It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
As ever, my timing is impeccable when it comes to making changes or buying new stuff. I'm down, YTD by -14%. That really smells. So.... your equity slot is smaller than your bonds. The standard wisdom is not holding up. Bonds are not a safe haven in this downturn. So, I'm thinking that it's not a bad idea to reduce cost basis and grow yield, with bonds being beat-up so badly. Most of them, anyhow. There's nowhere to run. Cash won't give you any dividends. I've seen advice which would direct us into dividend-paying equities, rather than bonds. PRDGX is down -15% ytd, but that just means this may very well be a great entry-point. And it throws off quarterly dividends. Over 3 and 5 and 10 and 15 years, it looks damn good. I'm not in it just because it's full of companies I love to hate.Hello Crash. Other than Equities? That is the question this year. Positions I held last year. SJNK…. PFXF. VWEHX. SCHP. PRFRX. IUSB. Since my Equity allocation is way smaller my need to do something with “the rest “ is greater. For me losing money on the safe side of the portfolio is almost unacceptable. 0.00 year to date is looking better than I would have thought. You can’t fight the river.
Hello! @larryB .... I'm SURE I'm doing this all wrong. I'm reducing cost basis in TUHYX. It's truly beat-down. Yield is higher than PRFRX. Often I feel like it's rearranging Titanic's deck-chairs, because in the T-IRA I'm married to TRP. I'm lately starting to exercise the freedom the BROKERAGE offers. Yes, PRFRX is down some, but to me, it's not terrible. Look at OTHER bond funds, eh? I'm holding my bonds "just because." I can't bear the idea of being 100% in equities. I'm building cash, outside the Market. I like the monthly "reward," the dividends from my bond funds. Total Return is what matters in the end, but I'm about at the limit of my comfort zone right now, with 66% in stocks. Also, 7% held as cash by the Fund Managers. 27% bonds.@ Crash. The bigger question is why TUHYX and why now? Care to share? As a PRFRX shareholder like you I am curious.


Similar to you, I have a Schwab office four short blocks from home. The nearest Fidelity is over in the next county. But I found that I virtually never walk in to a branch. When I do, it's for things like a notarization or signature guarantee.... my impression from absorbing extensive MFO commentary over the last year or so is that Fidelity is the way to go. We use Schwab mainly because they have an office one block away from our home, but I really don't do all that much trading anymore. Those trades that I have done (via their web site) have gone very smoothly. Also, because they have a bank, it's very easy to shuttle cash back and forth between other banks, although the three day wait until it is "available" seems unnecessary and excessive.
Service tends to degrade through branch and wholesale acquisitions. From Home Savings (itself acquired in 1993 by The Bowery Bank [see Joe DiMaggio commercial here] which had rebranded as Home Savings), to WaMu in 1998 (H.F. Ahmanson parent acquired), to the GFC takeover by JPMorgan Chase, the smaller (but not small) fish kept getting swallowed.Speaking of banks, I'm becoming more and more unhappy with JP Morgan Chase- to the point where we are actively considering going through the major hassle of changing the automatic deposits of our pension and SS monthly deposits to another institution.
Yes, it is rather silly. Much as so many headlines said that we hadn't reached a bear market because a magical, bright line hadn't been crossed. For example, CNBC's "S&P 500 falls again on Thursday, inching closer to bear market territory"Several people in the media are calling for VIX to be 40+ (without mentioning how much above 40) and then hope that this market will reverse. Do they realize that VIX has been almost there already? VIX was 39 on 1/24/22, 38 on 2/24/22 & 3/8/22, 37 on 5/2/22.
Agree.@davfor lays out a nice case. I don’t think we’re presently near the bottom of the bear market (term applyed by Forsyth this week). But we’ve made a lot of progress in that direction with the S&P down about 20% from peak and some tech heavy funds like TRBCX and TRMCX off more than 30%. That ought to have us at least half way down to ground floor from a broad perspective. Some areas may fall further and some less than that. Does anyone seriously expect the above mentioned funds to fall another 30-35% from here and go all the way down to -70% from peak? From a risk perspective, if you liked those funds 6 months to a year ago you ought to love them today.@davfor - thoughts worth chewing on
The vast majority of funds in ETFs are in passive strategies, but there’s an interesting divergence occurring. One of the fastest growing segments in the ETF universe is actively managed ETFs.
This week’s guest is involved in both actively managed mutual funds and ETFs and one of his main responsibilities is identifying best-in-class managers for both. He is Kristof Gleich, President and Chief Investment Officer of Harbor Capital Advisors.

© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla