This charting is not against any given benchmark; only a performance chart for a particular asset versus its 50, 100 and 200 moving price average. A somewhat pure view of performance of monies you may have invested.
If you're curious about a holding for the past 1 year period (this chart set to 1 year, but may be changed) to date, add your tickers/symbols. The chart is also set for "daily", this may be switched to weekly price, which will slightly alter the appearance of the graph. Save the link for a future visit, as desired.
This chart is set for VWINX. You will see the ticker at the upper left area. "Inspect" box (just above chart middle) is also selected. This allows the cursor to be placed on the graph for a particular date listing pricing information. You may "deselect" inspect. Additionally, just below the ticker symbol at the upper left area is "RSI 14". This is the relative strength index setting for a 14 day period. In theory, an above 70 reading is nearing an overbought, while a 30 or below is an oversold indication.
To change to another ticker/symbol merely type the letters to replace VWINX in the box. Click "UPDATE" just to the right or the keyboard enter key.
NOTE: The price line includes splits, dividends and other distributions; per Stockcharts information.
http://schrts.co/nr9enV
As to VWINX in particular, in this chart, one is able to discover the effect of early stage rising interest rates and a slap down of equities during the end period of January into February. Also, that the 50 day moving average line moving below the 100 and "looking" at the 200 day moving average price. Pretty smelly looking chart. Most bond charts right now have this appearance, as well as some equity trending in the same directions. Hoping I didn't miss something.
Well, anyway; be curious and enjoy.
Take care,
Catch

Also, @msf, I wonder if any investors would place their entire portfolio into a single fund, even one as diversified as these Simplicity RMD Fund offerings?
(FIRWX is a fund of "26" funds)?

I wouldn't read too much into their history. Per the prospectus:

Prior to June 1, 2017, the fund[s] operated under certain different investment policies and a different pricing structure. The fund's historical performance prior to June 1, 2017 may not represent its current investment policies and does not reflect the fund's current pricing structure.

Someone with time on their hands should see how the funds/managers on Bee's list of annual winners subsequently performed after winning. But then I just found this:
investors.morningstar.com/news/cmsAcontent.html?t=SEQUX&resourceId=582142&src=Morningstar&date=02-05-2013&nav=no&region=USA&culture=en_US&ProductCode=mle

PDBZX is not having fun this year in the rising rate environment.

Other funds I own that are struggling:
- VWINX struggling, which I realize its apples to apples with PDBZX
- FRIFX struggling over YTD, 1 YR & 3Yr timeframe
Don't own but follow:
- VCSAX & FDFAX (corrected, thanks @carew388) , Consumer Staples off 9% YTD, negative over 1 Yr
On the positive side:
- Some Energy funds turning positive after 3 yr negative returns- I watch FSENX, BENFX & VGENX
- HSGFX showing a long negative trend (1,3,5 & 10 Yr) reversal, strange market we are in.

Apologizes if this has already posted: FDGRX, CIVVX (CIVIX), PDBZX, PRWCX
https://fa-mag.com/news/morningstar-announces-2017-u-s--fund-manager-of-the-year-award-winners-36811.html?print

PDBZX is not having fun this year in the rising rate environment.

As you get older and your RMD withdrawal rate increases, the equity allocation in your Simplicity RMD Fund (FIRPX, FIRRX, FIRUX, FIRWX) is designed to decrease and the fund will become more conservative until it reaches an allocation similar to that of the Simplicity RMD Income Fund (FIRNX).
https://fidelity.com/mutual-funds/mutual-fund-spotlights/rmd-funds
My Take:
Downside risk was substantial during 2007-2009 time frame for these funds compared to a fund like VWINX, though they all are performing better than VWINX YTD.

Past winners of M* of the Year award:

@JoJo26 You mean like these? news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=321713
I guess one out of three--Herro--ain't bad. In baseball that's a darn good average.

Not THAT decade...the OTHER decade.

