Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Are Health Care Funds Taking PEDs?

FYI: Health care mutual funds have outperformed the S&P 500 by a wide margin in the past 15 years and have really taken off the past two years.

You'd be sitting on $48,522 today if you'd invested $10,000 in the average health care fund on Sept. 30, 1999, according to Morningstar data. The same investment in the S&P 500, which tracks the broad stock market, would have grown to $21,149.
Regards,
Ted
http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTg2NjE0NjA=

Enlarged Graphic: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=WEBlv1114.gif&docId=726493&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=1152&caption=&id=726495

Comments

  • ...and I think there's still a lot of running room for the sector. It's remarkable the advancements that are happening in biotech.
  • And if this continues I won't hesitate to vote 'yes' for the Hall of Fame regardless of whether there were PED's involved or not. It would be appropriately ironic if health care stocks were using drugs!
  • Health sector and especially biotech are strongly down today. Are you buying?
  • finder said:

    Health sector and especially biotech are strongly down today. Are you buying?

    Added to CELG.
  • Added to HQL
  • Mark said:

    Added to HQL

    I looked at the new fund from the same management (THQ) and despite the nice monthly div it just didn't really appeal to me (exposure to REITs, etc.)
  • @Scott - I don't mind the REIT exposure but it will depend on which ones, I'm waiting until I can view a list of their holdings
  • Who thinks there will be less healthcare necessary in the future? and it will cost less.
    To those I would say don't invest in healthcare, to everyone else......Do what you want
  • It's pretty hard to not invest in healthcare. If you are in a index fund, there you go.
  • Tampabay said:

    Who thinks there will be less healthcare necessary in the future? and it will cost less.
    To those I would say don't invest in healthcare, to everyone else......Do what you want

    To me, there's a few different layers of appeal. You have discoveries being made that I find absolutely astonishing. There is a lot of growth in biotech and I think there's still a lot of road ahead. Yet, there's the defensive nature that what's being provided are absolute needs. Past performance is no guarantee of future results by any means, but look how well some of the big biotechs fared in 2008.
  • Past performance is a "guide", I don't think there is any "guanantees" in investing, that I'm aware of
  • @scott makes a good point. The strength and growth in healthcare is coming from biotech and bionics and IT. Big pharma gives a steady investment along with companies like Becton Dickinson, Abbott, and numerous others. Even mainstream companies like GE have a healthcare component due to their manufacturing of diagnostic imaging devices and other electronics.
  • @MFO Members: Warren Buffett's latest purchase. The insurer's only new money purchase during the period was 450,000 shares of Express Scripts (ESRX) for an estimated cost of around $32 million
  • beebee
    edited November 2014
    Ted said:

    @MFO Members: Warren Buffett's latest purchase. The insurer's only new money purchase during the period was 450,000 shares of Express Scripts (ESRX) for an estimated cost of around $32 million

    Thanks Ted...he also added to, reduced and sold some other stocks over the last three months:

    New Purchases: ESRX,
    Added Positions: DTV, CHTR, GM, WMT, DVA, IBM, V, SU, MA, PCP
    Reduced Positions: COP,
    Sold Out: DE,

    More Q3 data:
    Warren+Buffett (x-out popup to see page)

  • bee said:

    Ted said:

    @MFO Members: Warren Buffett's latest purchase. The insurer's only new money purchase during the period was 450,000 shares of Express Scripts (ESRX) for an estimated cost of around $32 million

    Thanks Ted...he also added to, reduced and sold some other stocks over the last three months:

    New Purchases: ESRX,
    Added Positions: DTV, CHTR, GM, WMT, DVA, IBM, V, SU, MA, PCP
    Reduced Positions: COP,
    Sold Out: DE,

    More Q3 data:
    Warren+Buffett (x-out popup to see page)

    I think most of these changes were by Coombs and Wechsler who manage separate pools of money than Warren. Buffett probably was responsible for WMT, IBM, SU, and COP. The changes in those were very minor compared to portfolio size.
  • Are you comfortable investing in healthcare in view of the headwinds for Obamacare which may lead to temporary disruptions?
  • @JedClampett: You are correct, its one of the smaller portfolio holdings.
    Regards
    Ted
  • @finder - with "boomers" flooding into retirement I don't see anything, with or without Obamacare, holding healthcare down for long.
  • edited November 2014
    finder said:

    Are you comfortable investing in healthcare in view of the headwinds for Obamacare which may lead to temporary disruptions?

