Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • WealthTrack Show
    July 12 Episode:
    Financial historian James Grant says gold’s impressive rally is flashing a warning signal about the value of U.S. Treasury bonds and the dollar. Why investors should take note.
    https://wealthtrack.com/golds-message/
  • China reportedly orders its airlines to halt Boeing jet deliveries amid US trade war
    Following are excerpts from a current report in The Guardian:
    Carriers also asked to stop purchases of aircraft-related equipment and parts from US firms, report says
    China has reportedly ordered its airlines not to take any further deliveries of Boeing jets, the latest move in its tit-for-tat trade war with the US. The Chinese government has asked carriers to stop purchases of aircraft-related equipment and parts from American companies, according to a Bloomberg News article, which cited people familiar with the matter.
    The order was reported to have come after the country raised its retaliatory tariffs on US goods to 125% on Friday in response to Donald Trump’s levies on Chinese imports totaling 145%. Beijing was also said to be considering ways to support airlines that lease Boeing jets and are facing higher costs.
    About 10 Boeing 737 Max jets are being prepared to join Chinese airlines, and if delivery paperwork and payment on some of them were completed before Chinese ”reciprocal” tariffs came into effect, the planes may be allowed to enter the country, sources told Bloomberg.
    The restriction marks a serious blow for Boeing and other manufacturers trying to navigate the escalating trade war between the world’s two biggest economies.
    The group chief executive of the budget airline Ryanair, Michael O’Leary, has said his company could delay taking deliveries of Boeing aircraft if they become more expensive. He told the Financial Times that Ryanair was due to receive a further 25 aircraft from Boeing from August but would not need the planes until around March or April 2026. “We might delay them and hope that common sense will prevail,” O’Leary said.
    Shares in Boeing have been buffeted by worries about the impact of trade tariffs, as well as complaints from some shareholders that the company has underinvested in its engineering. The company has lost 7% of its market value since the start of the year, and in March its chief financial officer, Brian West, said tariffs could hit availability of parts from its suppliers.
    The rival European plane manufacturer Airbus said on Tuesday that it was watching the evolving situation on trade tariffs. Its chief executive, Guillaume Faury, told shareholders the company was having problems receiving components from the American supplier Spirit AeroSystems, which was weighing on the production of its A350 and A220 jetliners.
    Boeing was approached for comment.

    Comment: Boeing has lost 7% of its market value since the start of the year, with potentially a lot worse to follow. @FD1000 notwithstanding, C
    quote
    Boeing has lost 7% of its market value since the start of the year, with potentially a lot worse to follow. @FD1000 notwithstanding
    It was a "great" call.
    Let's see what happened since the above on April 21. Boeing went up 42+%.
    https://schrts.co/udiZpgWf
  • 25 best mutual funds of all time Oct 2019
    "if it gets folks on the road to saving and investing, that's a good thing"
    Absolutely. In our case it was an advisor who made his living peddling American Funds, which at the time had a hefty front load. However, his knowledge and advice went well beyond just American Funds ….
    Same here. One day during my 2nd year on the job I was chatting with one of the older guys - about nothing really - when it dawned on me to ask him if there was anything else I should be doing for long term financial planning beyond mandatory contributions to the pension system. He said “yes” and gave me the name of a fella who sold Templeton funds at a “discounted” 4.17% load. Knowing nothing about investing I called the guy and he got me started contributing. Not a lot really. But that was more than 55 years ago. Einstein is said to have called compounding “The Eighth Wonder of the World.”
    Dick Strong (of ill repute) also had a positive influence on me (in the mid 90s) Strong talked a good game. Based in neighboring Wisconsin I felt some familiarity. First heard the expression “Pay yourself first” from Strong. I think it might have been a company motto. Your first task every payday should be to invest something for your future. Unfortunately, Strong took it a bit too far and was found to have had his fingers in the cookie jar. :)
  • Schwab to roll out broader overnight trading platform
    Been waiting for the day when I can lose money on three continents in one day.
    :)
    The current thinking (reading from financial sources) is that the retail investor has been driving the recent rally. So these extended trading hours available to you and me should goose the markets even more.
