Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Fears Of A World Domination By A Handful Of Asset Managers Are Overblown
    But a board of 100% white males isn't favoring them by a gender/racial quota system, because obviously there were no qualified females or persons of color other than white. Sure thing.
    Essentially we are talking about perpetuating a gender/racial quota system that discriminates against any and all other than white males, quietly behind the scenes. These latter-day "gnomes of Zurich" don't like anyone other than white males, and are using investors money --- some who may well disagree with their aims -- to foist their "values" on others.
    But I can see that you are totally comfortable with that. No surprise, Edmond, none at all... totally predictable, in fact.
  • New to MFO & building a Defensive Equity Portfolio...
    Well, yes. That is because different sectors exhibit different levels of volatility. The objective of a min-vol product is...(gasp) reduced volatility, not "maximum total return" (which often exhibits higher than average volatility). It therefore follows that a min-vol product would underweight more-volatile stocks and overweight less-volatile stocks. Certain sectors are "pro-cyclical" and more prone to more pronounced moves up and down. Other sectors are more "defensive" based on their fundamental business models.
    Portfoliovisualizer.com is a great tool, for people thinking about structuring their portfolio. Relative to this thread, one could choose SPY (the market) as the benchmark, then choose sundry SPDR sector ETFs in alternative portfolios... Punching in XLU (utilities) and Technology (XLK) for example... XLU exhibits a beta of 0.43 vs the S&P. OTOH, XLK exhibits a beta of 1.35. If a min-vol product is NOT overweighting utes and underweighting tech, then its not a min-vol product... I see nothing to "be wary of". Utilities once (in a simpler time) were viewed as "Widow & orphan" stocks -- people seeking relative safety and predictable income.
    These min-vol products generally use "algos" to constantly assess betas on their securities are changing. If stocks in the portfolio start to experience increasing levels of volatility, they get replaced. Min-vol products are not for Bogleheads!
    Min-vol products often will assess how the collection of stocks assembled in the portfolio behave in concert. So, far example, I noticed very recently, one of the min-vol products (USVM) recently included a gold-mining stock as ONE of its top holdings. Now gold-mining stocks are VOLATILE by themselves, but they tend to make a great hedge --"zigging" when most normal stocks are "zagging" -- thus, in small doses, they help to tamp-down the portfolio volatility. I thought when I saw that "brilliant"!
    One thing to be wary of with low vol funds is to look at their over concentration in certain sectors like utilities and real estate.
  • Crashes coming?!
    Mona, you are free to post what you want. But the link is an opinion piece by a pundit, apparently with hurt feelings talking to himself. Opinions are like "cornholes" -- everybody has one.
    President Trump may have grown a short-fuse. You or I probably would have too, if either of us had been slandered for 30 months about "Russian Collusion" lies hatched by the Clinton campaign using a 'retired' British spy. The news media owes POTUS equal time: 30 months of them apologizing to him in sackcloth and ashes.
  • Crashes coming?!

    FWIW saying, I'm receiving noticeably more investment-signal service solicitations these days, including from services I briefly dabbled with over 10 years ago and haven't heard from in AGES. The contrarian in me takes that as a warning sign for equities.
    You have junk bonds at all time highs and now see where one of my favorite sentiment indicators the BofA bull/bear indicator gave a buy. The last time it went to a buy was January 3 of this year.
  • Manning & Napier Funds, Inc. liquidates several series of funds
    Update:
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/751173/000119312519234806/d93664d497.htm
    497 1 d93664d497.htm MANNING & NAPIER FUND, INC.
    MANNING & NAPIER FUND, INC.
    (the “Fund”)
    Equity Income Series – Class S, I, W and Z
    Income Series – Class S, I and Z
    International Series – Class S, I, W and Z
    (the “Series”)
    Supplement dated August 30, 2019 to:
    ·the Summary Prospectuses dated March 1, 2019 for the Series (“Summary Prospectuses”);
    ·the Prospectuses dated March 1, 2019 for the Series (“Prospectuses”); and
    ·the Statement of Additional Information dated March 1, 2019, as supplemented June 4, 2019, for the Series (“SAI”)
    This supplement provides new and additional information beyond that contained in the Summary Prospectuses, Prospectuses, and SAI, and should be read in conjunction with the Summary Prospectuses, Prospectuses, and SAI.
