Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Southwest Airlines Meltdown Cancels 60% of Flights
    TWU Local 556 President on Southwest's canceled flights
    The above is an NPR interview. There’s a written transcript of the full interview. But also, at the top, there’s a link to the (6 minute) audio version, which I found more compelling.
    Once upon a time (80s and 90s) this was a great little airline for some of us living in downstate Michigan (and I presume elsewhere). Low cost, easy to deal with, very consumer friendly - including no-cost (or very low cost) schedule changes. Their “on-time” was as good as or better than the majors. I never cared for their “stampede” boarding method in which all lined up and then dashed aboard to grab the best seat they could. But to the airline it was a time saver. And one did tend to have an extra connection when flying any distance - for example, from Detroit to Florida. But all in all it was a fine operation.
    What happened? Dunno. But their once warm labor relations have turned decidedly cold in recent years. Chill may be evident in my linked interview. And their sole reliance on the 737, for many years a strength, may have turned against them in a number of ways.
    I have to believe this affects its stock too.
    LUV: Down 6% today. Down 23% YTD according to Google
    Airlines are fun to fly on (usually), but I wouldn’t want to own stock in one.
  • 2022 year-end capital gains distribution estimates (Vanguard's Final estimated year-end posted)
  • 2022 year-end capital gains distribution estimates (Vanguard's Final estimated year-end posted)
    I don't really understand how the estimate ($0.00) could be so inaccurate but PIMIX distributed $0.10358 per share today.
  • Minimizing Tesla exposure
    Kind of remarkable he posted this today right after the market closed: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1607850458554449920?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
    Perhaps “remarkable” isn’t the right word.
  • Minimizing Tesla exposure
    Re: TSLA
    YTD -72.7%
    1 Month -40.36%
    Today -11.41%
    (Numbers from Google)
    ISTM @Sven ‘s original question has been largely answered. Your exposure to TSLA has now been diminished whether you did anything or not.
    Began tracking TSLA a week or so ago. Some astounding daily losses over that time. ISTM there’s some valuable lessons here for investors, as the stock seemed like a “sure bet” that just kept going up for many years. A look at what can go wrong with an investment and how quickly the tables can turn. Perhaps some needed humility.
  • Off-Shoring: "There's no such thing as Free Lunch"
    But it seems to me that the US needs to intensively examine what critical resources we are presently importing from potential enemies (ie: precursor drug ingredients) that could also be manufactured or sourced here, or from a friendly alternate backup location.
    Again, an observation that comes laden with a lot of issues.
    Precursor? I'm guessing you are referring to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
    Critical? An input ("precursor") to something downstream (final product) would seem to be critical only if at least one of its final product were critical. As an example of a final, non-critical product, it is hard to think of Zantac (old formulation) as a critical drug.
    Friendly? If a nation is a potential enemy but is currently friendly, what then? Is India friendly? Can't help but think of Tom Leher's line from Who's Next in the early 1960s about France: "they're on our side, I believe". (For context: "Franco–American antagonism of the 1960s ... culminated with France's partial withdrawal from NATO in 1966")

    On a nation by nation basis, India supplies about half of all APIs. (I believe this pie chart represents unweighted percentages of all APIs, not weighted by volume produced.) Of course this doesn't mean that for any given API there is any source outside of China.
    Another graphic can be found here (use arrows to move to slide 2). I believe this represents percentages by amounts produced ("global market share"); China is at 40%, India at 20%, US at 10%.
    image
    Source: https://qualitymatters.usp.org/geographic-concentration-pharmaceutical-manufacturing
    From your description of the precursor risk, I'm guessing that you're talking about active ingredients tainted with nitrosamines.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2022-08-17/a-threat-of-contaminated-drugs-persists-four-years-later
    Here's a good, short piece, admittedly commentary, from Science:
    https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/sartan-contamination-story
    The writer reports that a related contaminant was found in a drug using an API manufactured by a company in India. (See also here.) He goes on to speculate that based on the chemistry, it looks like the industry changed its process for producing these APIs around 2012. Thus, there was a problem that wasn't caught for years, and to address your point, sourcing domestically wouldn't have changed anything.
