Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Pimco Moving Away from Bill Gross Model

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSKCN0HN0YV20140929?irpc=932

This appears to be good news in that the new management is establishing their style and manner right off the bat.
It will be worth watching.

Also there are some reports that up to $10 billion has left Pimco since Bill Gross left on Friday.

Comments

  • As I mentionedelsewhere, I can't even logon to 401k site this morning. This is not over yet. Assets will flee PIMCO. Not sure all of them go to Janus though. The Janus fund has to go into 401k plans first. Also large institutional investors will not rush to Janus with its reputation. Doubleline, Vanguard, Loomis Sayles, TCW/MetWest and to some extent TRP I think will be the benefeciaries.
  • Obviously Pimco is the story of the day today.

    I'm actually wondering if moving out of Pimco is a good idea now that the proverbial horse has left the barn. For most retail investors it will be 2-3 days and most likely more than that to get their funds out. This situation is exceptional. I think the new management should deserve a chance if and only if one had a long time frame to invest.

    Anyone else agree? Or disagree?
  • I have no horse in this race. IMHO looks like a slow motion train wreck going back over several years. Now with SEC problems on top of this it will be a year at a minimum before this the dust settles out at best! You can't turn a ship this big on a dime.
    Just my 2 cents.
  • edited September 2014
    I own PASAX, which accounts for about 3.5% of my overall portfolio. I am currently watching as I have some long term capital gains in this fund as I have owned it for some time now. However, it is a fund-of-funds and if other Pimco funds are taking it on the chin, and begin to falter, this one most likely will too. If I see a price drop down to about five percent below its 52 week high them I am thinking strongly of letting it go and not waiting to read Morningstar under review take. It is currently trading at about 3.75% off its 52 week high and has a year-to-date gain of about 4.1% (I'll want to be out with some positive gain left).

    Old_Skeet
  • edited September 2014
    Did Pimco move away from the Bill Gross model or did Bill Gross move away from the Pimco model? Or has the Bill Gross model had its time and is now over? I dunno. I will fault Pimco for liking the Bill Gross model a little too much - he became the public face of the company and I don't feel like they were planning ahead for the potential time when that would be over.

    I'm not so sure that all of the Pimco TR money will move to Janus along with him - I think some will go to Doubleline, some will go to T Rowe and elsewhere, as others have said.

  • PIMCO is, and has been for a few years, MUCH more than Bill Gross. They already have, and have had, a team approach on the investment committee that sets the macro outlook for the firm's funds, a top-notch analyst staff, and a solid group of fund managers whose initials aren't BG. I think there's WAY too much of the heroic-CEO-uber-alles POV being expressed in the financial media and here at MFO about Gross's move out. It's a GOOD thing for PIMCO, maybe not for the TR fund and etf for now, but for the firm as a whole.
  • Excellent observations. Some may see all this as damage control to stem the tide of redemptions. It will be interesting to note when that outflow starts to slow.

  • All the tweets on Twitter from Gross were deleted.
  • Similar to @Gary, I have no investments with PIMCO. If I did, my concern would mostly be about all the distraction. Of course not everyone is answering questions about BG, but considering the media coverage it wouldn't be surprising if a lot of fund managers were spending an unusual amount of time trying to convince their shareholders that nothing has changed for their fund, and they must be spending much more time dealing with the need to raise cash for redemptions. I think I'd look at the turnover of any fund I was in and be more likely to sell those with higher turnover just for fear that the focus would be lacking.
  • I'm going to have my cake and eat it too. Going to sell half my PTTRX stake. When I can login to the blasted 401k site that is. Let me try now.
  • edited September 2014
    AndyJ said:

    PIMCO is, and has been for a few years, MUCH more than Bill Gross. They already have, and have had, a team approach on the investment committee that sets the macro outlook for the firm's funds, a top-notch analyst staff, and a solid group of fund managers whose initials aren't BG. .

    I don't disagree with you. However, I've seen two people from Pimco in the media: El-Erian and Gross and moreso the latter. The lack of an apparent attempt to groom a new public face for the company makes me think that there was little planning for the eventuality of a Pimco without Gross. Along the same lines, I think it's Pimco's fault for focusing so much on Gross that it made the company reliant upon him and the public perception that Gross IS (well, was) Pimco.
  • Well he did co-find Pimco. As much as Pimco may want to rewrite history that part they cannot.

    I know Wikipedia is not a reliable source but if this part is true it could explain his erratic behavior.

    "In 2014 Gross was reported as one of a number of "prominent investors [who] have taken to Transcendental Meditation".[21]"
  • edited September 2014
    scott said:

    The lack of an apparent attempt to groom a new public face for the company makes me think that there was little planning for the eventuality of a Pimco without Gross.

    Agreed. It sounds like it was a rebellion from within the #2 layer that precipitated BG's exit, and it's for sure a bad way to head into the post-Gross era, but they were already headed in that direction with the elevation of Ivascyn, Kiesel, and others. The transition had to come to a conclusion at some point, and as messy as it's turned out to be, now that it's happened, I think it's likely to turn out to be very positive for the firm.

    On the 'public face' thing, I'm hoping they'll decide they don't need a single big name out there pumping on a constant basis.
Sign In or Register to comment.