Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • 31 Index Funds That Are Robbing You Blind
    Usually these are just fluff pieces, but this one makes playing "spot the error" too easy.
    "Every investor should have some exposure to the S&P 500 index"
    Why should I bias my portfolio toward large cap vs. say, VTSMX?
    "Your return [on $10K] in the SNPBX would be $36,784 — a roughly 270% return"
    That would be a roughly 370% return. Rather, the total value of the investment, including both the original cost and the return would be $36,784.
    The number is way off anyway. It assumes that the ER of the class B shares doesn't change for 30 years. But the class B shares convert to cheaper class A shares after 8 years, so the return is significantly higher than shown. Obviously still less than that of truly inexpensive funds.
    This share class isn't open for sale. Even existing shareholders couldn't buy additional B shares after May 1, 2015.
    You have to wonder how much the writer understands index funds when he includes a Fidelity (enhanced) index fund FLVEX among the most expensive in a category (large cap value). Only TIAA-CREF has a lower cost enhanced LCV index fund (per M*).
  • NAV isn't quite what we think
    We all know that NAV = (total portfolio value)/ (shares outstanding), and
    total portfolio value = Σ #shares of each security x security price
    Most of us also know that security prices can be a little fuzzy if there's not a current price - because the foreign market it trades on is closed, or the security's illiquid and hasn't traded in awhile, or even if it is trading that a fund couldn't really sell it on the open market. See, e.g. Fair value pricing, or Heartland High-Yield Muni and Short-Duration Muni Bond Funds scandal, or Third Avenue Focused Credit TFCVX.
    I didn't know that the number of shares of each security is also suspect.
    Apparently, virtually all funds use the number of shares that it held the previous day to calculate the NAV. For example, the NAV of a fund tonight (May 6th) is likely computed by taking the number of shares of each security it held at the close of May 5th and multiplying it by tonight's closing price.
    This is not required (funds could use today's holdings), but it is allowed. In the vast majority of pricings, the effect is minuscule, but it does raise the question: do you know what's in your wallet (portfolio)?
    For a column on this, see: ETF.com, Net Asset Values Can Fool You
    For a paper on this, see: Live Prices and Stale Quantities: T+1 Accounting and Mutual Fund Mispricing (2006)
  • 31 Index Funds That Are Robbing You Blind
    FYI: When you are searching for the best index funds, there are two primary questions to answer prior to buying shares:
    Which index do you want to track?
    How much do those shares cost?
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://investorplace.com/2016/05/index-funds-overpaying/view-all/#.VyxxWjMo4qQ
  • Lots Of Money Just Came Out Of The Biggest Junk-Bond ETF
    Ha! Ha! I took some off the table Tuesday and Wednesday. Since I am apparently part of the herd we probably will regret it. Junk bonds are still hovering just a few percent off historical highs on a total return basis. It's the bank loans that baffle me. They seem immune to everything. My largest holding is EVFAX and like many there have had but two or so down days since February. And EABLX below has had zero down days since February. Talk about trend persistent! Just wonder when the inevitable pullback comes in that category if it will be short and sweet or drawn out.
    http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=eablx

    I think perhaps you have some recency bias on bank loans. Down past two years, and the run up has been the past few months. Same with HY, timed a buy on HYB just right and seems like I did great, and I did, but way off it's 52 wk high and many are flat or even still down over the past year in that space. All depends on when you bought.
  • Lots Of Money Just Came Out Of The Biggest Junk-Bond ETF
    @Junkster:
    Hate to cherry pick dates, but since you brought up recent success with bank loan funds, take a look at PTIAX since August of 2013. I believe this was a favorite of yours with its concentration of HY Munis back in Dec of 2015.
    @AndyJ first mentioned it here back in Sept of 2014.
    Nice Chart:
    image
  • Lots Of Money Just Came Out Of The Biggest Junk-Bond ETF
    Lots of possible choices for big money actions, not the least being hedge funds. These folks play with a lot of money in the etf circles.
    My novice view thinks more hedge funds will close the doors this year; from both money leaving and plain old "don't really know what they are doing syndrome". AIG's CEO also noted verbally that the company plans to continue more purchases in the IG bonds area.
    http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/05/05/metlife-joins-aig-in-scaling-way-back-on-hedge-funds/
    http://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/institutional-portfolio/bridgewater-associates-lp-699510
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Lots Of Money Just Came Out Of The Biggest Junk-Bond ETF
    This must have something to do with large institutional investor preference, with something non-fundamental? The much junkier JNK has only had $253M redeemed.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-05/biggest-junk-bond-etf-jolted-by-massive-redemptions-amid-rally
  • Lots Of Money Just Came Out Of The Biggest Junk-Bond ETF
    FYI: The popularity of the market’s biggest exchange-traded fund that tracks an index of junk bonds has cooled at the same time that rallies in oil and natural resources stocks abated in recent days.
