Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • 2VA American Freedoms ETF in registration
    The adviser selects companies based on their policies toward the Second Amendment, favoring "non-woke companies." They "strive to reverse the ESG investing and stakeholder capitalism trends, and give investors who are not progressives a voice." Companies are ranked from 1(very liberal) to 5(very conservative). Their founders and advisory board are made up of CPAC and AEI types. These proposed etfs look like they should be the foundation of any investor's portfolio. (massive snark!)
  • The Fed this summer will take another step in developing a digital currency

    Per @msf :
    My point is simply that, to use your own words, we can create an "alternative type of bank account" without creating an alternative type of electronic cash. (Cash in a bank is already electronic.)
    https://joinbankon.org/
    A new type of currency is not necessary to provide such accounts. Nor does this new currency seem to hold any intrinsic advantage for these customers over traditional (dollar-based) digital currency. Rather, it appears to be an example of a purported benefit promulgated as a rationale for CBDCs.
    The Fed is reviewing this specific issue within the framework of deciding if creating CBDC technology will be useful as a way to address the topics highlighted in my excerpt from the CFSAIS report (as well as other topics not mentioned). Deciding the new technology will probably be useful would lower the threshold the Fed would face when considering whether to extend that technology to include an alternative type of personal bank account.
    Presumably the Feds review is in detail examining the potential costs and benefits of creating various public sector alternate versions of a commercial bank account. Assuming empire building is not the overarching goal, the Fed will have not want to implement a public sector solution to a problem that is currently being adequately addressed by the banking community -- especially since doing so will most likely create new challenges the Fed will need to resolve regarding their relationships with that community.
    Also, even if the Fed decides development and installation of CBDC technology is adviseable, it appears that additional authority will need to be provided by Congress (See Link 1, Link 2, and Link 3). In that case, another layer of review and agreement would be required before CBDC rollout. Presumably that additional review would include examining and agreeing to details of the Feds proposal.
  • Dimensional Funds converts four OEF to ETFs
    Just for comparison’s sake, here’s the daily average trading volume for the Avantis ETFs run by DFA alumni which have been around for just shy of two years and cover a similar space:
    AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value 147,014
    AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity 111,454
    AVDE Avantis International Equity 62,698
    AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value 112,198
    AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity 67,246
  • Use Apple “Keychain” for your passwords? Yea or Nay?
    I haven’t used it before (at least knowingly). But today one of my seldom used IOS devices displayed a warning that a password I use for a news site (a very weak one by choice) had appeared on a national data base of stolen passwords. The message even identified the news site where I use it. Apparently I’d left keychain switched on on that device and Apple had been monitoring that password.
    Well, I changed the PW and a few others that were intentionally simple and easy to remember. Than I researched Apple’s keychain function to see what it’s all about.
    Article
    Here’s a snippet: “If you have iCloud Keychain set up as an option to auto-fill passwords into mobile and web apps, Safari will help out in the auditing so that it can warn you of compromised passwords whenever you log in to a website. So if you use iCloud Keychain to auto-fill your credentials into a website in Safari, after you sing in, Safari will give you a prompt to "Change Password on Website," like so: This password has appeared in a data leak, which puts this account at high risk of compromise. You should change your password immediately.
    One problem with above: I don’t use Safari for sensitive sites. I use DuckGo instead.
    Like most of you, I’m sure, I use some pretty tough passwords for financial sites, some extending to 15 characters. (And, most often 2-factor authentication is also used.) Each password is unique. So, I’m not particularly concerned. The one that may have been heisted is a simple one I’ve used for over 20 years where security isn’t much of a concern. On the other hand - If Russian hackers can shut down a major U.S. pipeline, how do you keep them from accessing your personal financial data - or worse?
    So … Do you think trusting Apple to remember your passwords is a good idea? Or a bad idea?
    Please forgive listing this as “Other Investing.” But ISTM security of financial records is pretty important.
  • The Amazon Customers Don’t See
    Worth considering before investing: https://nytimes.com/2021/06/15/briefing/amazon-warehouse-investigation.html
    In his drive to create the world’s most efficient company, Jeff Bezos discovered what he thought was another inefficiency worth eliminating: hourly employees who spent years working for the same company.
