Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Anybody use Schwab Financial Advisors?
    @FD100 @rforno
    I have had a similar experience at Schwab with the local FAs who have been very helpful with moving money, checking on accounts and answering the phone almost immediately. They probably would have been happy to give me investment advice, if I asked. (This is in contrast to Vanguard where your local FA is a "team". Not much experience with FIDO in this regard.)
    The current proposal concerns a firm outside of Schwab, not a Schwab FA. The fees are similar or lower than most actively managed mutual funds, and the fees for FI are actually lower than most active bond funds.
    FD100, if I had a system as reliable and apparently as successful as you do, requiring little time, I would not consider outside advice.
    I have had decades of experience and have read many books about "Lazy portfolio's" "Couch Potato Portfolios" " Ivy League Portfolio", but these tend to work best for the "Accumulation" phase of life, where you can "set it up and forget it"
    The computer generated portfolios of Fido, Schwab and Vanguard are similar to these "Couch potatoes" but just more complex and rest on assumptions that most people are not aware of ( and may not agree with) , especially referring to their large % of foreign stocks recently. With bond coupons back up, the 60/40 seem more reliable, but 2022 was a disaster for people who suddenly found they had 15 to 20% less money then they thought on retirement.
    For a long winded defense of the above read the thread on Bogleheads
    https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=412507&sid=16550dda64788e8838fa5d7004273d09
    Now in retirement, my wife and I need advice on Roth conversions, withdrawal rates estate planning and are trying to avoid large drawdowns early on while maximizing income and return. I have investigated all of this and came up with similar answers, but it takes a lot of time.
    While I am in good health, I believe as Lynn does , that my wife needs an honest and reliable firm to deal with the investments if I get hit by a bus, with more expert personalized advice than I think you will get at Vanguard. Fidelity seemed to offer a computer driven portfolio for a higher fee.
    I have tried other advisors over the years with fractions of our money, and found them to charge 1.25% to put you in their firm's Bond funds and use a 60/40 portfolio to track the SP500. This is quite different than what I am looking for here.
    I am starting small and will see how it goes.
  • Anybody use Schwab Financial Advisors?
    I don't need (or want) an FA to invest for me, thankfully.
    My Schwab FA came over from TDA. He treated me very well over the years in terms of customer service and we stay in touch very periodically to opine about the markets ... he has never pushed anything my way as a recommendation other than to gently note (back then) that I had a 'large cash pile' he thought could be better used. Also once he got to know me, he gave me direct access to some planning tools that he used to help his other clients, which I appreciated.*
    When we first met I told him my ground rules for a FA/broker: I'm self-directed, so while you can always recommend, don't be pushy. For 14-ish years, he's been exactly what I asked him to be. (The same applies to the FA for my long-long term account at WF, where we go back over 20 years)
    By contrast, the guy I was initially assigned from Schwab kept reaching out via email or phone, and once my TD guy also got onboarded at Schwab, I dropped him so we could reconnect and continue the relationship.
    * He appreciated that while I was very eager to leave TD once the merger was announced, I didn't transfer my TD account to Schwab in 2020 until after the TD FA evaluations were completed, b/c I didn't want him to have a noticeable loss of AUM on his book during the post-merger analysis of internal folks.
  • Anybody use Schwab Financial Advisors?
    Schwab assigned a local FA(financial adviser) to me when I joined years ago. This guy is amazing and can tell you what funds to use, he even does CEFs, all for free. I don't need it so I don't use him but over the years I met with him twice just to find out his knowledge. Last year I was assigned to another FA and she is your typical saleslady, which is what most FAs are IMO.
    I call it catch-22. If your knowledge is below average, you would not be able to know if the FA is good, if your knowledge is above average, you don't need one.
    In the past anytime I have asked Fidelity or Schwab for advice I received a portfolio made of 8-10 funds that looks like computer generated.
    My advice is to learn it by yourself, investing is really "simple" unless you want to complicate things...and most do. See ideas at https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Lazy_portfolios
    You can just go beyond that. Example: select 3 index funds + 2 managed funds = done.
