Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Is China a bargain?
    Here is one pundits caution laced opinion:
    "When Shanghai was peaking at 5,000 in June, I gave you five words of advice: Get. The. Hell. Out. Now.
    To which I’ll add five more: And. Stay. The. Hell. Out."
    From:
    marketwatch.com/story/chinas-stock-market-crash-is-just-beginning-2015-07-08?dist=lcountdown
  • Chart Of The Day: Shanghai Composite Index: (Update)
    When Bubbles Burst: China Edition
    Posted on July 8, 2015 by David Ott
    Acropolis Investment Management
    image
    You may be looking at the largely flat emerging markets returns in that chart, feeling nervous about Greece and China and wondering whether you should have emerging markets exposure at all. I completely understand the question and have two answers that I’ll bet you can anticipate.
    First, having two assets that you expect to earn positive rates of return over long periods that don’t move in lockstep with each other is a huge benefit to a portfolio – it’s the basis for diversification. If all assets were correlated with each other, you couldn’t lower portfolio risk by having the two assets.
    Second, the valuations overseas are much more attractive than they are in the US (and if you put a positive spin on the recent declines, you can say that they are getting more attractive every day).
    One of the better (though highly imperfect) measures of valuation is the Shiller PE ratio, which looks at current prices compared to 10 years of earnings to remove some of the volatility in the ‘e’ part of the ratio.
    The PE-ratio of the S&P 500 is currently around 26, which historically is very expensive. I wrote in February of 2014 that the market was overvalued on this basis and it’s more true today than it was then (which is why you don’t make big moves based on the Shiller PE ratio).
    image
    Whether you look at the Shiller PE or several other valuation metrics, you can see that emerging markets are the cheapest across the board. That doesn’t tell us anything about returns in the short run, but if the future is like the past, it should tell a lot about long-term future returns.
    This entry was posted in Daily Insights
    http://acrinv.com/when-bubbles-burst-china-edition/
    Round and round we go !
    Managing Rate Hike Expectations Down… Again
    If the US economy is still poised to grow, why are Treasury yields tumbling? Greece is probably the explanation. China’s sagging stock market isn’t helping either. The weakness in equities is unnerving investors in Asia and around the world at a time when global growth appears to be faltering. Markit Economics noted earlier this week in its global PMI report that growth in June weakened to its slowest pace in five months as output in emerging markets contracted.
    Is the Fed likely to start raising rates in the current climate? Probably not, although we’ll know more after Sunday, when the new-world-post-ultimatum order for Europe emerges. Meantime, it’s risk-off for a world that’s forced to endure another phase of blowback that can be traced to the Great Recession… six years later, and counting. When the dust clears, it’s not unreasonable to imagine that we’ll be back where we started: modest growth and more than a few caveats. That, of course, will lay the groundwork for a renewal in forecasting that a rate hike is just around the corner.
    image
    http://www.capitalspectator.com/managing-rate-hike-expectations-down-again/
  • Internet explorer or firefox
    catch22, it is easy enough in 8.1 (as in 7) to implement an XP- or Vista-like opening UI, taking little effort and including Start button etc. And W10 is said to be easier yet,
  • Is China a bargain?
    For China-centric exposure I might select MCDFX. MCDFX has exhibited less volatility over the long term making it easier to hold onto during sell offs like this. MCDFX is still up (+10%) YTD.
  • odds of bear market highest since 2007_ (anyone buying this?)
    Hi Guys,
    Please take a timeout from your real investing work to participate in this two question series that was designed to test your probability and statistics instincts.
    Assume you are gambling (speculative investing): In the first question you are tossing a fair two-sided coin, and in the second question you are rolling a single fair six-sided die. In each game you are investing one dollar per toss. Multiple tosses are encouraged.
    In the fair coin toss game, a 50/50 outcome likelihood, select the payoff option you want:
    (a) Win 1 dollar if heads comes up.
    (b) Win 2 dollars if heads comes up.
    (c) Win 2 dollars if tails comes up.
    (d) Win 3 dollars if heads comes up.
    In the single fair die toss game, not a 50/50 likelihood but a constant payoff, select your favored option:
    (a) Win 2 dollars if a 1 appears.
    (b) Win 2 dollars a 1 or 2 appears.
    (c) Win 2 dollars if a 1, 2,or 3 appears.
    (d) Win 2 dollars if a 1, 2, 3, or 4 appears.
    The obvious answer to both these simple questions is the (d) option. That choice, regardless if it is made mathematically or instinctively, depends on a probability based Expected Returns rule. Individual Expected Return is the product of the probability of an event happening times its payoff, either positive or negative. Total Expected Return is the sum of all possible outcomes.
    If you are sailing your portfolio ship through heavy seas, you had better have some probability understanding or probability instincts. Otherwise, you are piloting the Titanic into an iceberg field of danger. Disaster is a predictable ending. In that instance, it is a wise policy to hire a professional money manager to help pilot your portfolio ship into a safe port.
    Sorry for the sea analogy, guys. Sorry for the probability lesson, but perhaps a few MFO members might benefit from it. Temptation overcame me which is an unacceptable behavior when managing a portfolio.
    Best Wishes.
  • Internet explorer or firefox
    Hi @msf
    Thank you for this info. We will need to purchase another laptop soon for our daughter's use in school, as the current unit is suffering a problem with the ribbon cable connections to the display screen. A teardown fix exists, and I would be in the mood for such a repair 10 years ago, but not today.
    I have been scratching my head on this; as the laptop to be replaced is using Vista, which we won't miss, but my laptop still runs Windows 7 and I'm pleased with this and would prefer to purchase a new laptop with Win7 and not Win8.
    Still looking around, and have not placed much time into this search at this point.
    Lastly, a brother in law bought a replacement laptop a few years ago with Win8 and he was not very pleased with changes that had been made.
  • Internet explorer or firefox
    @catch22 - You're right about the dates. But there is a Technical Preview edition available. (Read the warnings - not easy to back out of.)
    What I've read says that Windows 10 is a good, major cleanup of everything Windows 8 did wrong. (Sort of like Windows 7 being a cleanup of Vista.) I've got a set top Windows 8 box (the antithesis of what Windows 8 was designed for - tablets), and am happy to put anything else on that box.
    But for my Windows 7 machines, I'm skeptical whether an upgrade is worth it. Here's a column discussing that (Windows 10 vs Windows 7) that suggests it may be worthwhile for performance improvement and a smoother (but similar) UI.
    I've read various theories on why this is called Windows 10, but I'm inclined to go with the marketing theory - Microsoft wanted to distance itself as far as it could from Windows 8.1, just as it distanced itself from Vista.
    http://www.businessinsider.com/this-is-what-happened-to-windows-9-2014-10
  • Where Are The Female Fund Managers?
    I was about to mention Leah Zell. She was an original co-manager of Acorn Int'l (ACINX) along with her husband. She outlasted him as a manager of the fund, taking on Margaret Forster as a co-manager for much of her remaining tenure with the fund.
    Here's a nice writeup of her, with a relevant lead paragraph.
    Chicago Tribune, Dec 10, 2000, Family History Helps Drive Leah Zell's Zeal For Success
    "The keepers of conventional wisdom contend that women are risk averse, to their detriment as investors. The conventional wisdom apparently isn't acquainted with Leah Joy Zell."
  • Internet explorer or firefox
    @Crash
    Didn't look through the FAQ page; but you noted you're trying to move to Windows 10 now.
    Windows 10 is not yet released, correct? Not until after or on July 29, 2015.
    Perhaps I don't understand what you are attempting to do with your pc.
  • Playing The Stock Index Reshuffle Game Can Cost Investors
    It would be interesting to know if there are any mutual funds that employ this type of buying strategy? And, if so, what they might be? I have three funds with high turnover ratios SPECX @ 147% , CCMAX @ 119% and AZNAX @ 114% that possibly might be. Now finding out for sure is something else.
  • Playing The Stock Index Reshuffle Game Can Cost Investors
    FYI: (This is a follow-up article)
    As asset management firms seek an edge in the dirt-cheap world of indexed investing, some passively managed strategies are becoming more active
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20150707/FREE/150709939?template=printart
    Investors Place Slant:
    http://investorplace.com/2015/07/advance-auto-parts-500-aap-stock/print
  • Internet explorer or firefox
    Windows 10 can be had for FREE as long as you're currently using a "legit" paid version of Windows. FREE download offer is valid only until 29th July, 2016...... I have my doubts about the upgrade. I hear awful things about Windows 8. Like, for example: OK, we're sorry for that glitch. Here's a tool you can use to fix that. That'll be $65.00, please. Screw THAT.... Not to mention that every time they come out with an "improvement," it takes more and more mouse clicks just to get to where you want to go. For those among us who know about this stuff, what do you think? I'm currently running Windows 7. And it refuses to update for me, with the same error code number coming up every time. Then I click on the link to find out more. And Windows tells me: "Sorry. We just don't know shit about that." AFTER 29th July, 2016, Windows 10 will SELL for over $100.00.