    I may have less faith in the FDA than you. The FDA is the organization keeping us safe from Canadian certified drugs. Did you know that if you want to mail order drugs from Canada you have to use Amex because the government has pressured MC and VISA to refuse to process these sales?
    In March [2004], Visa and MasterCard announced that they will not service Canadian mail order pharmacies because they have been under pressure from the FDA to cease their support of payment processing. They cited pressure from the FDA and have warned their member financial institutions to avoid so-called ``illegal'' transactions.
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108shrg93889/html/CHRG-108shrg93889.htm
  • Minimizing Tesla exposure
    @JohnN Tesla is down another 11% today. Seems like a falling knife right now. You could be right eventually, but the pain in the short-term now is real.
  • Off-Shoring: "There's no such thing as Free Lunch"
    There are many different issues and concepts mixed in here. All worth discussing, but not a simple question. I'll just try to identify some of what's in the mix. Way too much to go into detail in a post of this type.
    Supply chain concerns - logistical costs and risks
    Offshoring/manufacturing - global economic efficiency
    Natural resources - limited sources
    Potential risks with supply chains extend far beyond geopolitical risks. There's a tradeoff between robustness and cost. Does one second and third source supplies, or does one rely on a low cost provider? You know what happens to gasoline prices when just one supplier (refiner) in Richmond Calif. goes down. It's not an especially robust domestic system.
    Supply chain managers and logistics experts are aware of all the potential problems, and have been debating the trade-off between “risk” versus “resilience” – the latter being the ability to minimise or quickly recover from a disruption – for the past decade or more. Low just-in-time inventories increase the risks of shortages when a crisis bites. “Resilience”, however, means bigger stockpiles, more workers, multiple suppliers and higher costs.
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/11/just-in-time-supply-chains-logistical-capitalism
    For decades, the US has continued to lead in semiconductor design (so-called fabless manufacturing), while offshoring manufacturing to foundries that do not design their own chips.
    https://anysilicon.com/what-is-a-fabless-company/
    This came about in part because of a natural division of tasks and escalating costs of manufacturing equipment and facilities. Taiwan's dominance in foundries did not come about because of cheap labor, but because of dedication and heavy R&D investment by its government.
    It began in 1974, when the Taiwanese government decided to focus on the semiconductor industry as a key industry. At that point Taiwan’s economy was primarily based on agriculture—“nothing but paddy fields, sugar cane, and pineapples.” The Ministry of Economic Affairs chose semiconductors as the industry to work on.
    https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10677/chapter/9
    Even today, the few fabs that TSMC has in mainland China are there more for market access than for cheap(er) labor. "The investment in China is aimed at increasing business opportunities in China, which TSMC said will have a positive effect on additional expansion in Taiwan."
    While companies offshore production to lower costs, underlying this is the concept of comparative economic advantage. Even when country A can do nothing more cheaply than country B, it will not lose all business to country B. Rather, country A will concentrate on what it does best, and country B will concentrate on its most efficient sectors. This may not be intuitive at first, but that's how global economic productivity is increased.
    https://www.econlib.org/library/Topics/Details/comparativeadvantage.html
    Automation has changed the equation; it has lowered the cost of domestic manufacturing relative to other domestic activities. Though it doesn't help the labor market.
    New automation technologies that offset higher wages are driving deglobalization by increasing efficiency. As labor becomes a smaller share of the total cost of manufacturing, companies that once offshored due to cheap labor are beginning to favor production in closer proximity to the markets they serve.
    https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/96038-how-automation-accelerates-reshoringpart-1
    Raw material sources are what they are. They can't be relocated. The best one can do is mitigate disruptions by: second sourcing to the extent multiple sources exist, conserving (using less), creating substitutes. For example, instead of blood diamonds, or mined diamonds generally, substitute lab grown diamonds.