  • ⇒ All Things Boeing ... NASA may send Starliner home without its crew
    MSNBC chart today shows that BA stock price has lost a cumulative 35% over the last five years. I recall visiting the factory prior to that decline. The tour guide touted the then-high share price as evidence of the company’s excellence. Sometimes it does not pay to hold a blue chipper for the long haul.
  • ARGH !!! I want more tech, but dang, looking at 2023 returns. I track this one...and other tech
    I switched to stocks from mutual funds after I retired. Don't post much because of that. I have 9% of portfolio in Tech stocks having bought both AVGO and NVDA plus four other stocks in late summer of 2022.
    @Art - We’d enjoy your investment perspectives anyhow whenever you’re inclined to post.
    Nice going.
    A stranger I encountered on a hotel / airport shuttle a bit under 2 years ago (June ‘22) recommended I buy NVDA. (His only recommendation) Just casual chatter. He couldn’t even pronounce the company name correctly - but had read recommendations for it on the Motley Fool - which he swore by as a great source of investment guidance. Of course, I didn’t take his advice. Who in their right mind would buy a stock based on an anonymous tip from some stranger encountered by chance on an airport shuttle?
    I suspect there’s deeper significance to that story - but danged if I can figure it out.
    .
  • Rondure Overseas Fund will be liquidated
    ROSOX / ROSIX
    Morningstar 1* / 2*, Negative
    Firm https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/rosix/parent
    From Barron's 5/22/21:
    VALUE has lagged badly for so long, that it is risky to pick the NEXT GENERATION of value hunters. But that didn’t stop Barron’s from coming up with the following list (all have 10+ years of career ahead of them).
    .....
    Laura GERITZ, 49, Rondure Global (RNWOX, ROSOX). Quality-contrarian looks for high returns and free cash flows.
    Rondure family will now have only EM RNWOX / RNWIX, 3* / 4*. Negative. It has received several favorable mentions in Barron's.
    Interesting that Barron's put Geritz in the list of upcoming value managers, but her style in both of her funds is growth or blend.
  • Rondure Overseas Fund will be liquidated
    Really lousy performance....kinda think (know) sitting in my underwear half drunk throwing darts at a stock name dartboard would have gotten better results .... Several years ago I had some monies in that fund, thought the holdings were financially sound kind of like first eagle overseas but lately their holdings in ROSOX seemed kinda wonky to me....yeesh.
  • ⇒ All Things Boeing ... NASA may send Starliner home without its crew
    True @msf
    Only - it’s a “seller’s market”. The similar sized Airbus product (A-319 / 320) is from what I hear completely sold out for several years. So Boeing’s products might stink, but airlines are desperate for new product.
    Apparently China has a similar sized plane either in production or about to begin production. There’s speculation it might fill the gap - obviously with huge ramifications for the industry and global trade.
    These mid-sized single-aisle planes seem to be the “sweet spot” for airlines. They allow for near 100% occupancy per flight while providing plenty of booking latitude (ie schedule choice) for passengers. Two or three decades ago they were envisioned by the airlines more as short / intermediate haul aircraft with larger twin-aisle jets doing most of the longer haul work. Didn’t work out that way in practice. Might help explain the backlog for this size plane.
  • ARGH !!! I want more tech, but dang, looking at 2023 returns. I track this one...and other tech
    Hi @hank Using your noted PRMTX.....
    PRMTX v FSELX v SPY simple bar chart , Jan 1999 to date.
    You could have done much worse in many other areas of the markets. And I'm NOT suggesting one place all the marbles into one bag.
    NOTE: I first began training in electronics in 1968. I had several different employers during my employment period, involved with electronics/computer driven mechanical devices. My longest tenure was 33 years with one company. I have a comfort level with technology and its continued evolving into 'everything'.
    It is important to maintain one's feeling as much as possible and not flip investments. Not an easy task.
    SpaceX and Mr. Musk. Nope. Not interested in a single issue, regardless of the brilliance of Musk to get things done in technology. It's the other part of his brain that gives me pause.
    If one wants to maintain 10 investment positions (10% each) in a portfolio, I feel one pure area should be some form of technology (not a single issue), but an etf or fund with at least 30 holdings.
    ADD: investing in mushrooms
  • ARGH !!! I want more tech, but dang, looking at 2023 returns. I track this one...and other tech
    @catch22 - Why not hold on to your technology marbles and wait for SpaceX to go public?
    Perhaps as early as 2024
    In keeping with the football motif here, were I inclined to play this one I’d probably employ an ”End-around” (indirect route) and invest instead in mushrooms which should benefit from all the IPO publicity and are far less likely to explode.
    Really, the possibilities here are endless …
    - Reverse play - Sell the stock short which would pay off big if the first rocket blows up.
    - Punt - Hang on to for a few days as IPO attracts buyers and soars in price and than sell all.
    - Double reverse - Try driving the price down with a massive short position; than switch directions and buy in “on the cheap” after panicked investors have fled.
    - “Hail Mary” - Go for broke. Double-down using leverage.
    My own low key ”ground game” has never been interested much in high-tech. I’ve have made more money over the years - potentially anyway. But the big swings in valuation would have led to many sleepless nights. Those kinds of swings can also lead to making dumb decisions like jumping ship at the worst possible moment. However, I did own some PRMTX for a few months in late ‘08 - early ‘09 when valuations were at rock bottom.
  • ⇒ All Things Boeing ... NASA may send Starliner home without its crew
    Truth! They are gambling with lives. No one can say it's a mix-up, like the Air Canada plane that ran out of gas and had to do an emergency landing at a retired military airstrip in Manitoba, which was by then being used for drag-racing at the time. Why? it was a mistake regarding the switch from Imperial gallons to liters as the new standard measurement. 40 years ago.
    https://www.cbc.ca/archives/when-a-metric-mix-up-led-to-the-gimli-glider-emergency-1.4754039
  • T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund in registration
    @yogibearbull — I’ve purchased numerous third party funds through Fidelity over the years, and I’ve never had a transaction take so long to settle. This was a cash purchase, not an exchange. In other cases, if I placed an order before 4 pm, the purchase price was the fund’s closing value on that day.
  • ISHARES IBONDS TERM TREASURY ETF
    ... when I bought Fidelity’s TIPs index fund several years ago. I thought it would protect a portion of my portfolio from inflation spikes. It did just the opposite. It was my worst performing bond fund when the Fed started raising interest rates.
    Even worse, speaking of deep dumminess, I knew well (he said) that STIP would not be particularly protective, and I also knew it would fare meh or worse than meh with rate raises ... but I did not anticipate how much it would punk out and take time to get back to breakeven. Still better than BND, BSV, VGIT, which turned out to be amazingly bad. No selling of any of these yet, though.
  • ISHARES IBONDS TERM TREASURY ETF
    Not all investors will hold to maturity; not all notes and bonds mature at the same time within that year; and then there are the potential defaults (corporates of course). The portfolio would need to continue buying additional corporate notes/bonds, perhaps at lower rates.
    Consider just two investors and a single CUSIP. Investor 1 buys in now, investor 2 in a year.
    We'll start off as simple as possible. Let's say the current market rate on a 3 year Treasury is 4%, and the underlying Treasury bonds, maturing in 3 years have 4% coupons. So they trade at par. Let's also say that the ETF shares are $100/share.
    Investor 1 comes in an invests $10,000. That's 100 shares, buying 10 bonds at par in the underlying portfolio.
    A year goes by. We'll assume that the yield at that moment on 2 year treasuries is 3.5%. Shorter term bonds typically have lower yields, or perhaps all rates dropped over that year. The reason doesn't really matter.
    A two year bond with a 4% coupon and a YTM of 3.5% is priced at 100.9577. You can find that with a calculator, e.g. Fidelity's, and you can verify it with EXCEL:
    EXCEL function: YIELD(DATE(2024,1,1), DATE(2026,1,1), 4%, 100.9577, 100, 2)
    Because the underlying bonds have appreciated from 100 to 100.9577, the share price has likewise appreciated from $100 to $100.9577.
    Investor 2 comes in and buys 100 shares for $10,095.77. Keep in mind that the YTM at the time is 3.5%. Now each investor owns 100 shares.