    Longtime employees expected to receive raises. They also became less enthusiastic about the work, Amazon’s data suggested. And they were a potential source of internal discontent.
    Bezos came to believe that an entrenched blue-collar work force represented “a march to mediocrity,” as David Niekerk, a former Amazon executive who built the company’s warehouse human resources operations, told The Times, as part of an investigative project being published this morning. “What he would say is that our nature as humans is to expend as little energy as possible to get what we want or need.”
    In response, Amazon encouraged employee turnover. After three years on the job, hourly workers no longer received automatic raises, and the company offered bonuses to people who quit. It also offered limited upward mobility for hourly workers, preferring to hire managers from the outside.
    As is often the case with one of Amazon’s business strategies, it worked.
    Turnover at Amazon is much higher than at many other companies — with an annual rate of roughly 150 percent for warehouse workers, The Times’s story discloses, which means that the number who leave the company over a full year is larger than the level of total warehouse employment. The churn is so high that it’s visible in the government’s statistics on turnover in the entire warehouse industry: When Amazon opens a new fulfillment center, local turnover often surges....
  • Dimensional Funds converts four OEF to ETFs
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-14/booth-s-dimensional-converts-29-billion-of-mutual-funds-to-etfs
    The names of the ETFs are:
    The Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF (ticker DFUS, formerly the Tax-Managed U.S. Equity Portfolio)
    The Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS, formerly the Tax-Managed U.S. Small Cap Portfolio)
    The Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT, formerly the Tax-Managed U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio)
    The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC, formerly the T.A. U.S. Core Equity 2 Portfolio)
    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/15/dimensional-converts-4-key-mutual-funds-to-etfs-co-ceo-unpacks-move.html
    https://us.dimensional.com/about-us/media-center/dimensional-lists-four-new-etfs
    https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2021/06/14/dfa-launches-4-active-equity-etfs-converted-from-mutual-funds/
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    A $25 transaction fee at Schwab would be a nice benefit. A $10 transaction fee at any of my three major brokers would get off the sidelines with regard to SVARX , among others.
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    Makes sense. Using the MMA as a buffer reduces the number of transactions with RPHIX. That not only cuts down on transaction fees, but reduces the headache of keeping track of cap gains. And over the period of a year or so, you should not lose money due to minor fluctuations in the share price of RPHIX.
    You surely already know this, since you're currently using TRBUX and PRWBX.
    Another advantage of RPHIX over RPHYX aside from lower ER is that, should you need the cash quickly, Schwab won't charge you a short term redemption fee. Brokerages typically add that transaction fee on some NTF fund trades.
    Schwab’s short-term redemption fee will be charged on redemption of funds purchased through Schwab’s Mutual Fund OneSource service (and certain other funds with no transaction fees) and held for 90 days or less.
    https://www.schwab.com/public/file/P-6374145
    Also, some fund families are a bit flexible about how much money they require you to keep in the account after you open it. You might check with Schwab and/or Riverpark to ask how low you can let your balance go.
  • Hedge Fund Manager Who “Came Undone” is Headed to Prison
    “On a summer Friday afternoon last year, hedge-fund manager Dan Kamensky broke bankruptcy laws. That evening on a recorded line, he pleaded with a banker to say the whole thing was a misunderstanding. “Maybe I should go to jail,” Mr. Kamensky said on the call.
    Mr. Kamensky reports to federal prison on June 18. His hedge fund is in the process of closing, and a career that included stints at white-shoe law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and storied hedge fund Paulson & Co. has been wrecked. “He came undone,” U.S. District Judge Denise Cote said during a court hearing on May 7.
    Mr. Kamensky, 48 years old, worked in the high-stakes, high-conflict world of distressed investing, which aims to profit from companies teetering on the brink of or in bankruptcy. He launched his hedge fund, Marble Ridge, in 2015 with $20 million and was managing nearly $1 billion a few years later. His fund … was a relatively small player in the distressed market …
    He was anxious, had difficulty sleeping, lost weight and had trouble concentrating at the office or at home … In 2017, Mr. Kamensky began working with a psychologist and a sleep specialist. He also consulted an executive coach … His efforts to control his emotions began to unravel in a bitter fight over struggling luxury-goods retailer Neiman Marcus Group Ltd.”

    Thought maybe @Junkster would enjoy this story.
