Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Repost - 5 Star Bond Fund HOBIX loses over 2.70% in four trading days this week
    Scroll down to the holdings section near the bottom of the M* page. There you'll see 82.5% in bonds. I don't know why it doesn't match the 70% fixed income at the top of the page. Clearly this difference is coming from the 24% "other" allocation at the top of the page.
    Perhaps not all the bonds are "fixed" income? You might be right about convertibles. Have to check M*'s definitions.
    The 17% "other" in the holdings is a MMF (3.63%) and preferred (13% or so).
  • Preparing your Portfolio for Rate Cuts
    For investors looking to actively position their portfolios in anticipation of a turn in rates, here is a look at 5 asset classes and investments that have historically performed well when rates fall. Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results.
    From Fidelity:
    5 investing ideas for falling interest rates
    learning-center/trading-investing/5-invest-ideas-lower-interest-rates
  • Dave Giroux Explains TCAF's Portfolio Construction
    TCAF's active management tries to avoid the "fatal flaws" of the S&P 500 index. In doing so, TCAF attempts to beat the S&P 500 with less risk.
    David Giroux interview (22 minutes):
    capital-appreciation-equity-etf-tcaf-exploiting-market-inefficiencies-and-early-success-of-active
  • thinking about correlations within my non-retirement portfolio
    During 2022, the correlation between stocks and bonds approached 1.0 when the FED raised rate. Other time period, the correlation was much smaller. Having said that, one has to look at longer periods, 5 years or more to smooth out the year of 2022.
    Another parameter worth to look at is recovery period under MFO Premium. For allocation funds with flexible or tactical mandates, recovery period reveals how the funds perform through the drawdowns.
  • thinking about correlations within my non-retirement portfolio
    Well, PVCMX isn't correlated with any of the other 10 funds in my portfolio. The cross-correlations range from 0.19 - 0.56, which is the link to GP Global Micro.
    As to the others, the correlations with Crescent are nearly identical for all four funds at 86 - 88. Given the negligible overlap in holdings (even with LCORX, the differences in region, sector, asset class and size are substantial) between them (FPACX has 0.26% in EM equity, for instance, and 1.4% in microcaps), I found the results fascinating. Apparently there are common drivers of performance that span the five portfolios?
    It's the sort of puzzle that I sort of enjoy, until my brain starts to bubble.
    Your guess?
  • Leuthold: going anywhere
    You need to account for the portfolio's hedge to determine net equity exposure. image 66% gross, 51% net, I'd guess.
  • Repost - 5 Star Bond Fund HOBIX loses over 2.70% in four trading days this week
    HOSIX is only 2+ year old. So, it has none of the baggage of HOBIX and much of M* data is NA. It's also mostly structured credit and its average credit quality of BB is lower than that for HOBIX (BBB).
    TestFol data with 12-mo rolling periods looks OK. HOSIX-12
    The boutique firm Holbrook has only 2 funds - HOBIX (8+ years old) and HOSIX (2+ years old).
    https://www.morningstar.com/asset-management-companies/holbrook-holdings-BN00000J2X/funds
  • Repost - 5 Star Bond Fund HOBIX loses over 2.70% in four trading days this week
    Just checked X/Twitter comments - awful. Not taking them at face value, there may be something to those.
    Much of the M* report on HOBIX is computer-generated gobbledygook. Overall, it looks like run of the mill ST bond funds. But one M* comment in passing was an alert - its 5-yr SD was much higher than its 3-yr SD. Then I noted in M* Portfolio details that while total junk % is small, lot of it is in securitized credit with underlying shaky firms.
    So, I looked at TestFol that is based in daily data - not monthly data used by M*, PV, MFO Premium, etc. I ran with both 36-mo and 60-mo (default) rolling-periods and one can see that it was a disaster in 2020 pandemic and post-pandemic, but suddenly started doing better in early-2023.
    IMO, ST bonds aren't for speculation, but the category is so wide that almost anything goes. There isn't even a distinction between ST-inv-gr and ST-HY. And the fact that generic overviews (M*, etc) may look OK (as for HOBIX) points to dangers lurking in ST bonds. I suppose that the lessons learned during the GFC were forgotten.
    Rolling 36-mo HOBIX-36
    Rolling 60-mo HOBIX-60
  • Leuthold: going anywhere
    The discrepancy may have to do with how one counts "Equity Hedge". According to M*, as of June 30th (the date of the last monthly filing, and pretty close in time to Aug 6), LCORX was 75.66% long, but had only 62.57% in equity, net.
    That is consistent with the Semi-Annual Report with March 31 holdings. It has a pie chart showing 62.5% in traded US equities, 7.9% short US traded equities, short equity funds (1.8% + 0.7%), and noise. The Schedule of Investments reports 69.5% in common stocks and separately reports 9% short in common stocks.
    LCORX seems to have held a pretty consistent 60%+ in equities this year, net.
  • Two abrdn funds to be converted into ETFs
    Wiki explains, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrdn
    "In February 2021, the company announced that it was considering selling or abandoning use of the Standard Life name.[16][17] In April 2021, the company announced that – having sold the Standard Life Insurance business to Phoenix in 2018 and having sold the Standard Life name to Phoenix in 2021[18] – it would be rebranding as abrdn.[19] The new brand, pronounced "Aberdeen" and developed by the branding agency Wolff Olins, was criticised as difficult to pronounce, but was said by chief executive Stephen Bird to reflect a "clarity of focus".[20] Part of the motivation was that the Aberdeen.com domain was owned by another business.[21] The change of name and the rebranding took place in July 2021.[22] The name was met with widespread ridicule and was the butt of online jokes. An online poll of investors described the rebrand as an "act of corporate insanity".[23][24][25] In 2024, Peter Branner, Abrdn's chief investment officer, accused the media of being "childish" for ridiculing the disemvowelled name and said that the company was a victim of "corporate bullying".[21]"
  • Repost - 5 Star Bond Fund HOBIX loses over 2.70% in four trading days this week
    It is always an eye brow raising event when you see a five star rated short term bond fund lose over 2.70% in four trading days. Morningstar shows a one week loss of 2.58% as daily accumulated dividends are included. Apparently this loss is due to their holding of the preferred shares of Riley Financial. Riley Financial is in a world of hurt as their common shares have lost 75% this month. Noted short seller Marc Cohodes for the past many months on X (Twitter) has been on a rampage against Holbrook Holdings and their management warning of dire consequences for holding Riley Financial. Chalk one up for Marc.
    While I don’t hold HOBIX my concern is with HOSIX. HOSIX is a newer bond fund at Holbrook, also five star rated, and has been the “It” fund since its inception of the bond crowd due to its amazing persistency of trend. It is primarily a CLO fund and CLOs have been the latest rage in Bondland. While HOBIX and HOSIX are not similar they do share the same management team. HOSIX has seen a huge surge in AUM this year. My fear is the management team in their haste to employ new money will make a similar mistake as they did with Riley Financial in HOBIX.
  • Barrons thoughts on upcoming Fed actions
    Things look brighter this week. 50 bps or less for this year sounds reasonable unless the labor market turns really bad with massive layoffs. We see a few but nothing wide spread as in 2008’s GFC.
  • Barrons thoughts on upcoming Fed actions
    IMO, Fed is not going to drop FF rates in a hurry to 4% or below, unless it sees long term inflation expectations dropping to 2% AND r* at 4% or lower. I can make a case for a total of 50 bps or less cuts this year.
    This was along my line of thinking as well, but the market seems to be pricing in a bit more. It's not like corporate earnings are hitting it out of the park, and the consumer is wavering.
    The overall positive vibes continue (despite last week's blip.) The bull market marches on.
  • Barrons thoughts on upcoming Fed actions
    IMO, Fed is not going to drop FF rates in a hurry to 4% or below, unless it sees long term inflation expectations dropping to 2% AND r* at 4% or lower. I can make a case for a total of 50 bps or less cuts this year.
    I am surprised the article focuses so much on dropping inflation alone.
  • Barrons thoughts on upcoming Fed actions
    I found this piece from Barrons interesting and thought I'd share. Inflation is dropping and the anticipation of rate cuts is influencing investments. Also sheds light on the expected SS increase for 2025.