    At maturity, Investor 1 has received three years worth of coupons at a rate of 4% and gets back the original $10,000 investment when the bonds mature and the fund is liquidated. That's your basic 4% yield. The fact that Investor 2 bought additional shares at a higher price (lower yield) had no effect.
    At maturity, Investor 2 has received two years worth of coupons at a rate of 4%, but gets back $95.77 less than the original investment. That's because the investor bought the bonds at a premium.
    The YTM that Investor 2 received was 3.5% - just what the market rate on two year bonds was when the investment was made. See the EXCEL expression above. In short, having to buy or sell bonds shouldn't affect the fund's behavior. That's unlike "normal" Treasury bond funds where trading can alter the portfolio's average maturity. (In corporate bond funds, trading can also affect credit quality and risk.)
    The fact that the bonds mature over a period of a year can somewhat reduce yield. In that last year, as bonds mature their proceeds are held as cash (think 3 mo Treasuries) which should yield somewhat less than 12 mo Treasuries. Or as the prospectus puts it:
    Declining Yield Risk. During the six months prior to the Fund’s planned termination date, the Fund’s yield will generally tend to move toward prevailing money market rates and may be lower than the yields of the bonds previously held by the Fund and lower than prevailing yields for bonds in the market.
  • ISHARES IBONDS TERM TREASURY ETF
    @Old_Joe — Oftentimes it pays to acknowledge your ignorance. When I first started buying CDs last winter, I was ignorant of some important details— such as whether they are callable. Some more knowledgeable posters pointed that out to me, and I restricted all of my later purchases to noncallable CDs.
    I wish I had sought input, like you, when I bought Fidelity’s TIPs index fund several years ago. I thought it would protect a portion of my portfolio from inflation spikes. It did just the opposite. It was my worst performing bond fund when the Fed started raising interest rates. Ended up selling it for a big loss.
  • Old M* Portfolio Through 2024
    My M* Watchlists were also Exported. It was a while back, so I don't remember exact steps (Edit - Actually, the transport from old M* Portfolio to new M* Investor was automatic after login).
    Edit/Add. I checked M* Investor after a long while.
    So, basically, things updated in old M* Portfolio are automatically reflected in new M* Investor; I am not sure about the reverse*. This is a big help for those who are already familiar with old M* Portfolio Editing/Updating.
    *Edit/Add2. The buy/sell/delete are automatically updated both ways. But dividends can only be auto-refreshed in the old M* Portfolio, and are then automatically reflected in the new M* Investor. There is no way to auto-update dividends directly in the new M* Investor - those can be entered manually, or it can get those from the linked-account, and it treats old M* Portfolio as linked-account. This is a big help for those who are already familiar with old M* Portfolio Editing/Updating.
    Performance tabs for portfolios look almost the same as "My Performance" pages in the old M* Portfolio. So, the information is provided on Total Returns, Personal Returns (i.e., including any personal transactions), and index returns annually for up to 10 years, and then monthly for last 12 months (the Menu tab says Trailing 12 Months, but it means PAST 12 Months). This is followed by similar information for each holding (it seems to be open always; the old M* Portfolio had a click to Hide/Show these holding details).
    But missing are the total return data for 1-week, 1-month, 3-monts, YTD, 1-year, 3-years, 10-years, Since Purchase, and Custom Dates; these data are in the bottom half of "My Performance" page in the old M* Portfolio, and could possibly be added later.
    The old M* Portfolio was/is a unique product and I doubt that the new M* Investor will ever approximate/emulate it fully. The new M* Investors started out as a tool for linked-brokerage-accounts, with some M* analytics slapped on, and M* has made lots of improvements in its features after vigorous complaints.
    Anyway, things are much improved and the old M* Portfolio users can hang on to the new M* Investor rather than looking for alternatives. As I have mentioned elsewhere, I am also using Stock Rover (SR), so I have 2 different portfolio systems going for now.
  • Manager change at RLSFX ?
    So T-bills are in special category different from regular stock and fund sales.
