Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Cash Flow Strategy
    From cited paper:
    One of the primary questions clients want answered is: What is the safe maximum withdrawal rate? Once again, Bengen has done some of the seminal work on this topic and has currently settled on a withdrawal figure of 4.15 percent for a portfolio with 63 percent in stocks.
    This was outdated in 2008, let alone today. Bengen had raised the figure to 4.5% in 2005 by incorporating small cap stocks, and today his figure is even higher:
    Bill [Bengen]: [I]n 2005, while I was working on my book, I introduced small cap stocks, U.S. small cap stocks, which really juiced everything. The return – they didn't have a perfect correlation with large cap, so that juiced it from 4.15% to almost 4.5%. ... And that's when I came up with that number.
    ...
    Michael [Kitces]: And so, what do you think about as the number in the environment today?
    Bill: I think somewhere in 4.75%, 5% is probably going to be okay. We won't know for 30 years, so I can safely say that in an interview.
    Kitces, Financial Advisor Success Podcast!, Oct 13, 2020
    https://www.kitces.com/blog/bill-bengen-4-percent-rule-safe-withdrawal-rates-historical-returns-research-book/
  • Cash Flow Strategy
    Nice piece. Evensky is a common sense kind of guy. I'm not sure where that excerpt came from, because it looks somewhat like a mashup of three consecutive paragraphs on p. 71 (pdf p. 9) of the cited paper. It's worth reading what's in the paper for emphasis. I've highlighted some additonal text:
    Clients think that because they are retired, the way to get income is through dividends and interest. Such thinking arises from what my partner Deena calls the “paycheck syndrome,” and it is nonsense. ...
    ... if clients depend on income largely from their bond portfolios, then when interest rates go up, they feel rich. But what is actually happening to the value of their portfolio? It is going down. When interest rates go down, they feel poor, but the portfolio value is going up. The strategy runs counter to financial reality. ...
    People need real income. They need real cash flow, not nominal cash flow, and they do not get that real cash flow from an income portfolio.
    In a nutshell, this is why I (and some other posters here) focus on total return, not yield.
    See also M*, Income vs. Total Return: Who Says You Need to Take Sides?
    Needless to say, I also like what he has to say about Monte Carlo analysis:
    [T]here is nothing new about it. ... I think it has been misused and overused. ...
    I see several problems ... First, the increased number of guesses that Monte Carlo allows does not mean more accuracy. Second, Monte Carlo devalues the goal-setting process. Third, Monte Carlo probabilities are all or nothing. If Monte Carlo says I have a 70 percent chance of success, what does the remaining 30 percent mean? Starvation? Finally, Monte Carlo offers no insight into the unexpected, such as a Katrina event or the subprime crisis.
    He goes on for several paragraphs with examples and ways to address his concerns.
    The cash flow strategy described may be better known as the two bucket strategy:
    The first bucket strategy was developed by financial planning pioneer Harold Evensky in 1985. This was a two-bucket approach with a cash bucket holding five years of retirement spending, and a longer-term investment bucket consisting mostly of stocks. When the stock market performed poorly, withdrawals were taken from the cash account to avoid selling stocks in a down market, and when the stock market did well withdrawals were taken from the investment bucket, and investments from this bucket were also sold to replenish cash.
    https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2020/04/20/bucket-strategies-challenging-previous-research
    As a complement to the final section of the paper, Other Strategies, here's Wade Pfau's Fortune piece on managing sequence of return risk.
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadepfau/2017/04/12/4-approaches-to-managing-sequence-of-returns-risk-in-retirement/?sh=5bda15b66fcf
  • Thiel's Roth IRA is worth $5B, in comparison Romney was a piker
    Had Theil bought these shares in a taxable account the $5 Billion would also be mostly tax free to his heirs
    Perhaps $3B would have been passed tax free to his heirs, after accounting for the 40% federal estate tax. While there are ways to circumvent estate taxes, my figure is based on procedure in the diagram.
    I'm missing the connection to "stuffing" IRAs, an at best dubious and at worst illegal practice, to address @catch22's statement that "No law was broken".
