Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Intel stock spikes after report of possible u.s. government stake
    there is an inspiring list of innovations spouted by trump to industries of all flavors, him being a unique expert in all.
    my take is that AMD is more than happy for intel to be forced to act on strategic advice from trump and his anti-STEM MAGA morons.
    m.leder, noted forensic analyst on SEC postings, came from behind her paywall to comment on intel's CYA statement regarding the coercion. some clips....
    ...a lot to unpack in this risk factor and any number of parties that could potentially sue. But I love the nuanced language of “given the scarcity of recent US precedents”.
    Really? The government doesn’t take 10% stakes in major American companies that employ over 100,000 people with virtually zero planning based on some tweet... I'm shocked, shocked! Based on today's close, it seems clear as if the promised cash infusion did nothing to boost Intel’s stock price, so it will be interesting to see what impact this has over the next few months and years.
    I also thought the risk factor stating that there’s no requirement for the $8.9 billion infusion to be made by a certain date, although the 94-page filing spells out a closing date of Aug. 26 was worth noting. As too was the risk factor that the tax, accounting and financial impacts are uncertain and being evaluated!

    linkedin.com
    in short, intel is saying they have no idea, and by this disclosure take no liability regarding impact on legalities, capital deployment, taxes, and accounting.
    SHAREHOLDERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
  • Where to Invest Right Now: How to Profit From a Weak US Dollar - Bloomberg
    That's what I have done YTD, and it's only based on the markets, never based on silly politics and TDS on so many threads.
    I was out for several weeks during the meltdown and was back in mid-April and still invested at 99+%.
    I'm always dancing near the exit.
    =========
    Where should you invest?
    Stocks: International was much stronger early in the year, but US stocks have done better since April. Easy choice = invest globally. So, for 15 years (2010-2024) US ruled, and finally, diversification worked.
    Bonds: most categories have done well = many choices.
  • Examining 10 Years of Stock Performance by Sector
    It may make me shudder but will AI and crypto be the goto for the next ten years???
  • Examining 10 Years of Stock Performance by Sector
    A scorecard for M* US equity sector indexes lists calendar-year returns starting in 2015.
    Not suprisingly, technology has been a frequent winner.
    The energy sector underperformed all other sectors from 2017-2020
    but gained the most in 2016, 2021, and 2022.
    Industrials, consumer defensives, and financials were neither at the top
    nor at the bottom of the performance charts during this period.
    Healthcare has really struggled due to policy concerns and other issues.
    https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/6-key-takeaways-examining-10-years-stock-performance-by-sector
  • You're buying stocks where? But Europe Is Losing ...
    @bee,
    I owned the fund until a few years ago and liked it. While it was concentrated, I didn’t find it as volatile as other large foreign blend funds, and I remember it having a meaningful allocation to U.S. companies. I sold it because I didn’t want my foreign holdings to be currency-hedged and combined it with APDKX that I continue to own.
  • Longleaf International Fund being reorganized
    I quit Longleaf 10 years ago after they went out on several concentrated limbs. They have great reports and great explanations but all there of their funds ( Partners, small cap, Global) basically preform the same and not very well.
    Other old time favorites like Nicholas have done much better
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    @Derf Wait! My mistake, looks like a 29oz can. I was only off on the size by 39%. I haven't bought any of the common grocery store coffee's in years but when I did it seemed like it was a 3-lb metal can. Anyway it was just the largest selectable container available and it was an end-cap display or I never would have seen it. Thanks for pointing out my error.
  • This Day in Markets History
    From Markets A.M.newsletter by Telis Demos.
    On this day in 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit 2722.42, a new record high—
    up 44% for the year and triple its level just five years earlier.
    “In a market like this, every story is a positive one,” said Jon Groveman,
    head equity trader at Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co.
    Less than two months later, on October 19, the Dow lost 23% in a single day.
  • Longleaf International Fund being reorganized
    From an email ("August 2025 update") I received this morning:
    For 50 years, Southeastern Asset Management (SAM) has been a disciplined value investor through multiple market environments. We remain confident in our belief that bottom-up stock selection is the best approach to preserving capital and generating returns. Three years ago, SAM started making process improvements based on lessons we have learned over the years. As we wrote then, we had been better stock pickers than portfolio and risk managers before these changes started taking hold. Our goal has been to get back to the strong results we delivered for most of our history. We have seen meaningful signs that we are heading in the right direction on multiple fronts. Today, we are announcing additional changes:
    1. We are merging the Longleaf International Fund into the Longleaf Global Fund. The go-forward Global Fund will be run in-line with our current Global approach, allowing us to focus more on our best ideas. We have seen solid returns in the Global Fund since our initial round of changes in late 2022, and we will now own more of this strategy ourselves. As part of this tax-free merger, Global Fund fees will be reduced and capped at a level commensurate with the Small-Cap Fund (95 basis points). We will be sending additional materials on this transaction to our International and Global Fund shareholders in the coming days and weeks. If approved by shareholders, the merger will be finalized December 2025 at the latest.1 Please see the August 25, 2025 Prospectus Supplement for additional information (https://regdocs.blugiant.com/longleaf/).
