Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • BONDS The week that was.... December 31, 2024..... Bond NAV's...Most positive. FINAL REPORT 2024
    Last month there is a WSJ article describing money flow to bonds (behind a paywall). Rick Rieder, who oversees more than $2 trillion as BlackRock’s fixed income was mentioned. Through July 2024, the broad-based total bond index funds and active managed ETFs took in over $150 billions from institutional and retail investors.
    Thanks @junkster for sharing his experience on bonds. We will pay close attention to the credit quality within each bond funds and make adjustment toward high quality bonds accordingly.
  • CrossingBridge 2Q24 Investor Letter
    @newgirl
    Some info I received from John Connor of CrossingBridge after asking about the availability of a recording:
    ---
    Hi Dave - there is not. We are hosting another webinar for non-US clients/prospects on Tuesday at 10am. Please feel free to join that one. Should be a replay of that one available if you can't make it.
    https://info.crossingbridgefunds.com/quarterly-webinar-8-6-24
    John P. Conner, Jr.
    CrossingBridge Advisors, LLC
    ---
    They'd probably accept registration for the 8/6 presentation even though it's targeted at non-US clients... :-)
  • MRFOX
    Thanks. I guess nothing to check about MRFOX until Oct 15.
  • Go Anywhere Funds…
    I'm not invested in Permanent Portfolio but would you consider that a GA fund?
    That's a broad ranging fund, but lacks a GA feature: discretion.
    In pursuit of its investment objective, the Portfolio’s strategy is to invest a fixed “Target Percentage” of its net assets in each of the following investment categories: Gold 20%, Silver 5%, Swiss franc assets 10%, Real estate and natural resource stocks 15%, Aggressive growth stocks 15%, Dollar assets 35%
    https://www.permanentportfoliofunds.com/pdf/Prospectus.pdf
    Conceptually, I like the idea of a fund that can move at will to the "best" market. But then one thinks about it. It's hard enough to adjust a portfolio in the time dimension (when to be in the market, when out). Relatively few managers try even that baby step. Partly due to investors' expectations, partly due to difficulty in executing well.
    Adjusting a portfolio within time and space (the types of investment used) seems even harder. (Been watching too much Dr. Who.) The manager has to make accurate macro calls along with correct timing.
    [using go-anywhere funds] makes even planning for a target asset allocation problematic
    I'm happy giving managers broad discretion (within their areas of expertise) but not unfettered freedom. If my wide ranging managers make decisions that perturb my overall allocations, I defer (within broad limits) to their judgments on where one is best invested. Why should I insist on constraining my portfolio to some static allocation, give or take 5%? Why is that the "right" allocation for me, whatever those percentages are? I just shoot for the side of a barn.
    Here's a thread from seven years ago on the same topic. Ted did include PRPFX among funds he considered to be go-anywhere. I especially liked Bitzer's observation that may sum up the whole ball of wax:
    My "go anywhere" funds have historically gone to the wrong places.
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/31272/go-anywhere-fund
  • Fears of further market turmoil deepen after US economic data spooked investors
    Analysts await key services sector metric to gauge US vulnerability to recession as stocks in Middle East fall amid regional tension
    Following are edited excerpts from a current report in The Guardian:
    Global investors are bracing for further turmoil, after fears that the powerhouse US economy could be drifting towards recession sent stock markets tumbling at the end of last week. Investors in Europe, Asia and New York were spooked by US data that include worse-than-expected job numbers on Thursday, prompting concern that the world’s largest economy is in worse shape than previously thought.
    The data, coupled with disappointing results from tech firms Amazon, Alphabet and Intel, led to share sell-offs at the end of last week, while Middle Eastern stocks also fell on Sunday amid persistent tension in the region. Analysts fear that any further signs of fragility in large economies could herald fresh volatility. A slowdown in Germany last month prompted analysts to warn of a recession, while a rise in interest rates by Japan’s central bank sent shares on the Nikkei index down 2,216 points, or nearly 6%, on Friday.