    Again from ProPublica:
    Thiel’s unusual stock purchase risked running afoul of rules designed to prevent IRAs from becoming illegal tax shelters. Investors aren’t allowed to buy assets for less than their true value through an IRA. The practice is sometimes known as “stuffing” because it gets around the strict limits imposed by Congress on how much money can be put in a Roth.
    PayPal later disclosed ... in an SEC filing ... that Thiel’s founders’ shares were among those the company sold to employees at “below fair value.”
    Victor Fleischer, a tax law professor at the University of California [asserted that] buying startup shares at a discounted $0.001 price with a Roth ... would be indefensible.
  • Thiel's Roth IRA is worth $5B, in comparison Romney was a piker
    The problem is no one in Congress thought about putting an upper limit on Roth IRA withdrawals when they wrote the law
    Congress has done the opposite for inherited IRAs by eliminating the stretch provision for heirs. All inherited IRAs (including Roth IRAs) must be fully distributed within 10 years. This at least forces this $5 billion Roth account to be liquidated 10 years after the death of the Account holder.
    Had Theil bought these shares in a taxable account the $5 Billion would also be mostly tax free to his heirs based on the step up provision that:
    When someone inherits property and investments, the IRS resets the market value of these assets to their value on the date of the original owner’s death. Then, when the heir sells these assets, capital gains taxes are applied based on this reset value. The result is a situation – often considered a tax loophole – that allows investors to pass assets to their heirs virtually tax-free.
    image
    https://darrowwealthmanagement.com/blog/step-up-in-basis-on-certain-inherited-assets/
    Also,
    If President Biden gets his way, many wealthy Americans will no longer be able to pass stocks, real estate, and other capital assets to their heirs when they die without paying capital gains tax. He wants to do this by changing the tax rules that allow a "step up" in basis on inherited property. This proposal, along with others designed to increase taxes on the wealthy, is included in Biden's recently released American Families Plan – a $1.8 trillion package that includes spending on childcare and education, guaranteed paid family and medical leave, tax breaks for lower- and middle-income Americans, and more.
    https://kiplinger.com/retirement/estate-planning/602701/biden-hopes-to-eliminate-stepped-up-basis-for-millionaires
  • Revisiting Defensive Funds
    Was looking for a HY bond fund that had held up decently ("defensive?") in 1Q 2020. Found EIXIX with a 5.5% SEC Yield. $2,500 min at VGD (TF). May be my newest addition.
    Seeing that you have the Rational options fund, fyi, they have a non-ag'y mortgage fund too, RFXIX I shares, which is relatively new but has about the same total return profile so far as EIXIX. Just found it so no due diligence dive into it yet on my part.
    Availability prob'ly varies; at Fidelity the I shares are, with low minimum and a tf.
    Cheers, AJ
  • Last weeks link to Yahoo Finance didn't work, I'm trying Web version this try.
    https://newsletters.yahoo.net/H/2/v60000017a903048fd8914bef4bbe5bf30/a3abade4-a208-484d-935e-a3560e99bffb/HTML
    "And yet there are at least two factors that are potentially different this time around; cryptocurrency and the meme stock phenomenon. I won’t dwell on crypto — and all of its potential and foibles — here, but will focus instead on meme stocks and more broadly, the so-called retail investor revolution"
    Will the link work ?!
    Stay Kool, Derf
  • Mid-Year Update Brings Rolling Batting Averages and Trend Ratings
    AVEFX, CET, DODWX, BMPEX, ICMUX, FCEF, BIVIX, QSPIX, QMNIX among funds leading their categories mid-year:
    image
  • Thiel's Roth IRA is worth $5B, in comparison Romney was a piker
    I know I promised no quotes, but it's not accurate that "anyone here who is or was an excellent investor could have invested in their choice in 1999."
    Mr. Thiel purchased his founders’ shares in PayPal through his Roth IRA during PayPal’s formation.
    I've purchased founders shares, though they usually turned out to be worth about what I paid for them, i.e. nothing. Is there "anyone [else] here who ... could have invested in" founders shares in 1999?
    Regarding AAPL, even if we assume $6K contributions per year (they were limited to $2K in 1999 and only gradually rose to the current $6K in 2019), an account would have grown to less than $16 million. Thus at $2K/year, the account would have grown to well under $6 million.