    This supplement supersedes the supplement dated August 22, 2019.
    The Board of Directors of the Fund has voted to terminate the offering of shares of the Equity Income Series, the Income Series and the International Series and instructed the officers of the Fund to take all steps necessary to completely liquidate each Series. Accordingly, effective immediately, each Series will be closed to new investors. Effective November 6, 2019, each Series will stop selling its shares to existing shareholders and will no longer accept automatic investments from existing shareholders.
    Each Series will redeem all of its outstanding shares on or about November 20, 2019 and distribute the proceeds to its shareholders (subject to maintenance of appropriate reserves for liquidation and other expenses).
    As is the case with other redemptions, each shareholder’s redemption, including a mandatory redemption, will constitute a taxable disposition of shares for those shareholders who do not hold their shares through tax-advantaged plans. Shareholders should contact their tax advisors to discuss the potential income tax consequences of the liquidations.
    As shareholders redeem shares of each Series between the date of this supplement and the date of the final redemptions, and as each Series increases its cash position to facilitate redemptions, a Series may not be able to continue to invest its assets in accordance with its stated investment policies. Accordingly, a Series may not be able to achieve its investment objectives during the period between the date of this supplement and the date of the final redemptions.
    The Equity Income Series and the Income Series, which generally pay dividends quarterly, will each suspend its dividend scheduled for September in anticipation of its liquidation.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
    Supp EI_INC_INTL 8.30.19
  • Vanguard Seeks More Boardroom Diversity And Wants Details
    FYI: Top fund manager Vanguard Group Inc will ask companies about the gender, age and race of their directors, adding pressure on U.S. companies to diversify their leadership.
    Vanguard gave the guidance in its annual stewardship report scheduled to be released on Friday morning and seen by Reuters. With about $5 trillion under management and known for products like the Vanguard 500 index fund, (VOO.P) the firm wields much influence over executives and directors at major U.S. companies.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vanguard-boards/vanguard-seeks-more-boardroom-diversity-and-wants-details-idUSKCN1VK1FU
  • Josh Brown: The Real Bubble Has Always Been In Active Management
    FYI: Michael Burry joins the chorus of people referring to indexing and passive investing as a bubble. It’s not his main point – which is that value small caps are being ignored, which is true – but it’s a point we now hear tossed off on a daily basis as casually and nonchalantly as though the speaker were simply saying that water is wet or LeBron James is good at basketball.
    Most of the people referring to passive investing as a bubble have not accurately described the way in which it represents a bubble. What they’re really saying is that it is popular. So is shopping online and using Instagram and eating Mexican food. These things aren’t “bubbles.”
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://thereformedbroker.com/2019/08/29/the-real-bubble-has-always-been-in-active-management/
  • M*: What Has Been Manhattan's Return?
    FYI: Veteran fund manager Mario Gabelli raised the question. What has been the annualized gain for Manhattan? The property was purchased in 1626. How profitable was that transaction?
    The task is both easy and impossible.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.morningstar.com/articles/944161/what-has-been-manhattans-return
  • Fears Of A World Domination By A Handful Of Asset Managers Are Overblown
    FYI: Over the last decade, the largest asset managers have gotten bigger and more powerful. Just five — Vanguard, BlackRock, Fidelity Investments, American Funds, and T. Rowe Price — control 55percent of the $19.3 trillion in total assets of U.S. mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.
    But that concentration partly reflects the juggernauts that dominate passive investments, which are all about volume and keeping costs down. Indeed, BlackRock and Vanguard alone oversee $12 trillion in assets, if mutual funds tracked by Morningstar are included as well as institutional mandates.