    In the last month, the prospect of a recession in some of the world’s biggest economies has sent the cost of a barrel of Brent crude falling from almost $88 to below $78.
    Closely watched economic data due this week in the US includes figures for the services sector on Monday and the unemployment claimant count on Thursday. Elsewhere, the UK is among several big economies, including China and Japan, to release service sector data on Monday.
    Markets got the jitters last week after US jobs data for July showed a worse-than-expected slowdown, with 114,000 jobs created rather than the predicted 175,000. The unemployment rate increased to a three-year high of 4.3%, while US manufacturing activity also slumped, falling to an eight-month low in July as new orders tailed off.
    The figures stoked anxiety that the world’s largest economy is vulnerable to a recession and may need to cut rates faster than expected to spur demand, rather than unwinding them in a more orderly fashion. So far this year, investors have grown accustomed to cooling inflation and gradually slowing employment, which appeared to be setting the scene for the Fed to begin trimming interest rates gradually.
    That optimism had driven big gains in stocks: the S&P 500 is up by 12% this year, despite recent losses, while the tech-focused Nasdaq has gained nearly 12%.
    But on Friday, the Nasdaq lost 2.4% to finish in correction territory – 10% off its record high, while Japanese equities recorded their worst day since the Covid-19 pandemic, with the Nikkei 225 index down 5.8%. In London, the FTSE100 blue-chip share index lost more than 120 points at one stage, down by 1.5%. Europe’s main stock indices also declined on Friday, with European technology stocks falling to their lowest level in more than six months. France’s CAC 40 hit its lowest level since last November, down more than 1%, while Germany’s DAX lost 2%.
    In the US, Uber, Airbnb, Hilton International and Coca-Cola are among the big firms posting financial results this week. European bellwether stocks such as the Italian insurer Generali and Deutsche Telekom, will also report this week.
    While shares slid, gold hit a new record on Friday as investors flocked to safe-haven assets. The US dollar weakened, lifting the pound by 0.5% to $1.28, and the euro by 1.2% to $1.092.
  • BONDS The week that was.... December 31, 2024..... Bond NAV's...Most positive. FINAL REPORT 2024
    @MikeW
    Mike, my schedule is busy early today; but I'll reply in full later.
    @Junkster, good to 'see' you here. You know of many more bond cycles that I/we, but special periods pop up here and there, for various reasons.
    I am particularly reminded of the 'near' perfect storm, in junk bonds, after the GFC.
    At the time, we had access to 6 HY/HI junk bond funds in retirement accts; and placed money into all of them.
    I recall the period of time when this sector was badly damaged. Very low NAV's and of course, the related high yields. For a period of time, many fund yields were about 20%. SO, bought the cheap NAV's and obtained the yields. As the 'gov't' began to fix things, the sector began to recover, but with very nice yields. We made money on the yields and then more again from the NAV increases. I'm sure many 'bond' folks made decent money in this period.
    For the heck of it CHART: SPY vs SPHIX from June, 2008 to June, 2011.
  • January MFO Ratings Posted
    Reading headlines and listening to news this past week, given the weaker jobs report, it felt like the wheels were coming off. State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR (XLK) was indeed down 3.3% for July. But it was the only sector in the red and is still up more than 14% for YTD. April was much worse. That said, August is off to rough start.
  • Rising Auto & Home Insurance Costs
    I]n the second half of 2021 ... The prices of cars and parts were jumping and drivers were back on the roads and crashing left and right after a hiatus behind the wheel. "You went from this period of incredible profitability to incredible losses in the blink of an eye," ... “Everyone was together in significantly pushing for rate increases.” ...
    The point that drivers went from little driving to a lot of it (while out of practice) is pertinent here. But it may not comprehend the real elephant in the room.
    It is increasingly dangerous out there. I feel some are taking out their societal / political rage by more aggressive driving. And the move by many to owning “living rooms on wheels” (a reference to one of David’s recent commentaries) aggravates the problem by obscuring the line of sight for smaller vehicles mixed in amongst these behemoths and increasing the cost of repairs after collisions as well as the potential for personal injury.
    Paradoxically - ISTM the fact newer cars have anti-collision technology built-in is encouraging many drivers to pull into heavy traffic without much concern for others. Are you being tail-gated? Many new cars have radar enabled ability to stay a set distance behind the car in front of you when in cruise mode. The driver sets the distance (ie from 50’ to 200’). ISTM many select the shortest available option. For what good purpose I ask?
    I could ramble on. Some of this falls back on lax or underfunded enforcement. Some relates to overcrowded insufficient infrastructure in need of update. Perhaps the courts are too lax as well?
  • Go Anywhere Funds…
    Here’s a 2017 MFO thread on the subject.
    I may just create have to create my own “go anywhere” fund myself through ETFs and funds. It maybe easier to run my own “hedge fund” like fund myself. Finding one currently that meets my needs is harder than I thought.
    Yup. Sounds good on the surface. The devil’s in the details. I think CEFs with a set number of shares outstanding probably can (in some cases) afford managers a broader mandate than OEFs or ETFs. There were lawsuits after the ‘07-‘09 fiasco. So whoever writes a prospectus for a ”go anywhere” fund marketed to the public needs to be very precise as to how it seeks to accomplish its mission and what risks are involved.
    Hedge funds ISTM have much looser restrictions than publicly traded funds,
  • Rising Auto & Home Insurance Costs
    Investors expect their companies to increase profits every quarter; customers expect them to continually lose money. Neither expectation is realistic.
    Zooming out only slightly:
    A 2023 pretax underwriting profit of $3.6 billion, reversing a $1.9 billion underwriting loss reported for 2022 at Berkshire’s personal auto insurance operation, GEICO,
    https://www.carriermanagement.com/news/2024/02/25/259036.htm
    You can find us the figures for 2021 and 2020.
    Geico's ability to charge higher premiums even as drivers submitted fewer claims.
    Insurers play the long game. If they knew in advance each year how much they would have to pay out, they would set premiums precisely and never have a losing year. But see below (my final few paragraphs quoting NYT).
    Like the rest of the auto-insurance industry, Geico was hit by sharply higher claims costs in 2022. It responded by raising premiums, which were up an average of 17% per policy in 2023. That increase, plus sharp cuts in expenses, including for advertising, helped restore profitability in 2023.
    https://www.barrons.com/articles/berkshire-hathaway-geico-progressive-stocks-c03bcdf4
    make Geico more efficient.
    That's one way of putting it. Another would be: make Geico less inefficient. Again from that Barron's article:
    The head of Berkshire’s insurance business, Ajit Jain, acknowledged the challenges at the conglomerate’s annual meeting last May [2023], saying “Geico’s technology needs a lot more work than I thought it did.” He noted that Geico had “more than 600 legacy systems that don’t really talk to each other.” Geico, he added, is trying to compress that to no more than 15 or 16 systems.
    The underinvestment in technology that led to that tangle looks like an unusual unforced error by Buffett. He didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Geico declined to comment.
    In the recent 2024 annual meeting (short video clip below), Jain acknowledged that Geico is still playing catchup. Let's hope it continues to improve and that Salim Ramji over at Vanguard can take away some lessons from this. And speaking of Vanguard, Buffett also mentioned Geico's low cost advantage that "masked" Geico's inefficiencies.

    As to why the whole industry is raising rates quickly and why there are these wild swings in profits (losses), the NYTimes recently wrote in Why Is Car Insurance So Expensive?:
    A key reason car insurance costs are rising so fast right now has to do with how the industry is regulated. ...