    While one may talk about the "magic of compounding", the magic that's available to "anyone here" only gets you so far.
    Porfolio Visualizer AAPL backtest (with $6K annual contributions)
  • Fidelity ETFs in registration
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/945908/000137949121003042/filing712.htm
    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
    Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
    Fidelity Digital Health ETF
    Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
  • Thiel's Roth IRA is worth $5B, in comparison Romney was a piker
    Thank you. Thiel has access to special stocks and likely insider information that are no available to the public. Compounding on the large annual gain is what provided the $5 billions Roth IRA account. It is likely he combined the annual Roth contribution and Roth conversion (from traditional IRA).
  • Thiel's Roth IRA is worth $5B, in comparison Romney was a piker
    Roth IRA article at Bloomberg........hopefully, y'all may have access.
    ProPublica reported that in 1999, Thiel, the co-founder of Paypal Holdings Inc., placed 1.7 million shares of then-private PayPal into his Roth Ira. They were valued at $0.001 per share, meaning the contribution was under the $2,000 limit at the time.
    This reads as more of an "envy" write. No law was broken, and anyone here who is or was an excellent investor could have invested in their choice in 1999.
    --- APPL Apple
    --- Avg. stock price for the year, 1999 = $.52
    --- The easy math...........let us assume one bought $2,000 (1999 Roth limit) of APPL stock at $.50/share in 1999.
    --- This equals 4,000 shares, yes?
    --- AS OF July, 8, 2021 the cumulative percent change, which includes all distributions and splits, etc. = +45,129%

    As with Mission Impossible, your mission; if you choose, is to provide the total value today from the original $2,000.
    I've really got to get my arse in gear with chores.
    Thank you for finishing the math; and no, no prize awarded. And, yes; verify my numbers......there may be a "too little" coffee error.
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Thiel's Roth IRA is worth $5B, in comparison Romney was a piker
    From ProPublica:
    Using stock deals unavailable to most people, Thiel has taken a retirement account worth less than $2,000 in 1999 and spun it into a $5 billion windfall. To put that into perspective, here’s how much the average Roth was worth at the end of 2018: $39,108.
    https://www.propublica.org/article/lord-of-the-roths-how-tech-mogul-peter-thiel-turned-a-retirement-account-for-the-middle-class-into-a-5-billion-dollar-tax-free-piggy-bank
    To put that into a different perspective, Romney's (traditional) IRA, disclosed as a 2012 presidential candidate, was valued at "merely" between $20.7 million and $101.6 million.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-campaign-romney-ira/how-did-romneys-ira-grow-so-big-idUSTRE80N04E20120124
    This is just so far over the top that I'm not going to offer any other quotes or comments. The figures speak for themselves, and the legislative proposals seem to be as expected.
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-peter-thiels-roth-ira-means-for-yours-11625218209
    WSJ: What Peter Thiel’s Roth IRA Means for Yours
  • James Alpha Global Real Estate Investments Fund to change name
    One of a whole bunch (aka all) of the James Alpha funds
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/2021/06/briefly-noted-58/
    Aug 4, 2020 (Business Wire)
    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200804005968/en/Easterly-Announces-Investment-in-James-Alpha-Advisors
    -Easterly, an asset management holding company that owns stakes in third-party investment management businesses and assists them with strategic growth, announced today it has acquired an equity interest in James Alpha Advisors, LLC, a boutique asset management firm specializing in Global REITs and liquid alternative portfolio solutions for institutional and individual investors. ...
    As a result of the investment, Easterly has assumed operational control of the firm. ...
    [Darrell Crate, Easterly’s Managing Principal] helped to build an asset management powerhouse as Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE: AMG), established Easterly in 2009...
    Which seems to bring us back to the thread AMG to Acquire Parnassus Funds:
    https://mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/58434/amg-to-acquire-parnassus-funds
  • Rochdale Emerging Markets Portfolio (formerly City National Rochdale Emerging Markets Fund) changes
    The path was a little more messy.
    Rochedale Emerging Markets Portfolio, starting on Dec 11, 2011. It was reorganized into City National Rochedale Emerging Markets Fund on April 1, 2013.
