set for bond market return
    By Joy Wiltermuth
    Now it will hold a five-day roadshow in the UK and the US as it preps a new bond expected to raise $12 billion - or more - to help pay off holdouts who had rejected a debt restructuring.
    Finance Secretary Luis Caputo and Undersecretary Santiago Bausili will each lead teams meeting with investors in London, Boston, New York, Washington and Los Angeles.
    Deutsche Bank, HSBC, JP Morgan and Santander are arranging the meetings, but few other details were immediately available.
    "The dealers on it are keeping it hush-hush until they are ready to come to market," said Sean Newman, a senior portfolio manager at Invesco Fixed Income.
    One of the lead banks told IFR that investors had not yet been given any information about the ultimate size of the deal or the potential currencies of issuance.
    At US$12bn, the transaction would be the largest ever from an emerging markets borrower, according to Thomson Reuters data.
    "It does mean something really huge for Argentina," said Bianca Taylor, a senior sovereign emerging markets analyst at investment management firm Loomis, Sayles & Company.
    "They are back in the game with the curing of this longstanding issue with the holdouts, and they once again have access to the foreign capital markets."
    One trader in New York said he had heard yields whispered in the 7.5 percent range, but said 8.5 percent on a 10-year bond was a more feasible target given the current climate.
    But Taylor said a useful comparable would be a Brazil 10-year currently trading at 6.13 percent.
    "The talk of 7.5 percent seems rich for a country still in a balance-of-payments crisis and just coming out of default."
    In addition, after being unable to raise debt abroad for so long, Argentina might well come to market with a debt sale larger than US$12 billion in order to replenish its coffers and plug at least some of its fiscal deficit.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-argentina-bonds-idUSKCN0X42O6
    @DanHardy You're not the only one expecting low rates to remain for some time.
    Yield Curve Madness
    Posted on April 6, 2016 by David Ott Acropolis Investment Management
    ,,yield on the 10-year US Treasury hit 1.73 percent. After starting the year at 2.24 percent, the benchmark yield dropped to 1.63 percent when the stock market bottomed out on February 11th and then climbed to 1.98 percent before falling again.
    As low as your yields are today, they are among the highest in the developed world, as the chart below shows. The chart includes the G7 countries (with the benchmark eurozone rate representing Germany, France and Italy), Switzerland and Australia (each representing the highest and lowest rates in the developed world).
    image
    This chart is striking for at least three reasons. First, the overall level of rates is just appallingly low across the world. The idea that the highest rates are still a paltry 2.5 percent is troubling.
    Second, and even more bothersome, is that three of the curves are negative all the way out to 10 years. There are other countries with negative yields like Denmark, but the idea that the euro benchmark curve is negative is striking.
    Finally, there are only three ‘normal’ yield curves, where rates rise as the maturity goes out further into the future. The US has the steepest curve, although it’s far flatter now than it was six months ago.
    http://acrinv.com/yield-curve-madness/
  • RPHYX downgraded by Morningstar (to three stars)
    @David &Derf: All I have to say is ....................!
    Regards,
    Ted
  • RPHYX downgraded by Morningstar (to three stars)
    David, so it should come down to 3 1/2 stars for both !!! LOL
    Derf
  • M *: It's Flowmageddon!
    FYI: Something big is happening.
    A striking 18 Morningstar 500 funds suffered outflows of at least 40% of assets under management in the trailing 12 months ended February 2016, 61 shed 25% or more, and 168 had outflows of 10% or more.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=747879
  • RPHYX downgraded by Morningstar (to three stars)
    Right, the change simply reflects the fact that the average high-yield bond fund made 2.5% in the first quarter while RPHYX made 1%. As it turns out, this fund has virtually nothing in common with the average high-yield fund (the correlation between the two is 0.09), so its star ratings - high or low - are perpetually misleading.
    David
  • Any thoughts on High Yield Muni Funds?
    There is something that happens with municipal bonds in the Spring--- April, May, June--- but I can't remember what it is (and from this you can infer correctly that I have only pedestrian experience with muni's). Is it peak-season for new issuance, or is it when things dry up? If the former, may want to wait and see what the quality and quantity of new issuance is, identify muni PMs whose opinions you respect and see what they think of it, etc. before committing fresh funds to the asset class. My impression is (1) HY muni has had more than a good run and is getting richly valued, and (2) HY muni has very poor liquidity, and when things go south it can have a "mind of its own" and behave quite differently than investment-grade (which is why I have avoided it).
    @DanHardy You might check out this Thornburg white paper I posted awhile back re. liquidity concerns:
    http://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/16211/municipal-bond-market-risk-liquidity#latest
  • Snowball's great commentary
    A curious juxtaposition - a completely liquid MMF (even more liquid than a savings account) and a CD with a redemption fee (except at maturity).
    Personally, I prefer I-bonds to 1 year CDs. What I give up in short term liquidity (no redemptions in the first year) I gain in a better rate, inflation protection, state tax exemption, potential to defer taxes for years (until redeemed), and greater safety (theoretical only) than an FDIC-insured CD.
    - I bonds have no redemption fee once held for 5 years, so if one is expecting to roll over CDs, holding the I bond is slightly easier and more liquid over the long term.
    - The FDIC is not officially backed by the full faith and credit of the US government; savings bonds are treasury securities that have this backing.
    One can purchase $15K of I bonds/year per SSN. Current yield is 1.64%.
  • Snowball's great commentary
    Good site for best rate 1 yr CD's for those inclined. 1.33% better than 0.30%.
    https://www.depositaccounts.com/blog/
  • Snowball's great commentary
    So for a declining cash nut (being used for a year or two's living expenses) of $100k, the improvement over keeping it in bank savings is just a few hundred dollars. Tough times for safe investing, for sure.