    A deeper dive into the data shows that competition in the U.S. asset management industry remains healthy. According to research done by Morningstar Direct for Institutional Investor, the top five active managers controlled only 22 percentof mutual fund and ETF assets as of the end of 2018. These figures have been fairly steady for at least the last five years. That’s a far cry from the 55 percent run by the top five when both active and passive are included.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1gxz8xcd0vms3/Fears-of-a-World-Domination-by-a-Handful-of-Asset-Managers-Are-Overblown
  • Consuelo Mack's WealthTrack Encore: Guest Tom Russo, Managing Partner, Gardner Russo & Gardner
    FYI:
    Regards,
    Ted
    August 29, 2019
    Dear WEALTHTRACK Subscriber,
    Volatile U.S trade relations with China are immediately reflected in the financial markets but what about the economic impact? Could they push the U.S. into recession? On our website this week we have a podcast on the topic with leading global economist and strategist Nick Sargen.
    On the television program this Labor Day weekend we are revisiting a recent Great Investor show with a global value manager. He is a long time holder of Berkshire Hathaway, even though the stock has badly lagged the S&P 500 so far this year. It’s basically flat vs. the market’s around 15% gain. On a total return basis Berkshire’s stock has trailed for the past decade. Berkshire doesn’t pay a dividend. The S&P 500 does which makes a difference. Berkshire’s stock has risen by nearly 260% versus the market’s more than 300% total return advance in the decade ended in 2018.
    Despite Berkshire’s stunning record since 1965, 21% compounded annualized gains, this is not the first time that the company’s shares have underperformed the market for a decade. It has happened several times in recent years.
    Berkshire has outperformed the market by double digits in every trailing ten year period since 1978, but it hasn’t had a double- digit advantage since 2002, and in recent years it has underperformed the market in three ten-year spans.
    Even Warren Buffett himself admitted the company’s glory days of outperformance might be over. In an interview in the Financial Times his response to the question: if Berkshire would be a better investment than the S&P 500 he said “I think the financial result would be very close to the same.” He went on to say “…if you want to join something that may have a tiny expectation of better (performance) than the S&P, I think we may be about the safest.”
    At a $507 billion market capitalization and few places to deploy it in enough size to make a discernible difference to the bottom line, is Berkshire just too big?
    Over the years Berkshire Hathaway has benefitted from sizable stock buybacks in some of its major holdings. In Berkshire’s 2018 annual report Buffett cited American Express where its holdings “remained unchanged over the past eight years,” but our “ownership increased from 12.6% to 17.9% because of repurchases…”
    In the same his 2018 Letter to Shareholders, Buffett said the company itself “will be a significant repurchaser of its shares…at prices… below our estimate of intrinsic value.”
    What else does Buffett have up his sleeve to enhance shareholder returns?
    The company has never purchased a tech stock. It recently bought Amazon and Buffett heaped praise on CEO Jeff Bezos. Berkshire has also never paid a dividend. Could that be next?
    We’ll hear from Tom Russo, an avid student of Buffett’s style of value investing with no intention of changing his approach. Russo is Managing Partner of investment advisory firm, Gardner Russo & Gardner where he oversees around $11 billion including his Semper Vic Partners fund which he launched in 1984 after hearing Buffett address his class at Stanford. Semper Vic has generated 14% compound annual returns since inception, handily outperforming the S&P 500’s 11% returns.
    The global value manager focuses on owning a small group of exceptionally well managed brand name firms - 19 at last count - with dominant, almost unassailable positions in their mostly consumer-oriented businesses and then holding them pretty much forever. Berkshire Hathaway has consistently been one of his largest positions.
    On this week’s show I asked Russo, given Buffett’s modest expectations for the stock’s future performance, if he is rethinking the position.
    Don’t forget, if you are away this weekend, it’s easy to take WEALTHTRACK with you! The WEALTHTRACK podcast is available on TuneIn, Stitcher, and SoundCloud as well as iTunes and Spotify.
    Thank you for watching. Have a great Labor Day weekend, and make the week ahead a profitable and a productive one.
    Best regards,
    Consuelo

    Nick Sargen Podcast:
    https://wealthtrack.com/trade-war-impact-the-markets-economy/
  • Crashes coming?!

    FWIW saying, I'm receiving noticeably more investment-signal service solicitations these days, including from services I briefly dabbled with over 10 years ago and haven't heard from in AGES. The contrarian in me takes that as a warning sign for equities.