    Bloomberg notes that the $15.9 billion iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has seen redemptions to the tune of $2.6 billion over the past four trading sessions, the largest such streak of outflows since…. you guessed it, February, when credit markets and oil were in free fall
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://blogs.barrons.com/focusonfunds/2016/05/05/lots-of-money-just-came-out-of-the-biggest-junk-bond-etf/tab/print/
    M* Snapshot HYG:
    http://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/hyg/quote.html
  • Small/Mid Cap Value Options
    Thoughts on using benchmarks/graphs:
    - For benchmarking small cap value funds, a small cap value index would appear most appropriate
    - If the benchmark is an index, graph the index itself
    - If the benchmark is a fund, graph the cheapest share class of the fund.
    For Vanguard that's the Institutional or (if it exists) the InstitutionalPlus share class. These are cheaper than their fund's ETF share class, and also eliminate market tracking error.
    In any case, graph total return as opposed to price.
    Here are graphs (at M*) of Vanguard Small Cap Value Index, Institutional Class VSIIX vs. M*'s Small Value Total Return Index (graph), and Vanguard Small Cap Index InstitutionalPlus Class VSCPX vs. both the Russell 2000 total return and the M* US Small Cap Total Return Index (graph)
    You can add your fund(s) of choice to these graphs. They don't require Flash (google seems to require Flash, and I've uninstalled it on my machine).
    Not surprisingly, the Russell 2000 index significantly underperforms the M* index. The Russell 2K is especially susceptible to front running (because it is widely followed, because it contains small caps that are more sensitive to price movements, because it reconstitutes annually). What is IMHO more interesting is that the fund ever so slightly outperforms even the M* index.
  • Stan Druckenmiller: The Fed has no end game, and 'the chickens are now coming home to roost'
    Thanks for the perspective TSP.
    While there's no way (that I know of) to predict what any market will do in the next year or two, over the past decade or so most of those invested in equities should have made money. (John Hussman's an exception.) NASDAQ, of course, is still recovering from a huge bubble where it quadrupled from around 1,000 to 5,000 between '95 and 2000 when it burst. Those who bought the Kool-Aid late in the bubble probably deserved what they got. I don't think the DJI and S&P experienced anything near that kind of bubble. But, who knows? Anything could happen. That's why you get paid to take extra risk in the markets.
    Quality of life? We take so much for granted. When I was a kid we had 3 black & white TV stations to choose from. We had to run over to the TV about every 10 minutes to adjust the vertical or horizontal hold so picture would stop rolling or blurring. Few cars had power brakes or power steering. Air bags were unheard of. Flat tires along the road were common. You'd better know how to use a car jack. So ... we have such a higher quality of life today. OK - I'm getting old. But, even over 10 years, the quality of life for most (not all) Americans has increased immensely.
    The one painful issue is that we've experienced a market crash and strong deflationary undercurrents within the past decade. This has depressed some prices (like energy). But, perhaps more noticeably, it has led to wage stagnation in many sectors, so the average worker is suffering from stagnated income. Hopefully that will improve as the effects of the '08 crisis wane. FWIW
  • Small/Mid Cap Value Options
    @BrianW,
    Sorry to be obtuse, but what exactly is this showing? I am not understanding....
    Go to M* and graph growth of $10k of GABSX or other favorite vs VB for max/10/5/3/1y.
  • Put Buffett's Advice Into Action With These Two ETFs
    Jeez, if only it were true:
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-sp-500-index-is-not-your-buddy-2015-01-14
    And just graph $10k growth of SPX alone vs FPURX ytd/1/3/5/10y --- and be sure to include max, back 69y to the week I was born. I mean, seriously. And that's just FPURX.
  • Small/Mid Cap Value Options
    Yes, interesting to see superiority of GABSX and WEMMX since 1998 over VB, and then look at consistency and closeness of tracking wrt to it for 10/5/3/1y (which Snowball disdains for some reason, if I read him right), meaning sometimes outperformance by a hair and sometimes underperformance.
    Gabelli appears to add significant alpha much of which goes into his pocket. Weird, or maybe not weird.
    Whatever happened to PENNX?
  • Stan Druckenmiller: The Fed has no end game, and 'the chickens are now coming home to roost'

    Same theme not quite the alarm .
    Macro View
    Complacency in Uncharted Waters The next challenge for central bankers is changing monetary policy when the economy has come to depend on it.