    2. We are closing our Concentrated Europe strategy and investing our internal funds from it into our go-forward Longleaf Funds. As we like to see at our individual investee companies, this is a meaningful insider purchase of our go-forward strategies and an increase in our focus. Our Asia Pacific strategy will continue to operate under Ken Siazon.
    3. With these changes, John Woodman and Alicia Scarratt will be departing SAM at the end of September. We thank them for their time with us. Our continuing researchers have come up the curve in productivity and non-US coverage. Manish Sharma has been our best researcher outside of the US and will be gaining increased responsibility in the newly created position of Head of Non-US Research. Julio Utrera will be taking on an expanded role covering stocks in Europe, where he has done a great job for us. Separately, Peter Montgomery has recently rejoined our client service and development team to help us grow at the right times when we have qualifying investments. He was with us in the early 2010s, so he is familiar with our value approach as well as with SAM’s internal workings.
    Our go-forward research team has made strong stock picks for the last 10+ years, with mid-teens-plus annualized results at a statistically significant level. We are glad to discuss this with you at a level of detail that would not fit within this note. This data lines up with our returns from our first 30 years. We have been encouraged as well with our improvements in portfolio building. While there have not been many market tests in recent times, Longleaf Partners, Small-Cap and Global Funds materially outperformed during the volatile mid-February through April period earlier this year.
    “I’m excited about where SAM is heading. After delivering excess returns for the first three-plus decades of our 50-year history, we lagged our own goals and many of yours in some of the subsequent years. In recent years, Ross has taken definitive steps to improve our investing and our focus. We have an exceptionally talented analytical team. Under Ross’s portfolio management and research leadership, I’m most confident we will produce outstanding results,” said Mason Hawkins, Founder and Chairman of SAM.
    “Our Business, People, Price approach to investing works over the long term because it’s rational, as the underlying numbers show. We will stay true to SAM’s Governing Principles while continuing to improve as we grow,” said Ross Glotzbach, CEO and Head of Research at SAM.
    We thank you for your partnership and are looking forward to our next 50 years.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    @shostakovitch. VGWLX is what I am moving into at Schwab. NTF. The choice to go single fund is the best example of cognitive dissonance I have experienced in many years. Of course I think I could do better but maybe I would do worse.
  • You're buying stocks where? But Europe Is Losing ...
    There have been many discussions here lately on the preference for European over U.S. stocks. At 86, I'm strictly in MMkt, CD, and Treasury income, so have no horse in this race. But seeing this report in The Wall Street Journal made me sit up and take notice. The WSJ link should be free, and perhaps it will be of interest to some here at MFO.
    Today Europe, particularly Western Europe, finds itself adrift, an aging continent slowly losing economic, military and diplomatic clout.
    • The continent’s economies have been largely stagnant for about 15 years, likely the longest such streak since the Industrial Revolution, according to calculations by Deutsche Bank. Germany’s economy is 1% bigger than it was at the end of 2017, while the U.S. economy has grown 19%.
    • Europe’s share of global economic output, measured in current dollars, fell from roughly 33% to 23% between 2005 and 2024, according to World Bank data.
    • The long stretch of weak European growth has opened up a big gap in incomes between the U.S. and Europe. European household wealth has grown by a third as much as Americans’ since 2009. Per capita GDP in the U.S. is now $86,000 a year, versus $56,000 for Germany and $53,000 for the U.K.
    • In the absence of economic growth, Europe’s welfare states, which account for half the planet’s welfare spending, will come under growing strain from aging populations. The average European is nearly 45 years old, compared with 39 for the average American, and the continent’s working-age population is predicted to fall by nearly 50 million by 2050, leaving fewer workers to pay for more retirees.
    “Europe needs to wake up, or it’s dead in so many ways,” says Tracy Blackwell, the retiring CEO of Pension Insurance Corporation, a U.K. asset manager.
    Or as JP Morgan chief Jamie Dimon said at a recent speech in Dublin, “You’re losing.”