  • Fidelity Checks / Mail Delivery Speed / Security?
    We still use checks because we don't want any outside agency to have digital access to our bank or financial accounts,
    Bill payment systems make electronic payments, or if that is not possible (e.g. to your landlord) they send paper checks. It is true that they need the account number of the account you are paying.
    This "push" method is different from letting creditors "pull" money from your account (what hank referred to as direct debit). I generally don't permit that. If necessary, one can set up an account with a small balance - sufficient to pay the current bill - to wall off assets from the outside agency.
    Cash rewards don’t thrill me
    Even so, they are a secure way of making bill payments. Like direct debits, you don't have to worry about making timely payments - it's automatic. So long as you make at least as much on the cash back as the payee is charging for paying by CC, you're not losing. If you dedicate a CC for bill payments alone, you can avoid the temptation of buying more because you have a CC.
    Of course there's still the question of how you pay the CC bill - paper check, bill payment system, direct debit. But by using a CC there are many fewer bills to handle.
  • Fidelity Checks / Mail Delivery Speed / Security?
    Great questions. I read Larry’s post in OT and the situation sounds like insanity. But I left Citi 15-20 years ago. It seemed then they were more interested in trying to (aggressively) sell me things than servicing the credit card account I had with them. I find Elan Financial more user friendly.
    I come at the issue of credit from a different perspective than most. Years ago i got overextended with credit and it scared the *#A## out of me. So part of “recovery” was swearing off all credit. Interestingly, it was the same time that I began saving, running an annual budget and taking a real interest in investing. So even today I’m loath to use credit cards. Cash rewards don’t thrill me. I figure those are offset by a natural propensity to spend more when using credit rather than paying in cash or on a debit card.
    Except for travel I don’t like to use credit cards. However, after I’d already committed to a large home infrastructure project a year ago I received an offer of 18 months interest free credit on a new card thru Fidelity / Elan. The contractor was willing to put the job on a credit card with no fee. Rather than pull the project money from investments all at once (as first planned) it seemed to make sense to fund the project with this interest free line of credit and then repay it over time. It worked this time as my investments have done very well over that time frame. And, now a year later, I’m about to pay the entire sum off.
    I’ve always felt checks were very safe. Never ever had a problem with one. However in recent years, for better or worse, I’ve begun paying bills thru direct debit from my bank account. I was, however, a victim of identity theft 15-20 years ago and it may have been related to a newspaper subscription allowed to access my bank account. I’ll never know for sure. Law enforcement looked into it and believed it was a Russian based hacking operation. All they got was a few hundred dollars from one local bank checking account by running 3 or 4 bogus withdrawals. The bank made me whole. To @Old_Joe’s question - Yes, I do view checks as safer than authorizing direct withdrawals. But the difference isn’t great enough to dissuade me from using the latter.
    After the above affair I subscribed to Identity Guard . They are excellent. I have a reasonably priced annual plan (pay once yearly). They are very good at notifying me of any suspicious activity, changes in credit rating, credit inquiries, newly opened lines of credit, etc.
    Re “What's your perspective on the danger of hacking vs stolen checks?” I don’t have an intelligent answer. Two different birds. Neither is enticing. A “hack” implies a successful operation. But a stolen / lost check is only a first step. Any culprit still needs to make a withdrawal using such to be successful.
  • Fidelity Checks / Mail Delivery Speed / Security?
    @hank- We still pay for almost all miscellaneous purchases by credit card, and a few repetitive expenses, such as subscriptions to news media, are automatically charged to a credit card.
    Monthly all credit cards are paid by check, and additionally all regular expenses, such as utilities, are paid by check. So we use a fair number of checks.
    We still use checks because we don't want any outside agency to have digital access to our bank or financial accounts, due to the possibility of hacking. It's probably no exaggeration to say that almost weekly we read yet another account of hackers ripping people off one way or another.
    Of course there are sometimes reports of people having checks stolen too, so there's really no completely safe approach to paying monthly bills.
    What's your perspective on the danger of hacking vs stolen checks?