    There's so much going on in healthcare and, quite honestly, I don't think there will be a disruption in Obamacare. Additionally, I believe healthcare (and related) companies are sort of like TBTF banks. Heads they win, tails they win.

    As for Obamacare, I mean, as one of the architects of it (who, as we find out below, got paid millions for his involvement) noted, the voting population is too stupid to understand it (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-10/obamacare-architect-admits-lack-transparency-huge-advantage-against-stupidity-americ) so would we really be aware if it was disrupted? I mean...what was I saying again ...hey, the Kardashians are on!

    In all seriousness, there's so many trends going on right now (aging population, unfortunate situations like diabetes/obesity, etc etc etc...) health care has a lot of tailwinds and what's going on with some of the discoveries in biotech is amazing.

    Additionally, today re Obamacare: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-16/obama-comments-grubergate-i-did-not-mislead-americans-even-gruber-pocketed-millions
  • I agree with both Mark and scott. 0bamacare is just the vehicle for healthcare. That might sound important up front but investing in healthcare focuses on the companies directly involved. Even with the news of premium increases and changes for 2015, healthcare stocks will continue to go up. The boomer access is too big.
  • finder said:

    Are you comfortable investing in healthcare in view of the headwinds for Obamacare which may lead to temporary disruptions?

    I work in the health sciences industry....for a company working with the biotechs, big pharma and the medical device companies to bring their new compounds and devices through the clinical trial process and into the marketplace.

    Never have any of my customers mentioned the Affordable Care Act as a barrier to any business process or to their pipeline.

    Frankly, I find that to be a fairly odd question.
  • PRESSmUP said:

    finder said:

    Are you comfortable investing in healthcare in view of the headwinds for Obamacare which may lead to temporary disruptions?

    I work in the health sciences industry....for a company working with the biotechs, big pharma and the medical device companies to bring their new compounds and devices through the clinical trial process and into the marketplace.

    Never have any of my customers mentioned the Affordable Care Act as a barrier to any business process or to their pipeline.

    Frankly, I find that to be a fairly odd question.
    Thanks for the information. Given my fascination with the industry and continued allocation towards the sector, any other information/insights or general outlook regarding the industry is greatly appreciated.
  • Thanks Scott....as you can imagine, I am bound pretty tightly by non-disclosure and insider trading limitations, not only for my company but for my clients whose compounds are going through clinical trials in advance of hopeful FDA approval.

    In response to the question of the impact of the ACA, I will simply propose this pretty simple question....how many people have healthcare insurance because of the ACA who didn't have it previously? 9 Million? Or, pick a number based on your politics. It's a big number.

    If the marketplace for the consumption of medically related products increases due to new consumers, do you think the producers of these products will benefit?

    Sorry....that's a rhetorical question.
  • Not directly related to U.S. healthcare, I am sure many here are aware of the foreign health centers that have come into place in the past 10-12 years, in particular with India and Thailand.
    This is a new entry that I have watched for the past two years; although there isn't any investment potential directly related the hospital, as it is private.

    Acension Health/Caymans

    Ascension is a full blown, very sophisticated total health care organization involved in all areas of the business from venture capital startups to insurance and is a non-profit, Catholic based group.

    Regards,
    Catch
  • @catch22 Let's stay on mission !
    Regards,
    Ted
  • edited November 2014
    Although this hospital is not directly investible; the nature of the direction of these type of services/systems globally is part of healthcare, and many investments mixed into broadbased funds will have pieces of the various pies which sustain these type of operations.
  • There is a growing number of people who opt to have medical procedures done outside the U.S. mainly because it is cheaper. Asia and Latin America are common destinations and even Europe where some treatments can be done that are unavailable in the US.
  • Cheaper options via medical tourism will decline as a result of the ACA.

    As for unavailable treatments....well, if the Cleveland Clinic doesn't do it, I'm not interested.
  • edited November 2014
    The reason why I asked about ACA is that I still remember the time when the healthcare was way undervalued. An official explanation at that time was that uncertainty of the future legislation makes it difficult at least for some companies to plan ahead. What if we enter a similar period again? Perhaps it should not affect biotech companies, but they may be found "guilty by association", especially if they are no longer inexpensive.

    I am not making any predictions, lots of my own money is in healthcare, and I am happy that you are not concerned by the recent events.
Sign In or Register to comment.