    Said British historian Niall Ferguson in March: “What was the status quo? The Americans provide our security, the Russians provide our energy, and the Chinese provide our export market. Guess what? It’s all gone,”
    As Italy’s prime minister Giorgia Meloni puts it, “America innovates, China imitates, Europe regulates.”
    Bad luck and bad policy
    In the past 15 years, a key engine of European growth—manufactured exports—has been hobbled by events beyond its control, including U.S.-led trade wars, China’s mercantilist policies and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which sent European energy prices skyrocketing.
    • In Germany, industrial electricity costs three times as much as in the U.S.; in the U.K., four times as much.
    • Ten years ago, four European companies ranked in the global top 10 by revenues. Today, the continent’s biggest company by market value, German software firm SAP, ranks 28th.
    • America’s share of global stock market valuations has held steady at 48% since 2000, but the EU’s has fallen from 18% to 10%, and the U.K.’s from 8.3% to 2.6%, according to Deutsche Bank.
    Europe’s economic slide has been accompanied by shriveling military prowess. Though European leaders are now vowing to take defense more seriously in the face of a revanchist Russia, they are struggling to build up their forces. Britain’s entire army can fit comfortably inside Wembley Stadium.
    Mario Draghi, a former top European central banker, proposed a series of steps in a landmark EU report last year. But the proposals immediately ran into resistance. “You say no to public debt, you say no to the single market, you say no to creating the capital market union. You can’t say no to everything,” a clearly frustrated Draghi said in a speech to European lawmakers in February. “So when you ask me, ‘What is best to do now?’ I say, ‘I have no idea. But do something!’”

    Without more economic growth, European governments will have to choose between ever-higher taxes and massive cuts to welfare. That is because an aging population means much higher healthcare and pension costs, paid for by a working-age population projected to shrink by some 2 million a year on average through 2050, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels.
    Meanwhile, the current strategy of financing welfare spending with taxes and debt is running out of road. Tax revenue as a share of economic output is already around 38% in Germany, 43% in Italy and 44% in France, compared with 25% in the U.S., according to OECD data. The U.K.’s annual debt interest bill stands at nearly $150 billion, twice as much as defense. Borrowing costs have already risen in the U.K. as debt approaches 100% of yearly economic output.
    There are exceptions. Sweden has quietly spurred economic growth by cutting back its welfare state—tightening government spending, revamping the pension system and slashing corporate and personal tax rates. Per capita incomes are now climbing, and the country has seen a burst of entrepreneurship.
    But in most of Europe, such reforms are proving to be a big ask. Europeans consistently vote for politicians who protect the status quo and expand the welfare state. In France, which hasn’t balanced its national budget in more than 50 years, government spending is around 57% of GDP, compared with 36% for the U.S.
    Appeared in the August 23, 2025, print edition as 'Europe Is Losing Can Europe Reverse Its Long Slide?'.
    Notes: The above edited excerpts are a severely abridged version of the actual Wall Street Journal report. Some text emphasis was added to various quotes.
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    Mentioned above is a global bond fund. DINDX is a Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunity Fund with a long track record. It is classified as multi sector bond.
    In November this mutual fund will be converted to an Eaton Vance ETF. Hopefully with a lower expense ratio. Over the years have had good success with Eaton Vance and Morgan Stanley bond funds.
    Thanks for the info. 3 of the 4 fund managers of DINDX, who have only been with the fund since May of this year, are also the same fund managers for ESIIX (which I mentioned earlier in the thread and is one of my favorite bond funds). It will be nice to have this in an ETF format, and it would be interesting to see how closely it might track ESIIX.
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    Mentioned above is a global bond fund. DINDX is a Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunity Fund with a long track record. It is classified as multi sector bond.
    In November this mutual fund will be converted to an Eaton Vance ETF. Hopefully with a lower expense ratio. Over the years have had good success with Eaton Vance and Morgan Stanley bond funds.
  • IF RED STATE SOLDIERS OCCUPY BLUE STATES
    I respectfully submit that which national guards (or regular army) occupy areas is irrelevant.
    As to the economic impact on the only state occupied so far (California), by federalized units of the California national guard, here's what the government of California had to say:
    the number of people reporting to work in the private sector in California decreased by 3.1% — a downturn only recently matched by the period when people stayed home from work during the COVID-19 lockdown.
    ... a ripple effect – the state’s economy is likely to contract later this year due to fallout from global tariffs and immigration raids in Los Angeles and other cities that have rattled key sectors, including construction, hospitality, and agriculture, according to a UCLA Anderson forecast.
