Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Q&A With Craig Hodges, Manager, Hodges Small Cap Fund: Video Presentation
    I think the only thing investorz should be concernex about is the next 5 years in this fund. I would sell 1nd i think it would be the right thing to do
  • This Stock Bubble Is 'Beyond 1929 And 2007', Says John Hussman
    FYI Hussman’s funds have missed out on much of the strong equity gains in recent years, prompting some criticism of his investing style. The Hussman Strategic Growth Fund HSGFX is down 1.5% this year, compared to 7.2% gains on the S&P 500 index SPX , according to Morningstar. The other funds have fared a bit better: The Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund HSTRX is up 6.8%. The Hussman Strategic Growth Fund HSIEX is up 1.9%, while the Hussman Strategic Dividend Value HSDVX is up 0.2%.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/07/27/this-stock-bubble-is-beyond-1929-and-2007-says-john-hussman/tab/print/
  • Collectibles Lag Equities
    I still go back to the elder Baron Rothschild saying that to be safe, one should have 1/3 of their wealth in securities, 1/3 in real estate and 1/3 in 'rare art'. We'll call rare art = collectibles. I'm good with this. Gees, i's been 7-8 years since I first read this and I'm still not at 33/33/33. That's OK. I'm close enough that it really doesn't matter much on the margin.
    No one has shown me a better plan.
    peace,
    rono
    For those who don't own any real estate, do you all think REIT mutual funds are a good substitute?
  • Collectibles Lag Equities
    Hi Doc, Mo,
    Hope you and yours are both doing well.
    These figures don't surprise me at all. Equities are always where the good gains lie. Collectibles, as they were, are more of a wealth preservation hedge.
    I still go back to the elder Baron Rothschild saying that to be safe, one should have 1/3 of their wealth in securities, 1/3 in real estate and 1/3 in 'rare art'. We'll call rare art = collectibles. I'm good with this. Gees, i's been 7-8 years since I first read this and I'm still not at 33/33/33. That's OK. I'm close enough that it really doesn't matter much on the margin.
    No one has shown me a better plan.
    peace,
    rono
  • Jason Zweig: Should You Have To Pay A Fee To Fire An Adviser ?
    It's a bad practice that leaves a bad taste in customers mouths. Some years back I had to turn a airline ticket of $350 in for a refund. The airline, Northwest Orient, charged me a refund fee of $75.
    No matter which industry it is, when they charge you to give back your own money it is extortion as Crash stated. Some banks do it through fees to process your money. Sounds more like gangster tactics.
  • Managed-Futures Funds' Misery Continues
    FYI: Copy & Paste 7/26/14: Lawrence C. Strauss; Barron's
    Tiny gain in first half follows years of annual losses for hedge funds and mutual funds in this sector.
    Regards,
    Ted
    Many hedge funds specializing in managed futures have struggled with poor performance, to put it mildly.
    After shining during the financial meltdown of 2008 -- the HFR index tracking these funds returned an impressive 18.06%, versus a 37% loss for the Standard & Poor's 500 that year -- these funds have fallen on hard times. On average, they lost 3.54% in 2011, followed by negative performances of 2.51% and 0.87% in 2012 and 2013, respectively.
    As a result of this persistent underperformance, net outflows surged to nearly $6 billion in the first half of 2014, according to HFR. "Financial advisors are having a hard time persuading their clients to stay with it," says the manager of a large fund of funds.
    MANAGED-FUTURES FUNDS' ASSETS total about $230 billion, or roughly 8% of the $2.8 trillion invested in hedge funds, according to HFR. The good news is that there are small signs of an improving environment for these funds, which tend to be helped by more volatility and a macro environment in which there's a lot of divergence among asset prices. The unwinding of the Federal Reserve's quantitative-easing program should help. In the first half, the average return for managed-futures funds was 0.37%. That's not great, but it's better than it has been in the recent past.