Gee Ted. Three separate articles on Treasury yields in one day. Can't you post these duplicate stories under one post. You just beefing up your prestigious count of posts. :(

Yep - Ted’s a cagey one - always trying to pump up his score. :( :(
Hmmm ... I took a pass on @Flack’s monthly guessing contest - since I got the first one correct and didn’t want to tarnish my 1000 batting average. But there seemed to be a lot of bulls (or bull) this time round. How’s the month lookin guys?

@Maurice, maybe its time to jump onboard HSGFX...up 4.31% YTD. Maybe not.
Related topic to your comment:

As the authors stated, “As the size of the fund increases and because the manager’s investment ideas are finite, the new money flows are not able to be put to productive use, which subsequently leads to zero net alpha in equilibrium.”
The authors also stated, “… managers have no ability to generate additional investment ideas when existing opportunities are fully exploited.”
Fund managers cannot “cope with the influx of new money” resulting from the FMOY award, according to the authors.

https://advisorperspectives.com/articles/2017/10/16/should-you-invest-with-the-fund-manager-of-the-year
@JoJo26, Long term - 2 funds are at least 32 years old (PRWCX and FDGRX). PBDZX is 24 years old. Nothing but Long term success.

@JoJo26 You mean like these? news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=321713
I guess one out of three--Herro--ain't bad. In baseball that's a darn good average.

Apologizes if this has already posted: FDGRX, CIVVX (CIVIX), PDBZX, PRWCX
https://fa-mag.com/news/morningstar-announces-2017-u-s--fund-manager-of-the-year-award-winners-36811.html?print

FYI: U.S. stocks fell on Tuesday, with major indexes retreating from early highs as a rise in bond yields provided another reason for caution at a time when the first-quarter earnings season is failing to excite investors, despite some strong reads from corporate America.
While the earnings season remained in full swing, with results from a number of major firms, the tone was generally negative, with several bellwether stocks slumping despite posting numbers that were ahead of analyst forecasts.
Regards,
Ted
Bloomberg:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-23/yen-drop-to-buoy-japan-stocks-as-dollar-rallies-markets-wrap
Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-markets/stocks-retreat-as-u-s-10-year-yields-top-3-percent-idUSKBN1HV01Z
MarketWatch:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dow-shapes-up-to-break-losing-streak-but-earnings-could-kill-the-buzz-2018-04-24/print
IBD:
https://www.investors.com/market-trend/stock-market-today/stock-market-today-april-24-2018-caterpillar-earnings/
CNBC:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/24/us-stock-futures-dow-data-earnings-tech-and-politics-on-the-agenda.html
AP:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FINANCIAL_MARKETS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Bonds:
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-bonds/treasuries-u-s-10-year-yield-hits-3-pct-as-economy-shows-resilience-idUSL1N1S11C1
Currencies:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-forex/dollar-euro-hold-after-u-s-10-year-yield-hits-3-percent-idUSKBN1HV04J
Oil:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil/oil-steadies-after-brent-tops-75-on-supply-cuts-iran-sanctions-threat-idUSKBN1HV03J
Gold:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/24/gold-market-dollar-yields-in-focus.html
WSJ: Markets At A Glance:
http://markets.wsj.com/us
SPDR's Sector Tracker:
http://www.sectorspdr.com/sectorspdr/tools/sector-tracker
SPDR's Bloomberg Sector Performance Pie Chart:
https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/sectors
Current Futures: Negative
https://finviz.com/futures.ashx
Quote

@willmatt72 and @expatsp
Info only: BOTZ , managed by Global X........Global X is being acquired. See link below. There is a shareholder vote; but I suspect this is a done deal, and reportedly will not affect Global X and its etf offerings.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-x-and-mirae-assets-etf-businesses-combine-to-create-a-global-etf-franchise-300598198.html

FYI: From A to Z — Adobe Systems (ADBE) to Zoetis (ZTS) — $17.8 billion MFS Growth Fund (MFEGX) has the sort of leading stocks that lift the portfolio into the ranks of top mutual funds.
Regards,
Ted
https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/mutual-funds/netflix-lululemon-amazon-mfs-growth-mutual-funds/
M* Snapshot MFEGX:
http://www.morningstar.com/funds/XNAS/MFEGX/quote.html
Lipper Snapshot MFEGX:
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/fund/mfegx
MFEGX Is Ranked #26 In The (LCG) Fund Category By U.S. News & World Report:
https://money.usnews.com/funds/mutual-funds/large-growth/mfs-growth-fund/mfegx