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-faq?ocid=win10_auxapp_LearnMore_win10faq
  • Upside Reversal Day — Will The Momentum Continue?
    Depends which markets you're looking at: GSCI -36.43% 1 Year
    From Bloomberg: The S&P GSCI® is widely recognized as a leading measure of general price movements and inflation in the world economy. It provides investors with a reliable and publicly available benchmark for investment performance in the commodity markets.
  • odds of bear market highest since 2007_ (anyone buying this?)
    Dex said, "That is why I advise people to buy lottery tickets for their retirement - they have a 50/50 chance - either they win or they lose."
    First, I'd never try to characterize anything Bob C says - because no one else can say it so well.
    But Dex, You can't be serious! 50/50 chance of winning the lottery?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/10/your-money/win-a-lottery-jackpot-not-much-chance-of-that.html?_r=0
    "The odds of winning (the lottery) remain infinitesimal: Powerball players, for instance, have a 1 in 175 million chance of winning. You have roughly the same chance of getting hit by lightning on your birthday."
  • odds of bear market highest since 2007_ (anyone buying this?)
    Hi Dex,
    Your interpretation of BobC’s 50/50 market odds is very naïve. Formally, your reading might be called a Probit (PROBibility unIT) statistical measure. That form of measurement reduces the stats to an overly simplistic either/or positive/negative final judgment. Based on your post, you are satisfied with an equally weighted outcomes probability. The historical data does not support that weighting.
    Either/or results need not be equally weighted. When a baseball hitter makes an official plate appearance, he can register either a hit or make an out. Extending your assessment, he has a 50/50 likelihood of either outcome, batting averages notwithstanding. You will surely go bankrupt if you accept the hit side of that wager.
    Allow me to recite another extreme example of the problems assigning an equal probability to a bifurcation event for the mistaken reason that there are merely two possible happenings. Weather serves as a terrific illustration.
    In my part of the Southern California landscape, any weather forecaster would lose his license to practice if he assigned a 50/50 odds for rain or clear on any given day. The proper odds likely hover at the 2/98 level against rain. Bifurcation does not typically translate into equally probable events.
    From a Franklin Templeton market summary, over the past 88 years, the S&P 500 recorded 64 Up and 24 Down years. That is a 73% likelihood of a positive annual return. For the 64 positive return years, the annual average return was slightly North of 22%. For the 24 negative return years, the annual average loss was just South of -13% . So, not only do the odds favor a positive annual year, the returns for the positive years swamp the less likely negative years. That’s a double positive.
    These favorable equity return stats are the basis for investing in stocks. The historical data shows that fixed income investments (like Bonds) have a higher likelihood of a positive annual return than stocks, but the payoffs are more muted. That’s why most portfolios that seek growth emphasize its stock components.
    I’m sure you are familiar with these commonplace statistics. Given that familiarity, I’m puzzled by your submittal. You are just plain wrongheaded if you really believe that, without further mitigating circumstances, the odds are 50/50 that equities will deliver a positive or a negative reward/penalty in any given year.
    Of course you’re free to assign whatever probabilities you like to the markets, but that’s being more than naïve; that’s completely ignoring the available database at your investment peril.
    Good luck, and you will certainly need all of it if that’s your understanding and use of market statistics. I hope you were just joking or that I misread your post.
    Best Wishes.
  • Upside Reversal Day — Will The Momentum Continue?
    FYI: S&P 500 futures were higher prior to the open this morning, but things quickly turned south once the market opened for trading. At its lows this morning, the S&P 500 was down 1.2%. But afternoon trading brought an upside reversal, and by the end of the day, the index closed higher by 0.61%.
    So what might today’s upside reversal mean for trading in the coming days? Does the positive momentum seen into the close today continue into the days ahead?
    Regards,
    Ted
    https://www.bespokepremium.com/think-big-blog/upsidereversal/