    These funds rely heavily on futures contracts, usually to make calls on the direction of stocks, bonds, currencies, or commodities. Often with the help of computer algorithms, managers try to identify trends -- whether it's rising interest rates or declining gold prices. AQR Funds describes it in a recent shareholder letter as going long markets whose prices are rising and shorting those with falling prices.
    For managers who can correctly identify trends ahead of the pack, so much the better when it comes to performance. Especially good scenarios are when markets are going from good to very good or from bad to worse, as was the case in 2008. Later that year, stocks and commodities tanked, while gold and Treasuries rallied. All of which led to a stellar performance that these funds haven't come close to repeating.
    One of the trend-following strategy's selling points is that it's a good way to diversify a portfolio, thanks in part to low correlations to traditional assets like stocks and bonds. But with equities doing so well in recent years, many of these funds have been passed by. However, Pat Welton, co-founder of Welton Investment, which runs managed-futures strategies, points out that many of these managers don't take large positions in equities because "it's exactly what you've been hired to diversify away from." In addition, when markets flatten out -- as has been the case with interest rates, for example -- it's harder for managers to find trends and exploit them.
    Yao Hua Ooi, a portfolio manager of the $6.2 billion AQR Managed Futures Strategy fund (ticker: AQMNX), points to "how far you look back to determine whether a market is trending up or down" as a key factor. In the past few years, managers who use longer time horizons -- say at least a year -- have fared better than those who use a shorter window, typically one to three months, he observes. The AQR fund's managers blend shorter and longer time horizons to gauge trends, he adds.
    As if to illustrate how challenged performance has been for these funds, AQR Managed Futures Strategy has a three-year annual return of 1.2%, placing it near the top of its Morningstar category. It's a mutual fund, not a hedge fund, with an expense ratio of 1.50% -- pricey for a mutual fund but considerably cheaper than a typical hedge fund.
    Welton attributes these funds' performance difficulties to the flood of liquidity by central banks around the world, more or less in unison for many years. Low interest rates have been accompanied by lower spreads, making it hard to find good trends to follow, he adds.
    AN 18.73% RETURN in 2010 for the Welton Global Directional Portfolio was followed by three straight years of negative results, triggering outflows. In this year's first half, however, the fund was up 17.41%, having made money in equities, commodities, interest rates, and currencies. The portfolio also had success with so-called relative value strategies, an example of which would be going short one basket of stocks, while being long another.
    Several firms have studied the dismal performance of managed futures. Ooi, of AQR, contributed to a paper on that topic. With the help of financial simulations -- these funds weren't around in, say, the 1920s -- the paper concluded that "trend-following has delivered strong positive returns and realized a low correlation to traditional asset classes each decade for more than a century." Adds Ooi: "Just like any investment strategy, it has had underperformance, but that isn't predictive that the strategy will no longer generate returns going forward."
    Most of managed-futures funds, however, are in crying need of a sustained stretch of good performance -- and sooner rather than later.
    M* Snapshot Of Managed Futures Fund Returns: http://news.morningstar.com/fund-category-returns/managed-futures/$FOCA$13.aspx
  • Jason Zweig: In Honor Of Peter Bernstein
    FYI: Copy & Paste 7/23/14: Jason Zweig: WSJ;
    Regards,
    Ted
    include a tribute to the late Peter L. Bernstein. Few things have given me greater professional and personal pleasure than having been able to call Peter my friend.
    Peter, who died five years ago at the age of 90, spent nearly six decades on Wall Street. He also worked at the Federal Reserve, taught economics at Williams College, toiled as a commercial banker, ran an investment-counseling firm, and consulted on economics and investing strategy with some of the world’s largest money managers. He was the founding editor of the Journal of Portfolio Management, which took as its mission to make investing as close to a science as the theory and the data would permit. He wrote nearly 20 books, including the twin masterpieces Capital Ideas, his history of how modern financial theory transformed investing, and Against the Gods, probably the best popular book ever written on risk.