    If insurers are deemed to profit too heavily, regulators can make them return money to customers. ... At the height of pandemic lockdowns in 2020, when many cars sat idle, insurers returned almost $13 billion to customers through dividends, refund checks and premium reductions for policy renewals ...
    When the pandemic shut down most economic activity, it messed up insurers’ ability to use the past to predict the future. ...
    [I]n the second half of 2021 ... The prices of cars and parts were jumping and drivers were back on the roads and crashing left and right after a hiatus behind the wheel. "You went from this period of incredible profitability to incredible losses in the blink of an eye," ... “Everyone was together in significantly pushing for rate increases.” ...
    [California's insurance] regulator did not start approving insurers’ requests to raise rates until near the end of 2022. The backlog grew so large that the average wait time for approvals was longer — by several months — than the six-month policies that insurers wanted to sell.
    [Calif. was slowest but other states also very slow]
    In 2021, insurers’ personal auto businesses started recording losses. [2021: $4B, 2022: $33B, 2023: $17B] ... many companies still need to raise prices to make up for those bad years.
  • Rising Auto & Home Insurance Costs
    Do you guys remember Todd Combs? He is the CEO of Geico. He was originally hired by Buffett in 2010 to manage some of BRK portfolio investments, with the thought that he would take over BRK investments when Buffett retires. It turned out Todd had worked during his younger years at Progressive and some other insurance company as an analyst and had good knowledge of GEICO's line of business. So, Buffett made him CEO of Geico in 2020 to make Geico more efficient. I guess he is doing his job! It is interesting how Buffett seems to have a knack to identify human talent just as he is good at spotting good companies.
    It will be interesting to see how Geico investment portfolio has done since Todd took over.
  • QDSNX - A Fund for Retirees?
    Sorry to say that QDSNX has been quite a disappointment over the past month. The same goes for some other well regarded AQR funds, like QLENX and QMNNX. Apparently, someone bet in the wrong direction.
    I am now checking out two "Market Neutral" funds, QQMNX and VMNFX, which held up very well and provided some protection during the recent market downturn. New managers have been at the helm of both funds since 2021.
    Among conservative balanced funds, I was particularly impressed by the performance of Giroux's new fund, PRCFX. Also, VWINX seems to be finally making a comeback and acquitted itself well over the past month, it was up 3%!
    As a retired investor, I am currently dancing near the exit.
    Good luck.
  • Bloomberg Wall Street Week
    Mike McKee is always good. One of BB’s best analysts. Did anyone mention that sharply falling long term rates (as last week) lead to a more inverted curve?
    Mostly a wasted show largely occupied with several mostly political interviews (thinly veiled as economic) from the summit. One exception was Robert Zoellick - a former campaign manager for George HW Bush. (Bush 1) near the end of the interviews. Fascinating. Refreshing. Really knows his stuff when it comes to politics.
  • The Week in Charts | Charlie Bilello
    Some random thoughts -
    XLU was up 4.3% for the week which makes no sense if the economy is falling out of bed. At the end of October, 10 yr was at 4.9% and ended at 3.8% on 12/26. During that drastic drop in 10 yr rates, XLU did not rise or behave as well as it has done in the past 2 months when 10 yr rates dropped from a much, much lower level. XLU, as a staple necessity, not losing would make sense but gain so strongly if the economy is going to fall out of bed? I am not sure.
    I am guessing its recent behavior is just a reflection of moderating inflation expectations and consequential interest rates but not a signal about the economy. I am not sure inflation goes back to pre-Covid era without change in people's attitudes. Also, there is that onshoring related inflation but I will believe onshoring when I see it in size (outside the Chip sector). I am expecting deficits will come down as tax rates increase - sort of why Buffett is booking gains in Apple stock at the current lower rates. So, the inflation related to Govt spending likely comes down but that related to people's attitudes may not, unless there is pressure on wages. Only if we could make that hallucinating generative AI to work!
    What will happen to 10 yr rates and wages if services come strong next week and the next employment report comes stronger than the last one?
    Jackson Hole is not for another three weeks. Please post if you know when J Powel speaks before Jackson Hole.
  • Go Anywhere Funds…
    I’ve dug up one more from Barron’s EKBAX
    “This Go Anywhere Fund Beats 99% of its Peers” (I am a subscriber. Likely the link won’t help you much.)
    Barron’s
    Excerpt: “The lead manager of Allspring Diversified Capital Builder (ticker: EKBAX) invests in everything from high-quality blue chips like Alphabet (GOOGL) and small industrial stocks like Timken (TKR) to Treasury, high-yield, and convertible bonds.”
    See @msf’s link below.
    In the meantime … This linked story credits Blackrock with creating a “Go Anywhere” fund for star manager Rick Rieder to run. Take it with a grain of salt.
  • Berkshire Hathaway sells off large share of Apple and increases cash holdings
    How many of the MAG 7 grew earnings this quarter at 15% on a GAAP basis - not proforma or non-GAAP, non-stock comp basis?
  • Berkshire Hathaway sells off large share of Apple and increases cash holdings
    "My wild guess is that there will be a serious correction coming"
    Yes, sir- and that's exactly what I'm worried about. Having survived for 85 years I'm a true believer in the old adage "If anything can go wrong it will, and at exactly the worst time and place".
    If a serious correction should start in the next 100 days all bets are off on the election.
  • Berkshire Hathaway sells off large share of Apple and increases cash holdings
    Geico had a loss in 2022.
    It then cut costs and jobs, raised premiums, gave up some market share to become profitable in 2023.
    Results of turnaround are showing in 2024.
    It margins as % of premium have improved to 17%. Changes in profit levels alone don't provide the whole story or context.
  • Berkshire Hathaway sells off large share of Apple and increases cash holdings
    Warren Buffett’s firm increased its cash reserves to $227bn, sparking concerns about company’s view of US economy
    Following are excerpts from a current report in The Guardian:
    Warren Buffett appears to have soured on stocks, letting cash soar at his Berkshire Hathaway firm to nearly $277bn and selling a large chunk of its stake in Apple, even as the conglomerate posted a record quarterly operating profit.
    Berkshire sold about 390m Apple shares in the second quarter, on top of 115m shares from January to March, as Apple’s stock price rose 23%. It still owned about 400m shares worth $84.2bn as of 30 June.
    The cash stake grew to $276.9bn from $189bn three months earlier largely because Berkshire sold a net $75.5bn of stocks. It was the seventh straight quarter Berkshire sold more stocks than it bought.
    Second-quarter profits from Berkshire’s dozens of businesses rose 15% to $11.6bn, or about $8,073 per class A share, from $10.04bn a year earlier.
    Nearly half of that profit came from underwriting and investments in Berkshire’s insurance businesses.
    Personal observation:
    Would these be the same insurance companies that claim they are losing money?
    Berkshire often lets cash build up when it can’t find whole businesses or individual stocks to buy at fair prices. Its cash may also signal concerns about the broader US economy – many investors view Berkshire as a proxy for it.
    Government data on Friday that showed slowing job growth and the highest unemployment rate since October 2021 prompted some analysts to project multiple Federal Reserve rate cuts starting in September.
    But Berkshire’s returns from short-term treasuries should decline once rate cuts begin.
    “We’d love to spend it, but we won’t spend it unless we think we’re doing something that has very little risk and can make us a lot of money,” Buffett said at Berkshire’s 4 May annual meeting, referring to Berkshire’s cash.
    Since mid-July, Berkshire has also sold more than $3.8bn in shares in Bank of America, its second-largest stock holding.
    Buffett remains a big Apple fan, reflecting the iPhone maker’s strong pricing power and committed customer base.
    He said at the meeting that he expected Apple to remain Berkshire’s largest stock investment, but selling made sense because the 21% federal tax rate on the gains would probably grow.
    Note: Text emphasis added in above.