RPMGX reopening Thanks for the information as I have been waiting for RPMGX to re-open. I will wait until distributions are paid mid-December.
You are correct as here is the SEC filing:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/887147/000174177321003638/c497.htm497
1 c497.htm
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio
T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid-Cap Equity Growth Fund
Supplement to Prospectuses and Summary Prospectuses dated May
1, 202
1, as supplemented
Effective December
1, 202
1, the T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund, T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio, and T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid-Cap Equity Growth Fund (Funds), each of which was closed to new investors on May 28, 20
10, will resume accepting new accounts and purchases from most investors.
Accordingly, effective December
1, 202
1, the first two sentences under “Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares” in each Fund’s summary prospectus and Section
1 of each Fund’s prospectus are deleted in their entirety. In addition, in Section 2 of each Fund’s prospectus, the sub-section entitled “Closed to New Investors” is deleted in its entirety.
Financial intermediaries and other institutional clients should contact T. Rowe Price or their relationship manager to determine eligibility to open new accounts and purchase shares of each Fund.
The date of this supplement is October 27, 202
1.
G3
1-04
1 10/27/2
1
RPMGX reopening I just got an email from TRP telling me that the T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Fund, RPMGX is going from closed status to restricted status. It looks like purchases must be made directly with TRP.
If anyone desires, I can copy/paste the text from the email.
I've been in this fund since 1998.
Dave
theoretical no-growth math question
What if:
A. Joe begins the 25 year period by putting 50% into an S&P 500 index fund and 50% into GNMA funds
B. After 3 years the S&P index fund has fallen 40% in value. The GNMA funds have retained their initial value.
C. Joe than panics and moves his remaining equity balance into his GNMA funds for the duration of the 25 year term
For simplicity, let’s assume Joe’s GNMA funds’ managers achieve an annual 3.5% return over the 25 year period as the rate on the 10 year gradually increases from under 1% initially to 5% in year 25.
ISTM that that initial loss (near 20% of portfolio) over the first 3 years has done significant damage to Joe’s future earning prospects. (This proposition can be sliced and diced in a number of different ways.)
-
Taking into account the stocks losses in the beginning, I’m showing that w/o the annual withdrawals the sum after 25 years would have grown to approximately $1,787,262 (using 3.5% monthly compounding).
Had Joe avoided stocks altogether and gone 100% into GMNA funds at the onset (3.5% average return) he’d have approximately $2,234,007 at the end of 25 years.
Difference in return: $446,745 - Approximately 25% more without having incurred the initial stock losses
* Neither hypothetical case takes into account Joe’s $40,000 yearly withdrawals, which would alter the numbers somewhat.
TSHIX Yes-for the risk-tolerant, FMSDX crushes the other two.
But I see it's holding 58+ % in equities. Its category is 30-50% in equities. But that's a M* creation, anyhow. Then whatever comparison numbers you're looking at over at M* will be skewed. By how much? Yes, it does look like a fine fund. Turnover looks scary. But yield is over 3%. I look for yield. FMSDX changed its stripes in 20
19. Doing much better.
A New M* Low @Crash - Thanks for the aviation tidbits. You meet all kinds for sure. Once, riding in first class years ago, a couple older gals seated behind me were downing the
free alcoholic beverages as fast as they could. Sloshed by the time we landed. Obnoxiously loud. Not a great ride. “Pedestrian class” might have been better that day,
I have no particular gripe re M*. They are what they are. I always consult at least 3 different sources before buying a new fund. I do think M* favors funds that have been hot recently in awarding stars. So there’s a good chance those stars will propel you to buying at the worst possible time while the fund is hot. Suspect that’s true of a lot of rating systems.
FT is $
12 monthly on Amazon Kindle. Six issues weekly. It only takes one really good idea, bit of information, insight, suggestion or revelation to make a huge difference in your investment approach and outcome.
Ben Franklin:
“An investment in knowledge always pays the best dividend.”
TSHIX +1
Lacking a definitive answer, that’s the safest alternative. No need to do anything. Was just wondering.
Large Cap Growth Decision TRLGX. TRP. Holds the usual high-flying suspects: Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook, Apple, Visa. PRGFX. TRP. Almost a clone of the other.
Just noticed: HCAIX holds no bonds, as expected. But it's doing just a tiny bit better this year than PRWCX, which does hold bonds and is heavily into utilities. But you can't get in, unless you're already in.
Morningstar puts Mairs & Power Growth MPGFX into its large-blend category. It has slipped behind the Index that Morningstar compares it to. Instituted in 1958. Only two "bad" recent years I can see: 2014 and 2017. Past 15-year performance = 10.74%, in top 13th percentile vs. "peers." Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, United Health, US Bancorp, Ecolab...
Large Cap Growth Decision I like several funds in this category - POLIX, HCAIX, FBGRX, JGQIX. You need to look at the Sector weightings and holdings concentration among other things before investing. Stating the obvious, most of the top performers over the past 5 & 10 years more than likely held the FANG (Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google)
TSHIX After selling all or part of a mutual fund @ Fido, is there any restriction prohibiting purchasing that same fund again a day later?
I can think of 2 scenarios:
1) You’ve just sold a Fido fund (after holding it 31 days) …than buy it or add to it soon thereafter.
2) You’ve just sold a NTF fund you bought at Fido and held for 61 days … than buy it or add to it soon thereafter.
ISTM the answer to both is that you may do so without penalty. Since I served 90 days in their “penalty box” upon arrival, I’m not interested in testing any of this out.
(Sorry if this has already been addressed)
Green investments Also FWIW, and it may be worth plenty to anyone considering or actually BUYing FDRV...
FDRV is a brand new relatively, lightly traded ETF. It is (mysteriously?) UP 4.92% pre-market on a coupla hundred shares traded.
Just a WAG here, but looks like a single BUYer may have entered a Market order and got taken to the cleaners/woodshed. As an owner of FDRV, hoping it's something other than that, but...
Moral: HIGHLY suggest using ONLY Limit orders on FDRV given its daily trading volume.
EDIT_
1: FDRV opened UP ~
1%. Looks like some poor (pun intended) got burned on their pre-mrkt BUY.
EDIT_2: Article on EVs:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/26/americans-are-buying-teslas-not-evs-heres-why-thats-about-to-change.htmlEDIT_3: Yeah, RE E_
1...looks like FDRV BUYers are getting burned/today with their market orders, as it whiphaws between UP ~0.50% to ~3.0% during markets hours. Having owned it from near its inception date earlier this month, have not seen
anything like this on any previous trading day so far. Noted that volume is heavy on it today, 38K shares traded by
11:30 AM with avg daily volume 40K.
Be careful out there!
Sports betting DraftKings Walks From Potential $22.4 Billion Offer for Entain DFKG is up nearly
8% in pre-market trading this morning. The buyout bid has really hammered their stock the past
1-2 months. Still, with football season in high gear, I was surprised how far it slid.
Cathie Wood is a major holder through her ARK funds. Before buying a small sliver, I looked at its largest shareholders, with VG and TRP near the top - though TRP sold some shares off earlier this year.
As far as using their app - I haven’t accessed it since last March, as basketball is the only aspect that interests me.
Link to
StoryEdit : DKNG finished up 4% for the day.