    Like most people who knew him, I regarded Peter as the philosopher-king of Wall Street, the man who had read everything, knew everyone, and had thought longer and deeper about the hardest puzzles than anyone else.
    Yet the central lesson that emerged from Peter’s life and work was intellectual humility, not hubris. The more he learned, the more skeptical he became of his—or anyone’s—ability to predict the future.
    Insatiably curious, Peter never stopped learning, and his favorite word when confronted with something he hadn’t yet thought of was “Wow!”
    I think of him as the modern equivalent of the sages described by the great French essayist Montaigne:
    “To really learned men has happened what happens to ears of wheat: They rise high and lofty, heads erect and proud, as long as they are empty; but when they are full and swollen with grain in their ripeness, they begin to grow humble and lower their horns.”
    Again and again, Peter would marvel that he could “make a living by reminding people of what they know only too well already.”
    In 1999, I was thrilled when Peter asked me to write a guest essay for his newsletter. (To avoid any conflict of interest, he didn’t offer, nor did I request, any compensation for writing it.) For my topic, I chose the challenge that professional money managers faced in trying to take a long-term perspective in an increasingly short-term world.
    We titled it “The Velocity of Learning and the Future of Active Management.” Fifteen years later, the topic seems at least as relevant (click here to download the PDF).
    In 2004, I drove up to Peter’s summer house in Brattleboro, Vt., to do a long interview. We talked for nearly four hours about everything from John F. Kennedy (Peter’s classmate in the Harvard College class of 1940) and Peter’s experiences as an intelligence officer during the London blitz in World War II to the problems of 401(k)s and the puzzle of why companies pay dividends.
    Together, he and his wife, Barbara, could be as wickedly funny as classic comedy teams like Burns and Allen or Stiller and Meara. Peter mentioned during that interview that he and his lifelong friend, the economist Robert Heilbroner, had done everything together as children and teenagers. “We even lost our virginity together, at the exact same moment,” he recalled. “Not at the exact same moment, Peter,” Barbara said.
    You can click here for part one of my profile of him and here for part two; the PDFs are large files that could take a while to load, but any visit with Peter is worth the wait. A fuller transcript of our long conversation is available here.
    Economics And Portfolio Strategy: http://green.lunarbreeze.com/~jason146/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/PLBjz.pdf
    Peter's Uncertainty Principle Part 1. http://green.lunarbreeze.com/~jason146/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/11.04PBernstein1.pdf
    Peter's Uncertainty Principle Part 2. : http://green.lunarbreeze.com/~jason146/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/11.04PBernstein2.pdf
  • 5 Top Mutual Funds To Own From Janus Funds
    I'm surprised they listed Triton and Venture which have both been having sub-par years. A few years ago, Triton (JATTX) was one of my largest holdings. I sold it last summer when Brian Schaub and Chad Meade left Janus to work at a hedge fund. Schaub and Meade also ran Venture.
  • Q&A With Craig Hodges, Manager, Hodges Small Cap Fund: Video Presentation
    FYI: (Follow Up) According to a new study by S.&P. Dow Jones Indicies, only two out of 2,862 mutual funds managed to attain top-quartile performance for the five years between March 2010 and current day. One of those two funds was the family-run Hodges Small Cap Fund based in Dallas, Texas.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://screen.yahoo.com/why-mutual-fund-manager-trouncing-154012095.html
    M* Snapshot Of HDPSX: http://quotes.morningstar.com/fund/hdpsx/f?t=HDPSX
    Lipper Snapshot OF HDPSX: http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/hdpsx
    HDPSX Is Ranked # 22 In The (SCB) Category By U.S. News & World Report:
    http://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/small-blend/hodges-small-cap-fund/hdpsx
  • Vanguard Faces Tax Evasion
    FYI: Ex-employee alleges low-cost fund provider operated as an illegal tax shelter, avoided about $1 billion in taxes over 10 years.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20140725/FREE/140729927?template=printart
  • Can Individual Investors Time Bubbles?
