Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    That was something I guess I would have to wait twenty years for. I didn't really pay much attention to the MarketTimer title because he seemed to be a steady and sure investor with some small changes along the way. When the 2000 tech crash hit there was no change. Maybe he figured it was too late? Anyway that was the beginning of when I started to question his tactics. I think he was more like John Bogle than a timer. That crash did come out off nowhere to be fair.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    For all the years I listened to Brinker, and that amounts to around 15 years, he was very much the "stay the course" advisor. Perhaps his change of stance is reflective of a new investing environment we now face. Since 2008 it has been fast changing.
    One thing JohnChisum is that he has always been a market timer. His monthly subscription newsletter is called market timer. So I think bailing out of Vanguard GNMA's, Vanguard TIPS, and other high quality fixed income investments goes along with a Marketimer, even though market timing is usually associated with stocks. Actually, he's timing the bond market in a sense.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    For all the years I listened to Brinker, and that amounts to around 15 years, he was very much the "stay the course" advisor. Perhaps his change of stance is reflective of a new investing environment we now face. Since 2008 it has been fast changing.
  • How crazy would it be to implement this portfolio?
    @davidrmoran yes, you're probably right, and that was silly of me to call out that particular fund. But my basic thought is that for years we've been in a long-term bull market for bonds due to falling interest rates, so any backtesting for the last few decades is going to make a bond heavy portfolio look very good, but I'm doubtful as to whether that can continue. Interest rates just can't drop much further, and they may start going up.
    I'm sure the best funds will do fine, but a repeat of the 9% a year returns PIMIX has turned in the last 5 years is unlikely. Of course some people say stocks are overvalued too... Personally I don't see that, so I'd overweight POAGX in this two-fund portfolio, even if bee's backtesting shows that overweighting PIMIX was the way to go the past 5 years.
    I don't have a cristal ball, just my two cents' worth.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    I'll have to listen to him again. I'm sure I can listen on the internet somewhere.

    You can listen to the archives on ksfo.com
    Choose Sunday from 1-4 pm. There is a 7 day archive of all the ksfo.com radio programs. He did talk about bonds today. Actually, you can skip 3-4 pm if you are mainly looking for his info on bonds, because 3-4 pm is an interview with a guest author

    Bob Brinker is now recommending bond funds with shorter durations than the GNMA fund. The average duration is just a little over 1. His logic is that, in an improving economy, he would rather have credit risk than interest rate risk. He's actually going against the advice generally given by Vanguard (to stay the course in total bond market index) and Jason Zweig and I'm sure others. I like Brinker as well and would welcome the opportunity to dialogue his advice.
    @Jim0445, yes, in posts to JohnChisum I went over this. He sold his Vanguard GNMA holding quite some time ago, because he is convinced interest rates will rise and any bond fund with a significant duration will do very poorly. Currently the Vanguard GNMA fund has a duration of 5.8 years. Brinker has an average duration of 1.1 years on his Income portfolio.
    Yes, I welcome the opportunity to dialogue his advice with you too. He's definitely going against the advice to 'Stay the Course'.....he's investing in Fidelity's bank loan fund, OSTIX and DoubleLine Low Duration and MetroWest Low Duration. Taking a lot of credit risk. Those investments didn't work out well at all in 2008.......
  • How crazy would it be to implement this portfolio?
    I backtested your two fund portfolio by creating three distinct portfolios using your two funds in differing percentages. The starting balance was $10,000.
    Portfolio 1 - POAGX =20% & PIMIX =80%
    Portfolio 2 - POAGX =40% & PIMIX =60% (your suggestion)
    Portfolio 3 - POAGX =80% & PIMIX =20%
    Using this portfolio tool I was able to compare these three portfolios (from 2008-2013). What I found interesting is that for all years except 2013 the 20/80 (portfolio one) provided the highest end of year balance.
    Here's a small part of the results:
    image
  • Are Small Cap Stocks Waving A Warning Flag
    FYI: Most years, the performances of the two indexes track each other fairly closely. However, since late March the Russell has drifted lower while the S&P 500 has moved higher. As a result, the Russell is down 4.2 percent for the year, while the S&P is up 4.1 percent, so small caps have some work to do if they are to outshine the big boys.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.dallasnews.com/business/columnists/will-deener/20140803-are-small-cap-stocks-waving-a-warning-flag.ece
    As Of 8/22/14:
    S&P 500 7.58% YTD
    Russell 2000 0.50% YTD
  • How crazy would it be to implement this portfolio?
    With hindsight it looks great!! I'm a big fan of POAGX and its my largest single position so I've been very happy with its performance in the last few years. The Primecap folks have a fantastic record with the Vanguard funds they sub-advise for as well as their own Odyssey funds. I'm not sure I'd invest in anything from PIMCO now, but it certainly would have worked out over the past 6.5 years.
  • How crazy would it be to implement this portfolio?
    40% PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth POAGX
    60% PIMCO Income Instl PIMIX
    Since 1/1/2008 ~12.5% annual return vs S&P ~7% annual return
    2008 return -17% vs S&P -38% return
    Beat S&P 5 out of 6 years 2008-2013, YTD about even
    .55% expense ratio
    POAGX holds 30% Large/Giant Cap, 30% Mid Cap, 40% Small/Micro Cap, 14% non-US
    FWIW, POAGX is Morningstar 5 star Gold fund, PIMIX is Morningstar 5 star Silver fund
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.