    Thanks- OJ
  • 25 best mutual funds of all time Oct 2019
    Just thought I'd chime in with support for Kiplinger. I've been getting this magazine for probably 50 years ever since my dad got a subscription for me after starting my first real job where I had some disposable income to invest. After he passed, my sister continued that tradition.
    I enjoy reading the articles still.
    Keep is mind that the organization has an objective...per Wiki, "It claims to be the first American personal finance magazine and to deliver "sound, unbiased advice in clear, concise language". It offers advice on managing money and achieving financial security, saving, investing, planning for retirement, paying for college, and major purchases like automobiles and homes."
    It's a great mag for folks starting out and those who want some current information about topics of interest. It's not the most complete or esoteric in terms of investments, but if it gets folks on the road to saving and investing, that's a good thing.
  • Stagflation
    A tighter labor market, tariffs on $3.4 trillion of imports, tax cut stimulus, and a high level of government spending are all happening. This is not even questionable.
    The question is not whether or not these are all inflationary pressures. They are classic inflationary pressures. The question is how much inflation they produce. The FEDs hands will be tied. In a tight labor market unemployment will not necessarily rise severely, but wages will go up as businesses compete for scarce resources. The FED may actually have to raise rates, unless they kowtow to political pressure and let inflation run which would be disastrous.
    The FED may be unable to ride to the rescue, with unemployment only incrementally higher & inflation rising, if GDP slows as it is projected to do by nearly every source.
    From the linked article: "The economy is likely to enter a period of slow growth in the 1% to 2% range. Inflation will hover between 3% to 4%, and unemployment will rise to 4.5% to 5%. While these economic conditions don’t match the double-digit interest rates and inflation and chronically high unemployment of the 70s, the stagflation-lite economic framework will still shock consumers.
    Yes, the economy is likely to experience a sugar high following the coming tax cuts, which will temporarily send growth to 3% or higher. But the combination of new tariffs, tighter immigration policies, and sustained annual budget deficits will soon act as a drain on private sector investment as firms and households are priced out of the market."
    This implies that there may still money to be made in the 3Q of 2025. But that the whole shebang will coalesce into bad juju at some point not too far off. If inflation hits, GDP falls and the FED raises rates, I would assume that both stocks and bonds take a hit. Cash and cash equivalents may still be a good bet.
    Some relevant comments from Roubini in this article:
    https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560604851369
    Roubini has been one of the worst economic predictors, costing investors a lot of performance. See quote below from wiki (link).
    This is why he is among the "best" market predictors (here).
    Lastly, in 1-2 years from now we will revisit this thread.
    However, financial journalist Justin Fox observed in the Harvard Business Review in 2010 that "In fact, Roubini didn't exactly predict the crisis that began in mid-2007... Roubini spent several years predicting a very different sort of crisis — one in which foreign central banks diversifying their holdings out of Treasuries sparked a run on the dollar — only to turn in late 2006 to warning of a U.S. housing bust and a global 'hard landing'. He still didn't give a perfectly clear or (in retrospect) accurate vision of how exactly this would play out... I'm more than a little weirded out by the status of prophet that he has been accorded since."[27][28][29] Others noted that: "The problem is that even though he was spectacularly right on this one, he went on to predict time and time again, as the markets and the economy recovered in the years following the collapse, that there would be a follow-up crisis and that more extreme crashes were inevitable. His calls, after his initial pronouncement, were consistently wrong. Indeed, if you had listened to him, and many investors did, you would have missed the longest bull market run in US market history."[30][31][32][33] Another observed: "For a prophet, he's wrong an awful lot of the time."