    From Guggenheim's Macro View
    In his famous speech, Martin preceded his punch bowl comment by saying, on behalf of the Fed, “…precautionary action to prevent inflationary excesses is bound to have some onerous effects…” The flipside -- a lack of precautionary action by the Fed -- will have its own set of consequences in time. It is very difficult to say when exactly these will happen, but near-term indicators suggest the hangover won’t hit while you’re relaxing at the beach this summer.
    Equity Markets: The Bigger they Come the Harder they Fall
    The S&P500 has now gone nearly 800 days since a correction of more than 10 percent – the “meaningful” level for many analysts. The more extended the market becomes, the larger the eventual decline may be. Over the last 50 years, the longer the time between market corrections, the steeper the drop once the correction does occur.(chart)
    http://guggenheimpartners.com/perspectives/macroview/the-hangover
  • Can Individual Investors Time Bubbles?
    Hi John and others,
    I agree, we investors who have logged some time and have followed the markets through the years have an awareness of when good value can be had in the markets along with a feeling when valuations have become stretched. Currently, there are spots in the markets where I feel valuations are in bubble territory. One of them is the Russell 2000 Index where I believe the TTM P/E Ratio is in the 70’s. For me, this is just too richly priced and I have recently trimmed my allocation in small caps.
    Old_Skeet
  • Paul Merriman: Top Fund's Shareholders Missed The Party: CGM Focus Fund
    He is 74 in September, not nearing 80. (Why guess when we have the Internet?)
    If I had spare moneys I would put some again into CGMFX, hoping for regression to some mean or other :) .
    As for methodology and studiability thereof, see:
    http://www.hedgefundletters.com/cgm/
    Yes, he is the fund, and it has never been otherwise.
    rjb, half my moves are great in hindsight. I thought in those gogo years that I did not want to be in a balanced vehicle even run by him. Recall that the '80s were almost invariably gogo years too; it was an amazing time for anyone who suffered through the 1970s. Anyway, as soon as a focused variant was announced, I was in bigtime. And after the r-e slump, or the start of it, I wanted to dive into CGMRX. I am out of all Heebner now and will stay out.
  • Paul Merriman: Top Fund's Shareholders Missed The Party: CGM Focus Fund
    You made a great move in moving it all to CGMFX in 1997.
    Yeah, he is famously nerdy and studious. Probably one of the most studious managers out there. Fully committed to investing. He has few other interests in life, and rarely takes a vacation. Probably works very long hours. IIRC, I think his wife may also be a mutual fund manager, at least that's what I read several years ago.
    I remember the days when his CGMRX trounced everything in sight. No other real estate fund could even come close. I notice from his calendar year performances there too, that he is very often either in the top 10% or bottom 10%. Amazing. Somebody should undertake a serious study of his investing methodology. Unfortunately, he doesn't say enough in his annual and semiannual reports to really divulge.
    Even now, he has a huge short position in Treasuries in CGMFX. Quite an investor.
    image
  • Paul Merriman: Top Fund's Shareholders Missed The Party: CGM Focus Fund
    davidmoran, M* lists the 15-year return of CGMFX as 14.52%. The fund inception date was Sept. 3, 1997. You "bailed a couple years ago", so if you got in at inception, you were in very roughly 15 years. An initial investment of $5,000 compounds to $38,211 over 15 years at a 14.52% return, with all distributions reinvested.
    Anyone who got into this fund in time for the 2000 and 2001 performance hit a grand slam, and I'm sure you were one of them.
    I think his 2000 and 2001 performance will go down in investing history as truly without equal. Same goes for his 2007 performance.
    Perhaps just as surprising is how poorly he did in 2008, 2009 and 2011.
    In 2011, he underperformed the market by over 28 percentage points!