  • Crashes coming?!
    @Old_Joe: You said, "But we held on and came out the other side in decent shape."
    My question to you & others that were around in 2007-08. Did you make any buys with ( dry powder ) as the market bled DOWN ?
    I believe I made 2 or three small purchases & then held on for dear life !! Today I wished
    I had spent , invested, a few more bucks.
    With that said ,how many here at MFO were using some of their dry powder as of late Dec. 2018 ? I confess I missed that one also.
    Derf
    In Oct 2008 I bought a house. Sold it 10 years later for a good profit.
  • Crashes coming?!
    Junkster: DITTO!
    John, perhaps you do not recall, or were in a cave during the 2016 election cycle? Hillary carried a substantial lead throughout accordingly to "the polls". EVERY poll. Trump was expected to give his concession speech early on -- after he quickly "lost" Pennsylvania, Florida, and the Dems "Blue Wall". I mean, that is what the polls said would happen...
    President Trump may win OR lose 2020. And I am sticking with that prediction. As a political candidate, the President has some undeniable handicaps: He has a massive ego, even compared to other Presidents. (And that is saying something.). He does a spectacularly poor job of broadening his base. In fact, he appears to have no interest in doing so. Most bizarre! And his oratorical style is blunt, brusque, and undiplomatic. If Obama was "eloquent", President Trump is "plain-spoken" and "unfiltered". Of course, that really is an issue of style. Lots of people on the Left are obsessed with style, thinking it more important than substance. While I concede I sometimes find the President's verbal style grating, I am much more focused on the substance of the man.
    Candidate Trump has one big advantage though: His opponents. Bernie Sanders honeymooned in Moscow during the height of the Cold War. Talk about "Russian Collusion"! --- And not the kind manufactured by the opposition party... As for Joe Biden, imagine Joe Biden and the President on a debate stage two or 3 times. Think about that image for a while. Then, its pretty easy to see Joe spending the next 4 years anywhere but D.C....
    It's not politics but trump will Loose this time for sure -13 points in most polls vs old joe/vp sanders (Dream team) .. 99%chance that Biden will win elections 2020
    No need for recession

    The accuracy of political polls ( Brexit and Trump) is akin to the accuracy of all the pundits who are forever predicting crashes.
  • Crashes coming?!
    It's not politics but trump will Loose this time for sure -13 points in most polls vs old joe/vp sanders (Dream team) .. 99%chance that Biden will win elections 2020
    No need for recession
    The accuracy of political polls ( Brexit and Trump) is akin to the accuracy of all the pundits who are forever predicting crashes.
  • New to MFO & building a Defensive Equity Portfolio...
    For screening (ER under 1%, top quartile for 1,3,5 years):
    Conservative Equity Allocation Funds
    https://screencast.com/t/rPUmyOlq
    Moderate Equity Allocation Funds:
    https://screencast.com/t/mugBYO4y
    Aggressive Equity Allocation Funds:
    https://screencast.com/t/QzdxjX9jkV
    You might like to back test some of these choices using Portfolio Visualizer
    https://portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio
  • New to MFO & building a Defensive Equity Portfolio...
    Trying to parse through a lot of new data and ratios and have quickly learned that I my mathematical grasp of some of the ratios and how useful they are in different scenarios is far below many of you that post here. I am looking to build a portfolio of defensive equity funds that are primarily large cap domestic but adding in a 20% or so weight to international strategies and I'm trying to decide which ratios might be most useful in analyzing potential investments. right now I am leaning towards the following listed in order of importance:
    1) Martin Ratio
    2) Downside Deviation - chose this over bear market deviation as it seems easier to compare funds of different categories
    3) Ulcer Index
    4) Sortino
    I realize that Martin and Sortino are best used to compare funds that fall into similar categories so I'm not sure how appropriate they are in comparing the domestic to the international strategies. Any help or insights you can give to a newbie would be greatly appreciated.
  • Crashes coming?!
    It's not politics but trump will Loose this time for sure -13 points in most polls vs old joe/vp sanders (Dream team) .. 99%chance that Biden will win elections 2020
    No need for recession