[34] Tony Robbins wrote: "Roubini warned of a recession in 2004 (wrongly), 2005 (wrongly), 2006 (wrongly), and 2007 (wrongly)" ... and he "predicted (wrongly) that there'd be a 'significant' stock market correction in 2013."[35] Speaking about Roubini, economist Anirvan Banerji told The New York Times: "Even a stopped clock is right twice a day," and said: "The average time between recessions is about five years ... So, if you forecast a recession one year and it doesn't happen, and you repeat your forecast year after year ... at some point the recession will arrive."[36][10] Economist Nariman Behravesh said: "Nouriel Roubini has been singing the doom-and-gloom story for 10 years. Eventually something was going to be right."[17]
    In January 2009, Roubini predicted that oil prices would stay below $40 for all of 2009. By the end of 2009, however, oil prices were at $80.[34][37] In March 2009, he predicted the S&P 500 would fall below 600 that year, and possibly plummet to 200.[38] It closed at over 1,115 however, up 24%, the largest single-year gain since 2003. CNBC's Jim Cramer wrote that Roubini was "intoxicated" with his own "prescience and vision," and should realize that things are better than he predicted; Roubini called Cramer a "buffoon," and told him to "just shut up".[34][39] Although in April 2009, Roubini prophesied that the United States economy would decline in the final two quarters of 2009, and that the US economy would increase just 0.5% to 1% in 2010, in fact the U.S. economy in each of those six quarters increased at a 2.5% average annual rate.[40] Then in June 2009 he predicted that what he called a "perfect storm" was just around the corner, but no such perfect storm ever appeared.[41][40] In 2009 he also predicted that the US government would take over and nationalize a number of large banks; it did not happen.[42][43] In October 2009 he predicted that the price of gold "can go above $1,000, but it can't move up 20-30%"; he was wrong, as the price of gold rose over the next 18 months, breaking through the $1,000 barrier to over $1,400.[43]
    Although in May 2010 he predicted a 20% decline in the stock market, the S&P actually rose about 20% over the course of the next year (even excluding returns from dividends).[44] In 2012, Roubini predicted that Greece would be ejected from the Eurozone, but that did not happen.[45] The Financial Times observed that in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic arrived, he said that policymakers would not mount a large fiscal response. However—they did.[46] Also in 2020, he predicted that a US-Iran war was likely.[46]
  • Barron’s Funds Quarterly+ (2025/Q2–July 7, 2025)
    Barron’s Funds Quarterly+ (2025/Q2–July 7, 2025)
    https://www.barrons.com/topics/mutual-funds-quarterly
    (Performance data quoted in this Supplement are for 2025/Q2 and YTD to 6/30/25)
    COVER STORY, “ETFs Are Eating the World. The Right – and Wrong – Ways to Invest”. It’s hard to imagine an investment idea or theme without a related ETF. There are 4,000+ ETFs in the US, 700+ were added just in 2024, and several hundred are pending before the SEC. Note that there are only 2,400 listed stocks in the US (but there are many ETFs for single-stocks). Many mutual funds/OEFs are adding ETF classes after Vanguard’s patent expired in 2023. Almost 1,300+ active ETFs are competing with active OEFs. Many new ETFs won’t survive because viable ETFs need $100+ million AUM. There have been strong inflows, and the total ETF AUM is $11 trillion, and almost 33.3% of all listed funds (OEFs, ETFs) excluding the money-market funds (CEFs are too tiny to move the needle). Lot of money is just shifting from OEFs into ETFs.
    The ETFs has several advantages: (i) tax-efficiency (due to tax-free creation/redemption), (ii) accessibility, (iii) trading convenience, (iv) lower ERs; big ETFs are very liquid. Many financial advisors now prefer to use ETFs for asset allocation. On the other hand, there is more temptation to trade and reinvestments are inconvenient.
    Top 4 ETF sponsors/firms (Vanguard, BlackRock/BLK, Invesco/IVZ, State Street/STT) have 82% of the total ETF AUM, so there is lot of noise out there. Major stock ETFs are SPY, IVV, VOO (SP500); RSP (equal-weight SP500), IEFA (EAFE), VT (total world stock), NOBL (dividend Aristocrats), TCAF (capital appreciation), etc. Major bond ETFs are AGG, BND (US aggregate bond); BNDW (total world bond), MUNI (intermediate-term munis), JCPI (inflation-protected), ANGL (fallen-angle HY), etc. Major alternative ETFs are GLD, GLDM (gold bullion); IBIT, FBTC (spot Bitcoin), etc.
    There are flaws in some of these ETFs. Some bond, private-asset and commodity ETFs are in small, fragmented and illiquid markets that trade infrequently or not at all. The ETF pricing then is based on matrix-pricing or professional estimates/ guesses that may break down during market stresses. Most commodity ETFs hold futures because it isn’t practical to hold physical commodities except for some precious metals. This adds the complications of backwardation/ contango at future rolls. Also beware that ETFs can hold only up to 15% in private, illiquid assets, so pay attention to what the rest 85% is in. Then, there are leveraged ETFs, +/- 1x, +/- 2x, etc, often in pairs, so the firms make money whether investors have gains or losses.
    QUARTERLY REVIEW. It was a wild quarter for leveraged ETFs as winners and losers were magnified. Beware that their stated leverage applies on a daily basis, but it diverges long-term. The broad market had an early-April drawdown but rebounded strongly to new highs. A solid advice is to think long-term and ignore short-term noises (political, currency, etc), but the entire credit for crypto rally belongs to this Administration that is also a player. Ordinary folks can join the fund with small amounts in ETFs IBIT, FBTC, etc. Foreign stocks (especially small-caps), gold-miners (finally joining the gold rally), bonds and market-neutral funds did well in Q2. Outflows from mutual funds/OEFs continued and went into ETFs. (By @LewisBraham at MFO)
    More on FUNDS & RETIREMENT
    The new budget may trigger AMT for more people in higher income brackets. The AMT exemption amount is the same (as in TCJA, 2017) but the phaseout level has been reduced and the phaseout is at a faster pace. Higher SALT deductions and high state and property taxes may trigger AMT. Expectations are that most couples with income under $400K won’t be impacted.
    MFOP data for Q2 pending.
    Top 5 Categories, Q2 https://i.ibb.co/kgwb8rkv/MFOP-Quarterly-Top5-070625.png
    Bottom 5 Categories, Q2 https://i.ibb.co/FtLx8ZP/MFOP-Quarterly-Bottom5-070625.png
    LINK
  • How the Largest Bond Funds Did in Q2 2025
    The (admittedly deplorable) Bill O’Riley has been insisting the stimulus from the big deficit is intended to prevent the economy from dipping into a major recession before the mid-terms. After that, ”Look out below”. Not intended as political commentary. Just attempting to explain the economics / motives behind what at first appears financial madness. Would I bet the ranch on O’Riley’s progmosis? Hell no.
  • HR-1 and the $1 Trillion Medicaid related cuts, 5 large companies affected today, JULY 2
    Hi @bee The below are results for an ACA impact search relative to HR-1. I will presume that the information is accurate. Hopefully, there is some information of value for you.
    NOTE: implementation dates are not part of this information.
    Regards,
    Catch
    Key Impacts on the ACA and its Marketplaces:
    Millions losing coverage: Changes to the ACA marketplaces within H.R. 1 are estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to lead to at least 3 million people losing their marketplace coverage.
    Challenges to enrollment and potential premium increases: The bill makes it harder for individuals to enroll in and keep their ACA marketplace plans, potentially resulting in higher premiums by reducing available tax credits.
    Expiration of enhanced premium tax credits: H.R. 1 does not extend the enhanced premium tax credits, which were established in 2021 and have helped millions afford marketplace coverage. Their expiration is projected to lead to an additional 4.2 million people becoming uninsured and would be equivalent to a tax increase averaging $700 for millions.
    Destabilization of the marketplaces: The combination of these policies is expected to destabilize the marketplaces, reducing access to coverage and increasing the number of uninsured individuals and the amount of uncompensated care provided by hospitals.
    Elimination of automatic reenrollment: The bill requires annual re-verification of eligibility for individuals receiving premium tax credits, eliminating the automatic reenrollment that nearly 11 million people used in 2025. This adds an administrative burden and could lead to higher premiums for those who don't reenroll promptly.
    No provisional eligibility: Applicants will have to pay full, unsubsidized premiums while awaiting eligibility determinations, which can take weeks or months.
