Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

  • Ted December 2015
Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Has American Century Become an Asset Potato to be Passed Around?

edited December 2015 in Fund Discussions
Time and again, you see mutual fund families reach a certain size and they become, what seems to me, "investment vehicles" for others. Whether this is a bad thing is often hard to tell, but I'm hard-pressed to recall an instance where a mutual fund operation showed evidence where large outside investment proved to be a good thing. Or maybe it doesn't really matter--- hey, somebody's gotta hold the shares--- as long as the outside stakeholder remains a minority stakeholder.

At what point should it be concerning? Are there red flags that should raise concern; if so, what are they? My thinking on this is pretty fuzzy. What say others?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-21/american-century-sale-proceeds-seen-helping-cibc-on-other-deals
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-21/nomura-agrees-to-pay-1-billion-for-41-american-century-stake

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.