    T-bills are in a special category different from regular and muni bond sales. Bonds have their own rules dealing with appreciation. Unless bond appreciation is de minimus (under 1/4% per year), it is taxed as ordinary income (even for munis, except for OID).
    Q: If I anticipate a sizable capital gain on the sale of an investment during the year, do I need to make a quarterly estimated tax payment during the tax year?
    You can make substantially equal estimates or you can file Form 2210 Schedule AI (annualized income) to account for uneven income throughout the year. I've used that in the past for large 4th quarter Roth conversions, cap gains distributions, fund sales, etc.
    You have to keep track of your income by period (Jan-March, April-May, June-Aug, Sept-Dec) and work through the tax liability for each quarter. In recent years before 2023 it wasn't worth the effort because interest rates were so low. Little interest income was lost in paying equal estimates.
    2022 IRS pages:
    https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f2210.pdf (Form 2210)
    https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i2210.pdf (Instructions)
    Also, taxpayers are not required to file a 4th quarter estimate if they file their tax return including amount due by January 31st.
  • Two new Matthews International ETFs in registration
    @SecretAgent - My issue with Matthews was an investment with MAPIX. I owned it for more than 7 years, and it still lost money. I’m a buy and hold investor, and didn’t realize all of the turmoil going on at Matthews — managers leaving, manager changes, etc. They changed the manager of MAPIX, who changed its investment style significantly— and it went from a top performing fund to the bottom of the barrel. It made significant gains the first few years that I owned it, and then cratered. All of this happened after the management changes. My fault, I guess, for not keeping abreast. Apparently, a lot of their top managers quit.
  • M* basic fund screener discontinued
    MFO's MultiSearch is a great tool with an extremely extensive database underlying it, including a lot of MFO-defined metrics. In no way was I trying to disparage it.
    That said, I'm more interested in the underlying data than in the tool. You link to images of the UI to show the screening parameters available. I prefer to look at simple table of those parameters:
    https://www.member.mfopremium.com/wp-content/themes/twentynineteen-child_202106v3/olib/media/multisearch_screening_parameters.pdf?v20210728.1
    I was taught in programming language design that generally less is better; too many ways of accomplishing something confuses people. Not unlike the effect seen when 401(k)s have too many options. So using predefined sets of options via select boxes is a good screener design for many users.
    Realistically, many people think of screeners this way - give me all the diversified foreign funds with large cap blend portfolios and a three year risk/reward rating of 5 (out of 5).
    I prefer something more flexible and powerful like a SQL interpreter. The LexisNexis query language is another example of this sort of flexibility, though that language is designed more for document searches than database field searches.
    I gave a simple example of a query above that most tools can't handle. Say I'm concerned about the stability of funds that are very small. I might search for funds over $1B in AUM. But recognizing that it takes time to build assets, I might make allowances. For young (under 3 year old) funds, I could accept funds with at least $500M in assets.
    Of course I could do this in two separate searches (over $1B, young and over $500M), though I'd have to combine the result sets and weed out duplicates (young funds with over $1B in assets). I'd like to be able to do this in a single query. And I'd like to be able to set arbitrary thresholds, say $767M instead of $500M. That's not possible if I'm given only a choice of $500M, $1B, $10B, or $100B.
    As to cost, let's see how the tax laws change in a couple of years. Right now, there are no above-the-line charitable deductions (as there were in 2021). And without a mortgage it's hard to itemize now.
    One can still get a tax advantage by contributing via a donor advised fund or a QCD. Those must be pure contributions with no benefit received; they are not subscriptions. Proceeds do go to a good cause. I've contributed before and expect to do so again.
    This is not a complaint. It is a fact of life. The subscription services are an inducement to contribute and so pragmatically they cannot be offered separately. If the services were offered separately, people would be less motivated to contribute beyond the cost of the subscription. (I also decline the tote bags offered from 501(c)(3) institutions X, Y, and Z.)
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/support-us
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/support-us/501c3/
  • T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund in registration
    The attraction for many, I assume, is for investors locked out of PRWCX due to its prolonged closure. TRP put a hard close on PRWCX many years ago. I jumped on PRFCX when it became available and paired it with TCAF, so hopefully the result will replicate PRWCX.