    CPI Figures Tee Up September Move for Central Bank
    Cooler than expected inflation in July prompted traders to lower the odds of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates by a half point in September. But Wednesday’s inflation news did clear the runway for the Fed to begin cutting rates, and the size of the September move could depend on labor market data yet to come.
    Traders are pricing in a 37% probability that the Fed lowers rates by a half-point after its meeting next month, according to the CME FedWatch tool. The probability was greater than 50% just a day earlier and even higher one week ago. The tool sees a 63% chance of a quarter-point cut.
    The Fed might not stop there. Traders expect additional cuts at the two other meetings this year, putting a 44% probability on the Fed cutting rates by a whole percentage point by the end of the year. That implies two additional quarter-point cuts if the September cut is a half-point.
    July’s consumer price index rose 2.9% from a year ago, slower than the 3% gain expected. Core inflation not counting food and fuel rose 3.2%. The cost of housing accounted for 90% of the increase in consumer inflation last month.
    A broad array of products and services showed price drops, including airfares, down 1.6% from June, men’s suits, sport coats, and outerwear, down 4.2%, and used cars and trucks, down 2.3%. Prices for video and videogame rentals and subscriptions rose 7.6%, while hot dogs rose 4.4%.
    What’s Next: The Social Security cost-of-living adjustment for 2025 could shrink to 2.6% from this year’s 3.2% increase, according to Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare analyst and former analyst with the Senior Citizens League. In July she forecast adjustment to be a 2.7% increase.
  • If DJT gets to $1.38 ...
    I learned the hard way that those “fair value” ratings are worthless.
    Bought 2 very depressed small-cap stocks more or less on intuition + personal knowledge of the companies June 26. (Posted in the B/S thread.) I later checked the ratings at M*, WSJ and Barron’s. All 3 said the stocks were already above fair value when I bought them and that neither warranted higher than an a 3 out of 5 as investment prospects.
    A week or two later the Russell blasted off, carrying those 2 holdings along for the ride. I sold in only 10 days time after both had jumped about 8-10% because I trusted those 3 publications over my own instincts. Had I hung on they would have jumped at least another 10% by now. Likely even more.
    Be very leery of those FV ratings on stocks offered up by different sources. My own experience says they don’t know what they’re talking about. I believe in this case they were stuck in some kind of ”time warp”. Because small caps has suffered for many years compared to the S&P they must have allowed that to influence their own perception of value.
  • If DJT gets to $1.38 ...
    At $1.00 above its lowest close ever ($22.84 on 16 April), Morningstar rates DJT as a three-star stock. You're getting pretty okay value for your money, the computer thinks. Of course, "fair value" in March was $95/share. In April, $72 then 70, 43, 36 and (now) 49.
  • thinking about correlations within my non-retirement portfolio
    So, in general, I'm hopeful that each fund adds something to the strength of the whole portfolio. I tend to approach portfolio changes, additions especially, in three steps:
    1. is there something that I believe I should have exposure to (for a bad example, crypto) but don't? If yes ...
    2. is there a particularly good vehicle for gaining that access? Experienced manager, high insider investment, track record across multiple market cycles, clearly articulated positions on risk management and strategy capacity ... If yes ...
    3. is the fund highly correlated with something I already own? I might, for a bad example, think that crypto is interesting but learn that corporate high-yield debt is so correlated with crypto - presumably because they are driven by similar forces - that adding crypto has no benefit.
    Ran a correlation matrix just now. My top holding is FPA Crescent, at about 21% of the portfolio. For those not familiar, Crescent as a go-anywhere hybrid fund that started long ago as a hedge fund, has an absolute value discipline, about 60% equity just now, most of the rest in cash.
    Quick quiz: which of these funds is highly correlated (an R-squared of 85 or above) with Crescent?
    Grandeur Peak Global Microcap, 121 very small growth companies, about 13% EM exposure
    Leuthold Core, a quant-driven tactical allocation fund
    Seafarer Overseas Growth & Income, a GARPy emerging markets equity fund
    T Rowe Price Spectrum Income, a fund of actively managed T Rowe Price funds
    At the other end of the spectrum, which fund is most independent? T Rowe Price Multi-strategy Total Return, a sort of retail hedge fund, or Palm Valley Capital, a small cap value fund for people still shaking their fists at the 21st century?
    David