Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

US supreme court blocks Trump bid to deploy national guard to Chicago

Following is a current report in The Guardian:

In a 6-3 decision, the high court sided with a lower court ruling that blocked deployment of troops to the Illinois city
The US supreme court refused on Tuesday to let Donald Trump send national guard troops to the Chicago area, in an important reining-in of the US president’s efforts to expand the use of the military for domestic purposes in historic moves against a growing number of Democratic-led jurisdictions.

The nation’s highest court denied the US justice department’s request to lift a judge’s order in October that has blocked the deployment of hundreds of national guard personnel in a legal challenge brought by Illinois state officials and local leaders, who had opposed any federalization of those troops to offer backup to immigration enforcement.

The department had asked to allow the deployment while the litigation plays out. There have been sustained protests outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Broadview, on the outskirts of Chicago, with aggressive tactics used against the resistance by the authorities.

The justices decided on a 6-3 vote on Tuesday to back a lower court and rule that the Trump administration had not met the legal burden needed to show that it was not able to execute the laws of the land without federal military intervention.

The three justices leaning furthest to the right on the bench, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, dissented on Tuesday.

Comments

  • A small win but a win nonetheless.
  • It is a pretty big win, I'd say. There have been others. It is not the SCOTUS "maga unanimity" that some expected. But, point taken.
  • Well that certainly wasn't on my happy dance card but I'll take it.
Sign In or Register to comment.