David,
In your commentary on RiverNorth DoubleLine Strategic Income (RNDLX) published on April 22, 2011, you wrote, " I’ve been pondering a question, posed on the board, about a three fund portfolio; that is, if you could own three and only three funds over the long haul, which would they be? Given its reasonable expenses, the managers’ sustained successes, innovative design and risk-consciousness, this (RNDLX) might well be one of the three on my list anyway."
I am curious to know which are the other two? Thanks.
Mohan
Comments
In general, I think a long-term holding needs to minimize manager risk and to accord a fair degree of flexibility to the manager. That is, I'd be reluctant to box someone tightly in. Beyond that, it needs to be as inexpensive as possible.
Beyond that, I think that the fund would have a fair and opportunistic exposure to growth drivers; that is, the ability to expertly harness things that demographic changes favoring the emerging markets or the prospect of tens of trillions in infrastructure spending. It's tough to have broad enough expertise, though, to do more than dabble dangerously in some of those niches.
So probably a tactical allocation sort of fund (mostly stocks with the opportunity to invest elsewhere), a strategic income fund (mostly fixed-income with the opportunity to invest elsewhere) and an emerging markets balanced fund (mostly e.m. equities with the opportunity to invest elsewhere, increasingly called "multi-asset" funds).
For what interest it holds, here's what I actually own:
Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation (BBALX) - a very low-cost fund of index funds with a tactical overlay.
FPA Crescent (FPACX) - a reasonably low-cost fund whose manager famously roams over the world's capital markets, investing (successfully) here and there, in equity, debt and alternatives.
Matthews Asia Strategic Income (MAINX) - a reasonably low-cost package of Asian fixed-income with a dash of equities, managed by one of the bright younger stars in the best Asian manager.
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income (RPSIX) - a low-cost fund of actively managed, income-oriented funds which offers a broad basket of global fixed-income funds with a dash (up to 20%) in dividend-paying equities.
Seafarer Overseas Growth & Income (SFGIX) - an Asia-centric, equity-centric emerging markets fund that diversifies outside of Asia, outside of equities and even outside of the emerging markets.
Matthews Asian Growth & Income (MACSX) - the Asia-only version of Seafarer.
I also have owned two Artisan funds from about the day they opened (Artisan Small Cap Value, Artisan International Value) and one cash-management fund (RiverPark Short-Term High Yield).
The collection is currently about 60% stocks, 15% cash, 15% bonds, 10% other. That's my non-retirement portfolio. The allocation is a bit risky for something with an indeterminate time horizon, but the managers are - on whole - really quite risk conscious so I've been happy.
For what interest it holds,
David
Hedge fund manager indeed, cute quip. There's a few hundred feet of hedge here, in places as high as 18ft, exciting up there and crucial to strike a balance. Oh for the good old days of
5% money markets.
FPACX is FPA Crescent fund. Do you have it or you have FPA Capital fund ?
Also, Trow price strategic income fund ticker is PRSNX, not RPSIX, which is Spectrum Income fund. You have an interesting asset allocation.
Thanks,
Mrc
At one point, you did suggest a three fund portfolio of First Trust/Aberdeen Emerging (FEO), T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation (PRWCX) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income (RPSIX) which I tracked as a portfolio on Morningstar. Starting with 1/3 in each on 1/1/2008 would have gotten you an annualized return of 8.6 % since inception, compared to 2.9% for the S&P 500. The current balance is 40% FEO and 30% in each of the other two. Maximum down year was 2008 with -26%, compared to -37% for the S&P 500.
Pretty nice!
Cheers,
lrwilliams
FPA Crescent and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income are both correct. I managed the symbols (I think "I wonder how RPSIX did?") but botched the names.
Thanks for the catch. Back to grading!
David
For what it's worth,
David
I had a nice talk today with Ed Studzinski, who used to co-manage Oakmark Equity & Income (OAKBX). He argues that closed-end funds such as First Trust/Aberdeen Emerging Opportunities offer a lot more return than most of us realize. He named three or four of what he considered classics. Paired with the Morningstar research that I mentioned in this month's cover essay -- that in more than 60% of Morningstar categories, CEFs outperform mutual funds and ETFs -- I'm wondering if we need a way to pay a bit more attention to that slice of the market?
David
Mohan
On another note I noticed that these income containing funds are in your taxable accounts. Do you keep them their because most of the income is qualified for the lower tax rate?
If so how would you handle these funds in the event these low rates expire and dividends are back up to ordinary income?
prinx
David
prinx
I suspect that at Scottrade you do not have the 2 months holding period for NTF funds, but you better check contacting them directly; http://research.scottrade.com/qnr/Public/MutualFunds/Expenses?symbol=RPHYX, see also their general rules http://www.scottrade.com/online-brokerage/trading-fees-commissions.html#tab3
I work with Scottrade, I don't really trade much and I add new funds rarely. Over the long term, that means one fund swap a year or so (selling Artisan Small Cap to buy Artisan Small Cap Value, for instance). That's how Northern Global Tactical came into the portfolio; I liquidated my Leuthold Global holding to buy it. I'd held Leuthold pretty much since launch. In the last 18 months or so, there have been a number of particularly interesting new possibilities, so I've been a bit more acquisitive than usual. I sold much of MASCX to add MAINX and SFGIX, for instance, for didn't entirely liquidate MACSX. Closed out a money market to add RPHYX. Generally, that's a slow enough process that I don't annoy the custodians.
My normal expenses go through my bank, of course. My cash management accounts primarily hold vacation and emergency money: I make a single largish transfer from the account into a linked bank account once in a great while, then handle the day-to-day stuff out of the bank. RPSIX comes with a checkbook, which helps. Most short-term alarms are triggered when you hold shares for fewer than 90 days but the great bulk of my investment is in place for more than that, so it also seems amenable to the custodians.
That feels incredibly rambly. If so, sorry: grading Propaganda exams all morning.
And now, off to help Will with his National History Day project on the Beatles.
David
PIMCO. With ETFs there is no question of frequent trading/short-term redemption fees. Of course, you pay commission every time you buy and sell, which may be smaller depending as a percentage depending on the amount being traded. Of course, this is not a money market or even an ultra-short-term bond fund, but it is fairly stable.