    The US could serve as a second source for energy for Europe if the president asked people to share the sacrifice, to conserve by turning down the thermostat a bit. But we know what happened the last time a president made that suggestion. Hint: he was wearing a cardigan sweater.
    https://www.treehugger.com/jimmy-carter-moment-energy-conservation-5223822
    Finally, with regard to free lunches, remember that you get no (free) bread with (just) one meatball.

  • Guggenheim partners announces the untimely and unexpected death of Scott Minerd
    The pictures are not specific but he looks like he was a big guy and maybe overweight? Certainly his job was stressful and probably contributed to his early death. He "retired " at 37 with millions but had to go back to work!
    "Running a global firm requires extensive travel. In 2015, Minerd spent time in the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and other countries. His favorite travel destination is his beachfront home in Los Angeles: “If I can get the opportunity to be at home, I look forward to it. I already have a beach house, I just don’t get to spend any time there.”
    When he is on the road, Minerd follows a detailed regimen that includes a full arsenal of supplements such as Zicam (a cold remedy) and Pedialyte to prevent dehydration during his intense travel schedule. The entire time, he keeps his must-have “football” close. While the President of the United States is always accompanied by a military aide carrying a “football” including launch codes for nuclear weapons, Minerd’s “football” comes in the form of his Bloomberg Terminal, allowing him to monitor, analyze, and trade from wherever he happens to be at the time."
  • Good quote to file away
    Good quote. We’ve all heard many of his others: Like “Rule #1 - Don’t lose money … Rule #2 - Never forget rule #1.”
    Elsewhere he’s said you shouldn’t buy anything you’re not comfortable holding for 10 years. It strikes me that one’s a bit problematic for some of us post-75. But if it was a guaranteed way to prolong one’s life for 10 more years, I’d buy a bunch of whatever it was.
    Volatility in a particular holding is fine with me. Have a couple mining stocks that bounce up and down by 5-8% on an almost weekly basis - sometimes that much in a single day. But if your entire portfolio were moving by that amount, and if you were taking distributions to live on from those investments (not some cash reserve), it might drive you nuts.
    -
    FWIW - Here’s a 60-second video of a much younger Buffett summarizing his views on investing. Some might be interested ….

  • interesting commentaries
    All depends on earnings and inflation I think ( Not my original idea but from Pundit I subscribe to for $)
    Current estimates SP500 $225 at 3800 PE implied 17.3 or "Fair Value" 16.5
    If Growth falls faster than inflation so Earnings down to $210 at current valuation 3700 or "Fair valuation" of 16.5 = 3465.
    But this implies high inflation will prevent Fed from lowering rates so multiple will fall to 15 or SP 3150
    If Inflation falls faster than growth EPS stays at $225 Multiple can bump up to 18 or 4050
    I would bet on falling earnings and stagnant inflation, until unemployment rises to slow inflation
  • Several Fidelity Disruptive Funds being converted into ETFs
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/225322/000119312522312159/d414077d497.htm
    Target Funds :
    Fidelity® Disruptive Automation Fund, Fidelity® Disruptive Communications Fund, Fidelity® Disruptive Finance Fund, Fidelity® Disruptive Medicine Fund, Fidelity® Disruptive Technology Fund and Fidelity® Disruptors Fund
  • The PCE index, an inflation measure closely watched by the Fed, slowed to 5.5% in November
    Thank you @davidmoran. Paul Krugman added more details on factors contributing to high inflation. Challenge is that equity is one of the few asset class that is a good hedge against inflation in the long term. At the moment, YTD of S&P index is down -18% as of 12/23/22.
  • The PCE index, an inflation measure closely watched by the Fed, slowed to 5.5% in November
    I like Levitz but am not persuaded
    did not follow crash's anecdata at all
    here is PK today:
    The average national price of regular gasoline this Christmas was almost 20 cents a gallon lower than it was a year earlier. Prices at the pump are still higher than they were during the pandemic slump, when economic shutdowns depressed world oil prices, but the affordability of fuel — as measured by the ratio of the average wage to gas prices — is most of the way back to pre-Covid levels.
