I don’t know much about bonds or bond funds, so I tend to keep an eye on them, and record some of the parameters from Morningstar.
Here are some numbers for the Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) on two recent dates:
As of March 9, ,2013:
Cash 6.05%
U.S. Stocks 12.51%
Foreign Stocks 4.99%
Bond 59.90%
Other 16.54%
Credit quality: Low
Interest rate sensitivity: Extensive
Average effective duration: 6.56 years
Average effective maturity: 13.18 years
Average credit quality: BB
Yield: 5.09%
------------------------------------------------------------
As of today, April 7, 2013:
Cash 5.53%
US Stocks 12.98%
Foreign Stocks 5.23%
Bonds 58.15%
Other 18.11%
Credit quality: Low
Interest rate sensitivity: Moderate
Average effective duration: 4.27 years
Average effective maturity: 6.69
Average credit quality: BB
Yield: 3.39%
I could guess, but I’d rather hear from someone who knows: what happened here? how did the average effective duration go from 6.56 years to 4.27 years in less than a month? how much selling and buying went on to change the interest rate sensitivity from “Extensive” to “Moderate”?
Thank you,
Archaic
Comments
You might want to find the dates of the portfolios that correspond to those stats. The Morningstar portfolio page is 2/28/13 for the "Style Details" and 1/30/13 for everything else.
It could be that the portfolio you saw on 3/9/13 was as much as six months old. It's clear that their portfolio - as of 1/30 - had only about 40% of the weight in long bonds (20+ years) as their peers. It would certainly be possible that they sold off their long bonds entirely, which would take down the maturity a lot but I don't actually know that.
David
Archaic