    Mass arrests, detentions and deportations in California could slash $275 billion from the state’s economy and eliminate $23 billion in annual tax revenue. The loss of immigrant workers, undocumented and those losing lawful status under the Trump administration, would delay projects (including rebuilding Los Angeles after the wildfires), reduce food supply, and drive up costs. Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022 — a number that would rise to $10.3 billion if these taxpayers could apply to work lawfully.
    https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/07/31/nearly-all-national-guard-soldiers-in-los-angeles-are-demobilizing-governor-newsom-demands-those-remaining-be-released/
    The links embedded in that piece are worth following, for their greater depth, their figures on how other states could be affected, and their multiple additional citations.
    Here is the link for the UCLA Anderson report. While it focuses more on tariffs than on labor disruptions, it does note that deportations are playing into construction labor shortages. This in turn means lower construction projections and that "the prospect of the private sector building out of the housing affordability problem over the next three years is nil."
    https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/ucla-anderson-forecast-u-s-california-economies-slow-amid-persistent-economic-geopolitical-uncertainties
    P.S. Regarding rebuilding LA after the fires, the NYTimes Magazine has a piece I'm just reading now about the environmental and environmental justice issues in disposing of the waste from the fires. "That is more than the entire city of Philadelphia produces in a year [without] even account[ing] for all the charred vehicles and trees. " Maybe the national guard from those other states could lend a hand?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/24/magazine/landfill-calabasas-los-angeles-wildfire-ash.html
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    Here's a BrandywineGlobal paper from 1½ years ago discussing convexity and securitized debt, along with market conditions at the time and risks involved in four types of securitized debt.
    Riding the Convexity Wave in Securitized Credit
    Thank you for the link. Yet another reason I try to minimize exposure to securitized debt is because I don't understand things like the following from the link cited:
    Risks: If the job market worsens significantly along with a hard landing, subprime auto ABS bond defaults may increase sharply. However, we believe the potential credit losses should be absorbed by the cushion provided by credit enhancements and the fast deleveraging of the deal structure.
    "Fast deleveraging of the deal structure" sounds like Repo Man II: The Action Movie to me. But I know I don't know what I'm talking about. :).
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    With securitized debt borrowers typically have some control over payment schedules. See "prepayment risk" and "extension risk" in prospectuses. The bottom line is that this affects convexity, often leading to negative convexity (especially for longer term debt) that can make bonds behave badly at the worst times.
    image
    With normal bonds (positive convexity) as interest rates increase, prices decrease but at a decelerating rate (tempers bad effect of rising rates). And when rates decrease, prices increase at an accelerating rate. But bonds having negative convexity exhibit the opposite behavior. As interest rates increase, prices decline at an accelerating rate. And as interest rates decrease, bonds usually still appreciate but at slower and slower rates.
    This negative convexity is one reason why securitized debt tends to yield a bit more than other forms of debt. And like investing in general, risk tends to be rewarded over time if you wait long enough. But in the interim, one can take severe hits. That's what makes me nervous. So I'll consider multisector bonds where the manager has the flexibility to adjust allocations as seem appropriate, but I don't invest in securitized debt funds.
    Here's a BrandywineGlobal paper from 1½ years ago discussing convexity and securitized debt, along with market conditions at the time and risks involved in four types of securitized debt.
    Riding the Convexity Wave in Securitized Credit
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    It would be a good idea to examine drawdown periods as @Obervant1 noted with various multi-sector funds and ETFs for their risk. Using MFO Premium, one can compare these funds for their MFO rating and Risk over 3 years and 5 years period. In general, MS funds carry higher risk than that of investment grade bonds. I have short term investment bonds to compliment my MS and high yield bonds.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    Thanks @msf for the update. Two years ago there were fewer Vanguard funds available. There must be additional agreement made to be on Fidelity shelf space.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    @Mark is correct with D&C at Fidelity’s mutual fund supermarket. Years ago they were listed.
    Vanguard is listed today, although it limited only to a handful of OEFs and not the entire lineup.
    We consolidated to Fidelity several years ago. Few Vanguard funds remained and others are their ETFs.
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    Just be aware with securitized (MBS) funds.....SYFFX lost -31% in 1Q 2020, as many of these funds were crushed at the time. That's why I don't hold more HOSIX.
    It's not that history will repeat, but it can.
    Good observation. I normally don’t look further than 5 years (and place more emphasis on 3 year returns), and don’t look at individual quarters that far back. so I probably would have missed that. That is also something to consider.