    Removal of repayment cap: The bill removes the cap on how much individuals must repay if they receive excess premium tax credits due to income changes, potentially adding financial risk to those with unpredictable incomes.
    Shortened open enrollment period: The annual open enrollment period would be shortened to November 1st - December 15th, while in 2025, roughly 40% of enrollees signed up after December 15th.
    End to special enrollment periods: The monthly low-income special enrollment period and state-based marketplace special enrollment periods based on income would be eliminated.
    Increased administrative burden for income verification: Individuals with incomes between 100-400% of the Federal Poverty Level would face new income verification processes when applying for premium tax credits.
    Potential Impact on Medicaid:
    Increase in uninsured population: Changes to Medicaid proposed in the bill are estimated to cause 7.8 million individuals to become uninsured by 2034.
    Community engagement requirements: The bill would impose community engagement requirements for certain Medicaid recipients, which could lead to coverage losses.
    More frequent redeterminations: States would be required to redetermine eligibility for the Medicaid expansion population every 6 months, instead of the current 12 months.
    Delay of eligibility rule: A Biden administration rule aimed at simplifying redeterminations and removing barriers to Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) enrollment would be delayed.
    Note: These are potential impacts based on analysis of H.R. 1 as of July 3, 2025. The final impacts may vary depending on the ultimate outcome of the legislative process
  • The PCE(personal consumption expenditures) price index + Atlanta's Fed Q2 estimated GDP
    @FD1000, I really like the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow and use it in my financial model. It is subject to wild swings early on and then becomes more accurate as it gets more data. Currently, GDPNow is estimating GDP growth for the second quarter to be 2.55%, down from the 4.6% that you mentioned from June 2nd.
    Imports are subtracted from the GDP estimate. Imports increased as investors raced to beat tariffs. Import data on FRED are updated through April. May and June data will have a major impact on GDP estimates.
    As for inflation, the effects of tariffs should hit store shelves in July so estimates of inflation have a great deal of uncertainty. The Philadelphia Federal Reserve Second Quarter 2025 Survey of Professional Forecasters shows that economists estimate that inflation will peak at 3.4% next quarter and decline to 2.5% in 2026 and 2.1% in 2027. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development released its OECD Economic Outlook, with estimates that inflation in the US will average 3.2% in 2025 and 2.8% in 2026. In “2025 Economy Watch”, The Conference Board estimated that inflation would average 2.9% in 2025 and 3.0% in 2026. The International Monetary Fund database estimates that consumer prices in the US will be 3.0% in 2025, 2.5% in 2026, and 2.1% in 2027.
  • When government controls the means of production...
    @DrVenture You said it!
    This administration is rife with examples of socialist tendencies and attempts to hinder free markets. Trump wanted to "buy" a 5G cell phone manufacturer, when he discovered that the U.S. did not have one. Which would be government owned then.
    He DEMANDS that companies not raise prices in response to higher input costs, essentially using his bully-pulpit to attempt to set prices across corporate America < that one is huge! Government price controls through threats.
    He insists that U.S. oil companies produce more product to satisfy his demands for lower gas prices, even though that would hurt those companies investors and business model. They ignore him, of course, but the threat remains. This is more attempted price manipulation via threat.
    Tariffs on $3.4 trillion in imports are being used to control buying habits. They are being used to make buying higher priced alternatives more palatable, by removing the price advantages of certain imports. Even when, in most cases, alternatives either do not exist, or are still not attractive. More government market manipulation!
    Tariffs are also be utilized to force other countries to buy our products, again through threat and price manipulation.
    Universities are being bullied into changing the way they do business. Make no mistake, higher education in America is a business. To alter their admittance policies, course offerings and policies regarding free speech. Market/business (free market) manipulation again by government threat of financial consequences.
    Forcing law firms to provide free services, and hindering their application of free choice in choosing their clientele is another obvious example of free market interference.
    List any other "anti-free market" activities you may be aware of. They will no doubt keep coming.
  • Fidelity - Link External Bank Account
    @catch22
    Thanks for the link to the Fidelity message board.
    I received the same message that was referenced in the OP.