    It has been managed since inception by Anindya Chatterjee. On Dec 1, 2017 he (and the rest of his management team) moved to Fiera Capital, which the fund hired as subadvisor. The transaction completed on Jun 4, 2018 when Fiera Capital took over the entire fund, forming Fiera Capital Emerging Markets Fund.
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1026977/000139834417015414/fp0029454_497.htm
    Chatterjee formed Sunbridge Capital Partners LLC in February 2021. The Sunbridge is acquiring Fiera Capital Emerging Markets fund and Chatterjee will continue managing it. Hence the name change.
    This is all inconsequential to fund investors. I checked only because name changes like this one often indicate restructurings/acquisitions.
  • Should You Invest in Chinese Companies After China’s Didi Crackdown?

    Should You Invest in Chinese Companies After China’s Didi Crackdown?
    Regulators pounced on China’s biggest ride-hailing company after its U.S. IPO, raising questions about the risks retail investors face.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-06/didi-stock-should-you-invest-in-chinese-tech-companies-after-crackdown
    By Claire Ballentine
    July 6, 2021, 6:54 PM CDT
    Updated on July 7, 2021, 7:32 AM CDT
    Didi Plunges Below IPO Price as China Cracks Down on Tech
    Unmute
    Didi Plunges Below IPO Price as China Cracks Down on Tech
    The Chinese version of Uber had just started trading in the U.S. when regulators in Beijing stepped in and all but halted growth in its biggest market.
    The actions that China’s cyberspace regulator took this week against Didi Global Inc. — in the name of domestic security — complicated the picture for investors betting on the country’s tech giants. Didi’s share price fell as much as 25% on Monday before paring some losses.
    Last week, Didi pulled off the second-largest U.S. initial public offering for a Chinese firm, raising $4.4 billion in U.S. dollars. It had an initial 29% pop but then fell again, ending the day 1% above the IPO price with a market value of $68 billion. It’s not a household name in the U.S. yet, but Didi is ubiquitous in China.
    Didi’s not the first Chinese tech giant to run afoul of regulators. In November, China pulled the Ant Group Co.’s Hong Kong listing, and soon after that, shares of Chinese tech companies fell globally out of concerns about tougher rules. Then in April, China fined Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. after a speedy investigation. Now, Beijing is planning to tighten rules in a way that would allow them to block Chinese companies from listing overseas, according to people familiar with the matter. That could potentially prevent giant firms such as ByteDance Ltd. from selling shares outside China.
    The short answers maybe yes for long terms
    I am buying more Etf (eem fxi mathewAsia funds)
    instead of individual private stocks
  • Tweedy, Browne changes names on two funds
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/896975/000119312521210622/d153325d497.htm
    497 1 d153325d497.htm TWEEDY, BROWNE FUND INC.
    TWEEDY, BROWNE FUND INC.
    TWEEDY, BROWNE GLOBAL VALUE FUND
    TWEEDY, BROWNE GLOBAL VALUE FUND II - CURRENCY UNHEDGED
    (each, a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”)
    Supplement dated July 8, 2021
    to the Prospectus (“Prospectus”) and Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) dated July 29, 2020, each as supplemented or amended to date
    Effective July 29, 2021, the Tweedy, Browne Global Value Fund and Tweedy, Browne Global Value Fund II – Currency Unhedged will change their names to “Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund” and “Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II – Currency Unhedged,” respectively.
    Accordingly, effective July 29, 2021, all references to Tweedy, Browne Global Value Fund in the Prospectus and SAI shall be deemed to be references to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund, and all references to Tweedy, Browne Global Value Fund II – Currency Unhedged shall be deemed to be references to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II – Currency Unhedged.
    There are no changes to the Funds’ investment policies or other features, and the Funds’ CUSIP numbers and ticker symbols will remain unchanged.
    The Funds have always been managed as international vehicles. Tweedy, Browne and the Funds’ board of directors believe that the change of the term “Global” to “International” in each Fund’s name better reflects the composition of the Fund’s portfolio, given that each Fund invests primarily in foreign equity securities.
    This Supplement should be retained with your Prospectus and SAI for future reference.
    TWB-Sup-July 2021-1