    Excerpted / edited for brevity from The Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2021
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/hedge-fund-manager-who-came-undone-is-headed-to-prison-11623490201
  • Booth’s Dimensional Converts $29 Billion of Mutual Funds to ETFs
    Dimensional Fund Advisors just became one of the biggest players in the $6.5 trillion exchange-traded fund arena.
    In a milestone moment for the money management industry, the $637 billion quant pioneer founded by David Booth has converted four equity mutual funds with $28.8 billion of assets into ETFs.
    Link
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    @MikeM. Thanks - my error, I just assumed the typical 0.25% difference in ERs rather than read the 0.15% difference that was given in the OP.
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    A simple answer @Bobpa, with a $50,000 you will make up the $50 TF in about 9 months of owning the fund. All the time past that is extra money in your account.
    The difference between expense ratios is 1.05% - 0.9% = 0.15%. The reduced exp ratio equates to $75 saved on a $50k investment in one year. If you buy RPHIX you will spend a 1 time TF of $50 to make an extra $75 in reduced expenses in one year. The next 9 years is gravy.
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    Keep in mind that the magnitude of the final difference over ten years is affected by the volatility of the returns and by the magnitude of the returns. Just a way of saying that past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
    I prefer instead to look at the 0.25% difference in ERs and estimate my breakeven point. For a $50K investment, $50 represents 10 basis points (0.1%). So it would take about 10/25 of a year, or around five months, to break even. Anything after that is gravy.
    At Fidelity, you could make incremental additions for $5. So you could add $5K at a time and still have a 5 month break even point.
    If volatility and rate of return didn't matter, you could just compare a 0% return on retail shares with a constant 0.25% return on investor class shares after subtracting $50.
    This simplistic calculation gives you:
    RPHYX: $50K x 1.00 ^ 10 = $50K at the end of 10 years.
    RPHIX: $49,950 x (1.0025) ^ 10 = $51,212.89 at the end of 10 years.
  • The Secret IRS Files: How The Wealthiest Avoid Income Tax
    From the St. Louis Fed (reporting BLS data), using 1967 as baseline, the estimated CPI for 2021 is 792.5. The CPI for 1861 was 27.
    https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/inflation-calculator/consumer-price-index-1800-
    That would make the inflation adjusted value of $800 equal to $800 x 792.5/27 = $23,481.48.
    image
    Source: https://www.officialdata.org/us/inflation/1850
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    How much would a $50,000 investment in RPHYX, expense ratio of 1.05 lose over a 10 year period compared to RPHIX expense ratio of .90? RPHIX would have a transaction fee of approximately $50 at Schwab.
    Bobpa,
    FWIW, I put RPHIX and RPHYX, on the M* Interactive Performance Chart, and for the total existence period (9/30/2010 through 06/11/2021), the chart shows total return for an initial $10,000 investment as $13,632 for RPHIX and $13,237 for RPHYX. That is a difference of $395, multiplied by 5 to get the $50,000 investment, and it equals a total difference of $1975 more for RPHIX over the history of the funds. Trying to get down to the impact of a $50 transaction fee, in 2010, is beyond me, since I don't think M* tries to guess what the transaction fees, if any, are at the many different brokerages--which often negotiate transaction fees differently for different investors (I pay $25 transaction fee at Schwab, per a negotiated account opening, along with some extra cash that I got from Schwab to open an account over a designated amount)
  • The Secret IRS Files: How The Wealthiest Avoid Income Tax
    When did the U.S. first impose a federal personal income tax?
    On August 5, 1861, President Lincoln imposes the first federal income tax by signing the Revenue Act. Strapped for cash with which to pursue the Civil War, Lincoln and Congress agreed to impose a 3 percent tax on annual incomes over $800.
    Congress repealed Lincoln’s tax law in 1871, but in 1909 passed the 16th Amendment, which set in place the federal income-tax system used today. Congress ratified the 16th Amendment in 1913.
    lincoln-imposes-first-federal-income-tax
    Made permanent by Taft:
    https://history.com/news/income-tax-howard-taft
  • RPHIX RPHYX A Math Question
    @Bobpa : As per Chuck. Retail$1283 VS Inst. $1108 + $50 = $1158 You can take it from here.
    Stay Kool, Derf