    Now, gas prices aren’t a good measure either of economic health or of successful economic policy — although if you listened to Republican ads during the midterms, you might have thought otherwise. But subsiding prices at the pump are only one of many indicators that the inflationary storm of 2021 to ’22 is letting up. Remember the supply-chain crisis, with shipping rates soaring to many times their normal level? It’s over.
    More broadly, recent reports on the inflation measures the Federal Reserve traditionally uses to guide its interest rate policy have been really, really good.
    So is this going to be the winter of our diminishing discontent?
    After the nasty shocks of the past two years, nobody wants to get too excited by positive news. Having greatly underestimated past inflation risks myself, I’m working hard on curbing my enthusiasm, and the Fed, which is worried about its credibility, is even more inclined to look for clouds in the silver lining. And those clouds are there, as I’ll explain in a minute. It’s much too soon to declare all clear on the inflation front.
    But there has been a big role reversal in the inflation debate. Last year optimists like me were trying to explain away the bad news. Now pessimists are trying to explain away the good news.
    What’s really striking about the improvement in inflation numbers is that so far, at least, it hasn’t followed the pessimists’ script. Disinflation, many commentators insisted, would require a sustained period of high unemployment — say, at least a 5 percent unemployment rate for five years. And to be fair, this prediction could still be vindicated if recent progress against inflation turns out to be a false dawn. However, inflation has declined rapidly, even with unemployment still near record lows.
    What explains falling inflation? It now looks as if much, although not all, of the big inflation surge reflected one-time events associated with the pandemic and its aftermath — which was what Team Transitory (including me) claimed all along, except that transitory effects were both bigger and longer lasting than any of us imagined.
    First came those supply chain issues. As consumers, fearing risks of infection, avoided in-person services — such as dining out — and purchased physical goods instead, the world faced a sudden shortage of shipping containers, port capacity and more. Prices of many goods soared as the logistics of globalization proved less robust and flexible than we realized.
    Then came a surge in demand for housing, probably caused largely by the pandemic-driven rise in remote work. The result was a spike in rental rates. Since official statistics use market rents to estimate the overall cost of shelter and shelter, in turn, is a large part of measured inflation, this sent inflation higher even as supply-chain problems eased.
    But new data from the Cleveland Fed confirms what private firms have been telling us for several months: Rapid rent increases for new tenants have stopped, and rents may well be falling. Because most renters are on one-year leases, official measures of housing costs — and overall inflation numbers that fail to account for the lag — don’t yet reflect this slowdown. But housing has gone from a major driver of inflation to a stabilizing force.
    So why shouldn’t we be celebrating? You can pick over the entrails of the inflation numbers looking for bad omens, but I’m ever less convinced that anybody, myself included, understands inflation well enough to do this in a useful way. Basically, as you exclude more and more items from your measure in search of “underlying” inflation, what you’re left with becomes increasingly strange and unreliable.
    Instead, my concern (and, I believe, the Fed’s) comes down to the fact that the job market still looks very hot, with wages rising too fast to be consistent with acceptably low inflation.
    What I would point out, however, is that many workers’ salaries are like apartment rents, in the sense that they get reset only once a year, so official numbers on wages will lag a cooling market, and there is some evidence that labor markets are, in fact, cooling. Official reports in January — especially on job openings early in the month and on employment costs at the end — may (or may not) give us more clarity on whether this cooling is real or sufficient.
    Oh, and with visible inflation slowing, the risks of a wage-price spiral, which I never thought were very large, are receding even further.
    So we’ve had some seriously encouraging inflation news. There are still reasons to worry, and the news isn’t solid enough to justify breaking out the Champagne. But given the season, I am going to indulge at least in a glass or two of eggnog.
  • The PCE index, an inflation measure closely watched by the Fed, slowed to 5.5% in November
    The persistent high service cost is due the large number of workers who quit or retired during the pandemic. Restaurants are having hard time find enough workers even as they increase their wages. This appears to be a global phenomenon not just in US.
    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/12/is-the-u-s-going-to-have-a-recession-and-how-bad.html
    The Fed needs to revise their target goal.