    IIRC, micro-deposits have always been used to validate linked accounts
    at every financial institution where I was a customer (including Fidelity in the past).
  • Fidelity - Link External Bank Account
    I attempted to link an external bank account to one of my Fidelity accounts today.
    After entering the required information online, a message was displayed stating more information was needed.
    An option for using Finicity (affiliated with Mastercard) to link bank accounts was then provided.
    I prefer not to use third parties when linking financial accounts.
    I called Fidelity, explained the current situation, and mentioned that I didn't experience
    previous issues when linking bank accounts.
    The Fidelity rep alluded to increased security measures implemented by the firm.
    The following sequence of events transpired¹.
    1) Fidelity sent me an Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Authorization Form via their secure email.
    2) Printed 4/6 pages of the form.
    3) Using pen, completed form.
    4) Using phone, took picture for each page and for bank statement.
    5) Copied pictures from phone to PC (phone not used for financial transactions).
    6) Navigated to Fidelity's secure email to upload completed form and bank statement.
    7) Attempted to attach five .jpg files but was only able to attach two—exceeded total upload size of 13 MB.
    8) Sent two additional secure emails in order to upload all five .jpg files.
    9) Wait a few days for request to be processed.
    I appreciate that Fidelity has stringent security measures in place for linking bank accounts.
    However, their corresponding online process is cumbersome and somewhat time-consuming.
    The process would be much more efficient if the EFT Authorization Form (PDF) was modified
    to allow electronic editing (e.g. Docusign) and automatic online submission.
    ¹ Alternatively, Fidelity could have sent an EFT Authorization Form via postal mail.
    I'd complete the form and mail it back to Fidelity along with my bank statement.
  • prwcx expands # 'co-managers'
    I thought it would be entertaining and potentially instructive to go over the list of talented managers who have run PRWCX since inception. While none attained the notoriety of Giroux, all excelled. If memory is correct Giroux came in about 15 years ago along with a co-manager of equal status. That lasted only a year or two. ISTM the fella’s name was Jeff Arackle or something similar. It later came out he had some serious personal issues (financial ?) but I can’t recall the nature of such.
    I even resorted to Bing’s AI asking about the history of managers for this fund. All AI could provide is this:
    Publicly available sources do not list any named individual managers prior to David Giroux (2006). Earlier reports consistently highlight Giroux as the first lead manager since founding. T. Rowe Price has not disclosed earlier stewardship or predecessor managers in public filings or press materials.”
    Surely AI isn’t providing a very intelligent answer! I’d also love to know how much the fund has grown in AUM under Giroux? I’d guess it’s doubled since he became co-manager - perhaps even adjusting for asset growth..
  • Fears of a Wider Mid-East War are Growing ...
    I am taking the liberty of quoting excerpts from an excellent post by richardsok that appeared on the BIG BANG! Investors site:
    "Trump's penchant for crowing victory on TV last night was unfortunate. He preens and congratulates himself too early and too much -- a habit of his. He's attempting to show his attack was a pain-free surgical strike without consequences. In truth, the mullahs do NOT have to seek peace. They still have a hundred ways to strike back.... including terror, sleeper cells, mining Hormuz Straits, Jihad eruptions from sympathetic quarters, and small scale bio/chemical "events". The American public's patience for easy-to-start wars is notoriously brief; more so after initially promising disasters in Afganistan, Iraq, Lebanon in recent memory. By itself, air power has not had great historic success in ending wars -- merely prolonging them and making people more grimly determined.
    With our debt-growth trajectory already unsustainable, another war would be economically foolhardy for the US. There are more ways than military defeat to kill a great republic. Endless wars, crippling expense and financial collapse will do the trick too. Powell was exactly correct not to reduce interest rates the other day.
    Wars have ways of surprising us all. Three long years ago it was "Ukraine is doomed! Surrender! America's fault! Putin will unleash nukes if NATO aids Zelensky!" (The posts are still preserved here on BB, I hope.) Well, well, well. The "doomed" side is still grimly hanging on and striking back harder than ever.
    Wars end only when the LOSERS say they're over. Now we see how the mullahs respond."
  • Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund will be reorganized
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/34273/000093041325002005/c112473_497.htm
    497 1 c112473_497.htm
    Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund,
    a series of Virtus Equity Trust
    Supplement dated June 20, 2025, to the Summary Prospectus and
    the Virtus Equity Trust Statutory Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”),
    each dated January 28, 2025, as supplemented
    IMPORTANT NOTICE TO INVESTORS
    As approved by the Board of Trustees of Virtus Equity Trust, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund (the “Acquired Fund”) will merge with and into Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund (the “Acquiring Fund”) a separate series of Virtus Equity Trust, on or about September 12, 2025. The Acquired Fund and the Acquiring Fund have the same Board of Trustees and subadviser, as well as the same portfolio manager. The Acquiring Fund’s investment advisory fee rates are contractually identical to those of the Acquired Fund, and the Acquiring Fund’s expenses are or will be contractually limited by the investment adviser to levels the same as or lower than those of the Acquired Fund. The fundamental investment restrictions of the Acquired Fund are the same as those of the Acquiring Fund.
    The Acquiring Fund’s investment objective and principal investment strategies are similar to those of the Acquired Fund. Therefore, the combined fund after the merger is expected to be managed similarly to the way that the Acquired Fund was managed before the merger, with higher assets and the potential for lower fees and expenses. Under normal circumstances, each of the Acquired Fund and the Acquiring Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in dividend paying equity securities. Each of the Acquired Fund’s and the Acquiring Fund’s investment strategy emphasizes companies the subadviser believes to have a durable competitive advantage, strong management and low financial risk and to be able to grow over market cycles. Each Fund typically invests in the securities of medium to large capitalization companies, but neither is limited to investing in the securities of companies of any particular size. Generally, each Fund invests in approximately 25 to 50 securities at any given time. However, whereas the Acquired Fund invests in companies that are tied economically to a number of countries throughout the world, the Acquiring Fund invests in U.S. companies, or companies with significant economic ties to the U.S.
    Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, the Acquired Fund will transfer all or substantially all of its assets to the Acquiring Fund in exchange for shares of the Acquiring Fund and the assumption by the Acquiring Fund of all liabilities of the Acquired Fund. Following the exchange, the Acquired Fund will distribute the shares of the Acquiring Fund to its shareholders pro rata, in liquidation of the Acquired Fund, and shareholders of the Acquired Fund will therefore become shareholders of the Acquiring Fund in the same class of shares they owned of the Acquired Fund immediately prior to the reorganization.
    The merger is expected to be carried out pursuant to Rule 17a-8 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, which means that shareholder approval is not required for the merger to be carried out.
    Investors should retain this supplement with the Prospectuses and
    Statement of Additional Information for future reference.
    VET 8019/Global Quality Dividend Merger (06/25)
  • M* AI research slop

    Was researching EUFN, an ETF that holds European banks.
    From their AI-generated 'research' page:
    ...analysis of the strategy's portfolio shows it has maintained a significant overweight position in liquidity exposure and an underweight in volatility exposure compared with category peers (Such gobblydegook!) High liquidity exposure is attributed to stocks with a high trading volume, lending managers more flexibility. And low volatility exposure is rooted in stocks that have a lower standard deviation of returns.
    < - >
    The investment seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI Europe Financials Index composed of developed market European equities in the financials sector. (So ... it's tracking a financial index; that's fair given its name.) The fund generally will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index and in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the component securities of the underlying index. The index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the combined equity market performance of the financials sector of developed market countries in Europe......
    ...The portfolio is overweight in financial services by 10.5 percentage points (ya think??) in terms of assets compared with the category average, and its utilities allocation is similar to the category. The sectors with low exposure compared with category peers are technology and consumer cyclical, with technology underweighting the average portfolio by 2.7 percentage points of assets and consumer cyclical similar to the average (Gee, I would hope so!) The portfolio is composed of 113 holdings and is diversified among those holdings.
    < - >
    Just another reason to take anything authored by "Morningstar Manager Research" with a healthy grain of salt. Because, who wants utilities and consumer cyclical stocks in an ETF tracking a Financial Index?