Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Index funds and taxable accounts
    Index funds are usually more tax efficient. Tax managed funds are another option.
    I feel this is one area most of us have less experience with. As I noted in another thread:
    Many of us are not well versed in managing tax efficient accounts since most of our excess cash usually goes into tax deferred accounts during the accumulation stage of our lives. Now, after age 70.5, we can't contribute and must begin distributions from these types of investments (tax deferred accounts).
    Managing investment in taxable accounts require an understanding of how these investments are impacted by taxes.
    Fidelity's take on managing taxes and investements:
    https://fidelity.com/viewpoints/investing-ideas/tax-strategy
    US News:
    money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/mutual-funds/articles/2015/02/09/your-guide-to-tax-efficient-investing
    Kitces:
    https://kitces.com/blog/tax-managed-mutual-funds-avoid-tax-drag-but-cause-higher-tax-rates/
  • Index funds and taxable accounts
    I almost posted this in the thread that noted that even active funds that are outperforming are losing assets to index funds but I decided it might generate more discussion as a separate thread .scussion as a separate thread
    Speaking for myself I am truly sorry that since 2013 I did not have most of the assets in my taxable accounts in index funds(until that year distributions were not that large). Outperformance by up to 3% does not compensate for 10% or more capital gain distributions which throw me into a higher bracket and make me exposed to other penalties Even worse any underperformance can result in large withdrawals by others resulting in even larger distributions. Selling the funds is no solution as that results in a bigger tax bill.Obviously if I had to do it all over again I would do it differently . Any ideas would be appreciated as my current strategy of avoiding taxes is to die and that strategy has flaws
  • Investors Pay If Wall Street Wins A Fiduciary-Rule Delay
    FYI: Wall Street continues a doomed fight for brokers’ right to give bad advice to retirement savers, all in the hopes of propping up earnings. After three stinging courtroom defeats, the industry procured a presidential memorandum directing the Labor Department to review its ban on giving disloyal advice to investors.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-03-28/investors-pay-if-wall-street-wins-a-fiduciary-rule-delay
  • Warning: Hot Pizza
    Pick the right restaurant stock and you can be happy. Panera IPO'd in 1999 and has been a great investment. DPZ's performance is stunning; but there are a lot of crashes and burns in the sector. Don't eat dairy, so no opinion on pizza.
  • IBD: Which Mutual Funds Beat The S&P 500 Over The Last 1, 3, 5 & 10 Years?
    >> Why not just look at 10 years? I give you WWWFX
    Just plot it at 3-4-5y, and there's the answer to why not. But if you believe in the decisionmaker, sure. Same as CGMFX and Heebner. 'Twas ever thus. Gotta believe the manager's skills abide.
  • IBD: Which Mutual Funds Beat The S&P 500 Over The Last 1, 3, 5 & 10 Years?
    Why not just look at 10 years? I give you WWWFX, just plot it @ Morningstar. Best yet, plot it at portfoliovisualizer from 2007 through 2016. Look at all the ratios too. WWWFX according to M* I think is worse than the worst. At some point in time because they couldn't call it "negative" they simply dropped coverage. But who remembers?
    WWWFX is substantially in cash right now. I've been waiting to buy this fund for a long time. Next correction it's going to be perfect for a trade.
    Btw, I like it how IBD slipped in the word "best". Not the "outperforming", but rather, the "best".
  • Henderson High Yield Opportunities Fund reorganization into T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield Fund
    *******Update************
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141306/000089180417000237/hend70884-497.htm
    497 1 hend70884-497.htm HENDERSON HIGH YIELD OPPORTUNITIES FUND
    HENDERSON GLOBAL FUNDS
    Henderson High Yield Opportunities Fund
    Supplement dated March 27, 2017 to the
    Prospectus, Summary Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information,
    each dated March 27, 2017
    IMPORTANT NOTICE
    This supplement provides new and additional information beyond that contained in the Prospectus and should be retained and read in conjunction with the Prospectus.
    As previously announced, on February 24, 2017, the Board of Trustees of Henderson Global Funds (the “Board”) approved the reorganization of Henderson High Yield Opportunities Fund (the “Acquired Fund”) into the T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield Fund (the "Acquiring Shell Fund"), a newly-organized fund in the T. Rowe Price family of funds (the “Reorganization”), subject to approval by the shareholders of the Acquired Fund. The proposed Reorganization will involve transferring the assets and liabilities of the Acquired Fund to the Acquiring Shell Fund in a tax-free reorganization, as set forth in an agreement and plan of reorganization (the “Plan”). If approved, the Reorganization is expected to occur on or around May 22, 2017, at which point Acquired Fund shareholders will receive shares of the Acquiring Shell Fund representing the same total value as their shares of the Acquired Fund.
    In anticipation of the Reorganization, effective upon the close of business (4:00 pm Eastern) on May 18, 2017, the Acquired Fund will not accept purchase orders, including with respect to additional investments for existing shareholders of the Acquired Fund. Any purchase orders for shares of the Acquired Fund received upon or after the close of business on May 18, 2017 will not be accepted and the transaction will not be processed. In addition, effective immediately, the Acquired Fund will not accept purchase orders for Class C shares subject to a contingent deferred sales charge.
    Before the Reorganization can occur, the Plan must be approved by shareholders of the Acquired Fund. Detailed information on the proposal will be contained in proxy materials that are expected to be filed in the near future.
    The foregoing is not an offer to sell, nor a solicitation of an offer to buy, any shares in connection with the Reorganization, nor is it a solicitation of a proxy from any shareholder of the Acquired Fund. The solicitation of proxies to effect the Reorganization will only be made by a final, effective Registration Statement on Form N-14, which includes a definitive Proxy Statement/Prospectus, after the Registration Statement is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Registration Statement on Form N-14 has yet to be filed with the SEC. After the Registration Statement on Form N-14 is filed with the SEC, it may be amended or withdrawn and the Proxy Statement/Prospectus will not be distributed to shareholders of the Acquired Fund unless and until the Registration Statement on Form N-14 is declared effective by the SEC.
    Shareholders of the Acquired Fund are urged to read the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and other documents filed with the SEC carefully and in their entirety when they become available because these documents will contain important information about the Reorganization. The Proxy Statement/Prospectus will contain information with respect to the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Acquiring Shell Fund and other important information that Acquired Fund shareholders should carefully consider.
    INVESTORS SHOULD RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT WITH THE PROSPECTUS,
    SUMMARY PROSPECTUS AND STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
  • IBD: Which Mutual Funds Beat The S&P 500 Over The Last 1, 3, 5 & 10 Years?
    FYI: A mutual fund exists for virtually any and all your investment needs in your retirement or other accounts. The challenge is in choosing the right one for your portfolio from the more than 8,000 mutual funds available.
    The second annual IBD Best Mutual Fund Awards makes the task a lot easier. Every one of them has beaten its benchmark for the past one, three, five and 10 years — a feat that fewer than 4% of U.S. diversified stock and U.S. bond funds can claim.
    Look at the list and see if you already own any of these top performers. If you don't, compare them to the ones you do own and see if they might make a better fit in your portfolio. If you're looking for a fund to start or add to your portfolio, this best-of-the best list is a great place to start.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.investors.com/best-mutual-fund-awards/ibd-best-mutual-fund-awards-growth-value-large-cap-small-cap-muni-bond/
  • Bill Gross Settles Lawsuit Against Pimco For $81 Million And A Nameplate:
    FYI: Bill Gross, who was fired from Pimco four decades after he co-founded the investment firm, has settled his lawsuit against the company for just over $81 million, sources told CNBC on Monday. He also gets a "Founders Room" named after him at the company's Newport Beach headquarters, along with the launch of a "Bill Gross Award," according to a Pimco press release.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/27/bill-gross-settles-lawsuit-against-pimco-for-81-million-sources.html
  • American Funds aims for fee transparency with ‘clean shares’
    Abridged excerpts from article:
    American Funds "hopes to reduce the confusion created by having many versions of the same fund by launching yet another version, called clean shares."
    "With its new clean shares... American will no longer act as paymaster. It will collect only its own fees. Brokers and advisers... can add whatever fees or commissions they want... [however] it should be easier for investors to see how much they are paying American and how much they are paying for advice."

    Link to Article
  • How Should Active Management Fit Into One’s Portfolio?
    First things first ...
    @JoJo26,
    Yes indeed I find a good number of spelling errors in my writting this is due in part to, at times, a sticking key board and coming form the deep south plus a little European background. Perhaps, I'll upgrade my tablet and get one with spellcheck. But, spelling has not kept me of actively engaging the markets and trolling good money from them through the years. I think I'll take the money over good spelling in my casual writting. Seems, also, my brain moves faster than my fingers.
    @bee,
    I don't own SFAAX but due to my study of interesting mutual funds it is one that I have kept on my list along with a sister fund EKSAX which is another five star asset allocation fund that uses some interesting an adaptive allocation strategies to position. I found the SFAAX fund for my engineer budy to compare and measure his success to that of this "professional money" fund as a benchmark.
    For CTFAX (COTZX), I own this fund in my income sleeve becuse as it is currently about 90% fixed and 10% equity. This fund throttles its allocation based upon the price movement of the S&P 500 Index. Last year it held a high of about 25% equity, or there abouts, to a low of 15% possibly 10%. A good fixed income fund from my thinking that can load equities during a stock market pullback. I'm thinking it should do well in a rising interest rate environment.
    And, yes I can buy in some fund families at nav. However, know that I am not an investment advisor nor broker and what I write about is things I do within my own personal portfolio. And, all those sites you have linked above I have used, or currently use, in the discovery of what others are thinking towards positioning.
    @BrianW,
    When you get right down to it selling one security and buying another by some is market timing and also throttling one's asset alloction is market timing. To me, market timing is going completely all in and then back out of the markets. Adjusting one's alloction is a form of rebalancing from my perspective but to some others being active is market timing.
    @MJG,
    No doubt MJG has his perspectives and sides more towards being a passive investor much like my high school budy who by profession is also an engineer like MJG. Because, my budy, "thought" he could enage the markets with some short term packaged timing strategies (day trade) he lost a bundle. With this he went to two funds a stock index fund and a bond index fund and throttles the asset allocation between 40% to 60% equity based upon some technicals of the 500 Index. I call this throttling, some call it rebalancing, some call it makret timing ... in the end he now earns good returns where before those that made the most money were the software and platform folks which he traded through. The two of us together had hands in the development of Old_Skeets market barometer and equity weighting matrix which we both use. I added a fundamental feed (earnings) while he moves from the other two feeds which are the technical strength feed and the breath feed. He uses only two while I use all three.
    There you have it folks ... Market timing is most anything you want it to be because form time-to-time securities get added and/or removed even the indexes through repositioning; and, even doing this by some folks makes it an active fund perhaps streaches it on out to market timing by addition and deletion of securities.
    Time to move on. I've got things to do ...
    And ... @JoJo26, I sincerely wish you the very best with your investing endeavors as you progress and become a more seasoned investor.
    Old_Skeet
  • How Should Active Management Fit Into One’s Portfolio?
    Hi Guys,
    The active vs. passive debate will never end. Mostly because a case for either side of that argument can be made depending on the timeframe being measured. As a generic rule I subscribe to the belief that active investing is indeed a Loser's game, but there are many exceptions.
    Like in so many real world situations and various circumstances, the 80/20 distribution rule applies. In general, 20% of the input or people or effort generates 80% of the output. That observation seems to work most of the time.
    In the investment universe, most active tactical asset allocation funds underperform simple buy-and-hold funds, yet they are specifically designed to do so. But some do although persistence is a standing issue. Most mutual funds underperform also but some manage their performance goal over long periods. Of course, the challenge is to choose wisely before the fact. That's not an easy job.
    Personally, I own a mixed portfolio of both active and passive mutual funds. To cut costs, I have decided to move more heavily into passive components, but I plan to maintain some actively managed units. That's just me; you folks do whatever allows you to sleep comfortably.
    Here is a Link that might contribute to you making a decision on this controversial subject:
    https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2016/08/09/how-tactical-allocation-mutual-funds-fared-over-the-last-five-years
    The Vanguard balanced fund comes out looking pretty attractive in this comparison, but this is just one of hundreds of professional and academic papers and studies that explore this issue. Most of these studies demonstrate the futility of active investing, but it is never 100% conclusive. If it were so, the debate would end. And still the debate continues.
    Best Wishes
  • Warning: Hot Pizza
    FYI: It’s 2010. You’re an eager investor presented a choice between two stocks: Google or Domino’s Pizza. Where do you put your money?
    You should have gone with your gut.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://qz.com/938620/dominos-dpz-stock-has-outperformed-google-goog-facebook-fb-apple-aapl-and-amazon-amzn-this-decade/
  • Say Hello To $3 Trillion In Forgotten Debt
    FYI: Companies have been on a borrowing binge, but you wouldn't always know the full scale of their liabilities by looking at the balance sheet. This makes it hard for investors to compare businesses that fund their activities in different ways. Happily though, that's about to change.
    How come? The answer is buried in the notes to financial statements (you know, the ones you don't bother reading). It's here that companies have parked about $3 trillion in operating lease obligations, according to Bloomberg data. For non-financial companies, those obligations equate to more than one quarter of their long-term (on-balance sheet) debt.
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2017-03-20/say-hello-to-3-trillion-in-forgotten-debt
  • International Investing Options
    @MFO Members: Here is a 2014 Vanguard Study on the subject;
    Regards,
    Ted
    Global Equitirs: Balancing Home Bias And Diversification:
    https://personal.vanguard.com/pdf/ISGGEB.pdf
  • How Should Active Management Fit Into One’s Portfolio?
    @JoJO26,
    Don't have to. Those that have followed my post on the board through the years know of my calls. What is at hand though is for you to now prove long term market timming strategies don't work. Are you up to it?
    Years back when I started posting I made some statements and Derf is one that called me out. After I postured my position as I have asked you to do I earned the respect of others.
    Going forward please don't make statements that you can't posture.
    Old_Skeet +100
  • How Should Active Management Fit Into One’s Portfolio?
    No numbers of your performance proving anything...
    Old_Skeet -1
  • I believe it was possible to sell correctly stocks in the year 2000
    I even believe it was possible to sell international stocks in 1990 and could be convinced that it was right to sell stocks in the summer of 1987 What is not clear to me is how I should have known to sell in the fall of 2007. Did I have to be on top of real estate issues (I surely wasn't ) Were evaluations crazy (not as I recall)
    Again I don't know how to have gotten out in 2011 and then get back in time.
    So this is basically how can one market time BIG moves