    May 03, 2016 Global CIO Commentary by Scott Minerd
    ...Another market area that is clearly not behaving according to the central banks’ script is foreign exchange. Japan’s current laundry list of woes is topped by the strengthening yen, which is a major headwind for its moribund economy. The Bank of Japan is due to convene later this month, and may decide that the best course of action is to intervene directly to drive down the value of its currency. Such direct intervention basically will entail selling yen and buying U.S. dollars, and typically those dollars go to buy U.S. Treasurys. Europe is probably not far behind: It has tepid growth, a strengthening currency, and more potential downside to their policy rates. This means there is a high likelihood of a fairly good bid on Treasurys in the coming weeks that could be sufficient to push the 10-year U.S. Treasury note lower.
    My message to central bankers is the following: Although the waters at the present time might seem calm, they are still uncharted and there are risks beneath the surface. QE and negative interest rates, once thought to be extraordinary measures, have become the new monetary policy orthodoxy in the largest developed economies. The data on the long-run effects are limited, but real-time experience with these policies offers a few lessons.
    ...we learned from Japan that ever larger doses of unconventional monetary policy may be required in the absence of growth-enhancing structural reforms. Moreover, it is incredibly difficult to reverse these policies from an economy that has come to depend on them. Second, in Europe we are learning that such policies offer limited benefits unless paired with a coordinated fiscal plan. Finally, we have learned here at home that trying to “normalize” policy, even in a gradual manner, can strain financial markets.
    https://guggenheimpartners.com/perspectives/macroview/complacency-in-uncharted-waters
    Also
    Markets and life since 2006.
    10 Stats About the Last 10 Years
    May 02, 2016 By Nicholas Colas who is is Chief Market Strategist for Convergex.
    Summary: The headline today that Goldman Sachs’ stock has gone nowhere for a decade got us thinking about general market performance over the last 10 years. The key contours are straightforward: subpar price returns (a 4.9% compounded annual growth rate for the S&P 500) with increased volatility (a VIX that is 25% more volatile than average). From there, things get funky.
    Think back over the last 10 years - how different was your life in April 2006? While you may think your daily existence is largely the same (maybe the kids are older or you’re married now, but that about it…), consider what was actually different about your life in the spring of 2006:
    No iPhone. Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone in January 2007, and it didn’t ship until June of that year.
    No Facebook (unless you were in college at the time). Facebook only opened to the general population in September 2006.
    No Twitter. The full version of the product launched in July 2006.
    No Instagram. The picture sharing site only launched in 2010.
    No Kim Kardashian. “Keeping up With The Kardashians” debuted in October 2007.
    No Uber. The company received its seed funding in 2009.
    No iPad. Apple started taking pre-orders on the first-gen product in March 2010.
    It feels like April 2006 demarcates the last days of some Dark Age, or at least a simpler time without the manifold distractions of today. And while you might opt for a world without the Kardashians, imagine it without your smartphone, Facebook/social media, and an iPad to entertain the kids (or yourself). It’s ok – don’t panic. You have them now.
    The journey from April 2006 to April 2016 in financial markets has, of course, been a wild ride. But just as it is hard to remember what daily life was like a decade ago, it is also easy to forget some of the important waypoints that capital markets took from there to here.
    Here are 10 data points about the last 10 years we hope you will find useful:
    http://www.convergex.com/the-share/10-stats-about-the-last-10-years
  • Matthews Asia Renames Fund To Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
    Hi, Ben.
    Not sure about the 2-3 year holding pattern thing. They crushed the competition 3 years ago and crushed them 2 years ago then trailed for the first 3 quarters of 2015 then outperformed in the 4th quarter. They're trailing this year. Over the whole period from Jan. 2015 to now, they trail their peers by 5% cumulative.
    Innovators, to them, do stuff like high levels of employee training and product refinement (think of it as "continual internal upgrades"). But they also look for businesses that won't flame-out which means many quarters of cash-flow growth. Tesla, cool as they are, posted losses of $0.54 share with a share price of $225. They also lose $30,000 on every high-end car they sell. That's not a profile these guys would get within a mile of.
    David
  • Small/Mid Cap Value Options
    If we're including multi-billion funds, one I like is American Century Mid Cap Value, ACMVX. (Before anyone writes that this is closed, look again. It is only closed when purchasing through a third party, e.g. Schwab.)
    I ran a search for small funds in the small cap value space, and ran across LSV Small Cap Value (LVAQX). In some senses, similar to TDVFX (tiny AUM, tiny cap). Not quite deep value though. Even lower turnover (15%). And fine performance so far (three years old - see original share class LSVQX).
    This seems like a quant fund with training wheels. It keeps its sectors within 5% of its benchmark - I'm guessing that this could explain the low turnover, since quant funds are often whipsawed.
  • Putnam Voyager Fund Will Be Merged Out Of Existence
    @MFO Members: Let's see now, here is this turkey's track record, enough said !!!
    Regards,
    Ted
    YTD: 76 Percentile
    1Yr. 90 "
    3Yr. 85 "
    5Yr. 98 "
    10 Yr. 66 "
    15 Yr. 89 "