Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Hidden Costs Of Schwab's 'Free' ETF Trades

Comments

  • Good article by Mr. Jaffe:
    Want to trade Standard & Poor’s 500? The SPDR S&P 500 Trust (NAR:SPY) — the first ETF and the one with the most trading volume — isn’t on the list; you could settle for the Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (NAR:RSP) or the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (NAR:SPLV) , but they’re hardly the same thing.
    One key issue that investors often overlook with ETFs is liquidity. A fund that is lightly traded can have a wide bid-ask spread, the difference in the lowest price a seller is willing to accept and the highest price a buyer was willing to pay as of the last trade.
    Mutual Fund OneSource started with eight fund families and less than 100 mutual funds, and today it has more than 4,000 funds, so the ETF availability issue could evaporate in time. The same can’t necessarily be said for execution concerns.
    If, over time, ETF sponsors raise operating expenses slightly to make up for the dough they fork over to participate, the trades may be free but the cost would be undeniable for all affected shareholders.
    Thanks Ted.
Sign In or Register to comment.