FYI: Kenny Feng is president and CEO of Alerian, a leading provider of MLP indexes. About $18 billion is tied to the Alerian Index Series, including the $9.5 billion Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and the $3.1 billion J.P. Morgan Alerian MLP ETN (AMJ). ETF.com spoke with Feng to discuss the latest outlook for MLPs after recent share price declines, and what the Republican tax cuts mean for MLP ETFs.
Regards,
Ted
http://www.etf.com/sections/features-and-news/what-do-about-mlps-after-turmoil

I was just debating fixing up the old reliable 13-year old GMC pickup for somewhere between $3,000 and $5,000 or buying a brand new one. Took a look. Sticker prices of $40,000 - $80,000 convinced me to fix up the old one. (What inflation?)

That is the reason we drive a minivan as a family car. SUVs are expensive! We rent one recently not by choice (only ones left in the lot) and had less than satisfactory experience with it comparing to our minivan. Next time we will walk over to another rental shop at the airport.

All I'm saying is that one can't infer that bank loans are harder to price than treasuries from the fact that the former are classified as level 2. Certainly pricing them is more difficult, just as investment grade corporates are harder to price than Treasuries. But you won't get that from their pricing level. Right conclusion, wrong evidence.
Quoting from the Vanguard report: "Various inputs may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes. The inputs or methodologies used to value securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities."
You say you don't like Vanguard; you say it's too conservative. Have I got a deal for you :-)
How about Fidelity? The annual report for its Limited Term Government Fund classifies all its holdings (again excluding cash equivalents) as level 2, including both US and foreign government and government agency obligations, US government agency mortgage securities, CMOs, commercial mortgage securities, and purchased "swaptions".
Or let's get wild and crazy, and check out PIMCO. In PIMIX's semiannual report we finally find some level 1 bonds. But they're not treasuries - all the US government obligations and treasuries are level 2.
0.01% of banking and finance bonds are level 1, while 11% are level 3, showing that sometimes bank loans are rated at level 3. (All the financial stocks held by the fund are also rated level 3.)
0.3% of corporate industrial bonds are level 1, while 0.14% are level 3.
There are a variety of other categories of bonds and stocks with some rated level 3.
JP Morgan gives a clue as to why all these bonds show up as level 2 or lower:
"J.P. Morgan has reserved the definition of ‘quoted prices in active markets’ to strictly be applied to exchange trade equity and derivative securities. Fixed income prices provided by a vendor or broker/dealer are classified as a Level 2. This decision is based on our analysis which found that most fixed income securities are priced using an evaluated price provided by an independent pricing vendor or broker/dealer."

@willmatt72
Cost of some industrial robotics, not unlike other "new" in many areas; will be a part of all of this, too. The pros and cons, the needs and the wants, will get worked out.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/sam-bricklaying-robot-6x-faster-than-you-can/
You've probably already searched videos, but this link is a good overview for some robotics. ALSO, while at YouTube, if interested; search Boston Dynamics robots. This company is an example of a private company purchased by Google several years ago and then sold to Softbank of Japan. The CEO of this company is on the ball/forward looking and has built a large empire of technology.
@Old_Joe, I know you'll likely enjoy the video links in the below link. Start with the 3rd down.....8 Amazing Robots
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1404&bih=659&tbm=vid&ei=kkbdWoaaJouHjwT0t56wBg&q=robots&oq=robots&gs_l=psy-ab.12..0l10.37093.41458.0.46343.16.9.0.0.0.0.132.726.8j1.9.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..11.5.429...0i7i30k1j0i8i7i30k1j0i13k1.0.JbiOidGth-A
Just the above robotics is the one area; which still leaves machine learning, other A.I., manufacturing, chip makers/engineering and all of the areas these will become involved.
Take care,
Catch