Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

FPA Capital/Queens Road Small Cap Value Funds registration filing (combination)

edited October 2020 in Fund Discussions
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1170611/000110465920114615/a20-32694_1n14.htm

Excerpt from filing:

It is proposed that this filing will become effective on November 13, 2020, pursuant to Rule 488 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Comments

  • The "combo" actually is just the proxy that incorporates the registration (prospectus) by reference. It does contain links to the prospectuses on p. F-13 (near the bottom of the file Shadow linked to).

    Here's the link to the acquiring fund's (Queens Road Small Value Fund's) new prospectus:
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1170611/000139834420019562/fp0058114_497.htm

    Tax issue, from the proxy statement:

    "Any sales by the Target Fund [FPA Capital], including those made in anticipation of the Reorganization, of portfolio holdings prior to the Reorganization may generate capital gains that are expected to be distributed to shareholders prior to the Reorganization, which distribution may be taxable to shareholders." (p. 4)

    "Because there are differences in the Funds’ principal investment strategies, if the Reorganization is approved by shareholders of the Target Fund, it is anticipated that substantially all of the investments held by the Target Fund will have to be sold prior to the Reorganization and reinvested in accordance with the investment strategies of the Acquiring Fund." (p. F-14)

    M* reports a negative 17% cap gains exposure in FPPTX, so in theory this should not be a problem. The downside of having capital losses is that they will be carried over (I think) to the merged fund and thus apportioned among a larger base of shareholders.
  • With the sale of all investments & reinvested' become a drag ?! Or with the (- cap gain ) "if" passed on be a + ? I apologize for the grammar

    Stay Safe, Derf.
  • Passing on the loss is a plus; the problem is that while this is a loss existing shareholders have "earned", they now have to share that benefit with other shareholders. Their benefit (an embedded capital loss) is getting diluted. Were the fund not to be acquired, or were the fund to have offsetting gains, then all the losses would stay with the existing shareholders.
  • edited October 2020
    FPPTX has been a laggard for years since Robert Rodriguez left managing the fund. Only good news was I was able to get in the fund while Bob was still managing the fund (and pay a load) before it closed for the last time.

    Also, the asset base of FPPTX is nearly double that of QRSVX. There should be a sizeable capital gain loss remaining for a little while after the funds merge.
  • @msf @TheShadow: Thanks for your comments. So with all the new assets moving to QRSCVF all that is needed now is some great investments ideas. With value being knocked to the curb over the last 10 years, it may be time to invest there.
    Stay Safe, Derf
Sign In or Register to comment.