    In 2009 he underperformed the market by over 16 percentage points.
    What a party in 2007, but then the hangover in 2008 and 2009.
    image
  • Thoughts on "Raising Cash" ... and, also "Trimming the Dead Wood?"
    "Timing in and out, trying to own that "perfect" fund and collecting hot funds just doesn't make sense to me anymore. It can be fun as a hobby, but it can be detrimental on returns. Play on the fringe, invest the bulk with a longer term vision. "
    Well said and that's really it. Again, I'm not one of those people who says that their way is the only way - farthest thing from it. People who use technical indicators and all of the other factors - all that stuff fascinates me. 5+ years ago, I moved in and out of things constantly and I really feel that it was detrimental on returns. Gradually I did that less and less.
    The thing is, less micromanaging doesn't mean I'm not enjoying investing. If anything, having a "best ideas"/themes portfolio and having all but a couple of things pay a dividend has actually made the entire effort less stressful and decisions less emotional and less focused on the day-to-day. I can just own a (to use examples) Canadian National Railway or Conocophillips and that's it. Collect the dividend. Love researching ideas, have ideas in mind if I want to put more money in the market. Otherwise, best ideas that pay a dividend and just sit on them.
    I think you have a portion that can be still for "play", but I dunno, I don't even find myself that interested in that anymore. I was going to invest in a little Canadian pot stock the other day and instead went with Marine Harvest (MHG), which has a variable dividend but a very generous dividend policy and is one of the world's largest seafood companies.
    GAINX is really appealing and probably what I'll continue to move the rest of the money from PQIDX to.
    As for TOLLX mentioned above, that's a great infrastructure mutual fund. I own INF, which I think is a good CEF play on it and I just keep reinvesting that monthly div. There's also Brookfield Infrastructure (BIP), which is a pure play on infrastructure but results in a K-1 at tax time.
  • Is CAMAX shorting a leverage ETF (SSO)?
    Umm, Bee, lack of volatility??? Volatility is typically measured by standard deviation, and CAMAX stdev is almost 3x higher than YACKX, 26 versus 9 over the last 3 years. It does have a winning upside/downside capture ratio, but boy are the ups and downs magnified.
    I'd agree that over the long-term this fund has hot and cold periods, as well as above-average volatility. Still, not a bad fund for aggressive investors with a time horizon beyond short-term.
  • Finally: New SEC rules for money-market funds
    The following is an Associated Press news release quoted from the Washington Post.
    (It is the second article down on the page.)
    New SEC rules for money-market funds
    "Regulators voted by a narrow margin to end a longtime staple of the investment industry — the fixed $1 share price for ­money-market mutual funds — at least for some money funds used by big investors.
    The idea is to minimize the risk of a mass withdrawal from the funds during a financial panic.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission also is letting all money funds block withdrawals when their assets fall below certain levels or impose fees for withdrawals.
    The rules were adopted Wednesday by a 3-to-2 vote, culminating several years of regulatory haggling and false starts. They were opposed by one Democratic and one Republican commissioner.
    The floating-price requirement applies only to prime institutional funds, which are considered riskier. They represent about a third of money-market funds, according to the SEC.
    A run on a money-market fund during the financial crisis showed how risky the funds could be. The Lehman Brothers collapse in fall 2008 triggered the failure of the Reserve Primary Fund, one of the biggest money-market funds, which held Lehman debt. The Reserve Primary Fund lost so much money that it “broke the buck,” as its value fell to 97 cents a share."
    — Associated Press
  • Paul Merriman: Top Fund's Shareholders Missed The Party: CGM Focus Fund
    Avert your eyes. That's how (the only way) I turned $5k in this fund into $165k over the decades. And I bailed a couple years ago only cuz I was (forcibly) entering retirement.
    Congratulations. Also, you had to have added new monies to that original $5k, not just reinvested distributions, to turn $5k into $165k