Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Question on WBLRX

edited October 2013 in Fund Discussions
Can someone please explain to me why Whitebox and M* thinks this is a market neutral fund? In what possible combination of 18.38% cash, 69.94% long, 0.96% short can one create a market neutral portfolio? Simple fact of the matter is it lost 0.93% today. On the other hand WBMRX which Whitebox lobbied to actually be classified as L/S lost only 0.16% and boasts more "long/short" ness to be actually classified market neutral.

Asset Allocation WBLRX
Asset Distribution
-100-50050100

Type % Net% Short % Long Bench-mark Cat AvgAs of 08/31/2013
Cash 18.38 0.00 18.38 — 41.34
US Stock 68.99 0.95 69.94 — 30.67
Non US Stock 9.91 0.00 9.91 — 10.79
Bond 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 13.35
Other 2.71 0.01 2.72 — 3.8

Comments

  • edited October 2013
    Hi Vintage. I actually listened to the Whitebox Long Short quaterly call. Dr. Cross gave a pretty good explanation of the fund's market neutral strategy, summarized here:

    http://www.whiteboxmutualfunds.com/docs/lit/long-short/Commentary_Q2_2013.pdf
    </b

    Hope it helps.

    Hey, I noticed too the numbers yesterday. Tactical Opportunities lowered its beta this quarter, I believe due to headwinds foreseen. I also noticed that Tactical now has grown to $252M!
  • edited October 2013
    I will read that commentary, but I think basic math tells me the portfolio does not compute to a market neutral stance.
    Also WBLRX is supposed to be more conservative than WBMRX, or so I thought. I'm getting the feeling now it is the reverse.
Sign In or Register to comment.