    @expatsp: EDV has a duration of 24.9 years! So if you are in that fund and interest rates go up 2%, the net asset value of that fund goes down by 50%. That's some serious stuff.......for that reason, I would never invest in anything like that.......well, unless we had a repeat of September 8, 1981, when the 10-year Treasury had a yield of 15.59%......remind me then, and I'll buy an extended duration Treasury!
    You can buy short term Treasuries, Intermediate term Treasuries, Long term Treasuries, etc. Or you can buy individual Treasuries at any place from less than one year all the way out to 30 years.
    I wouldn't count on people getting interest rate calls right, or any other predictions right, at least not on a consistent basis. They can certainly get a lucky one or two.
    Another option for fixed income money is to go with an online FDIC insured bank and accept anywhere from 0.87% at Ally Bank to 0.95%, and have instant access to your money, and total safety. Of course, that's all you are going to make. But it does diversify a portfolio that is 85% stocks.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    Well that's interesting. He was against junk bonds back when but of course stocks were the sure bet too. OSTIX sounds like ASDVX which I own. He is the king of the $cost avg.
    He only went into funds like OSTIX due to his conviction that interest rates will rise and traditional bond funds will do very badly. That's why he went into Fidelity's bank loan fund too. And Gundlach's Low Duration Bond, and Metro West Low Duration Bond. He's focused on only one thing with bonds right now: he says rates will rise and bond funds will do badly, except short duration. Now, if you go short duration Treasuries, those will do fine, but they have almost no yield.....therefore, he went into the bank loan fund, OSTIX, and Gundlach's Low Duration Bond. And his average duration of 1.1 is about as low as you can get. Fidelity Floating Rate High income has a duration of something like 0.24 years, so a hefty weighting to that keeps his duration very low.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    OSTIX, duration 1.94 years. Sort of like a short term junk bond fund right now. Supposedly it has the ability to go anywhere, but M* says it has been mainly in junk bonds for many years now. Not sure how many years they have been as short duration as they are now.
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    "do you still listen to Bob Brinker. I listen to him every Sunday for the full 3 hours. Maybe we can share some Brinker stories....."
    @rjb112
    I don't listen to him any longer and haven't done so for several years now. Do you remember his QQQ buy signal? That was before the tech crash. I was a subscriber and got the bulletin in the mail. It seemed to go against everything he had preached on his show and besides that, the bulletin was on a plain sheet of paper, not even his letterhead. At first I thought it was fake.
    I listened to him for a few years after that but he would never talk about that QQQ debacle. During the 90's he had a great show and some excellent advice.
    @JohnChisum: you bet I remember his QQQ buy signal! I made the mistake of buying on that signal! And I still hold a chunk of those QQQs in my account to this day!
    I too was a subscriber and got the bulletin in the mail.
    You're right, he would never talk about that QQQ debacle. I still listen to him every Sunday and participate in a Google blog that someone has on Brinker.
    Yeah, that QQQ call was awful....
  • Bonds. The Intense Discussion Thread.
    "do you still listen to Bob Brinker. I listen to him every Sunday for the full 3 hours. Maybe we can share some Brinker stories....."
    @rjb112
    I don't listen to him any longer and haven't done so for several years now. Do you remember his QQQ buy signal? That was before the tech crash. I was a subscriber and got the bulletin in the mail. It seemed to go against everything he had preached on his show and besides that, the bulletin was on a plain sheet of paper, not even his letterhead. At first I thought it was fake.
    I listened to him for a few years after that but he would never talk about that QQQ debacle. During the 90's he had a great show and some excellent advice.
  • Ouch Funds 2014
    Smaller caps funds are struggling this years comparing to that of the larger caps. High valuation would keep me to put in more $$.
  • Jason Zweig: The Decline and Fall Of Fund Managers
    @MJG Thanks for taking the time to address my question. Useful information and well thought out analysis as always.
    VWELX vs. DODBX - When confronted with vexing choices during my migration to passive ETFs, I tend not to completely dump "old friends" who have been good to me over the years. I simply reduce dollar holdings in each. Might result in a few additional active funds to monitor, but it gives me something to do and something to talk about here.
    @Ted Any other candidates, besides SHRAX?
  • Why Its So Difficult To Raise Kids-And Save For Retirement
    FYI: My youngest daughter was born 21 years ago this week. At the time, I called an economist named Mark Lino from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, who told me to expect to spend as much as $300,000 to get her to age 18; toss in college costs, and it was well past $500,000 to get her to adulthood.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-its-so-difficult-to-raise-kids-and-save-for-retirement-2014-08-22/print
  • Scott Burns: The Five Secrets To 'Happy Money'
    @PRESSmUP I've been linking Scott's article for years, he was big fan of Roy Weitz and FundAlarm. Here's what he had to say back in 2005
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://assetbuilder.com/scott_burns/an_interview_with_mr_fund_alarm
  • Ouch Funds 2014
    I have two funds underwater YTD out of 28 open end funds and ETF's that are on my crowded portfolio. Bringing up the rear are RYSEX at -1.36% and PRSVX at 0.99%. My top two are BRUFX at 15.25% and PRHSX at 16.28%. All these funds I've owned for several years.
    This year I started trimming some funds to keep my AA closer where I want it to be, which is 55% stock funds. I am an old guy at 64, retired, living off my investments. The trimming has been very gradual and gentle.
    Best wishes,
    Dave
  • Ouch Funds 2014
    BUFOX hammered ytd...negative 13.62%! Ouch!
    Yeah, micro and growth. I used to own this fund very long time back and sold long time back, after concluding my WHEN vs WHAT mantra. Not sure if you own this fund, but we take diversification to extreme when we think about such funds. On one end I do own BRLIX. Next correction I plan to buy BRSIX - the other end.
    PS BUFOX showing down 10 percent not 14, but maybe you seeing different reported number. BUFSX also down 9 plus. Another fund I owned but sold long time back. Such funds to be bought after heavy correction, and sold 3 years later and use to improve quality of life.