Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
TCAF vs SPY will be a fascinating battle to watch play out over time. Need more time = 5 years. TCAF 15.74% avg annual return vs 16.56% SPY from inception 6/14/2023 thru March 31. TCAF higher ER which compounds over time. Other metrics in the same ballpark thus far.
I agree with you and I've been tracking their progress along with the addition of CGDV and QLTY into the mix. Why? I felt the addition of one or the other would add to my overall portfolio balance but I couldn't choose which one. I started positions in all 3 and here is the total return to date using the TCAF starting date.
CGDV 47.37% TCAF 39.24% SPY 39.97%
Since QLTY did not begin trading until 11/30/23 (QLTY inception) here are those total return figures.
CGDV 42.02 QLTY 33.27 TCAF 32.84 SPY 35.94
I agree that a longer time period is needed for fair judgment.
I track these ETFs and their top 10 holdings. Overall I found CGDV and its stock picking process to have an edge over SPY, for example. Also my prior experience with American funds helped to better understand their stock picking process and multiple manager approach.
According to M* the top 4 positions in both TCAF and VOO are the same companies. . Seems like the results are likely to be similar. We have been building a position in CGDV. so far so good but a short track record.
It's hard to argue with CGDV's results. Upside capture ratio is 99%, while the downside is only 81%. It is our largest single ETF or OEF. Do have a small position in TCAF, but do not own any of the "quality factor" funds.
Comments
CGDV 47.37%
TCAF 39.24%
SPY 39.97%
Since QLTY did not begin trading until 11/30/23 (QLTY inception) here are those total return figures.
CGDV 42.02
QLTY 33.27
TCAF 32.84
SPY 35.94
I agree that a longer time period is needed for fair judgment.