It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Sorry, I don't generally pay too much attention to closed end funds - haven't found a use for stock funds, and most bond funds are leveraged. (There's additional risk with leveraged funds, especially in a rising interest rate environment, and while I don't necessarily like my bond funds too boring, that's one factor I prefer to take out of the equation.)Thanks for your thoughts, everyone.
@msf, I guess that makes sense about PDI, but I'm not sure it makes me feel better -- it gives the manager an extra motive to lever up, though he's got a ton his own money in the fund that I presume he believes what he's doing. Is that common for CEF expenses?
I haven't read the prospectus/offering, I'm not planning to invest in it unless there's a major dip (I like my bond funds boring), though I sure regret not having bought it a year ago. Anything striking in the prospectus?
Me too. My very first screening criteria was to look at min return over any rolling 3 year period.Actually I think lower numbers are useful.
3 would show how fund does across typical 50% declines
5 would show investor patience justified or not (all those people lamenting investor returns don't match fund returns need to get a reality check)
Actually I think lower numbers are useful.@VintageFreak.
...rolling returns over X years...
What is highest X you think is of interest?
10, 15...20?
Let me know.
Thanks, c
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla